technology and culture Book Reviews 779 merits, Herrigel also uses interviews with some 166 individuals, but these are hidden in his endnotes. For whatever contingent historical reason, Herrigel knowingly chose his narrative strategy. For a sense of change depending not on the unfolding of different regional logics but rather on contingent choices resulting from conflict, one need only turn to his essay on machine-tool firms in two different industrial orders, in PeterJ. Katzenstein ’s edited volume, Industry and Politics in West Germany: Toward the Third Republic (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1989). Nev ertheless, his monograph demonstrates that Germany is best under stood in terms of two different kinds of industrial orders that devel oped in different regions. As a result, it provides a solid basis for understanding the history of technology and industrial policy in Ger many. It also suggests the need to conceive of the strength of the German state in terms of its decentralized structure, which provided a good deal of flexibility. Edmund N. Todd Dr. Todd teaches German history and the history of science and technology at the University of New Haven. Konzepte von Elektrizitatsversorgung und Elektrizitatswirtschaft: Die Entstehung eines neuen Fachgebietes der Technikwissenschaften zwischen 1880 und 1945. By Norbert Gilson. Stuttgart: Verlag fur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik, 1994. Pp. 475; maps, figures, tables, appendixes, notes, bibliography, index. DM120.00 (cloth). In this published dissertation, Norbert Gilson deals with the devel opment of concepts for the economic analysis of electricity supply in Germany. His exploration is situated in the context of the devel opment of specific structures of public electricity supply. The determination ofa utility’s operating cost ofelectrity is rather complicated. This cost varied, depending on the rate of capacity uti lization of the power station and of the network. Cost analysis be came even more complicated when different types of power stations (hydroelectric power, coal) were interconnected (Verbundbetrieb) in the 1920s and when the economic efficiency of the high-voltage transmission lines also had to be taken into consideration for large networks. Norbert Gilson describes in detail how business and eco nomic analyses were anchored in the instruction of electrical engi neers. At first, this was done within the framework of the subject ElektrischeAnlagen (Electrical Equipment). From 1925, the Elektrizitatswirtschaftslehre (course of study dealing with the business economics of electricity-producing plants) was established as an autonomous field at some technical universities. At the technical university in 780 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Darmstadt, the most outstanding representative, Ruppert Schnei der, set up a research program to find an exact method to determine the prime cost. According to him, a well-grounded system of rates would be possible only on this basis (p. 183). Gilson points out that the Elektrizitatswirtschaftslehrethat had developed since the 1920s was not able to evaluate those electricity supply systems that were practi cable from a technical point of view but which were not put into practice. The normative basis was made up of the centralized supply via superpower stations (Grofikraftversogung) and interconnected op eration (Verbundwirtschaft) (p. 242). Although Schneider criticized various aspects of this conception (p. 207), the ElektrizitatswirtschaftslekrecRA finally serve as scientific legitimation for the decisions made by the electricity-generating enterprises. The considerations of Georg Klingenberg, director of AEG, in spired several concepts in the years 1913 and 1916 for the organiza tion of electricity supply in Germany. According to him, generation of electricity should be concentrated in a few interconnected super power stations (Verbund). The argument in favor of centralized and large-scale solutions was the lower cost as, e.g., the construction of superpower stations was comparatively cheap and their rates of ca pacity utilization were more favorable because of the large supply districts. Gilson traces back with meticulous care how and on the basis of which arguments these concepts were realized. According to him, a powerful pressure group made up ofpolitical institutions, the large-scale electro-industry, and financial capital had advocated centralized supply via superpower stations (Grofihraftversorgung ) (p. 105). Opposition came mainly from the municipal authorities who, apart from preserving their influence on local en ergy politics, also wanted to secure their income from the municipal electric-power stations...
Read full abstract