Abstract Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative intervention to anticoagulation to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation with a higher risk of bleeding. The imaging of LAA is crucial to determine the optimal ostium dimensions for safe closure and procedural outcomes. Sizing using three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) is likely to offer a more accurate assessment, as seen in other structural interventions such as annular measurements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Aim This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of LAA sizing using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TOE) and 3D-TOE. Furthermore, we assessed the accuracy of the measurements by correlating both imaging modalities with final device size and post-device leakage. Methods Our study prospectively analysed the LAA dimensions of 63 consecutive patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) with measurements using both 2D and 3D-TOE (Figure 1 & 2). The assessing clinician remained blinded to measurements that were performed retrospectively by data analysts. Additionally, we retrospectively evaluated outcomes with 25 consecutive LAA closures (Figure 3 & 4), where 2D-TOE was utilised alongside fluoroscopy for sizing in 18 (72%), and 3D-TOE was employed in 8 (32%) of patients. Results The mean age of patients was 76 ± 7 years. The LAA annulus was eccentric in 47 (75%) and circular in 16 (25%) of patients. There was a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between 2D and 3D-TOE (ICC=0.81, p <0.001) and Pearson’s correlation (r=0.84, p <0.001). Bland-Altmann analysis (Figure 5) revealed a bias of 0.19, indicating 3D-TOE LAA measurements were larger overall, with limits of agreement between -0.33cm to 0.71cm. The retrospective analysis showed that 2D-TOE underestimated the final device size by 1.86 ± 1.1 mm, while 3D-TOE underestimated by 0.6 ± 1.2 mm. Clinically, using only 2D-TOE measurements, 9 patients (36%) required upsizing, whereas 3D-TOE accurately predicted the final device size in all but one case. Additionally, in 18 cases guided solely by 2D-TOE, 9 (50%) were complicated by post-device leakage at the six-week follow-up, albeit they were all leaks were less than the guideline cut-off value of 6 mm. In contrast, for 8 patients where 3D-TOE was also used, there was only one case of post-device leak. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that while 2D and 3D-TOE values are mostly consistent, 3D-TOE measurements are larger and more accurately depict the irregular, eccentric nature of LAA orifices. 3D-TOE guidance had better correlation with true device size, resulting in lower post-device leakage and less intra-procedural upsizing. These findings align with TAVI literature, which notes that 2D echocardiography underestimates the true size of the aortic valve annulus compared to CT and 3D echocardiography techniques.
Read full abstract