Commentary on “Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional Physicians”

Abstract

The article “Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional Physicians” addresses an important and controversial issue of whether nonneuroscience interventional physicians should be performing stroke thrombectomy ( 1 Sacks D. Dhand S. Hegg R. et al. Outcomes of stroke thrombectomy performed by interventional radiologists versus neurointerventional physicians. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022; 33: 619-626 Google Scholar ). There is convincing evidence that stroke thrombectomy improves the clinical outcomes of large vessel occlusion (LVO) anterior circulation strokes and that it is cost effective ( 2 Powers W.J. Rabinstein A.A. Ackerson T. et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019; 50: e344-e418 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1847) Google Scholar , 3 Bulwa Z. Chen M. Stroke center designations, neurointerventionalist demand, and the finances of stroke thrombectomy in the United States. Neurology. 2021; 97: S17-S24 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar ). This article provides data to support the position that interventional radiology (IR) physicians with additional training can achieve technical and clinical outcomes similar to those obtained by neurointerventional (NI) physicians. We do not take sides in this controversy. The purposes of this commentary are to appraise the current article critically, to examine its potential implications, and to provide an update on the issues of the supply of, demand for, and access to stroke thrombectomy. Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional PhysiciansJournal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyVol. 33Issue 6PreviewTo test the hypothesis that interventional radiologists (IRs) and neurointerventional (NI) physicians have similar outcomes of endovascular stroke thrombectomy (EVT), which could be used to improve the availability of thrombectomy. Full-Text PDF