Comparison of clinical outcomes, including the wound healing rate, between inframalleolar bypass to the pedal artery and that to the pedal branch artery in the modern endovascular era

Abstract

ObjectiveInframalleolar (IM) bypass has been reported to demonstrate acceptable patency and limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. However, wound healing after IM bypass and comparisons between pedal artery (PA) bypass and pedal branch artery (PBA) bypass are lacking. MethodsWe reviewed prospectively collected data from 208 consecutive patients after IM bypass performed over a period of 6 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on the distal anastomotic artery: the PA group (dorsal pedis artery or common plantar artery) and the PBA group (medial tarsal, lateral tarsal, medial plantar, and lateral plantar artery). The primary outcome was wound healing, and secondary outcomes included loss of patency and limb and life prognosis. ResultsOf the 208 patients, 174 (74%) had PA bypass, whereas 34 (16%) had PBA bypass. Patients in the PBA group were significantly younger than those in the PA group (69 ± 7 vs 73 ± 9; P = .03). Although early (30-day) graft failure was more common in the PBA group, late clinical outcomes, including the wound healing rate (79% in the PA group and 84% in the PBA group; P = .74), were similar between the two groups. The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System IM grade (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.93; P = .006); wound, ischemia, and foot infection wound grade (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; P < .01); and wound, ischemia, and foot infection foot infection grade (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .02) were independent predictors of wound healing. ConclusionsThe current study revealed that wound healing in patients after PBA bypass was acceptable and comparable with that after PA bypass. In the modern era, including a high prevalence of infrapopliteal angioplasty, our results could provide useful information to clinicians in actual clinical settings. Moreover, PBA bypass may be an alternative revascularization procedure to avoid major amputation when the PA is occluded, such as in the global vascular guideline IM P2 grade. Prospective multicenter larger studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study and to compare PBA bypass and IM endovascular treatment in patients with anatomical no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia.