This paper focuses on economic, political & cultural changes in respect to globalization. It proposes a conceptual model to discuss the effect of mutual relationships among these concepts in the view point of futures studies. Discussing the literature of globalization and its effect on fundamental concepts of human's life, i.e. culture, politics and economy leads to a better understanding of basic features of these concepts. The connections among these concepts in front of a time line with globalization growth can be put together to make a new conceptual model in order to explain their relationships in future. Proposed model shows that the growth of globalization will dismantle economic, political & cultural differentiation issues, as globalization will reduce their complexity and discrepancy. In other words, future world is not affected significantly by economic, political and cultural infrastructures since the distinctions among these concepts will be reduced by an overall convergence resulted from positive trend. To understand the best future we should stand on a tiny point to see the reality. This goal is just reached through right vision to understand the best plausible scenarios. This paper aims to propose a model in order to show the basic impact of culture, politics and economics on world which are the basic pillars events of today, but not for tomorrow.Keywords: Futures Studies (FS), Globalization, Culture, Politics, Economics.IntroductionThe word, globe, was first utilized in England in 1980s. This word comes from the Latin word Globous meaning sphere. Ize is added to Globe to show a fundamental change with the passage of time. Globalization is derived from globalize to show the emergence of a new network of social and economic systems [1]. Then, this new combination was mentioned by The Economist Journal in an article titled of Markets in order to emphasize Italy's increased role in automobile manufacturing across the world in 1983. Many significant works were published about globalization in 1990s, including The End of History by Fukuyama [2], The Clash of Civilizations by Huntington [3], End of Nation-State by Jean-Marie Guehenno [4], and Westernization of World by Serge Latouche [5]. These attempts succeeded in spreading the globalization and entering it into the public culture, politics and economics.The concept of globalization created a new line of life and a new school of taught which came into existence as a result of McLuhan [6] Village a concept introduced in the book War and Peace in the Global village. IMF introduced four basic aspects of globalization including trade, investment, migration & dissemination of knowledge [7]. Fotopoulos introduced six dimensions: economic, political, cultural, social, technological and ideological globalizations. Steger referred to five dimensions, He added ecological to Fotopoulos list but deleted technological and social [8].This paper argues that Technological, ideological, ecological and social dimensions can be categorized under the other three bigger dimensions, i.e. economic, political and cultural. For example technological globalization like World Wide Web has changed every one's life, as it facilities connections, ended in a change of culture of communication. In other words we can see technological globalization a category of our big three dimensions, as it has changed culture and also economics and politics. In other words, other dimension change our life through these three main streams indirectly, such as cell phones and social media which have changed at last, culture and also economics and of course, politics. This inference can also be applied for other ideological, ecological or social dimensions. This three main categories are also used in many other globalization studies like Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. [9].In economics, enormous changes in business and trade affairs are occurred, after globalization rise, since globalization works with Smithian and not Marxian theories. …