Global Limb Anatomic Staging System Research Articles

Relationship between peripheral arterial disease severity determined by the Glass classification and triglyceride-glucose index; novel association and novel classification system.

Peripheral arterial disease is a serious clinical manifestation caused by atherosclerosis. It is one common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is commonly seen in males, and its (prevelance) increases with age. It is most prevalent with smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlip-idemia. Novel studies investigate the relationship between triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) and cardiovascular diseases. Studies investigating the association of this index and peripheral arterial disease and disease severity are generally done by using The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) classification. We aimed to study this association by using the new Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) classification. Two hundred patients between 25 to 90 years old diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease and admitted to the hospital for peripheral arterial angiography between July 2021 and December 2021, were evaluated retrospectively with blood parameters and angiographic images. Patients were divided into two groups: moderate (group 1; n=58) and severe (group 2; n=142) according to the GLASS classification. No statistical differences were observed for comorbidities and repeated interventional pro-cedure rates (p=0.164). Triglyceride values were found to be statistically dif-ferent between groups (p=0.040). TyG was found higher in group 2 (p= 0.04). According to the binary logistic regression model, only TyG was found to have a significant effect as a diagnostic factor (p=0.011). TyG was also significantly correlated with the Rutherford (p=0.012) and GLASS classification severity (p<0.001). Peripheral arterial disease and disease severity could be easily moni-tored with simple calculable TyG. In this way, precautions could be taken, and morbidities could be prevented.

Evaluation of global limb anatomic staging system for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia treated with autogenous bypass grafts.

We evaluated the relationship of the global limb anatomic staging system (GLASS) stage with the clinical outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who had undergone distal bypass with vein grafting. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with CLTI who had undergone distal bypass with vein grafting from January 2012 to December 2019. The primary end point was freedom from CLTI, including amputation-free survival, complete wound healing, and no ischemic rest pain. The secondary end points included a composite outcome of recurrence (patients who had achieved freedom from CLTI but had developed a new wound or ischemic rest pain), major limb amputation, amputation free-survival, overall survival, major adverse limb events, limb-based patency, and primary and secondary patency rates. A total of 190 patients had undergone 211 distal bypasses with a median follow-up of 30months. Of these patients, 80% had had diabetes or end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Most patients (63%) had experienced major or extensive tissue loss (WIfI [wound, ischemia, foot infection] wound class ≥2), and more than one half of these had had some degree of infection of the foot. A severe anatomic pattern (GLASS stage III) was predominant, with a prevalence of 78%. No significant differences were found between GLASS stage I and II and GLASS stage III groups for all the outcomes analyzed. Approximately 80% of the 211 revascularized limbs were free of CLTI at 12months after treatment. At 4years of follow-up, we observed that 25% of the patients had had CLTI recurrence, 83% were free from major amputation, and 61% were free from major adverse limb events. Limb-based patency, primary patency, and secondary patency were 79%, 80%, and 93% at 1year and 64%, 65%, and 81% at 4years, respectively. The GLASS stage was not related to patency or the clinical outcomes after distal bypass with vein grafting. Distal open revascularization resulted in excellent rates of freedom from CLTI with low rates of CLTI recurrence, two key time-integrated outcomes of clinical disease severity for patients with CLTI.

Evaluating The Use Of Glass, Wifi And Mac Scores As Predictors Of Limb Salvage Success In Patients Receiving Free Tissue Transfer For Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds

The WIfI (wound, ischemia, and foot infection), MAC (medial arterial calcification), and GLASS (global limb anatomic staging system) grading scales have recently been adopted by the Society of Vascular Surgery as predictors of amputation rates and failure of revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, these metrics have not taken into account the ability of free tissue transfer (FTT) to shift these outcomes. This study seeks to characterize whether the addition of free tissue transfer can facilitate limb salvage in patients who would otherwise be deemed as high risk for failure using these grading systems.

Evaluation of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing endovascular intervention for femoropopliteal disease

BackgroundThe Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) is a new method of quantifying the anatomic severity of infrainguinal disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. However, because GLASS has undergone limited validation, its value as an aid to shared decision-making regarding the choice of revascularization strategy remains incompletely defined. Here we report the relationship between GLASS and outcomes in a contemporary series comprising all 309 patients who underwent an attempt at femoropopliteal and/or infrapopiteal endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in our unit between 2009 and 2014. MethodsBaseline patient characteristics and outcome data including immediate technical success (ITS), amputation-free survival (AFS), overall survival, limb salvage, freedom from reintervention (FF-R), and freedom from major adverse limb events (FF-MALE) were obtained from hospital databases. GLASS grades and stage were obtained from pre-endovascular therapy angiographic imaging. Outcome data were censored on May 31, 2017. ResultsBaseline patient characteristics were similar across different GLASS femoropopliteal and IP grades and overall limb stages. Worsening GLASS stage was associated with a significant reduction in ITS (97.5% vs 91.5% vs 84.0%; P = .029). At 72 months FF-R (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.57; P = .020) and FF-MALE (hazard ratio, 1.76, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.81; P = .019) were significant worse in GLASS stage 3 than in stage 2 limbs. ConclusionsIn our study, there were significant differences in ITS, FF-R and FF-MALE between limbs with GLASS stage 2 and 3 disease. However, further GLASS refinement seems likely to be required if its usefulness in everyday clinical practice as an aid to shared decision-making regarding the choice of revascularization strategy is to be maximized.

The Infrapopliteal Global Limb Anatomic Staging System Predicts Wound Healing and Pain Relief after Partial Revascularization

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is frequently associated with crural artery occlusion. Complete revascularization beyond the diseased crural artery is preferable; however, complete revascularization is challenging in many cases for various reasons. On the other hand, partial reconstruction for inflow disease sometimes leads to complete relief of symptoms. It is not elucidated which patients may recover from CLTI with partial revascularization (PR). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the factors affecting outcomes after PR. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent first-attempt PR, for CLTI, for limb salvage, in our institution, between April 2012 and December 2020. We divided these 103 cases into 2 groups: the salvage group (who achieved wound healing or relief from rest pain with PR; n=81) and the nonsalvage group (who ended with major amputation or additional distal revascularization; n=22). We evaluated the factors affecting the outcome of PR in terms of patient risk, limb severity (Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System; wound, ischemia, and foot infection [WIfI] classification), and anatomical pattern (Global Limb Anatomic Staging System; GLASS classification). Although patient risk between the 2 groups was not statistically significant, hypoalbuminemia (< 3.0mg/dL) was more prevalent in the nonsalvage group without significance (P=0.068). Regarding limb severity status, there was no significant difference in WIfI grades. Wound grade showed the strongest correlation (P=0.11) and reduced wound grade suggested future wound healing. In terms of GLASS, infrapopliteal grade was statistically significant (P=0.033). Upon a multivariate analysis, among infrapopliteal grade, hypoalbuminemia, and wound grade, infrapopliteal grade (P=0.0096) and hypoalbuminemia (P=0.2512) revealed significant differences. Wound grade also showed correlation (P=0.085). The usefulness of the WIfI classification and GLASS classification to predict wound healing after PR for CLTI was validated.

Predictability of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) for Technical and Limb Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The newly proposed Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), a categorical staging of infrainguinal artery disease complexity, is expected to correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). This study aimed to verify the relationship between GLASS stages and clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) and bypass surgery (BS).

Prediction of Wound Recurrence in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Treatment

Purpose: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to isolated below-the-knee lesions is a factor associated with wound recurrence. However, there is a lack of data regarding wound recurrence in such cases. This study aimed to determine the predictors of wound recurrence in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing endovascular treatment. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. We enrolled 152 consecutive patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (172 limbs) who achieved complete wound healing after undergoing endovascular treatment for isolated below-the-knee lesions between February 2008 and December 2017. Of these, the wound had recurred in 56 limbs (33%), and we divided the patients into 2 groups based on wound recurrence. We evaluated the recurrence rate of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and predictors of wound recurrence. Wound recurrence was defined as recurrence of the wound within 2 years of complete wound healing. Results: Patients’ backgrounds were similar in both groups, including mean age (72±9 vs 72±11; p=0.76) and hemodialysis (43% vs 40%; p=0.66). Pre-pedal arch type 2 (52% vs 8%; p<0.01), infrapopliteal grade 4 of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (77% vs 59%; p=0.02), and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection criteria stage 4 (43% vs 28%; p=0.04) were more common in the wound recurrence group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis identified pre-pedal arch type 2 (hazard ratio, 5.28; 95% confidence interval, 3.08–9.10; p<0.01) and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection criteria stage 4 (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–3.36; p=0.01) as predictors of wound recurrence after complete wound healing. Conclusion: Pre-pedal arch type 2 and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system stage 4 were associated with wound recurrence in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who achieved complete wound healing after undergoing endovascular treatment for isolated below-the-knee lesions.

Limb-based patency as a measure of effective revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

ObjectiveIn 2019, the Global Vascular Guidelines on chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) introduced the concept of limb-based patency (LBP) defined as maintained patency of a target artery pathway after intervention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between LBP and major adverse limb events (MALE) after infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI between 2016 and 2019 at a single tertiary institution with a dedicated limb preservation team were included. Subjects with aortoiliac disease, prior infrainguinal stents, or existing bypass grafts were excluded. Demographics, Global Limb Anatomic Staging System scores, Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) stages, revascularization details, and limb-specific outcomes were reviewed. LBP was defined by the absence of reintervention, occlusion, critical stenosis (>70%), or hemodynamic compromise with ongoing symptoms of CLTI. MALE included thrombectomy or thrombolysis, new bypass, open surgical graft revision and/or major amputation. ResultsWe analyzed 184 unique limbs in 163 patients. This cohort was composed of 66.9% male patients with a mean age of 72 years. Baseline characteristics included diabetes (66%), tissue loss (91%), and advanced WIfI stages (30% stage 3, 51% stage 4). Global Limb Anatomic Staging System stage 3 anatomic patterns were common (n = 119 [65%]). Sixty limbs were treated with open bypass (65% involving tibial targets) and 124 underwent endovascular intervention (70% including infrapopliteal targets). The 12-month freedom from MALE and loss of LBP were 74.0% ± 3.7% and 48.6% ± 4.2%, respectively. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-5.83; P = .025) and loss of LBP (HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.96-8.64; P < .001) were independent predictors of MALE in a Cox proportional hazard model. Loss of LBP was the sole independent predictor of major limb amputation after revascularization (HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 1.89-13.09; P = .001). Loss of LBP impacted both intermediate-risk limbs (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.02-7.97; P = .047 in WIfI stages 1-3) and high-risk limbs (HR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.32-12.11; P = .014 in WIfI stage 4). However, the loss of LBP had the greatest impact on patients presenting with WIfI stage 4 disease (31% vs 8% major limb amputation at 12 months in limbs without vs with maintained LBP). ConclusionsThe anatomic durability of revascularization, as measured by LBP, is a key determinant of treatment outcomes in CLTI regardless of the initial mode of intervention undertaken. Loss of LBP is most detrimental in patients presenting with advanced limb threat (WIfI stage 4).

Global Limb Anatomic Staging System Score correlates with the clinical outcomes in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) affects millions of people and causes health care burden around the globe. Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) was proposed as a new anatomic system for integrating the complexity of threatened limb. We retrospectively classified computed tomography angiography images of threatened limbs into GLASS stages between January 2018 and April 2020. Comorbidities, limb treatments, and outcomes including amputation-free survival (AFS), reintervention and mortality were compared and the likelihood of benefit from revascularization was estimated according to GLASS. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to determine the rates of endpoint events at 1 year. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of those outcomes. In our study, 285 threatened limbs in 263 patients were stratified including GLASS stage I disease (N.=53, 19%), stage II (N.=129; 45%) and stage III (N.=103; 36%) disease. The percentage of limbs undergoing endovascular revascularization and minor amputation increased significantly with increasing GLASS stage. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, increasing GLASS stage was associated with 1-year reduced AFS (stage I: 96.1%, stage II: 94.1%, stage III: 83.9%; log rank P=0.016). The percentage of 1-year reintervention rate in infrapopliteal GLASS grade 3-4 (15%) was significantly higher than the percentage of reintervention in infrapopliteal GLASS grade 0-2 (5%) (Log rank P=0.002). Infrapopliteal GLASS grade 3 and 4 was the independent predictor of reduced AFS. GLASS stage correlated with intensity of limb treatment and with clinical outcomes at 1 year. Infrapopliteal GLASS grade 3 and 4 independently predicted the reduced amputation-free survival.

Predictive impact of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) on perioperative outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with isolated below-the-knee lesions.

Although the global vascular guidelines recently proposed the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) as an anatomical classification for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), prediction of perioperative outcomes using the GLASS classification in patients with CLTI due to isolated below-the-knee (BTK) lesions has not been well studied.This retrospective study included 585 patients with CLTI due to isolated BTK lesions who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). The severity of arterial lesions was graded using the GLASS infrapopliteal (IP) and inframalleolar (IM) classifications and defined as follows: non-severe IP, 0-3; severe IP, 4; non-severe IM, P0-1; and severe IM, P2. The outcome measures were technical failure, defined as recanalisation failure of the target artery path, and perioperative failure, defined as a composite of all-cause death, major amputation, or repeat revascularisation within 30days.Technical and perioperative failures occurred in 9.4% (n = 55) and 9.9% (n = 58) patients, respectively. Compared to patients with non-severe IP and IM, those with both severe IP and IM were significantly associated with technical and perioperative failures (odds ratio [OR]: 13.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.69-41.02, P < 0.001] and OR: 2.18 [95% CI 1.08-4.38, P = 0.041], respectively).The GLASS classification may have predictive value for technical and perioperative failure in patients with CLTI due to isolated BTK lesions after EVT.

Eligibility of Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia for Deep Venous Arterialization

Percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) has emerged as a new modality for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and no standard option for revascularization. The proportion of patients facing major amputation who are eligible for this technology remains unknown. This study aims to provide a real-life estimate of patient eligibility for pDVA to reduce major amputations. Electronic medical records of 100 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who underwent major amputation of 106 limbs were reviewed. Angiograms performed ≤6months before amputation were assessed by two vascular surgeons. Disease severity was categorized using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) and patients were classified as ideal, possible, or not candidates for pDVA. Ideal candidates had ≥1 patent tibial artery, no target in the foot, and no proximal disease. Possible candidates had ≥1 patent tibial artery with PAD, no target in the foot, and proximal disease amenable to endovascular therapy. Patients were not eligible if there was no patent tibial artery, extensive PAD, or an arterial target in the foot for bypass. Of 106 limbs reviewed, 35 (33%) did not undergo angiography ≤6months before amputation because of infection (n=14), advanced tissue loss (n=10), failed revascularizations (n=8), advanced limb ischemia (n=2), and refusing revascularization (n=1). Thus, 69 lower extremity angiograms (2 incomplete excluded) in 68 patients were analyzed. A total of 15 patients with 16 limbs (23.2%) were identified as candidates for pDVA (ideal=7, possible=9). There were no differences in demographics between the two groups, but candidates for pDVA were less likely to have hyperlipidemia and congestive heart failure than those who were not candidates. The pDVA candidates underwent significantly fewer interventions before major amputation compared to patients who were not candidates (1.50±0.73 vs. 2.61±2.57, P=0.007). Angiographically, patients who were pDVA candidates had significantly higher Inframalleolar GLASS grades (1.81±0.40 vs. 0.86±0.41, P<0.0001) but lower Femoropopliteal Glass grades (0.73±1.10 vs. 2.43±1.71, P<0.0001) than patients who were not candidates. There was no significant difference in GLASS stage between these two groups (P=0.368). After mean follow-up of 48months, there was no difference in mortality between both groups (40% vs. 32.1%, P=0.567). Among patients considered for revascularization, 23.2% had favorable angiography and 14.7% could have benefited for pDVA as a new therapeutic modality for limb salvage. 33% of major amputations were performed for clinically-deemed unsalvageable CLTI.

Effects of Infra-malleolar Status According to Global Limb Anatomic Staging System on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

The global vascular guideline proposed a novel anatomical classification of infra-malleolar (IM) arterial lesions. We aimed to investigate the association of IM classification with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) due to isolated infrapopliteal (IP) lesions. We retrospectively analyzed 509 limbs with tissue loss in 357 patients due to isolated IP lesions who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) between April 2010 and December 2018. The primary outcome was 1-year wound healing rate. The association of patient and anatomic characteristics with non-healing was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The 1-year cumulative wound healing rate was 59.7%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that IM grade 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; P = .044), non-ambulatory status (HR, 1.49; P = .008), hemodialysis (HR, 1.37; P = .020), left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% (HR, 1.72; P = .030), and wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) classification 4 (HR, 1.33; P = .032) were significantly associated with non-healing, whereas no below-the-ankle (BTA), below-the-knee (BTK) runoff, and Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) IP grade had no statistically significant association with non-healing. Global Limb Anatomic Staging System IM grade 2 was an independent risk factor for wound healing in patients who underwent EVT with CLTI due to isolated IP disease.

The Relationship Between the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) and Midterm Outcomes of Retrograde Tibiopedal Access After Failure of Antegrade Recanalisation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

To examine the relationship between the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) and midterm limb and survival related outcomes of retrograde tibiopedal access, after failed recanalisation of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions (CTOs) using the antegrade approach, in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). This prospective, observational study was conducted between January 2017 and April 2019, and included 213 patients (29 GLASS I, 53 GLASS II, and 131 GLASS III lesions) with infrainguinal CTO in whom a percutaneous tibiopedal access was attempted following failed recanalisation using an antegrade approach. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess possible predictors of midterm clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate limb based patency (LBP), limb salvage, amputation free survival (AFS), and overall survival. The study reported access, crossing, and treatment success of 92.5%, 89.2%, and 89.2% of all tibiopedal access attempts, respectively. In comparison with GLASS I, GLASS stage III was associated with statistically significantly worse midterm LBP (p= .005), overall survival (p= .037), limb salvage (p= .021), and AFS (p < .001). Retrograde tibiopedal access for recanalisation of infrainguinal CTOs in patients with CLTI is associated with high access, crossing, and treatment success, and low complication rates. The study suggests that GLASS stage may be a useful predictor of midterm limb and survival related outcomes of this approach. In comparison with GLASS I, GLASS III anatomy is associated with a statistically significantly worse LBP, limb salvage, AFS, and overall survival.

Distal Endarterectomy Combined With Endovascular Proximal Treatment: The Hybrid DEEP Retrograde Technique for High-Complexity Infrainguinal Disease

Purpose: We present a hybrid technique for the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) due to complex, multilevel infrainguinal disease. It consists of an open distal endarterectomy combined with endovascular proximal treatment (the DEEP technique). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Thirty-three limbs (30 patients) were treated. Main inclusion criteria were absence of significant disease in femoral bifurcation associated with a complex infrainguinal pattern. This approach was specially considered in absence of suitable vein for bypass, obesity, hostile groin, and overall high surgical risk. Results: Mean age was 72.8 ± 10 years (ranging 50–93). Most cases presented with severe limb threatening onset (90.9% Rutherford >4 and 81.8% WIfi >3) due to high-complexity infrainguinal disease pattern (Global Limb Anatomic Staging System [GLASS] stage III) in 31/33 (93.9%), chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in 24/33 (72.7%), and severe calcification (Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System [PACSS] grade 4) in 22/33 (66.6%). Mean lesion length was 228.2 mm ± 83 (ranging 40–340 mm). In all procedures, a covered-stent (25 cm length Viabahn) was implanted in a retrograde fashion as the endovascular component. Effective revascularization was achieved in all cases, showing significant clinical and hemodynamic improvement (median pre- and postprocedure ankle-brachial index [ABI]: 0.3 and 0.9, respectively). Results at 12 months follow-up were as follows: 93.9% limb salvage ratio, 75.7% primary patency, 84.6% assisted primary patency, and 90.9% secondary patency. Major adverse limb events (MALE) and cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 8/33 (24.2%) and 2/33 (6%), respectively. Mean length of postoperative stay was 7.5 ± 6.92 days (3–27). Conclusion: This less invasive hybrid technique has promising short-term results for limb salvage and it is worth to be included in vascular armamentarium for CLTI revascularization in selected patients.

Comparison of clinical outcomes, including the wound healing rate, between inframalleolar bypass to the pedal artery and that to the pedal branch artery in the modern endovascular era

ObjectiveInframalleolar (IM) bypass has been reported to demonstrate acceptable patency and limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. However, wound healing after IM bypass and comparisons between pedal artery (PA) bypass and pedal branch artery (PBA) bypass are lacking. MethodsWe reviewed prospectively collected data from 208 consecutive patients after IM bypass performed over a period of 6 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on the distal anastomotic artery: the PA group (dorsal pedis artery or common plantar artery) and the PBA group (medial tarsal, lateral tarsal, medial plantar, and lateral plantar artery). The primary outcome was wound healing, and secondary outcomes included loss of patency and limb and life prognosis. ResultsOf the 208 patients, 174 (74%) had PA bypass, whereas 34 (16%) had PBA bypass. Patients in the PBA group were significantly younger than those in the PA group (69 ± 7 vs 73 ± 9; P = .03). Although early (30-day) graft failure was more common in the PBA group, late clinical outcomes, including the wound healing rate (79% in the PA group and 84% in the PBA group; P = .74), were similar between the two groups. The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System IM grade (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.93; P = .006); wound, ischemia, and foot infection wound grade (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; P < .01); and wound, ischemia, and foot infection foot infection grade (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .02) were independent predictors of wound healing. ConclusionsThe current study revealed that wound healing in patients after PBA bypass was acceptable and comparable with that after PA bypass. In the modern era, including a high prevalence of infrapopliteal angioplasty, our results could provide useful information to clinicians in actual clinical settings. Moreover, PBA bypass may be an alternative revascularization procedure to avoid major amputation when the PA is occluded, such as in the global vascular guideline IM P2 grade. Prospective multicenter larger studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study and to compare PBA bypass and IM endovascular treatment in patients with anatomical no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Retrospective Validation of Global Limb Anatomic Staging System with Respect to Technical Failures in Endovascular Infrainguinal Revascularization for Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia

Introduction: The Global Vascular Guidelines proposed the Global limb anatomic staging system (GLASS) to overcome the shortcomings of previous multiple classification system. It grades the infrainguinal disease into three stages with a specific algorithm to score the femoropopliteal and tibial segments. We aim to retrospectively validate the GLASS staging in primary endovascular therapy with respect to immediate technical failures (ITFs). Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from November 2017 to September 2021 were collected from the existing clinical database. All patients who underwent primary infrainguinal endovascular intervention for critical limb-threatening ischemia were included in the study. The patient who had isolated infrapopliteal disease without a named tibial outflow and only inframalleolar disease were excluded. The GLASS scoring was applied to the angiographic details in the database. The ITFs from the database were compared to the predicted technical failure according to GLASS staging. Statistical analysis was done. Results: Hundred thirty-two patients were studied from clinical database. We had 13 (9.8%) ITFs. None of those in GLASS Stage I had failure. Among 26 patients in Stage II, 1 (4%) had failure, against the predicted failure rate of lesser than 20%. Among 89 patients in GLASS Stage III, only 12 (13.5%) had failures against the predicted failure rate of more than 20%. The majority of failures had occurred in higher GLASS staging. Conclusion: Higher failures in higher GLASS staging have been validated by our study. However, it is limited considering the small cohort and retrospective analysis.

Retrospective Validation of Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) with Respect to Technical Failures in Endovascular Infrainguinal Revascularisation

Introduction: The recent global vascular guidelines aim to improve outcomes in patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) with recommendations to decide on patient management based on the PLAN principle. The Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) is used to grade the severity of infra-inguinal disease. It has been postulated to predict the probability of technical failure of endovascular therapy. However, it has not been thoroughly validated.

Pedal arterial calcification score is associated with the risk of major amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

The medial arterial calcification (MAC) score is a simple metric that describes the burden of inframalleolar calcification using a plain foot radiograph. We hypothesized that a higher MAC score would be independently associated with the risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We performed a single-institution, retrospective study of 250 patients who had undergone infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI from January 2011 to July 2019 and had foot radiographs available for MAC score calculation. A single blinded reviewer assigned MAC scores of 0 to 5 using two-view minimum plain foot radiographs, with 1 point each for calcification of>2cm in the dorsalis pedis, plantar, and metatarsal arteries and >1cm in the hallux and non-hallux digital arteries. The MAC score was 0 in 36%, 1 in 5.2%, 2 in 8.4%, 3 in 14%, 4 in 14%, and 5 in 21%. The MAC score was trichotomized to facilitate analysis and clinical utility (mild, MAC score 0-1; moderate, MAC score 2-4; and severe, MAC score 5). The variables independently associated with a higher MAC score were male sex, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and the global limb anatomic staging system pedal score. The MAC score was not associated with the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) grade or overall WIfI stage (P= .58). The median follow-up was 759days (interquartile range, 264-1541days). A higher MAC score was significantly associated with the risk of major amputation (P< .0001). In a Cox proportional hazards multiple regression model for major amputation that included the trichotomized MAC score, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and WIfI stage (1-3 vs 4). The MAC score (MAC score 5: hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-13.1; P= .001; MAC score 2-4: HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.8; P= .01) and WIfI stage (WIfI stage 4: HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P= .03) were significantly associated with the risk of major amputation. In the subsets of patients with the most advanced WIfI stage of 3 to 4 (191 of 250; 76%) and patients with diabetes (185 of 250; 74%), the MAC score further stratified the risk of major amputation on univariate and multivariate analyses. The MAC score is a simple, practical tool and a strong independent predictor of major amputation in patients with CLTI. It provides novel clinical data that are currently unmeasured using any validated CLTI staging system. The MAC score is a promising standardized measure of inframalleolar disease burden that can be used in conjunction with the WIfI staging system to help improve outcomes stratification and determine the optimal treatment strategies for patients with CLTI.

Factors Associated with the Loss of Limb Based Patency After Distal Bypass Using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System

Factors Associated with the Loss of Limb Based Patency After Distal Bypass Using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System

Validation of the GLASS Staging Systems in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing De Novo Infrainguinal Revascularization

The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) was proposed for evaluating the anatomic complexity of arterial disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We aimed to examine the relationship between GLASS stage and treatment outcomes after infrainguinal revascularization in patients with CLTI. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2010 and 2018 to examine whether GLASS stage affects the limb salvage, wound healing, and overall survival (OS). Throughout the study period, 153 CLTI patients and 190 limbs with Fontaine classification III and IV were analyzed for major amputation and OS, and 125 patients and 157 limbs of Fontaine classification IV were analyzed for wound healing. The number of patients with WIfI stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 14 (7.4%), 44 (23.2%), 65 (34.2%), and 67 (53.3%), respectively. The number of patients with GLASS stage I, II, and III was 23 (12.1%), 48 (25.3%), and 119 (62.6%), respectively. Among the 190 limbs, the number subject to bypass surgery, endovascular therapy, and hybrid therapy was 132 (69.5%), 39 (20.5%), and 19 (10.0%), respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that only WIfI stage and inframalleolar (IM) disease were risk factors for major amputation and impaired wound healing. There was no relationship between GLASS stage and limb salvage or wound healing. A multivariate analysis revealed that age, geriatric nutritional risk index and GLASS stage were risk factors for 2-year OS (P < 0.01). Patients with all risk factors had a poor prognosis (35.3% at 2 years). WIfI stage and IM disease predicted limb salvage and wound healing after infrainguinal revascularization in patients with CLTI. Although GLASS stage did not affect limb salvage or wound healing, it was a prognostic factor for poor OS. The GLASS staging could be useful for deciding between bypass surgery and endovascular therapy in prediction of prognosis.