Glenoid Retroversion Research Articles

Glenoid retroversion does not impact clinical outcomes or implant survivorship after total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming.

HypothesisBoth clinical outcomes and early rates of failure will not be associated with glenoid retroversion.MethodsAll patients who underwent an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming between 2006 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Measurements for retroversion, inclination, and posterior subluxation were obtained from magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. A regression analysis was performed to assess the association between retroversion, inclination and subluxation, and their effect on patient reported outcomes (PROs). Clinical failures and complications were reported.ResultsOne hundred fifty-one anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (90% follow-up) with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-12 years) were assessed. The mean preoperative retroversion was 15.6° (range, 0.2-42.1), the mean posterior subluxation was 15.1% (range, −3.6 to 44.1%), and the mean glenoid inclination was 13.9° (range, −11.3 to 44.3). All median outcome scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operatively (P < .001). The median satisfaction was 10/10 (1st quartile = 7 and 3rd quartile = 10). Linear regression analysis found no significant association between retroversion and any postoperative PRO. A total of 5 (3.3%) failures occurred due to glenoid implant loosening (3 patients) and Cutibacterium acnes infection (2 patients) with no association between failure causation and increased retroversion or inclination. No correlation could be found between the Walch classification and postoperative PROs.ConclusionAnatomic total shoulder replacement with minimal and noncorrective glenoid reaming demonstrates reliable increases in patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes at a mean of 4.6-year follow-up in patients with up to 40° of native retroversion. Higher values of retroversion were not associated with early deterioration of clinical outcomes, revisions, or failures. Long-term studies are needed to see if survivorship and outcomes hold up over time.

Posterior Glenoid Osteotomy With Capsulolabral Repair Improves Resistance Forces in a Critical Glenoid Bone Loss Model.

Background:There is no widespread consensus on the surgical treatment of posterior shoulder instability with critical posterior glenoid bone loss.Hypothesis:That opening posterior glenoid wedge osteotomy with soft tissue repair would improve the resistance forces of instability when compared with soft tissue repair alone in the setting of 20% critical bone lose.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Native glenoid retroversion was measured on 9 shoulders using computed tomography (CT) scans. The humerus was potted in 90° of forward flexion and 30° of internal rotation relative to the scapula, and a posterior dislocation was performed to create a posterior capsulolabral injury model. The specimens were each taken through a fixed sequence of testing: (1) posteroinferior capsulolabral tear, (2) no glenoid bone loss with posteroinferior capsulolabral repair, (3) 20% posterior glenoid bone loss with posteroinferior capsulolabral repair, and (4) 20% glenoid bone loss with posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy and posteroinferior capsulolabral repair. Bone loss was created using a sagittal saw. The resultant peak forces with 1 cm of posterior translation were measured. A 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare mean force values.Results:After the initial dislocation event, all shoulders had a resultant posterior capsulolabral injury. The resulting labral injury was extended from 6- to 9-o’clock in all specimens to homogenize the extent of injury. Repairing the capsulolabral complex in the 20% posterior glenoid bone loss group did not result in a statistically significant increase in resistance force compared with the labral deficient group (34.1 vs 22.2 N; P = .068). When 20% posterior bone loss was created, the posterior glenoid osteotomy with capsulolabral repair was significantly stronger (43.8 N) than the posterior repair alone both with (34.1 N) and without (31.8 N) bone loss (P = .008 and .045, respectively).Conclusion:In the setting of critical posterior glenoid bone loss, an opening wedge posterior glenoid osteotomy with capsulolabral repair improved resistance to posterior humeral translation significantly compared with capsulolabral repair alone.Clinical Relevance:The results of this biomechanical cadaveric study may aid in surgical planning for this complex patient population.

Walch B2 glenoids: 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional comparison of humeral head subluxation and glenoid retroversion.

BackgroundThe posterior subluxation and glenoid version in Walch B2 glenoids are routinely assessed by 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT). Different methods of calculation are used to analyze these parameters. Alternatively, the rising use of 3-dimensional (3D) planification tools in arthroplasty requires the clarification if the 3D measurements are equivalent to 2D. The aim of this study was to compare B2 glenoids characteristics between 2D CT assessment method and 3D automated software method.MethodsCT scans from patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty were identified. In the 2D method, measurement of glenoid version was determined. Measurement of the humeral head subluxation (HHS) (scapula axis method) was determined by the percentage of the humeral head posterior to the Friedman line (scapula axis). Three-dimensional analysis allowed an automated segmentation of the humerus and scapula, definition of scapular planes, and determination of glenoid version and HHS.ResultsFifty-one CT scans met inclusion criteria. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the 2D retroversion (RV) and 2D HHS intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient>0.9).The median RV was 16° [12-20] in 2D and 19° [16-23] in 3D (P < .0001). The median subluxation was 71% [66-75] in 2D and 81% [78-86] in 3D (P < .0001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated low positive correlation between RV and subluxation in 2D and 3D (R2 = 0.31 and R2 = 0.23, respectively).Discussion/ConclusionThe assessment of version and HHS in Walch B2 glenoids between 2D CT and a 3D planification were significantly different. Low correlation between RV and HHS was observed (2D and 3D assessment).

Commercial 3-dimensional imaging programs are not created equal: version and inclination measurement positions vary among preoperative planning software.

BackgroundVariability exists between total shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software (PPS) systems for glenoid angular measurements. The purpose of this study is to locate the region on the glenoid at which inclination and version are measured on the PPS modalities of Blueprint and VIP.MethodsPreoperative computed tomography scans of 30 consecutive patients undergoing primary arthroplasty were analyzed using two PPS systems (VIP and Blueprint) to independently obtain glenoid version and inclination measurements through their respective protocols. Three-dimensional equivalent images were independently analyzed utilizing open-source OsiriX DICOM software by two board-certified orthopedic sports medicine surgeons measuring glenoid version and inclination along ten equal intervals of the glenoid from superior to inferior and anterior to posterior. Manual version and inclination measurements were compared to both the VIP and the Blueprint measurements, and variances were analyzed by calculating root mean square error (RMSE). The closest interval (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) to the VIP and Blueprint measurement was identified for both version and inclination to determine the region of the glenoid both software programs obtained their measurements.ResultsMean glenoid retroversion manually measured using OsiriX was 13.5° compared with 15.1° recorded by Blueprint (P = .516) and 12.2° by VIP (P = .621). Mean inclination using OsiriX was 5.5°, compared with 7.1° (P = .314) and 9.0° (P = .024) recorded by Blueprint and VIP, respectively. RMSE for version between Osirix and VIP was 4.65°, for Osirix and Blueprint was 4.44°, and for VIP and Blueprint was 4.45°. RMSE for inclination between Osirix and VIP was 6.43°, for Osirix and Blueprint was 5.25°, and for VIP and Blueprint was 5.13°. For version, VIP measurements most frequently aligned with the inferior quadrant of the glenoid (n = 13) with a median interval of 7, while Blueprint aligned with the superior quadrant of the glenoid (n = 13) with a median interval of 4. Inclination measurements aligned with the posterior quadrant of the glenoid for both VIP (n = 19) and Blueprint (n = 15) with a median interval of 8.ConclusionPPS systems for shoulder arthroplasty vary in the region of the glenoid for which version and inclination are measured, which may affect the absolute values generated. Location of version measurement was different among the two commercial software programs, with VIP corresponding closest to the most inferior region of the glenoid, while Blueprint to the most superior one. Further research should assist in determining the version and inclination variations among commercial planning software.

Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy: relation to glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Muscle atrophy (MA) and fatty infiltration (FI) are degenerative processes of the rotator cuff musculature that have incompletely understood relationships with the development of eccentric glenoid wear in the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). All patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff who underwent both magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans of the affected shoulder prior to total shoulder arthroplasty between 2015 and 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Rotator cuff MA was measured quantitatively on sequential sagittal magnetic resonance images, whereas FI was assessed on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging slices using the Goutallier classification. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reconstructed using automated 3-dimensional software to determine glenoid retroversion, glenoid inclination, and humeral head subluxation. Glenoid deformity was classified according to the Walch classification. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to characterize associations between age, sex, muscle area, FI, and glenoid morphology. Among the 127 included patients, significant associations were found between male sex and larger overall rotator cuff musculature (P < .01), increased ratio of the posterior rotator cuff (PRC) to the subscapularis area (P = .01), and glenoid retroversion (19° vs. 14°, P< .01). Larger supraspinatus and PRC muscle size was correlated with increased retroversion (r = 0.23 [P = .006] for supraspinatus and r= 0.25 [P=.004] for PRC) and humeral head subluxation (r = 0.25 [P = .004] for supraspinatus and r = 0.28 [P = .001] for PRC). The ratio of PRC muscle size to anterior rotator cuff muscle size was not associated with evidence of eccentric glenoid wear (P > .05). After we controlled for confounding factors, increasing glenoid retroversion was associated with high-grade infraspinatus FI (β, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-10.7; P < .01) whereas larger PRC musculature was predictive of a Walch type B (vs. type A) glenoid (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.5; P = .04). Patients with eccentric glenoid wear in the setting of primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff appear to have both larger PRC musculature and higher rates of infraspinatus FI. Although the temporal and causal relationships of these associations remain ambiguous, MA and FI should be considered 2 discrete processes in the natural history of GHOA.

Association of the Posterior Acromion Extension with Glenoid Retroversion: A CT Study in Normal and Osteoarthritic Shoulders.

Posterior eccentric glenoid wear is associated with higher complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty. The recently reported association between the acromion shape and glenoid retroversion in both normal and osteoarthritic shoulders remains controversial. The three-dimensional coordinates of the angulus acromialis (AA) and acromioclavicular joint were examined in the scapular coordinate system. Four acromion angles were defined from these two acromion landmarks: the acromion posterior angle (APA), acromion tilt angle (ATA), acromion length angle (ALA), and acromion axial tilt angle (AXA). Shoulder computed tomography scans of 112 normal scapulae and 125 patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were analyzed with simple and stepwise multiple linear regressions between all morphological acromion parameters and glenoid retroversion. In normal scapulae, the glenoid retroversion angle was most strongly correlated with the posterior extension of the AA (R2 = 0.48, p < 0.0001), which can be conveniently characterized by the APA. Combining the APA with the ALA and ATA helped slightly improve the correlation (R2 = 0.55, p < 0.0001), but adding the AXA did not. In osteoarthritic scapulae, a critical APA > 15 degrees was found to best identify glenoids with a critical retroversion angle > 8 degrees. The APA is more strongly associated with the glenoid retroversion angle in normal than primary osteoarthritic scapulae.

Long-term results after posterior open glenoid wedge osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability associated with excessive glenoid retroversion.

Treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) associated with excessive glenoid retroversion is a rare, challenging problem in shoulder surgery. One proposed technique is posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy to correct excessive glenoid retroversion as described by Scott. However, this operation is rarely performed, and limited long-term outcomes using this approach are available. The goal of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion. Six consecutive patients (7 shoulders) with a mean age of 24 years (range 19-34) were treated with posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with a glenoid retroversion greater than 15° and followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean age of 15 years (range 10-19). Recurrent, symptomatic PSI was observed in 6 of 7 shoulders (86%). One necessitated revision with a posterior (iliac crest) bone block procedure and was rated as a failure and excluded from functional analysis. One patient rated his result as excellent, 3 as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as unsatisfactory. Mean relative Constant Score (CS%) was unchanged from preoperation to final follow-up (CS% = 72%) and pain did not significantly decrease (Constant Score = 7-10 points; P = .969). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) improved postoperatively, but with 6 patients the improvement did not reach statistical significance (SSV = 42%-67%, P = .053) and the total Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index averaged 30% at the final follow-up. Mean glenoid retroversion of all 7 shoulders was corrected from 20° (range 16°-26°) to 3° (range -3° to +8°) (P = .018). In the 5 shoulders with preoperative static posterior subluxation of the humeral head, the humeral head was not recentered. All 7 shoulders showed progression of glenoid arthritic changes. Posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion neither reliably restored shoulder stability nor recentered the joint or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. Alternative treatments for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion have to be developed and evaluated.

Evaluation of Scapula and Humerus Bone Change after Repair of Small- to Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison between Healing and Retear Groups Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Rotator cuff tendon retears after rotator cuff repair cause glenohumeral joint instability, which results in changes in the glenoid and humerus head. However, limited data are available on the bone change after repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of glenoid and humerus bone changes between healing and retear groups after repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. Among patients who had arthroscopic repair due to small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears from January 2009 to January 2017, 49 patients who underwent both preoperative and postoperative (at least 3 years after surgery) shoulder computed tomography were enrolled. Using three-dimensional reconstruction program (3D Slicer) and shape analysis program (SlicerSALT), we compared the occurrence and degree of glenoid bone change, glenoid inclination change, retroversion change, and glenoid center, as well as the degree of humerus head change, between the healing and retear groups. The occurrence of glenoid bone change was significantly more common in the retear group than in the healing group (p = 0.026). The degree of bone change in the 11-1 o'clock axial plane and 10-8 o'clock, 11-7 o'clock, and 12-6 o'clock coronal plane and the degree of glenoid inclination change were significantly larger in the retear group than the healing group (p = 0.026, p = 0.026, p = 0.026, p = 0.026, and p = 0.014, respectively), but the average value of glenoid bone change in the retear group was within the range of 0.14 to 1.01 mm for each plane. The mean humeral head change was 5.69 ± 3.67 mm increase in the retear group and 1.27 ± 2.02 mm increase in the healing group. Compared with the healing group, the retear group showed statistically significantly increased humeral head change (p < 0.001). There was difference in glenoid and humerus bone change between the healing and retear groups at midterm follow-up after repair of small- to medium-sized tears. However, considering the measurement bias, the difference between the two groups was within the measurement error range.

Preoperative differences in glenoid deformity, patient-determined outcomes, and range of motion as per disease type in shoulders undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundDiseases commonly treated with shoulder arthroplasty include the following: osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA), and irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). Currently, there are few data available that identify if preoperative differences exist between these disorders in (1) computed tomography findings, (2) patient-determined outcome scores, and (3) range of motion. Understanding these disease-specific differences may allow for the development of disease-specific strategies in total shoulder arthroplasty to attempt to improve patient outcomes and implant longevity. MethodsA database of shoulders undergoing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was reviewed. The cohort was divided into three groups as per the disease treated with total shoulder arthroplasty: osteoarthritis, RCTA, and IRCT. The outcomes included preoperative range of motion, 3-dimensional computed tomography determination of glenoid morphology, and patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Differences between the groups were examined with analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test. The level of significance was P = .05. ResultsTwo hundred seventy-nine shoulders met inclusion and exclusion criteria. One hundred fifty-four shoulders had osteoarthritis, 94 shoulders had RCTA, and 21 shoulders had an IRCT. Patients with osteoarthritis had significantly greater mean glenoid retroversion (12.9°) than patients with an IRCT (7°; P = .03) and RCTA (8.6°; P = .004). Patients with osteoarthritis had significantly less mean superior glenoid inclination (5.9°) than patients with an IRCT (10.2°; P = .03) and RCTA (9.5°; P = .001). Patients with osteoarthritis had greater mean posterior humeral subluxation (68.9%) than patients with an IRCT (58.3%; P = .002) and RCTA (60.2%; P = .001).There was no difference in preoperative Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scale (P = .86), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .81), Simple Shoulder Test (P = .13), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (P = .57). Patients with osteoarthritis had greater mean flexion (101°) than the IRCT (86°; P = .17) and RCTA groups (84°; P = .001). Patients with osteoarthritis had greater mean external rotation in the abducted position (54°) than the RCTA group (38°; P = .001) but similar to the IRCT group (48°; P = .68). The osteoarthritis group had inferior mean internal rotation in the abducted position (0.2°) compared with the RCTA (20.6°; P = .001). There were no differences in extension (P = .08), external rotation (P = .58), and abduction (P = .15). ConclusionShoulders with osteoarthritis have greater glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral subluxation, whereas shoulders with RCTA or IRCT have greater superior glenoid inclination. Patient-determined outcome scores do not differ between these diseases. Shoulders with osteoarthritis have greater baseline (1) flexion and (2) abducted external rotation but inferior abducted internal rotation.

Indications and outcomes of glenoid osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability: a systematic review.

There is limited evidence examining glenoid osteotomy as a treatment for posterior shoulder instability. A search of Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from the date of origin to 28th November 2019. Nine out of 3,408 retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria and quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool. In 356 shoulders, the main indication for osteotomy was excessive glenoid retroversion (greater than or equal to approximately -10°). The mean preoperative glenoid version was -15° (range, -35° to -5°). Post-operatively, the mean glenoid version was -6° (range, -28° to 13°) and an average correction of 10° (range, -1° to 30°) was observed. Range of motion increased significantly in most studies and all standardized outcome scores (Rowe, Constant-Murley, Oxford instability, Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Scoring and mean shoulder value) improved significantly with high rates of patient satisfaction (85%). A high complication rate (34%, n = 120) was reported post-surgery, with frequent cases of persistent instability (20%, n = 68) and fractures (e.g., glenoid neck and acromion) (4%, n = 12). However, the revision rate was low (0.6%, n = 2). Glenoid osteotomy is an appropriate treatment for posterior shoulder instability secondary to excessive glenoid retroversion. However, the high rate of persistent instability should be considered when making treatment decisions.Level of Evidence: Systematic review; Level 4.

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Although reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown satisfactory outcomes in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders, its performance in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff has not been fully elucidated. Shoulder osteoarthritis can present with alterations in glenoid morphology, which have contributed to inconsistent outcomes in anatomic shoulder replacement. The glenoid component is responsible for a predominance of these arthroplasty complications. Given these glenoid-related difficulties, RSA may provide a more favorable option. We aimed to summarize the current literature on rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis treated with primary RSA and to determine whether morphologic changes in the glenoid led to inferior outcomes. A literature search was performed using an inclusion criterion of primary RSA for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was calculated to analyze reporting quality. Following appropriate exclusions, of the 1002 studies identified by the databases, 13 were selected. Postoperative improvement in weighted means for Constant scores reached statistical significance (P = .02). The mean rate of major complications was 3.8%. A subset of 8 studies was created that detailed the following descriptions of altered glenoid morphology: "static posterior instability," "severe posterior subluxation," "posterior glenoid wear >20°," "significant posterior glenoid bone loss," "biconcave glenoid," "B2 glenoid," and "B/C glenoid." Within this subset, the mean complication rate was 4.7%, with 4 of the 7 studies having a rate ≤ 3%, and improvements in the Constant score (P = .002) and external rotation (P = .02) reached statistical significance. RSA as treatment for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff provides optimal outcomes with low complication rates across a short term of follow up. Preoperative considerations for using reverse arthroplasty in the treatment of osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff include glenoid retroversion, posterior humeral subluxation, and glenoid bone loss. The attributes of reverse arthroplasty that contribute to favorable outcomes in arthritic shoulders include its semiconstrained design and robust glenoid fixation. Soft-tissue imbalances as a consequence of pathologic glenoid morphology and chronic humeral subluxation can be mitigated with the RSA semiconstrained design. Glenoid bone loss can be effectively managed with RSA's robust glenoid fixation, with and without the use of bone graft. The capability to lateralize the joint center of rotation may be valuable when faced with a medialized glenoid wear pattern. The current findings suggest that reverse arthroplasty can achieve highly favorable outcomes for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.

A lower critical coracoid process angle is associated with type-B osteoarthritis: a radiological study of normal and diseased shoulders.

BackgroundDegenerative rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis (OA) are associated with differences in coronal plane scapular morphology, with particular focus on the effect of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) on shoulder biomechanics. The effect, if any, of axial plane scapular morphology is less well established. We have noticed wide disparity of axial coracoid tip position in relation to the face of the glenoid and sought to investigate the significance of this through measurement of the critical coracoid process angle (CCPA), which incorporates coracoid tip position and glenoid version.MethodsCCPA, CSA, and glenoid retroversion were measured by three independent reviewers from the cross-sectional two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging of 160 patients in four equal and matched case-control groups: (1) a control group of patients with a radiologically normal shoulder and no history of shoulder symptoms who had a CT thorax for another reason, (2) patients with primary OA with Walch type-A glenoid wear pattern on CT scan, (3) patients with type-B glenoid primary OA, and (4) patients with magnetic resonance imaging–proven atraumatic tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff.ResultsInterobserver agreement was excellent for all measured parameters. The median CCPA was significantly lower in the type-B OA group (9.3˚) than that in controls (18.7˚), but not significantly different in the other study groups. There was a trend toward greater glenoid retroversion in the type-B OA group, but receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated the CCPA to be by far the most powerful discriminator for type-B OA. The optimal cutoff value was calculated for the CCPA at 14.3˚ with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% for type-B OA. Compared with controls, the CSA was significantly higher in the rotator cuff tear group and lower in both OA groups, but did not differentiate between type-A and type-B OA.ConclusionCombined with a lower CSA, a lower CCPA (<14.3˚) is strongly predictive of type-B glenoid OA. The authors propose a simple model of pectoralis major biomechanics to explain the effect of this axial plane anatomical variation, which requires further investigation.

Biconcave glenoids show 3 differently oriented posterior erosion patterns.

Posterior glenoid wear remains a challenge in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) because of an asymmetric erosion with altered retroversion. The purpose of this study was to assess glenoid morphology and evaluate the influence of acromial orientation in posterior glenoid erosion patterns by using 3-dimensional (3D) models. Computed tomographic (CT) shoulder scans from 3 study centers of patients awaiting rTSA between 2017 and 2018 were converted into 3D models and analyzed by 2 observers. Morphology, orientation and greatest depth of erosion, inclination, current retroversion and premorbid retroversion, surface areas of the glenoid, and external acromial orientation and posterior acromial slope were assessed. Measurements were compared between wear patterns, glenoid erosion entities, and genders. In the complete cohort of 68 patients (63.8 ± 10.0 years; 19 female, 49 male), a mean of 85.9° (±22.2°) was observed for the glenoid erosion orientation. Additionally, a further distinct classification of the glenoid erosion as posterior-central (PC, n = 39), posterior-inferior (PI, n = 12), and posterior-superior (PS, n = 17) wear patterns was possible. These wear patterns significantly (P < .001) distinguished by erosion orientation (PC = 86.9° ± 12.0°, PI = 116.3° ± 10.3°, PS = 62.3° ± 18.9°). The greatest depth of erosion found was 7.3 ± 2.7 mm in PC wear patterns (PC vs. PI: P = .03; PC vs. PS: n.s.; PI vs. PS: n.s.). Overall, the observed erosion divided the glenoid surface into a paleoglenoid proportion of 48% (±11%) and a neoglenoid proportion of 52% (±12%). For the complete cohort, glenoid inclination was 85.4° (±6.6°), premorbid glenoid retroversion was 80.7° (±8.1°), and current glenoid retroversion was 73.4° (±7.4°), with an estimated increase of 6.9° (±6.0°). The mean external acromial orientation was 118.2° (±8.9°), and the mean posterior acromial slope was 107.2° (±9.6°). There were no further significant differences if parameters were compared by wear patterns, entities, and gender. Three significantly differently oriented wear patterns (posterior-superior, posterior-central, and posterior-inferior) were distinguished in shoulders demonstrating posterior wear on axillary imaging. No significant differences between the observed erosion patterns or any relevant correlations were found regarding the orientation of the acromion.

Encouraging outcomes of stemless ceramic head anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in severe primary osteoarthritis (Walch type B glenoids).

Background: We report the radiological and functional outcomes at five years in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint and a Walch type B glenoid who have undergone stemless anatomic total shoulder replacement. Methods: A retrospective analysis of case notes, computed tomography scans and plain radiographs of patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder replacement for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were performed. Patients were grouped by the severity of their osteoarthritis using the modified Walch classification, glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation. An evaluation was made using modern planning software. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons score, shoulder pain and disability index and visual analogue scale. Annual Lazarus scores were reviewed as regard to glenoid loosening. Results: Thirty patients were reviewed at 5 years. Analysis of all patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement at 5-year review, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (p = <0.0001), shoulder pain and disability index (p = 0.0001), visual analogue scale (p = 0.0001). Radiological associations between Walch scores and Lazarus scores were not statistically significant (p = 0.1251) at 5 years. There were no associations between features of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcome measures. Discussion: The severity of osteoarthritis did not show any association with glenoid component survivorship or with patient-reported outcome measures at 5 years review. Level of evidence: IV.

The Influence of Glenoid Retroversion on Posterior Shoulder Instability: A Cadaveric Study (214)

Objectives:Increased glenoid retroversion has been associated with an increased risk of posterior glenohumeral instability. Normal mean glenoid version is between 0-7° of retroversion depending on the population and measurement method. Retroversion can range above 20°, notably in patients with glenoid dysplasia. Increased glenoid retroversion has also been proposed as a risk factor for failure after primary soft tissue repair. Arthroscopic repair is the most common surgical treatment; however, this does not address cases of increased glenoid retroversion. What has not been identified is the degree of glenoid retroversion associated with recurrent instability or failed repair. The goal of our work is to (1) measure how resistance to posterior translation changes as retroversion increases, (2) examine if labral tear results in a greater decrease to resistance at increasing degrees of retroversion, and (3) to determine the degree of retroversion at which labral repair fails to restore the resistance of the intact, neutral version state.Methods:Eight fresh frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens (age 50-64, 4 male) were prepared, maintaining bone and capsulolabral tissue. The scapula and humerus were potted using quick-set polyurethane. CT scans were obtained to establish a scapular 3D coordinate system relative to the potting. Specimens were mounted on a 6 degree of freedom musculoskeletal simulation robotic arm (KUKA KR 6 R700, Augsburg, Germany) and referenced to the coordinate system. The humeral head was centered on the glenoid using a 50N compressive force, and the humerus was translated posterior-inferiorly (30° inferior to the midline) at 1mm/sec in neutral rotation for 10mm. The shoulder was positioned in 30° of abduction and 30° of flexion, based on prior protocol. Custom simVITRO (Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, US) labview-based control software measured peak resistance at 0° of version and then in 5° increments of retroversion until the specimen dislocated, up to 30° of retroversion. Version was adjusted through use of a multiplanar vice. A posterior labral tear was created from the 2 to 6 o’clock position on a left shoulder, and the same testing parameters were performed. Vertical mattress sutures using 4 independent bone tunnels were used to repair the labrum and the same version iterations were tested.Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the peak resistance to translation for each degree of version in the intact, cut and repaired states. The maximum likelihood estimators of the model were adjusted for any model misspecification using classical sandwich estimation. Post hoc pairwise comparisons between conditions were conducted via orthogonal contrasts. The Holm-test was used to calculate adjusted p-values and confidence intervals. Statistical significance was established at the P<0.05 level and all interval estimates were calculated for 95% confidence.Results:The mean peak resistance for the intact labral state decreased significantly for each interval increase in retroversion when the humerus was translated posterior-inferiorly (Figure 1). On average, a 1° increase in retroversion correlated with a 3.5% decrease in resistance to translation. Dislocation with an intact labrum without any posterior force occurred at a mean of 22.7° (range 15-30°) of retroversion. After labral tear, resistance forces to posterior-inferior translation decreased but not significantly from the intact state. However, the percent change of resistance force decreased 41% at 25° of retroversion; this was notably higher than the percent change at 0-15° of retroversion (range 2.7-6.5% decrease) but was not statistically significant (Figure 2). Compared to the intact state at 0° version, there was a 45% and 81% decrease in resistance after labral repair at 20° and 25° of retroversion, respectively (p=0.04 and p=0.004).Conclusions:Glenoid retroversion has a significant effect on resistance to posterior humeral head translation, with each degree increase accounting for 3.5% of resistance to translation. Cutting the labrum at 0-15° of retroversion does not have a significant effect on resistance to posterior inferior humeral translation; however, at 25° of retroversion cutting the labrum results in a 41% decrease in resistance. Similarly, labral repair at 20-25° of retroversion does not recreate peak resistance values of the intact state at 0-5° of retroversion. These findings point to the bony anatomy (retroversion) playing a larger role in preventing posterior instability than the labrum. It also provides evidence that the labrum plays a more significant role in stability at higher degrees of retroversion, and labral repair in patients with >20° of retroversion may be subjected to a relatively greater percentage of force than those at lesser degrees of retroversion.

Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion.

Background:Rotator cuff tears may result from repeated mechanical deformation of the cuff tendons, and internal impingement of the supraspinatus tendon against the glenoid is one such proposed mechanism of deformation.Purpose:To (1) describe the changing proximity of the supraspinatus tendon to the glenoid during a simulated overhead reaching task and (2) determine the relationship between scapular morphology and this proximity. Additionally, the patterns of supraspinatus-to-glenoid proximity were compared with previously described patterns of supraspinatus-to-coracoacromial arch proximity.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Shoulder models were created from magnetic resonance images of 20 participants. Standardized kinematics were imposed on the models to simulate functional reaching, and the minimum distances between the supraspinatus tendon and the glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint and the glenoid were calculated every 5° between 0° and 150° of humerothoracic elevation. The angle at which contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid occurred was documented. Additionally, the relationship between glenoid morphology (version and inclination) and the contact angle was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the minimum distances, and glenoid morphology was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and simple linear regressions.Results:The minimum distances between the tendon and the glenoid and between the footprint and the glenoid decreased as elevation increased. Contact between the tendon and the glenoid occurred in all participant models at a mean elevation of 123° ± 10°. Contact between the footprint and the glenoid occurred in 13 of 20 models at a mean of 139° ± 10°. Less glenoid retroversion was associated with lower tendon-to-glenoid contact angles (r = –0.76; R 2 = 0.58; P < .01).Conclusion:This study found that the supraspinatus tendon progressively approximated the glenoid during simulated overhead reaching. Additionally, all participant models eventually made contact with the glenoid by 150° of humerothoracic elevation, although anatomic factors influenced the precise angle at which contact occurred.Clinical Relevance:Contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid may occur frequently within the range of elevation required for overhead activities. Therefore, internal impingement may be a prevalent mechanism for rotator cuff deformation that could contribute to cuff pathology.

Comparison of two-dimensional manual and three-dimensional SurgiCase and BLUEPRINT planning software measurements of glenoid version, inclination, and humeral subluxation

IntroductionVirtual planning for shoulder arthroplasty using preoperative computed tomography (CT) has been gaining popularity, and it is imperative for surgeons to recognize any differences in measurements that may exist amongst software platforms. The purpose of this study is to compare measurements of glenoid version, inclination, and humeral head subluxation between a manual approach and two varying automated software platforms using either a best-fit sphere technique (Wright-Medical BLUEPRINT) or an anatomic landmarks technique (Materalise SurgiCase). MethodsA case control study of 289 CT images from patients preoperatively planned for a total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty using SurgiCase (v3.0.110.5) were also successfully analyzed by BLUEPRINT (v2.1.6). Glenoid version, inclination, and subluxation were measured manually in a blind fashion by two separate investigators using axial and coronal images oriented to the scapular plane; interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), mean differences, and clinically relevant agreement in measurements between the software platforms and with the manual technique were compared. The impact of greater glenoid retroversion on the differences in measurements between the software platforms was further studied by correlation analysis. ResultsThe mean differences between SurgiCase and BLUEPRINT were + 0.5° for glenoid inclination (P = .064; CCC = 0.84), -0.9° for glenoid version (P < .001; CCC = 0.92), and -1.4% for humeral subluxation (P = .002; CCC = 0.88). Agreement within 5 units was 78.9% for inclination, 89.3% for version, and 64.1% for subluxation. Glenoid retroversion had no relation with the degree of variation in measured inclination (P = .59) or version (P = .56). There were significant differences between manual and 3D software measurements for glenoid inclination, version, and subluxation (P < .001). Both software measurements were more inferiorly inclined (average difference, SurgiCase -3.2° and BLUEPRINT -3.9°), more retroverted (average difference, SurgiCase -4.0° and BLUEPRINT -3.2°), and more posteriorly subluxated (average difference, SurgiCase + 3.4% and BLUEPRINT + 4.8%). ConclusionThe SurgiCase and BLUEPRINT preoperative planning software yield clinically similar measurements for glenoid version, inclination, and subluxation. The degree of glenoid retroversion does not impact the variability of inclination or version between the landmark and best-fit sphere software techniques. Compared to the 2D manual technique, both 3D software programs reported greater inferior inclination, retroversion, and posterior subluxation. Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Diagnostic Study

Early outcomes of augmented glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BackgroundThe objective was to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes following augmented anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with posterior glenoid deficiency.MethodsAn electronic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed identified studies reporting clinical and radiographic outcomes following augmented anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty among patients with posterior glenoid deficiency.ResultsNine studies including 312 shoulders underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using an augmented glenoid implant between 2015 and 2020. A statistically significant improvement in range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, University of California - Los Angeles and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores was demonstrated at mean follow-up of 37.1 months. Glenoid retroversion improved from 21.8° to 9.5°. At final follow-up, radiolucency was reported in 35.1% of shoulders. The 16° full-wedge augment led to higher and more severe radiographic lucency, while high peg perforation rates (44%) were observed among 5-mm augment stepped implants. The overall rate of complication was 2.6%. Rate of revision surgery was 1.9%.ConclusionsOverall, early- to mid-term outcomes following augmented anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid deficiency demonstrate good to excellent overall clinical results. More radiographic and clinical failures were reported in larger full wedge (16°) augments and stepped augments (5 mm). Prospective studies examining mid- and long-term outcomes will help further elucidate safety and efficacy of these relatively new implants.

Glenoid Bone Loss After First-Time Posterior Instability Events: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objectives:To prospectively determine the amount of bone loss associated with posterior instability and to determine predisposing factors based on pre-instability imaging.Methods:A total of 714 athletes were evaluated prospectively for 4+ years. At baseline, every patient received a subjective history of shoulder instability as well as bilateral noncontrast shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) regardless of any reported history of shoulder instability. The cohort was prospectively followed during the study period, and those who were diagnosed with posterior glenohumeral instability were identified. Postinjury MRIs with contrast were obtained and compared with the screening MRI. Glenoid version, perfect-circle-based bone loss was measured for each patient’s pre- and post-injury MRI using previously described methods.Results:Of the 714 athletes (1428 shoulders) who were prospectively followed during the 4-year period, 5 athletes (7 shoulders) sustained a first-time posterior instability event (1 dislocation, 5 subluxations), and one athlete (1 shoulder) sustained a recurrent posterior instability event. At baseline, 6 out of 8 shoulders were noted to have some level of dysplasia and/or bone loss. Glenoid bone loss increased significantly after instability event in terms of percentage linear bone loss (6.96 ± 4.66 versus 13.54% ± 4.66, p=0.014) and total area of bone loss (3.51 ± 2.78 versus 8.10 ± 3.25, p= 0.009). Baseline glenoid retroversion >10° was associated with a significant greater percentage of bone loss (2.58 ± 1.94 versus 5.79 ± 1.28, p=0.028).Conclusions:Patients with posterior instability tend to have baseline dysplasia and/or glenoid bone loss. Glenoid bone loss of 8.1% was observed after index posterior instability event, with baseline glenoid retroversion >10° being associated with more bone loss.

Biomechanics of Posterior Glenoid Bone Block Procedures for Posterior Instability with and Without Correction of Glenoid Retroversion

Biomechanics of Posterior Glenoid Bone Block Procedures for Posterior Instability with and Without Correction of Glenoid Retroversion