Article 8.2 of the Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) mentions that “For the purpose of typification a specimen is a gathering, or part of a gathering” and “A specimen is usually mounted on a single herbarium sheet or in an equivalent preparation, such as a box, packet, jar, or microscope slide.” For bryophytes, the holotype (and any duplicate, i.e. an isotype) usually consists of many individual plants and is usually kept in a paper packet. Our proposed Recommendation is related to the preservation of bryophyte type specimens and problems faced by researchers while studying such specimens. The dissected parts are very important because authors describe bryophyte taxa based on observations of these parts, which are usually not preserved along with the type specimens. Our recommendation can be justified by the following points: 1. Due to their small size, bryophytes require microscopic examination to ascertain their identity. Hence, to study the type material, dissecting them becomes necessary, which means loss of type material. In many cases, type specimens usually remain scanty (e.g. for Drepanolejeunea pulla (Mitt.) Grolle only a single specimen placed between two mica sheets serves as the lectotype housed in BM, pers. obs.) and studying such a type specimen is nearly impossible for later researchers. Preserving the dissected parts of the type material on glass slides or any equivalent material used in mounting eliminates the need for further dissection and hence prevents loss of type material. Such a slide should be kept with and thus remain part of the type specimen. 2. The dissected bryophyte parts may belong to different plants from the holotype specimen, which covers the range of morphological variation observed by the author(s) while describing the taxon for the first time. Later study of such variation as observed by the author(s) becomes nearly impossible if they are not preserved on glass slides. 3. Dissected parts of bryophytes are often too small to be mounted on any herbarium sheet or placed in packets, and preserving them permanently on glass slides or an equivalent material used in mounting is convenient. In addition to the points discussed above, the importance of parts originally used in establishing the diagnosis is already recommended by the Code for fossil-taxa (Rec. 8A.3): “If the type specimen of a name of a fossil-taxon is cut into pieces (sections of fossil wood, pieces of coalball plants, etc.), all parts originally used in establishing the diagnosis should be clearly marked.” We therefore would like to propose a new Recommendation for preserving dissected parts of holotype specimens of names of bryophytes. “8A.n. For bryophytes (Marchantiophyta, Bryophyta, and Anthocerotophyta), dissected parts of the holotype specimen such as leaves, anatomical sections, and fertile parts including sex organs should be preserved permanently on labelled glass microscope slides and kept together with the holotype.” We thank the Principal, Banwarilal Bhalotia College and the Principal, Parimal Mitra Smriti Mahavidyalaya for encouragement. We also thank Dr. Subir Bandyopadhyay for advice.