Goal Attainment In Patients Research Articles

Risk-stratified analysis of long-term clinical outcomes and cumulative costs in Finnish patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization: a 5-year real-world study using electronic health records.

Risk assessment is essential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary revascularization, risk prediction tools, like the European Society of Cardiology guideline recommended SMART-REACH risk score, are increasingly used to predict the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events enabling risk-based personalized prevention. However, little is known about the association between risk stratification and the social and healthcare costs at a population level. This study evaluated the associations between baseline SMART-REACH risk scores, long-term recurrent clinical events, cumulative costs, and post-index event LDL-C goal attainment in patients with recent ACS and/or revascularization. This retrospective study used electronic health records and was conducted in the North Karelia region of Finland. The study cohort included all patients aged 45-85 admitted to a hospital for ACS or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into quintiles based on their baseline SMART-REACH risk scores to examine the associations between predicted 5-year scores and selected clinical and economic outcomes. In addition, simple age-based stratification was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. The observed 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrent events ranged from 20% in the lowest to 41% in the highest risk quintile, whereas the corresponding predicted risks ranged from 13% to 51%, and cumulative 5-year mean total costs per patient ranged from 15 827 to 46 182€, respectively. Both monitoring and attainment of low LDL-C values were suboptimal. The use of the SMART-REACH quintiles as a population-level risk stratification tool successfully stratified patients into subgroups with different cumulative numbers of recurrent events and cumulative total costs. However, more research is needed to define clinically and economically optimal threshold values for a population-level stratification.

Association of health information technology-driven multidisciplinary approaches with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

ObjectiveControlling of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a challenge. Health information technology (HIT) is increasingly being applied to close quality gaps in chronic illness care. The aim of this study was to perform a qualitative review of the association of implementing HIT on lipid management processes of care and LDL-C goal attainment in patients with ACS. MethodEligible patients with a discharge diagnosis of ACS from January 2018 to December 2021 at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. An HIT system with a multidisciplinary approach including initiating high-intensity statin therapy, periodic laboratory follow-up, titration of lipid-lowering agents, patient education, patient-level and system-level interventions involving database monitoring and outreach by centralized care teams was introduced in October 2018. Electronical medical records including data on medications and laboratory findings at discharge and within 1 year were compared before and after implementing the HIT system. ResultsA total of 2001 ACS patients (average age 63 ± 12.7 years, 79.66 % men) were analyzed. The LDL-C < 70 mg/dL goal attainment rates (36.52 %, 53.57 %, 59.22 %, 62.18 % in 2018–2021) and medium serum LDL-C levels (80.5 mg/dL, 68 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL, 64 mg/dL in 2018–2021) significantly improved within 6 months (2018 as the reference, all p<0.001). The LDL-C attainment rate at 12 months also steadily increased (53.80 %, 61.82 %, 64.21 % in 2019–2021, p = 0.019). Most of the patients switched to a high-intensity statins regimen at discharge (0.57 %, 63.67 %, 72.41 %, 84.44 %, in 2018–2021, p<0.001 with 2018 as the reference), with low adverse event rates. The maintenance rates of high-intensity statin regimens at 12 months continued to improve (41.36 %, 49.04 %, 61.39 % in 2019–2021, p<0.001). ConclusionsEfforts to control LDL-C should be increased in ACS patients by initiating and intensifying statin treatment earlier. Our results confirmed that a team-based strategy with HIT improved LDL-C target achievement for most patients with ACS.

Impact of team-based health information technology to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: a single-center experience

Abstract Objectives The reduction in circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary aim of lipid-lowering therapies as a method of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Although guidelines recommended strictly control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 70 mg/dL by high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the LDL-C target goal is not often attained. Health information technology (HIT) with information integration, decision making algorithm, is being applied on chronic illness care. Purpose We aimed to perform a qualitative review of the impact of HIT interventions on lipid management and LDL-C goal attainment in patients after ACS hospital discharge. Method Consecutive ACS patients with dyslipidemia (LDL-C &amp;gt;100 mg/dL) at discharge between January 2018 and December 2021 in a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The LDL-C &amp;lt;70 mg/dL is defined as target. The team-based approach quality improvement program that consisted of patient education and high-intensity statin initiation before discharge, outpatient clinics with periodic laboratory follow-up, titration of lipid-lowering agents, and system-level interventions that involve database monitoring and outreach by centralized care teams, was introduced in October 2018. Electronical medical records including the medications, laboratory data at discharge and within 1 year were compared, before and after initiation of HIT system. Result A total 2248 ACS patients were included. The LDL-C &amp;lt;70 mg/dL attainment rate (36.52%, 53.57%, 59.22%, 62.18% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) and medium serum LDL-C level (80.5 mg/dL, 68 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL, 64 mg/dL in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) significantly improved within 6 months after initiation of the team-based integrated intervention with assisted by HIT (2018 as the reference, all p&amp;lt;0.001). The LDL-C goal attainment rate at 12-month kept increasing gradually (53.80%, 61.82%, 64.21%, in 2019, 2020, 2021, p= 0.019). Most of the population initiated with moderate-intensity statin in 2018 (76.24%, 20.92%, 10.95%, 6.41% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021), then switched to a high-intensity statin after initiation of the program (0.57%, 63.67%, 72.41%, 84.44% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) (2018 as the reference, all p&amp;lt;0.001), while the adverse event rates including hepatotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis remained similarly low. Conclusion Our results confirmed that multifaceted intervention with HIT assisted multidisciplinary approach could substantially improve LDL-C goal attainment in post-ACS patients. There was a direct relationship between high-intensity statins and LDL-C goal attainment, without significant increase of adverse events.LDL-C goal attainment rate and levelLower lipid treatment and adverse event

Low LDL-C goal attainment in patients at very high cardiovascular risk due to lacking observance of the guidelines on dyslipidaemias.

Dyslipidemias are defined as a wide range of abnormalities of the lipid profile. Treatment guidelines recommend aiming at lowering LDL-C. We investigated the adherence of Czech cardiologists to the dyslipidaemia treatment guidelines, especially in the management of patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. In this retrospective cross-sectional multicentric study data from medical records of 450 adults with ASCVD, enrolled between June 2021 and January 2022, were analysed. Demographics, clinical outcomes, medical history, LLT treatment and other medications were collected. The physicians were to include patients at a very high risk of ASCVD and to complete a general questionnaire on their personal therapeutic preferences. Objectively assessed, only 80% of total patients (N = 450) enrolled in the study were at very high risk of ASCVD, and 12.7% of patients were at high risk of ASCVD, respectively. In total, 55 (13.1%) patients were diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia, and 39.1% of them had a positive family history of ASCVD. Generally, only 20.5% of patients reached the 2019 LDL-C goals- 19.4% of very high risk patients and 28.1% of high risk patients, respectively. 61% of the physicians preferred a slow and careful up-titration of the dose, which is contradictory to the guidelines. Only 17% of the physicians increased the statin dose or added/combined/changed the treatment to achieve the LDL-C goals as soon as possible. Surprisingly, in up to 61.5% of patients at very high risk who did not meet the LDL-C goals, their physicians stated subjective satisfaction with the treatment and considered no change needed. Among very high and high risk patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy, with high treatment adherence, the LDL-C goal attainment is very low and LLT utilization is rather sub-optimal. Improving observance of the guidelines by physicians bears a substantial potential for LDL-C goal attainment and thus improving overall benefit for patients for no additional costs.

1075 USE OF LIPID-LOWERING COMBINATION THERAPIES IN SANTORINI STUDY: EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN COHORT

Abstract The SANTORINI registry is an observational study that aims to evaluate the management of patients with high and very high cardiovascular (CV) risk in clinical practice, collecting data at enrolment and after 12 months. Italy participated in this study with 1531 patients at very high risk and 446 at high risk. The scope of the present analysis was to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment in patients who do not qualify for PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) (according to Italian reimbursement regulations) in Italian cohort, with focus on patients in secondary prevention. The current indications for PCKS9i charged to the National Health System in Italy in secondary prevention, are for patients aged ≤ 80 years with LDL-c levels ≥ 70 mg/dl in at least three detections despite therapy for at least 6 months with high intensity statin at the highest tolerated dose and ezetimibe or after a single LDL-C detection for recent myocardial infarction or multiple cardiovascular events or with demonstrated intolerance to statins and/or ezetimibe. At enrolment, a total of 509 (33.2%) of 1531 patients at very-high risk had an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dl. Of them, about half do not reach the LDL-C target. In particular, 34.4% takes statin monotherapy, and 50.3% of them do not reach the target. Even patients taking high-intensity statins as monotherapy reach the target in only 47.9% of cases, leaving more than half of patients with LDL-C levels between 55 and 70 mg/dl. Regarding combination therapy, statin and ezetimibe, patients taking this combination account for 26.9%, of these those taking the combination of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe reach the target in 56.7% of cases while those taking high-intensity statins and ezetimibe reach the target in 51.4% of cases. Our findings show that there is a proportion of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl who do not qualify for PCSK9i who are not at target for LDL-C levels despite maximal therapy with statins and ezetimibe.

HSD14 Lacking Observance of the Guidelines on Dyslipidaemias as Possible Reason for Low LDL-C Goal Attainment in Patients at High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk

Several studies have clearly demonstrated the causative role of increased plasma concentrations of LDL-C in the process of atherosclerotic plaque formation. These findings have been reflected in the updated guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, proposing new stringent LDL-C goals and treatment algorithm. Although the evidence is quickly translated into the guidelines, there still exists a large gap between recommendations and real clinical practice. The objective of the study was to investigate the adherence of Czech cardiologists to the dyslipidaemias guidelines, especially in the management of patients with high- and very-high cardiovascular risk.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients with clinical evidence of familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a)

BackgroundAlthough potent lipid-lowering therapies are available, patients commonly fall short of recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and LDL-C goal attainment, as well as the prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, we characterized patients failing to meet recommended LDL-C goals.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Clinical FH was determined by the Dutch Clinical Lipid Network Score, and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (≈ 107 nmol/L) was considered elevated.ResultsA total of 838 participants were included. Overall, the prevalence of CAD was 72%, and 62% received lipid-lowering treatment. The prevalence of clinical FH (probable and definite FH) was 4%, and 19% had elevated Lp(a) levels. With 35%, LDL-C goal attainment was generally poor. Among the participants with clinical FH, none reached their LDL-C target. Among patients with elevated Lp(a), LDL-C target achievement was only 28%. The prevalence and severity of CAD were higher in participants with clinical FH (86% prevalence) and elevated Lp(a) (80% prevalence).ConclusionMost participants failed to meet their individual LDL-C goals according to the ESC 2016 and 2019 guidelines. In particular, high-risk patients with clinical FH or elevated Lp(a) rarely met their target for LDL-C. The identification of these patients and more intense treatment approaches are crucial for the improvement of CAD primary and secondary prevention.

Intensity of lipid-lowering therapy, adherence and LDL-cholesterol goal attainment in patients with coronary heart disease

Background and Aims : To examine patterns of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use, and persistence and adherence among coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and their association with lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment.

Combined lipid goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: A head-to-head comparative trial of statins.

This study compared the efficacy of two statin treatments (simvastatin vs rosuvastatin) in achieving the combined goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <2.6 mmol/L and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) <3.4 mmol/L in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. After a 5-week run-in, 89 patients with type 2 diabetes having fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of 1.7 to 5.7 mmol/L or non-HDL-C levels of 3.4 to 5.2 mmol/L were randomized to receive simvastatin 20 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg for 8 weeks or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 4 weeks followed by 20 mg for 8 weeks. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients achieving the combined goal at week 12. Although significant between-group differences were observed in changes in LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels, both study treatments were sufficiently intensive for a 40% to 55% LDL-C reduction. At the end of the study, the two groups had similar percentages of patients who achieved the combined lipid goal (84% vs 89%, p = 0.66). All patients who attained the combined lipid goal also met the apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) target of <0.9 g/L. No between-group differences were noted in changes in HDL-C and TG levels at week 12. The patients tolerated both treatments well. In our study, ≈85% of patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia could achieve the combined lipid goal with statin monotherapy. The two statin treatments could sufficiently control diabetic dyslipidemia (NCT00506961).

Lipid-lowering treatment intensity, persistence, adherence and goal attainment in patients with coronary heart disease

BackgroundTo examine patterns of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use, and persistence and adherence among patients with coronary heart disease and their associations with lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment. MethodsObservational study among 26,768 patients who had suffered a myocardial infarction or had been revascularized in Stockholm during 2012 to 2018, and followed up through 2019. Outcomes included initiation of LLT, discontinuation, re-initiation, adherence to treatment and LDL-C goal attainment according to the European dyslipidaemia guidelines from 2011 and 2016 (mainly LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L). Results82% of patients commenced or continued LLT within 90 days after discharge. Of those, 71% were dispensed an LLT prescription within 30 days (62% of them for high-intensity LLT). High-intensity LLT prescribing increased over time, from 12% in 2012 to 78% in 2018. During a median follow-up of 3 (IQR 2-5) years 73% continued to fill prescriptions for a statin, 26.3% temporarily or permanently discontinued, and 0.5% changed to non-statin LLT. Only 1.3% discontinued statin treatment permanently. Throughout observation, about 80% of patients showed good statin adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%). LDL-C target attainment was 52% the first year and <50% during subsequent years. LDL-C goal attainment was highest among patients receiving high-intensity statin treatment and showing good treatment adherence. ConclusionIn secondary prevention for patients with established coronary heart disease, the proportion of LDL-C target attainment was low throughout the time period of the study, despite increasing use of high-intensity LLT and good treatment persistence and adherence.

Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in patients treated with combination therapy: A retrospective cohort study in primary care

The attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in real-world settings among patients receiving combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT, statins plus non-statins) is not well characterised. To evaluate LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment in patients treated with combination LLT in real-world primary care settings. A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with combination LLT. Data were drawn from general practitioner electronic medical records across Australia from 2013 to 2019. The on-treatment goal for LDL-C was < 2 mmol/L (77 mg/dL), as per Australian guidelines. The cohort analysed included 9,173 individuals treated with combination LLT. The mean age was 65.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.5), 60.1% were males, and 56.7% had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. The median on-treatment LDL-C was 2.1 mmol/L (IQR 1.6-2.8), and overall 45.4% of the cohort met LDL-C goals, with individuals on fixed-dose combination of statins plus ezetimibe having the highest rates of achievement (49.8%). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, factors associated with LDL-C goal achievement were male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.6, p < 0.001), aged >80 years (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 6.6, p=0.006), and a history of T2DM (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.9, p < 0.001) or coronary heart disease (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.6, p < 0.001). More than half of Australians on combination LLT did not achieve LDL-C goals. Urgent measures are needed to address this gap in clinical practice to minimise negative health outcomes.

Individual treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment in patients with somatic symptom disorder from the perspective of clinicians: A concept mapping study

ObjectiveOverviews of treatment goals and influencing factors may support shared decision making and optimize customized treatment to the patient with somatic symptom disorder (SSD). The aim of this study was to identify and structure comprehensive sets of treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment in patients with SSD from the perspective of clinicians. MethodsUsing a concept mapping procedure, clinicians participated in interviews (N = 17) and card sorting tasks comprising 55 treatment goals and 55 factors influencing goal attainment (N = 38). ResultsWe identified four overarching categories (A to D) of nine clusters (1 to 9) of treatment goals: A. empowerment (A1. personal values, A2. committed action, A3. self-esteem), B. skill improvement (B4. interpersonal skills, B5. emotion and stress regulation), C. symptom reduction (C6. dysfunctional beliefs, C7. somatic symptoms, C8. psychological symptoms), and D9. active and structured lifestyle. Also, we identified four overarching categories (A to D) of nine clusters (1 to 9) of factors influencing goal attainment: A1. therapeutic alliance, B. social and everyday context (B2. [family] system, B3. meaningful daily schedule, B4. social and economic circumstances), C. ability to change (C5. externalizing tendency, C6. reflective and psychological skills, C7. perspective and motivation), and D. psychological vulnerability (D8. vulnerable personality, D9. [psychiatric] comorbidity). ConclusionThe overviews of treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment reflect different paradigmatic backgrounds of clinicians. The results can be used, in combination with the perspective of the patient, to define treatment goals, and to monitor and evaluate change in outcomes.

The effect of evinacumab on LDL-C goal attainment in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

The effect of evinacumab on LDL-C goal attainment in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Comment on Pantalone et al. The Probability of A1C Goal Attainment in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Integrated Delivery System: A Prediction Model. Diabetes Care 2020;43:1910–1919

We were interested in the recent article from Pantalone et al. (1), who reported that 23.7% of 6,973 subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c >9%) attained HbA1c below 8% within 1 year, based on the electronic health record at Cleveland Clinic. Although the 6,973 participants represented only 6.7% of the 103,969 encountered patients in the database, their fate is a matter of concern, as high rates of vascular and infectious complications have been related to HbA1c above 9%. The follow-up of HbA1c trajectories has shown that high HbA1c usually remains stable or ascending for years, and long-term frank reductions are uncommon, only occurring for 3–4% of the patients (2). Real improvement of …

PATTERNS OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTOEROL MANAGEMENT AND GOAL ATTAINMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ATHEROSCLEROTIC CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE 65 YEARS AND OLDER FROM ALBERTA AND ONTARIO

Despite advances in lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) and public health interventions, ischemic heart disease remains a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality in Canada. Differences in disease management between provinces may lead to variations in treatment outcomes for patients with similar diagnoses. The availability of large data sets from population-based health databases has enabled analysis of lipid management and goal attainment in patients with public coverage. The goal of this study was to describe treatment patterns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) from Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON).

Blood pressure goal attainment in multi-ethnic Asian patients with hypertension and dyslipidaemia in primary care.

Hypertension and dyslipidaemia are major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and achieving treatment goals mitigates such risks. This study determined demographic and medication-related factors associated with blood pressure (BP) goal attainment in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidaemia. This paper is a sub-analysis of the Lipid HEALTH study, a questionnaire survey focusing on adult Asian patients with both dyslipidaemia and hypertension. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to obtain demographic and clinical information. Laboratory and prescription data was retrieved from electronic health records. BP goals were defined by international guidelines. Data was audited and analysed, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors determining BP goal attainment. Among the 851 included patients, 49.7% attained their BP goals. 37.0% were on monotherapy, 57.6% on ≥ 2 BP-lowering medications, and 5.4% had no pharmacologic treatment. Among those on pharmacotherapy, 51.2% failed to achieve BP goals. Calcium channel blockers were the most frequently prescribed medications. Attainment of BP goals was significantly associated with: not having Type 2 diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-3.13); attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45-2.81); being solely on dietary control (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.09-4.39); and receiving monotherapy (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.18-2.48). BP treatment goals were attained by half of the patients with dyslipidaemia and hypertension, and half of those on pharmacotherapy. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control were significantly associated with BP goal attainment.

The Probability of A1C Goal Attainment in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Integrated Delivery System: A Prediction Model.

OBJECTIVETo assess patient characteristics and treatment factors associated with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the probability of hemoglobin A1c (A1C) goal attainment.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study using the electronic health record at Cleveland Clinic. Patients with uncontrolled T2D (A1C >9%) were identified on the index date of 31 December 2016 (n = 6,973) and grouped by attainment (n = 1,653 [23.7%]) or nonattainment (n = 5,320 [76.3%]) of A1C <8% by 31 December 2017, and subgroups were compared on a number of demographic and clinical variables. On the basis of these variables, a nomogram was created for predicting probability of A1C goal attainment.RESULTSFor the entire population, median age at index date was 57.7 years (53.3% male), and the majority were white (67.2%). Median A1C was 10.2%. Obesity (50.6%), cardiovascular disease (46.9%), and psychiatric disease (61.1%) were the most common comorbidities. Metformin (62.7%) and sulfonylureas (38.7%) were the most common antidiabetes medications. Only 1,653 (23.7%) patients achieved an A1C <8%. Predictors of increased probability of A1C goal attainment were older age, white/non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, Medicare health insurance, lower baseline A1C, higher frequency of endocrinology/primary care visits, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use, thiazolidinedione use, metformin use, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use, and fewer classes of antidiabetes drugs. Factors associated with lower probability included insulin use and longer time in the T2D database (both presumed as likely surrogates for duration of T2D).CONCLUSIONSA minority of patients with an A1C >9% achieved an A1C <8% at 1 year. While most identified predictive factors are nonmodifiable by the clinician, pursuit of frequent patient engagement and tailored drug regimens may help to improve A1C goal attainment.

Impact of Extended- Versus Intermittent-Infusion Cefepime on Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients.

Background: Pharmacodynamic models support potential improved antimicrobial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic goal attainment in patients treated with extended-infusion (EI) versus intermittent-infusion (II) cefepime. Small clinical studies demonstrate inconsistent findings in patient outcomes, necessitating a deeper review of this administration method. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients receiving EI versus II cefepime between September 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary objectives included length of hospital and ICU stay, time to defervescence, duration of therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and readmission rate. Subgroup analyses for the primary objective were conducted based on comorbid burden and isolate susceptibilities. Results: No statistically significant differences were noted in the 645 included patients for the primary outcome between the EI and II groups (7.8% vs 10.4%, P = .32). Median length of stay was 9 days (IQR 12) versus 11 days (IQR 14) (P = .30), respectively. In addition, statistical significance was not seen in any of the subgroups for the primary outcome including patients with APACHE II score ≥ 20 (17.4% vs 30.6%, P = .26) and for infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.9% vs 20.0%, P = .23) or Enterobacteriaceae (11.1% vs 20.0%, P = .13) with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 4. Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were noted between EI and II groups, although benefits in specific subpopulations may exist when these results are correlated with findings from studies examining alternative antipseudomonal beta lactams.

Real-world impact of glycated hemoglobin reduction on treatment intensification and glycated hemoglobin goal attainment in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients initiated on a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor (SGLT2i)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a 0.2% reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on treatment intensification, poor HbA1c control and HbA1c goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiated on a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor (SGLT2i).Methods: IQVIATM Health Plan Claims Data – US and IQVIATM Ambulatory EMR Data – US databases (29 October 2012–31 March 2016) were used to identify adults with T2DM initiated on an SGLT2i (index date) who had HbA1c measurements pre- and post-index, and ≥6 months of eligibility pre-index (baseline). HbA1c change was defined as the difference between the first post-index and the last pre-index measurements. Cox regression models were used to assess treatment intensification, poor HbA1c control (i.e. HbA1c > 9%, among patients <9% at baseline) and goal attainment (HbA1c < 7%, <8%; among patients with HbA1c above goal at baseline) adjusting for HbA1c change and baseline characteristics. Patients were observed up to one year after the first HbA1c measurement or end of eligibility. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.Results: A total of 938 patients (mean age 54.9, 42.5% female, mean HbA1c 8.5%) were selected. Following SGLT2i initiation, each 0.2% reduction in HbA1c levels was associated with a decreased risk of treatment intensification (HR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.86–0.92]), a decreased likelihood of reaching HbA1c > 9% (HR [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.79–0.88]) and higher likelihoods of achieving a treatment goal of HbA1c < 7% (HR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.12–1.21]) and HbA1c < 8% (HR [95% CI] = 1.08 [1.04–1.10]).Conclusions: In T2DM patients, each HbA1c reduction of 0.2% following the initiation of an SGLT2i was associated with a significant positive impact on treatment intensification and HbA1c goal attainment.

Lipid-modifying therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Germany: The CaReHigh Registry

Background and aimsFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is amongst the most common genetic disorders encountered in primary care. Yet, only a minority of affected patients is diagnosed and treated. This interim analysis of the CaRe High Registry aims at examining the state of treatment and attainment of lipid goals in German FH patients. MethodsThe CaRe High registry includes FH patients from lipid clinics and private practices. Data have been collected using questionnaires filled in by the recruiting physicians and by interviewing the participating patients. ResultsWe examined 512 F H patients diagnosed according to clinical criteria. Median age at the time of the first FH diagnosis was 39 (25th and 75th percentile: 27–50) years, median treatment naïve LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was 239.4 mg/dl (6.19 mmol/l), 25th to 75th percentile 191.8–342.5 mg/dl (4.96–8.86 mmol/l). 27% of the participants did not receive lipid-lowering drugs. Among the patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs, 19% received a PCSK9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) in combination with a statin, 9% were treated with a PCSK9i alone and 3% were treated with a combination of PCSK9i and a non-statin drug. Patients with pre-existing CVD were more likely to be treated with lipid-lowering drugs and more likely to receive a PCSK9i, but LDL-C targets were only achieved by a minority of patients (<20%). Gap to target LDL-C was lowest and the median achieved LDL-C reduction was 1.4 times higher with PCSK9i treatment than with (oral) lipid-lowering therapy without PCSK9i. ConclusionsThe Care High registry has included patients with the typical clinical features of familial hypercholesterolemia. PCSK9i treatment in addition to standard therapy allows attainment of target values in many patients with initially very high LDL-C.