Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating red blood cell (RBC) disorder. The root cause of SCD is polymerization of sickle hemoglobin (HbS) upon deoxygenation, resulting in poorly deformable sickled RBCs with shortened lifespan. 2,3-diphosphyglycerate (2,3-DPG), a glycolytic intermediate in RBCs, promotes deoxygenation by lowering hemoglobin (Hb)-oxygen affinity. Mitapivat (AG-348) is an oral allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase (PK), a key enzyme in RBC glycolysis generating adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and reducing 2,3-DPG levels. Aims: To report follow-up data of the safety and efficacy of mitapivat treatment in subjects with SCD (ESTIMATE study; www.trialregister.nl NL8517; EudraCT 2019-003438-18). Methods: The ESTIMATE study is a phase 2, investigator initiated, open-label study. Subjects ≥16 years with SCD (HbSS, HbS/β0 or HbS/β+), 1-10 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in the prior year and/or prior SCD-related complications, a Hb level >6.1 g/dL and ≤11.1 g/dL, and no chronic transfusions are eligible and treated with mitapivat after obtaining informed content. In the 8-week dose finding period, initial dosing is 20 mg twice daily, escalated to max. 100 mg twice daily, and followed by an up to 52-week fixed dose extension period (FDEP). Primary endpoints are safety, based on adverse events (AEs), and efficacy of mitapivat treatment on RBC sickling (Point of Sickling (PoS), oxygen gradient ektacytometry). Key secondary endpoints are changes in Hb level, markers of hemolysis, ATP/2,3-DPG levels, and Hb-oxygen affinity (p50, Hemox Analyzer). Results: Until Jan. 2022, 9 subjects were treated with mitapivat. Baseline characteristics were: median age 22 years (range 16-59 years), 6/9 (67%) female, and 6/9 (67%) used hydroxyurea. 7/9 (78%) had HbSS, 1/9 (11%) had HbS/β0, and 1/9 (11%) had HbS/β+. One subject with a non-treatment related serious AE (SAE) of a urinary tract infection (grade 4), was lost to follow-up shortly after first dosing. No other SAEs or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) grade ≥3 occurred. The remaining 8 subjects had a median treatment duration of 38 weeks (range 11-60 weeks). 6/8 (75%) took 100 mg mitapivat twice daily in the FDEP, and 2/8 (25%) took 50 mg mitapivat twice daily after a single dose reduction because of progressive transaminase increase. The most common TEAEs were (n>2 subjects): ALT or AST increase (both 5/9, 56%; all grade 1), and headache (4/9, 44%; grade 1-2). Three VOCs occurred: one related to excessive alcohol consumption with no need for hospitalization, and two in subjects with documented noncompliance the week before hospitalization. Mean annual VOC rate and SCD-related hospital admission days were, respectively, 1.5±1.3 and 5.9±7.1 days at baseline, and reduced to 0.5±0.7 and 1.6±3.1 days when weighting cases by follow-up duration (p=0.021 and p=0.134, respectively). Table 1 summarizes mean changes in parameters of primary and key secondary endpoints of scheduled visits in the FDEP compared to baseline. Hb level significantly increased, accompanied by a decrease in markers of hemolysis (absolute reticulocyte count, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase). Mean PoS decreased, and p50, 2,3-DPG level and ATP/2,3-DPG ratio significantly improved. Conclusion: Treatment with mitapivat for up to 60 weeks in subjects with SCD showed no treatment related TEAEs grade ≥3. Improvements in anemia, markers of hemolysis, oxygen affinity, 2,3-DPG level and ATP/2,3-DPG ratio were seen.
Read full abstract