Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures: Equivalent Long-Term Reoperation Rates Between Fixation and Primary Arthroplasty.

Abstract

Our primary objectives were to 1) determine the rate of requiring conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF of geriatric distal femur fractures and 2) compare 10-year reoperation rates after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus primary arthroplasty for geriatric distal femur fractures. Propensity-matched retrospective cohort study. All centers participating in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database.Patients/Participants: All patients 65 or older who underwent operative management of a distal femur fracture between 2000 and 2017. ORIF, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or distal femur replacement (DFR). Reoperation. A total of 16,784 geriatric distal femur fracture patients were identified, of which 16,343 (97.4%) underwent ORIF. The cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty within 10 years of ORIF was found to be 3.5%, with young age and female sex identified as risk factors for conversion. There was no significant difference in 10-year reoperation free survival rate between propensity matched patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty (94.5% vs. 96.2%, p=0.659). There were no differences in short-term complication or readmission rates between matched treatment cohorts, but arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of wound infection within 90 days (2.0% vs. 0.2%, p=0.011). The 10-year cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF was found to be low. There was no significant difference in long term reoperation-free survival rates between patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty. Primary arthroplasty was associated with significantly higher rates of acute wound or joint infection. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.