Geriatric Fracture Research Articles

A Systematic Review of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Management in Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fracture in the Elderly

Background Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fracture in elderly patients. It is clear that identifying an evidence-based treatment algorithm for odontoid fractures in these patients is paramount. Although patients of all ages with type I and III fractures are routinely treated in a cervical orthosis, the optimal treatment for type II geriatric odontoid fractures has been the topic of substantial debate in recent years. Aim of the Work To compare the outcome of conservative external immobilization versus surgical fusion in terms of morbidity, mortality, fusion rates and quality of life estimates in treatment of odontoid fracture type II in elderly. This will be done through a systematic review of literature addressing this research question. Patients and Methods In this Review, the authors are aiming at the analysis of the collective outcomes from studies comparing surgical and non-surgical management in elderly patients with odontoid fracture type II. Primary objective is to compare between the two groups in terms of mortality within the first year of injury and major and minor complications. Secondary objective is to evaluate the rate of fusion within a follow up period of 2-3 years. Results From the 17 included studies, six studies with total number of patients of 235 reported patients complicated with pneumonia with 9 (7.7%) patients in the non-surgically managed group and 12 (10.2%) patients, which was statistically insignificant with p-value 0.506 (NS). Only 2 studies reported patients with postoperative DVT with total number of patients of 109 from which 69 managed surgically and postoperative 3(4.3%) complicated with DVT which was statistically insignificant with P-value 0.182 (NS). Four studies with total number of 219 patients reported the patients complicated with Myocardial infarction, with 5 (4.9%) patients in the non-surgically managed group and 7 (6.0%) patients in the surgically managed group which was statistically insignificant with P-value 0.701 (NS), Three studies with total number of 177 patients reported the patients complicated with pressure ulcers in the non-surgically managed group 2 (2.1%) and wound infection in the surgically managed group 3 (3.7%) which is statistically insignificant with P value 0.517 (NS). Four studies with total number of patients of 175, reported minor complications such as blood transfusion, swallowing problems, UTI, in the non surgically managed group 10 (9.1%) and in the surgically managed group 16 (24.6%) which is statistically significant with P value 0.005 (HS). Conclusion Type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients are a common injury, and the mortality rate is substantial in patients treated with or without surgery. However, patients undergoing surgical treatment appear to have a decreased risk of mortality at least in the first year of trauma without an increase in the risk of significant complications, with higher rate of fusion.

Evaluation of a New Treatment Strategy for Geriatric Fragility Fractures of the Posterior Pelvic Ring Using Sensor-Supported Insoles: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) is currently rising. Surgical treatment, which is performed using sacroiliac screws, is complicated by compromised bone quality, oftentimes resulting in implant failure. The iFuse implant system aims to improve attachment and durability with promising results for sacroiliac dysfunction, though data for its feasibility on FFPs are rare. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the iFuse for FFPs. A total of 10 patients with FFPs were treated with the iFuse in this study. Pre- and postoperatively, both mobility using an established insole force sensor for an inpatient gait analysis and general well-being and pain using questionnaires were evaluated. When comparing pre- and postoperative findings, this study demonstrated a significant increase in the average (8.14%) and maximum (9.4%) loading (p < 0.001), a reduction in pain, as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), from 4.60 to 2.80 at rest (p = 0.011) and from 7.00 to 4.40 during movement (p = 0.008), an increase in the Barthel Index by 20 points (p < 0.001) and an increase in the Parker Mobility Score by 2.00 points (p = 0.011). All this contributes to the possibility of early postoperative mobilization and improved general well-being, ultimately preventing the late consequences of postoperative immobilization and maintaining patients autonomy and contentment.

Intravenous application of tranexamic acid in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMeta-analyses on the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in intertrochanteric fractures have shown inconsistent results due to variations in inclusion criteria and clinical heterogeneity. To address these limitations, we conducted a rigorous analysis of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with strict inclusion criteria. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the effects and safety of intravenous TXA administration in the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric femoral fractures with intramedullary nailing.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs published from the database inception to August 2022. The date of total blood loss (TBL), intra-operative blood loss (IBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), transfusion rate, transfusion units, thromboembolic events, and mortality were extracted. Review Manager 5.3 was used for the analysis.ResultsA total of six RCTs involving 689 patients were included. Meta-analyses indicated that TXA can significantly reduce TBL (WMD = -232.82; 95% CI -312.81 to -152.84; p < 0.00001), IBL (WMD = -36.33; 95% CI -51.38 to -21.28; p < 0.00001), HBL (WMD = -189.23; 95% CI -274.92 to -103.54; p < 0.0001), transfusion rate (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85; p = 0.008), and transfusion units (WMD = -0.58; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.41; p < 0.01). No increase in thromboembolic events rate (RR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.50; p = 0.42) and mortality (RR = 1.36; 95% CI 0.61 to 3.04; p = 0.45) was observed.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA administration in treating geriatric intertrochanteric femoral fractures with intramedullary nailing. TXA significantly reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events or mortality.

The impact of preoperative single low-dose dexamethasone on in-hospital prognosis in geriatric intertrochanteric fracture patients: Analysis of secondary outcomes in a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIntertrochanteric fracture in the geriatric population is associated with poor prognosis, which may be attributed to consistent stress and the systemic inflammatory response. Dexamethasone is an exogenous glucocorticoid commonly used in clinical practice for broad anti-inflammatory action. The purpose is to investigate whether a single preoperative low-dose dexamethasone can improve the in-hospital prognosis in geriatric intertrochanteric fracture patients undergoing internal fixation surgery. MethodsBetween June 2020 and October 2022, 219 eligible patients with intertrochanteric fractures were in this study. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 160 patients were randomly allocated to the dexamethasone or placebo groups (80 patients who are geriatric with an intertrochanteric fracture in each group). The patients in the dexamethasone group received 10 mg (2 mL) of dexamethasone intravenously, whereas the patients in the placebo group received 2 mL of saline intravenously within 30 minutes before being sent to the operating room. The efficacy-related outcomes (the first bed-chair transfer ability, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay) and safety-related outcomes (infection events and hyperglycemia) were collected for analysis. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The dexamethasone group had a significantly higher rate of the first bed-chair transfer than the placebo group (65.0% [52/80] vs 48.8% [39/80], relative risk = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 2.11; P = .038). One patient in the dexamethasone group and 7 patients in the placebo group died during hospitalization (1.3% [1/80] vs 8.8% [7/80], relative risk = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.86 to 0.99; P = .07). No differences were found in the length of stay, infections, and hyperglycemia between the 2 groups. ConclusionA single preoperative low-dose of dexamethasone can improve the in-hospital prognosis (increase the ability of the first bed-chair transfer and potentially decrease the in-hospital mortality) in geriatric intertrochanteric fracture patients after internal fixation surgery.

Republication of "Assessment of Recovery From Geriatric Ankle Fracture Using the Life Space Mobility Assessment (LSA): A Pilot Study".

The Life Space Assessment (LSA) is a validated outcomes measure that aims to assess the level of mobility and physical functioning within one's own environment following a medical event. We sought to study the recovery of geriatric ankle fracture patients utilizing the LSA. We hypothesized that the LSA would provide improved assessment of these patients and help identify key differences in operative and nonoperatively treated patients. Prospective observational study of geriatric patients age 65 years and older with an ankle fracture with 1-year follow-up. Operative versus nonoperative intervention was determined by the attending physician on a patient-specific basis. The LSA, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and visual analog pain scale (VAPS) were administered at predetermined intervals postinjury and scores were analyzed for significance. 20 patients were enrolled in this study. 11 underwent surgery whereas 9 were treated nonoperatively. Regardless of treatment, the preinjury LSA score was 86.7. This significantly dropped to 20.6 at 6 weeks and recovered to 73.6 at 12 months. In the operative cohort, the LSA scores preinjury were 91.4 and improved to 87.6 after 1 year. The nonoperative group recorded 80.9 preinjury and only improved to 59.5 at 1 year (P = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the results of the SF-36 and VAPS to the LSA. The LSA was effective in assessing recovery in geriatric ankle fracture patients. A severe deficit in mobility was seen for the first 6 months of recovery regardless of treatment. Operative patients ultimately returned to their baseline LSA at 1 year while nonoperative patients did not. Outcomes from the VAS and SF-36 mirrored the LSA but were not found to be statistically significant. Level II.

Cephalomedullary Nailing of Unstable Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures on a Traction Table Combined with Percutaneous Reduction Techniques is Safe and Results in a Low Rate of Cut-out.

To describe a reproducible technique for reduction assessment and percutaneous reduction of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with a cephalomedullary nail on a traction table. Retrospective cohort study. Level-1 trauma center. Two-hundred twenty consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Initial closed reduction performed on a traction table. Accessory incisions were used to facilitate a reduction in 77 patients (35%). All fractures were stabilized with a cephalomedullary nail. Radiographic outcome including union, cut-out and fracture collapse (FC). Surgical outcomes including infection and hematoma were also reported. Mechanical complications (nonunion, cut-out and varus collapse) occurred in 8.8% of patients at one year. Eleven of 13 patients that developed these complications had either sub-optimal implant placement (tip-to-apex distance > 25 mm) or a varus reduction. There was no difference in the incidence of reoperation, nonunion, lag screw cutout, or posttraumatic arthritis based on the use of an accessory incision for fracture reduction. There was a significant increase in FC in patients who received an accessory incision (6.8 mm vs. 5.4 mm, p=0.04). One patient (1%) developed a hematoma in the accessory incision cohort, and one patient (0.7%) that did not have an accessory incision developed a postoperative infection. The current study suggests utilization of accessory incisions assist in reduction is safe and is associated with a low rate of complications. The surgeon should prioritize fracturereduction and optimal implant placement and not hesitate to utilize an accessory incision to assist with fracture reduction. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty with limited open reduction and internal fixation vs open reduction and internal fixation for geriatric acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comminuted fractures with poor bone quality in the elderly are associated with poor outcomes. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone, primary or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA), allows early mobilization with full weight bearing. In this study, we aim to analyze whether treatment of aTHA with/withtout ORIF (limited ORIF) vs ORIF alone yields better intra-operative results, functional outcomes, and less complications. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals were used. The outcomes of interest were surgery time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, Harris hip score (HHS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), complication rate, surgical site infection rate, heterotopic ossification rate, reoperation rate, and mortality rate. Ten observational studies with a total of 642 patients (415 ORIF alone and 227 aTHA with/without ORIF) were included in the systematic review. Compared to ORIF alone, aTHA with limited ORIF provided higher HHS (P = 0.029), better physical function (P = 0.008), better physical component summary (P = 0.001), better mental component summary (P = 0.043) in postoperative 1-year SF-36, lesser complication rate (P = 0.001), and lesser reoperation rate (P = 0.000), but however greater bodily pain (P = 0.001) in acetabular fractured elderlies. Acute THA with limited ORIF is favorable alternative to ORIF technique alone. It provided better HHS, physical, and mental component summary in SF-36 and yielded lower complication and reoperation rate compare to ORIF alone.

Risk of Contralateral Hip Fracture Following Initial Hip Fracture Among Geriatric Fragility Fracture Patients.

Geriatric hip fractures are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and risk factors of contralateral hip fracture after initial hip fracture. Initial hip fractures in patients older than 65 years were abstracted from the national, administrative M91Ortho PearlDiver data set. Incidence and timing of contralateral hip fractures in the following 10 years were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral hip fracture was conducted. To account for patient mortality over the later years, 2-year univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors predictive of contralateral hip fracture. Of the initial 104,311 hip fractures identified, contralateral hip fracture in the 10 years that followed was identified for 7,186 (6.9%), of which 68.4% occurred in the first 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral fracture revealed the 10-year incidence to be 12.9% when controlling for those lost from the data set during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression revealed independent predictors of contralateral hip fracture in the 2 years after index hip fracture, when the incidence was greatest, to be female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.15), body mass index < 20 (OR 1.30), and percutaneous pinning surgery for initial hip fracture fixation (OR 1.58) (P < 0.0001 for each). In a national cohort of 104,311 geriatric hip fractures, Kaplan-Meier analysis for contralateral hip fracture found the 10-year incidence to be 12.9%, of which nearly 70% were in the first 2 years, and predisposing factors were defined. As such, future research should aim to identify the cause and mitigate the risk of secondary contralateral hip fractures in geriatric patients.

A nationwide analysis of geriatric proximal humerus fractures: trends, outcomes, and cost

BackgroundIn the USA, proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Although most geriatric PHF are treated conservatively, surgical management remains an option. This retrospective...

Geriatric Pain Protocol: Impact of Multimodal Pain Care for Elderly Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.

Hip fractures are costly, and associated complications are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in persons 65 years or older. Pain medications in this population can be more potent, have a longer duration of action, and have serious side effects (Chau et al., 2008). Hip fractures are projected to reach 6.26 million worldwide by 2050 (Gullberg et al., 1997; Kannus et al., 1996). Morrison et al. (2003) report that uncontrolled pain leads to increased hospital length of stay (LOS), delayed physical therapy, and long-term functional impairment. The Geriatric Pain Protocol (GPP) is Cedars-Sinai's multimodal pain management solution, addressing the needs of older adult inpatients who have suffered fractures. Can the implementation of GPP reduce the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) used, LOS, and postoperative outcomes compared with non-GPP patients? Study participants included hip fracture patients admitted between February 1, 2019, and March 5, 2021; data were collected prospectively from electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria were patients 65 years or older with a hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall and surgical candidate. Participants were divided into two categories: Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) and non-GFP, with physician participation in the GFP being the differentiating factor. End points included postoperative pain, postoperative opioid utilization, LOS, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used for data analysis. Spearman's rank-based correlation coefficient was used to assess associations. The GPP decreased MME daily totals on Days 1 and 2 and improved pain management compared with non-GPP patients. The MMEs were lower in the GPP group than in the non-GPP group for both Postoperative Day 1 (POD1) (p = .007) and POD2 (p = .043); Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain on POD1 was lower in the GPP group (vs. non-GPP, p = .013). There were no group differences in NRS POD2 Pain or complications (all ps > .1). The study sample (N = 453) had no significant difference between sex and LOS (all ps > .3). Although not statistically significant, the 30-day readmission rate trended lower in patients treated in accordance with the GPP. Use of the multimodal GPP reduced pain levels and MME totals for older adult hip fracture inpatients. More data are needed to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed protocol. Future studies should explore the possibilities of using the GPP across the geriatric orthopaedic patient care continuum.

Geriatric spine fractures – Demography, changing trends, challenges and special considerations: A narrative review

The aim of this manuscript was to summarize the demography and changing trends of geriatric spinal injuries and to enumerate the challenges and special considerations in the care of geriatric spinal injuries. PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases were searched for literature on geriatric spine fractures using MeSH terms ‘aged’, ‘aged, 80 and over’, ‘elderly’, ‘spinal fracture/epidemiology’, spinal fracture/therapy∗’ and keywords pertaining to the same. The search results were screened for appropriate articles and reviewed. There is a high community prevalence of elderly vertebral fractures ranging from 18% to as high as 51%. The proportion of older patients among the spinal injured is rising as well. There is a higher chance of missing spinal injuries in the elderly and clinical guidelines may not be applicable to this patient group. Classification and surgical treatment are different from younger adult counterparts as the elderly osteoporotic spine behaves differently biomechanically. There is a high incidence of respiratory complications both for surgically and conservatively managed groups. Older age generally is associated with a higher complication rate including mortality.

A single preoperative low-dose dexamethasone may reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative delirium in the geriatric intertrochanteric fracture patients with internal fixation surgery: an exploratory analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

ObjectivePostoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication along with poor prognosis in geriatric intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) patients. However, the prevention and treatment of POD remain unclear. Previous studies have confirmed that POD is essentially a consequence of neuro-inflammatory responses. Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid with comprehensive anti-inflammatory effects, while a high dose of dexamethasone correlates with many side effects or even adverse consequences. Thus, this prospective study aims to discuss whether a single preoperative low-dose dexamethasone can reduce the impact of POD on geriatric ITF patients with internal fixation surgery.MethodsBetween June 2020 and October 2022, there were 219 consecutive ITF patients assessed in our department. Of the 219 ITF patients, 160 cases who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally enrolled and randomly allocated to the dexamethasone group and the placebo group (80 geriatric ITF patients in each group) in this prospective study. The patients in the dexamethasone group received intravenous 10 mg (2 ml) dexamethasone while the patients in the placebo group received intravenous 2 ml saline in 30 min before being sent to the operating room, respectively. The baseline characteristics, surgical information, incidence and severity of POD as the efficacy-related outcomes, and infection events and hyperglycemia as safety-related outcomes (adverse events), were collected and analyzed between the two groups. The severity of POD was evaluated by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) score.ResultsThere were no differences in baseline characteristics and surgical information between the dexamethasone group and the placebo group. The dexamethasone group had a lower incidence of POD than the placebo group within the first 5 days after surgery [(9/80, 11.3% vs. 21/80, 26.3%, RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.97, P = 0.015]. The dexamethasone group had lower MDAS scores (Mean ± SD) than the placebo group [13.2 ± 1.0 (range 11 to 15) vs. 15.48 ± 2.9 (range 9 to 20), P = 0.011, effect size = 0.514]. There were no differences in infection events and hyperglycemia between the two groups.ConclusionsA single preoperative low-dose dexamethasone may reduce the incidence and severity of POD in geriatric ITF patients with internal fixation surgery.Trial registration: ChiCTR2200055281.

Evaluating femoral augmentation to prevent geriatric hip fracture: A scoping review of experimental methods.

Various femoral augmentation designs have been investigated over the past decade for the prevention of geriatric hip fracture. The experimental methods used to evaluate the efficacy of these augmentations have not been critically evaluated or compared in terms of biofidelity, robustness, or ease of application. Such parameters have significant relevance in characterizing future clinical success. In this study we aimed to use a scoping review to summarize the experimental studies that evaluate femoral augmentation approaches, and critically evaluate commonly applied protocols and identify areas for concordance with the clinical situation. We conducted a literature search targeting studies that used experimental test methods to evaluate femoral augmentation to prevent geriatric fragility fracture. A total of 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. The most commonly investigated augmentation to date is the injection of bone cement or another material that cured in situ, and a popular subsequent method for biomechanical evaluation was to load the augmented proximal femur until fracture in a sideways fall configuration. We noted limitations in the clinical relevance of sideways fall scenarios being modeled and large variance in the concordance of many of the studies identified. Our review brings about recommendations for enhancing the fidelity of experimental methods modeling clinical sideways falls, which include an improved representation of soft tissue effects, using outcome metrics beyond load-to-failure, and applying loads inertially. Effective augmentations are encouraging for their potential to reduce the burden of hip fracture; however, the likelihood of this success is only as strong as the methods used in their evaluation.

Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Achieve Better Postoperative Radiographic Parameters After Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures when Compared With Non-trauma-Trained Surgeons.

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common orthopaedic injuries accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture-related hospitalizations. Because many factors predictive of failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation, comparing fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with surgeons who did not complete an orthopaedic trauma fellowship. We initiated a search for CPT code 27245 across our hospital network to identify 100 consecutive patients treated by five fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Patients were then stratified based on their surgeon's subspecialty training (trauma vs community). Primary outcome variables were neck-shaft angle (NSA), a comparison of the repaired NSA with the uninjured side, tip-apex distance, and reduction quality. One hundred patients were included in each group. The mean age in the community group was 77 years compared with 79 years in the trauma group. The mean tip-apex distance for the trauma group was 10 mm compared with 21 mm for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133° compared with 127° for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean difference of the NSA of the repaired side compared with the uninjured side was 2.5° of valgus in the trauma group compared with 5° of varus for the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared with 19 in the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 0 poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 in the community group ( P < 0.001). Overall, we have shown that fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons achieve better reductions when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary nails. Orthopaedic residency training should emphasize teaching proper techniques and acceptable parameters for reduction and implant placement when treating geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.

The Impact of Increased Time to Surgery in Geriatric Patients with Acetabular Fractures.

To explore the association between time-to-surgery (TTS) and postoperative complications in geriatric patients with acetabular fractures. Retrospective cohort study. Level I trauma center.Patients/Participants: 51 consecutive geriatric patients (≥60 years) that presented to a level-I trauma center for surgical fixation of an acetabular fracture between 2013 and 2020. The primary and secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS), respectively. TTS was determined by time between arrival to ED and time of surgery, with a threshold of 48 hours (early vs. delayed TTS group). Nineteen patients (37.3%) had ≥1 postoperative complications. Patients in the delayed TTS group had 5x higher odds of developing ≥1 complications (OR:4.86, CI:1.48-15.96). There were no 30-day mortalities in either group. Patients in the delayed TTS group had an average LOS of 19 days compared to 12 days for early TTS patients (p=0.040). Geriatric acetabular fracture patients with delayed TTS had increased postoperative complications and LOS. This data suggests that expedited care may have a similar protective effect in geriatric acetabular fracture patients, as it does in the acute hip fracture population.

Superior Outcomes with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Nonoperative Management for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

To evaluate early outcomes (within 1 year) for geriatric proximal humerus fractures managed nonoperatively or with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Retrospective cohort Setting: Academic level 1 trauma center, level 2 trauma/geriatric fracture centerPatients/Intervention: 71 patients with proximal humerus fractures that underwent nonoperative management or RSA, matched by age, comorbidity burden, and fracture morphology. Patient reported outcomes, range of motion, and complications rates within 1 year of treatment. RSA patients demonstrated greater active forward flexion (aFF) and external rotation compared to nonoperative patients throughout the first 6 months after treatment (p<0.05 for all). RSA patients achieved satisfactory ROM (>90° aFF) at higher rates than nonoperative patients (96.2% vs 62.2%, p<0.01). RSA led to significantly lower shoulder pain and PROMIS pain interference scores throughout the first year post-treatment (p<0.05). PROMIS physical function scores were also higher in the RSA group at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year compared to the nonoperative group (p<0.05 for all). Similar complication rates were experienced in both groups (nonoperative=8.9%, RSA=7.7%; p=0.36). In an age, comorbidity and fracture morphology matched analysis, treatment of proximal humerus fractures with RSA is associated with greater shoulder ROM throughout the first 6 months of treatment, decreased pain, and improved physical function compared to nonoperative management, without significant differences in short term complications. These results suggest that RSA may be superior to nonoperative management during the early recovery period for proximal humerus fractures. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

MANAGEMENT OF GERIATRIC OPEN ANKLE FRACTURES

IntroductionOpen fragility ankle fractures involve complex decision making. There is no consensus on the method of surgical management. Our aim in this study was to analyse current management of these patients in a major trauma centre (MTC).Materials &amp; MethodsThis cohort study evaluates the management of geriatric (≥65years) open ankle fractures in a MTC (November 2020–November 2022). The method, timing(s) and personnel involved in surgical care were assessed. Weightbearing status over the treatment course was monitored. Patient frailty was measured using the clinical frailty score (CFS).ResultsThere were 35 patients, mean age 77 years (range 65–97 years), 86% female. Mean length of admission in the MTC was 26.4 days (range 3–78). Most (94%) had a low-energy mechanism of injury.Only 57% of patients underwent one-stage surgery (ORIF n=15, hindfoot nail n=1, external frame n=4) with 45% being permitted to fully weightbear (FWB). Eleven (31.4%) underwent two-stage surgery (external fixator; ORIF), with 18% permitted to FWB. Of those patients with pre-injury mobility, 12 (66%) patients were able to FWB following definitive fixation. Delay in weightbearing ranged from 2–8weeks post-operatively. Seven patients (20%) underwent an initial Orthoplastic wound debridement. Ten patients (28.6%) required plastic surgery input (split-skin grafts n=9, local or free flaps n=3), whereby four patients (40%) underwent one stage Orthoplastic surgery.Eighteen (51.4%) patients had a CFS ≥5. Patients with a CFS of ≥7 had 60% 90-day mortality. Only 17% patients had orthogeriatrician input during admission.ConclusionsThese patients have high frailty scores, utilise a relatively large portion of resources with multiple theatre attendances and protracted ward occupancy in an MTC. Early FWB status needs to be the goal of treatment, ideally in a single-staged procedure. Poor access to orthogeriatric care for these frail patients may represent healthcare inequality.

Is Nail-Canal Diameter Discordance a Risk Factor for the Excessive Sliding of Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery?

Background and Objectives:: There were limited studies which investigated nail diameter as a predictor for cephalomedullary nail (CMN) failure in intertrochanteric fracture (ITF). We aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of CMN in fragility ITF following nail-canal (N-C) diameter discordance. Materials and Methods: From November 2010 to March 2022, we retrospectively reviewed 120 consecutive patients who underwent CMN surgeries due to fragility ITF. We included patients with acceptable reduction and a tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm. The N-C diameter differences both in anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral-view X-rays were measured, and we compared the number of excessive sliding instances and the rate of implant failure between the N-C concordance (≤3 mm) and discordance (>3 mm) group. Simple linear regression was used to determine the strength of the relationship between the N-C difference and sliding distance. Results: The sliding distance showed no differences between the groups in the AP (3.6 vs. 3.3 mm, p = 0.75) and lateral view (3.5 vs. 3.4 mm, p = 0.91). For analyses in the AP view, the AP-concordance and AP-discordance groups had 14 (25%) and 14 patients (22%) with a sliding distance of >5 mm (p = 0.69), while treatment failure occurred in 3 (5%) and 3 (3%) patients, respectively (p = 0.66). For analyses in the lateral view, the lat-concordance and lat-discordance groups had 8 (27%) and 20 patients (22%) with a sliding distance of >5 mm (p = 0.62), while treatment failure occurred in 1 (3%) and 4 (4%) patients, respectively (p = 1.00). Linear regression analyses showed that the N-C difference in either views was not a significant predictor of sliding distance in both the AP (R2 = 0.002, p = 0.60) and lateral views (R2 = 0.007, p = 0.35). Conclusions: If appropriate fracture reduction and fixation are achieved, the N-C discordance of short CMN does not affect treatment outcomes in ITF.

Which non-infection related risk factors are associated with impaired proximal femur fracture healing in patients under the age of 70 years?

Background/purposeImpaired healing is a feared complication with devastating outcomes for each patient. Most studies focus on geriatric fracture fixation and assess well known risk factors such as infections. However, risk factors, others than infections, and impaired healing of proximal femur fractures in non-geriatric adults are marginally assessed. Therefore, this study aimed to identify non-infection related risk factors for impaired fracture healing of proximal femur fractures in non-geriatric trauma patients.MethodsThis study included non-geriatric patients (aged 69 years and younger) who were treated between 2013 and 2020 at one academic Level 1 trauma center due to a proximal femur fracture (PFF). Patients were stratified according to AO/OTA classification. Delayed union was defined as failed callus formation on 3 out of 4 cortices after 3 to 6 months. Nonunion was defined as lack of callus-formation after 6 months, material breakage, or requirement of revision surgery. Patient follow up was 12 months.ResultsThis study included 150 patients. Delayed union was observed in 32 (21.3%) patients and nonunion with subsequent revision surgery occurred in 14 (9.3%). With an increasing fracture classification (31 A1 up to 31 A3 type fractures), there was a significantly higher rate of delayed union. Additionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (OR 6.17, (95% CI 1.54 to 24.70, p ≤ 0.01)) and diabetes mellitus type II (DM) (OR 5.74, (95% CI 1.39 to 23.72, p = 0.016)), were independent risk factors for delayed union. The rate of nonunion was independent of fracture morphology, patient’s characteristics or comorbidities.ConclusionIncreasing fracture complexity, ORIF and diabetes were found to be associated with delayed union of intertrochanteric femur fractures in non-geriatric patients. However, these factors were not associated with the development of nonunion.

Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures: Equivalent Long-Term Reoperation Rates Between Fixation and Primary Arthroplasty.

Our primary objectives were to 1) determine the rate of requiring conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF of geriatric distal femur fractures and 2) compare 10-year reoperation rates after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus primary arthroplasty for geriatric distal femur fractures. Propensity-matched retrospective cohort study. All centers participating in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database.Patients/Participants: All patients 65 or older who underwent operative management of a distal femur fracture between 2000 and 2017. ORIF, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or distal femur replacement (DFR). Reoperation. A total of 16,784 geriatric distal femur fracture patients were identified, of which 16,343 (97.4%) underwent ORIF. The cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty within 10 years of ORIF was found to be 3.5%, with young age and female sex identified as risk factors for conversion. There was no significant difference in 10-year reoperation free survival rate between propensity matched patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty (94.5% vs. 96.2%, p=0.659). There were no differences in short-term complication or readmission rates between matched treatment cohorts, but arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of wound infection within 90 days (2.0% vs. 0.2%, p=0.011). The 10-year cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF was found to be low. There was no significant difference in long term reoperation-free survival rates between patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty. Primary arthroplasty was associated with significantly higher rates of acute wound or joint infection. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.