Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Research Articles

Total Knee Arthroplasty After Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: Reduction in Prolonged Opioid Use Without Increased Postsurgical Complications.

Introduction:Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an increasingly used nonsurgical treatment modality for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. Previous studies have demonstrated this to be an effective and safe method to decrease pain and increase functionality in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year postoperative complication rates and rates of prolonged postoperative opioid usage between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after previous GNRFA and those undergoing TKA alone.Methods:Patients who underwent primary TKA after prior GNRFA (GNRFA-TKA) of the ipsilateral knee were identified in a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2019. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted comparing those with prior GNRFA and those without. Outcomes of interest included prolonged postoperative opioid usage, 2-year revision rates, and 90-day medical complications. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software provided by the PearlDiver Database.Results:In total, 675 patients in the GNRFA-TKA cohort were compared with a control cohort of 255,351 patients. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation-total knee arthroplasty patientshad lower odds of prolonged opioid use postoperatively (OR: 0.478; 95%: 0.409 to 0.559; P < 0.001). No notable difference was observed in the 2-year surgical outcomes between cohorts. Patients in the GNRFA-TKA cohort had lower odds of requiring a blood transfusion and having postoperative anemia, all arrhythmias, and urinary infections compared with primary TKA control patients.Conclusion:Preoperative GNRFA leads to a lower rate of prolonged postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing TKA, without an increased risk of complications. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings of this database study.

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Inferomedial Knee Pain.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment for chronic knee pain related to osteoarthritis. It is often utilized when conservative management has failed and patients wish to avoid arthroplasty, are poor surgical candidates due to comorbid medical conditions, or in those suffering from persistent pain after arthroplasty. The classic targets for GNRFA include the superior lateral genicular nerve, superior medial genicular nerve, and inferior medial genicular nerve but multiple anatomic studies have demonstrated additional sensory innervation to the knee. In this research article, we propose an image-guided technique that can safely target the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve which also provides sensory innervation to the anterior capsule. The proposed technique includes variations for conventional bipolar radiofrequency ablation, cooled radiofrequency ablation, dual-tined bipolar radiofrequency ablation, and monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a long axis approach. The described technique is based on updated anatomic studies and takes into account safety concerns such as thermal risk to the skin and/or pes anserine tendons and breaching of the synovial cavity. Future clinical research should be performed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of this specific approach.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-Month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

ObjectiveTo assess long‐term outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) of genicular nerves for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA prospective, observational extension of a randomized, controlled trial was conducted on adults randomized to CRFA. Subjects were part of a 12‐month clinical trial comparing CRFA of genicular nerves to a single hyaluronic injection for treatment of chronic OA knee pain, who then agreed to visits at 18‐ and 24‐months post CRFA and had not undergone another knee procedure since. The subjects were evaluated for pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), subjective benefit using the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale, quality of life using the EuroQol‐5‐Dimensions‐5 Level (EQ‐5D‐5L) questionnaire, and safety.ResultsOf 57 subjects eligible, 36 enrolled; 32 completed the 18‐month visit with a mean NRS score of 2.4 and 22 (69%) reporting ≥50% reduction in pain from baseline (primary endpoint); 27 completed the 24‐month visit, with a mean NRS of 3.4 and 17 (63%) reporting ≥50% pain relief. Functional and quality of life improvements persisted similarly, with mean changes from baseline of 53.5% and 34.9% in WOMAC total scores, and 24.8% and 10.7% in EQ‐5D‐5L Index scores, at 18‐ and 24‐months, respectively. There were no identified safety concerns in this patient cohort.ConclusionIn this subset of subjects, CRFA of genicular nerves provided durable pain relief, improved function, and improved quality of life extending to 24 months post procedure, with no significant safety concerns.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for pain control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A case report

Adequate postoperative pain control is an essential factor for the success of rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRF) is a recently developed method.This study aimed to evaluate the use of GNRF in patients who underwent ACLR.We performed GNRF guided by ultrasonography for patients who underwent ACLR with aggravated pain. GNRF was performed following ACLR a day after surgery. The pain was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Euroqol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) measured the quality of life on the day of one, three, and seven after surgery.ResultsIn this study, two patients participated. In the postoperative days first, third, and seventh, the mean VAS was decreased after providing the intervention (from 8 to 5, 2, and 1, respectively). The mean EQ5D improved from 0.48 to 0.52, 0.56, 0.66, respectively.We concluded that GNRF is an adequate and safe procedure for managing postoperative pain after ACLR. It may enhance the postoperative rehabilitation program.

Effectiveness of the Thermal Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy Under Fluoroscopy in Patients with Non-operative Advanced Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: 1-Year Follow-Up Results.

In this study, our aim was to present the 1-year results of the effect of thermal genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) therapy on pain and functional outcomes in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. After retrospectively examining the hospital records, 49 knees of 35 patients who had undergone thermal RFA of the superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial branches of the genicular nerve under fluoroscopic guidance between July 2019 and December 2020 were included in the study. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the patients were recorded before RFA, on the day of RFA, and at the first, sixth, and 12th months postoperatively, as well as their Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores before RFA and at the 12th month postoperatively. Complications developed after the procedure and during the follow-up period were screened. Twenty-five of the patients were females and 10 males, with a mean age of 77.3 ± 7.9years (range 61-92years). The mean VAS score was 8.4 ± 0.9 before RFA, and as 1.7 ± 1.0 right after the procedure, 2.4 ± 1.7 at the first month, 3.4 ± 1.8 at the sixth month, and 4.4 ± 1.9 at the 12th month (p < 0.01). In terms of the WOMAC score, the average value was 69.7 ± 6.4 before the treatment and 36.1 ± 11.8 at the final follow-up at the 12th month (p < 0.01). No complications were observed in any patient during the treatment or the follow-up period. Non-surgical thermal GNRFA therapy of knee osteoarthritis provides significant outcomes in terms of pain and functionality, with no significant systemic or local side effects. Therefore, the technique can be considered as an alternative to other methods when treating advanced osteoarthritis.

Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience.

BackgroundGenicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA.MethodsA 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA.ResultsA total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95–96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks.ConclusionPain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.

The Analgesic Effect And Functional Improvement Produced by Radio-Frequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective: To study the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treating pain in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis.&#x0D; Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Pain Clinic of Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine Rawalpindi, from Sep 2019 to Feb 2020.&#x0D; Methodology: Patients of more than 50 years of age, with grade III and IV Kellgren-Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis and at least a score of 4 for three months on the numerical rating scale were included in the study. Measurements were taken on the numerical rating scale and Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index before and four weeks after fluoroscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation of three genicular nerves around the knee joint. .&#x0D; Results: Fifty patients (mean age: 62 ± 6.5 years) were included in the study. The median numerical rating scale scores before and after intervention were 9 (Interquartile range: 7-10) and 5 (Interquartile range: 2-8), respectively (p&lt;0.001). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index scores before and after intervention were 76.7 ± 13.4 and 50.3 ± 18, respectively (p&lt;0.001). No complications were reported. The reduction in numerical rating scale, Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index scores after the intervention were significantly better in females than in males (p=0.023 and p=0.012 respectively); however, no significant change was observed for the right and left knee or grades of knee osteoarthritis (p&gt;0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves around the knee joint significantly improves pain, stiffness and body function in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis .........................

Pulsed Radiofrequency Rhizotomy of the Genicular Nerves of the Knee Guided by Radioscopy and Ultrasonography: Step-By-Step Technique

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is highly prevalent and causes pain, stiffness, and harms the quality of life of millions of patients. Scientific evidence about radiofrequency ablation or rhizotomy of genicular nerves has been presented with increasing frequency in the literature for the treatment of chronic pain related to knee OA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty. The main indication for this procedure is symptomatic OA unresponsive to conservative treatment, regardless of the disease evolution, although more common indications are in Kellgren–Lawrence grade III or IV, in post-total knee arthroplasty residual pain without an identified cause, in patients with comorbidities and high surgical risk, and those who do not want to undergo surgery. The aim of this study is to describe the step-by-step rhizotomy technique with pulsed radiofrequency of the 3 genicular nerves, guided by radioscopy and ultrasonography.

Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

To evaluate various radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and determine the best modality, target, number of electrodes, and image guidance for improving knee pain and function. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of RFA treatments for knee OA from inception up to September 30, 2021. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the mean difference (MD) and rank the comparative effectiveness of treatments. A total of 21 eligible RCTs (from 2011 to 2021, involving 1,818 patients) with 8 RFA treatments, 6 intra-articular injections, NSAIDS, exercise, and placebo were assessed. Conventional bipolar genicular nerve RFA (GNRFA) had the greatest net benefit on the VAS at 6 months (MD,-5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI],-4.3 to-6.7; SUCRA, .98). And cooled monopolar GNRFA had the greatest net benefit on the WOMAC at 6 months (MD,-33; 95% CI,-37 to-29; SUCRA, .99). In conventional and pulsed modalities, bipolar RFA was associated with a significant decrease in VAS and WOMAC than monopolar RFA. Combining pulsed intra-articular RFA and platelet-rich plasma injection had no additional positive effects on VAS or WOMAC at 3 months. RFA is effective in improving both knee pain and function in patients with OA, at least in the short term (6 months). Patients respond better to the cooled modality than the conventional and pulsed modalities. Bipolar is more effective than monopolar for improving pain and function in conventional and pulsed modalities. Fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance showed no differences in improving pain and function. The effectiveness of RFA in cooled modality using bipolar or in combination with various intra-articular injections remains to be compared. II, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

How I Do It: Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation

How I Do It: Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation and Dual Subsartorial Block for Chronic Knee Pain Post Total Knee Replacement: A Case Report

Introduction. Chronic pain defines as pain persisting for three months or longer, chronic post-surgical pain can affect all dimensions of health-related quality of life, and is associated with functional limitations. treatment of chronic pain after total knee replacement is challenging, and evaluation of combined treatments and individually targeted treatments matched to patient characteristic. Genicular nerve block radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for pain associated with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis, and the evolution of newer regional analgesia techniques aids in reducing postoperative pain Dual Subsartorial Block (DSB) as a procedure specific, post total knee replacemet. historically there has been a reliance on using a pain-spesific assessment tools Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)&#x0D; Case Presentation. A 55-year old woman admitted she had pain on bilateral knee, the knee pain had affected her daily living, she was diagnosed with chronic knee pain post TKR because of osteoarthritis genu bilateral, the patient was planning genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation and dual subsartorial block, from the examination we found that numeric rating scale was 6 (moderate pain) with WOMAC score 76, before the procedure the patients are examined through radiology for any deformity in the knee. The genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance on bonylandmark, resulting anesthesia of the anterior compartment of the knee, and dual subsartorial block that cover almost all the innervations of pain generating component of the anterior and posterior knee joint involved in TKR surgery. After the procedure we reevaluated the pain score using NRS was 2 (mild pain), and with WOMAC Score 19.&#x0D; Conclusion. Treatment of chronic pain post total knee replacemet was challenging, targeted treatment may ameliorate the pain and prevent long term disability.&#x0D;

Comparison between fluoroscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves and intra-articular injection of steroid in relieving pain and improving function among candidates of knee replacement surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Comparison between fluoroscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves and intra-articular injection of steroid in relieving pain and improving function among candidates of knee replacement surgery: A randomized controlled trial

The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopically-Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopically-Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Long-term clinical outcomes of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain using a three-tined electrode for expanded nerve capture

ObjectiveGenicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment option for chronic knee pain in native knee osteoarthritis and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Recent dissections have revealed significant variability in typical genicular nerve targets and other sensory nerves not included in previous studies. Early, short-term results suggest that more complete sensory denervation with GNRFA may result in more significant pain reduction; however, no long-term clinical outcome exists. We aim to present long-term clinical outcomes after an expanded GNRFA technique with a three-tined radiofrequency cannula. MethodsEleven consecutive patients with ≥6 months of knee pain underwent an expanded GNRFA protocol targeting the superomedial (SMGN), superolateral (SLGN), inferomedial genicular nerves (IMGN), in addition to the nerves to vastus medialis (NVM), lateralis (NVL), and intermedius (NVI). Long-term pain and impression of change outcomes were collected in a cross-sectional fashion. ResultsAt ≥18 months (mean 24 months) post-GNRFA, 91% (95% CI ​= ​59, 100%), 73% (95% CI ​= ​46, 99%), and 9% (95% CI ​= ​0, 26%) of patients reported ≥50%, ≥80%, and 100% pain relief, respectively. Additionally, 27% (95% CI ​= ​1, 54%) and 64% (95% CI ​= ​35, 92%) of individuals reported a PGIC score of 6 (“much improved”) and 7 (“very much improved”), respectively. The proportion of individuals who reported the MCID for the PGIC (score of ≥6) was 91% (95% CI ​= ​59, 100%). There were no adverse events reported amongst the patients in this cohort. No patients progressed to surgery. ConclusionThis single-arm cohort suggests that an expanded GNRFA protocol targeting SMGN, SLGN, IMGN, NVM, NVL, and NVI nerves with a three-tined electrode, resulted in significant long-term (≥18 months) improvements in pain and patient-perceived global improvement. Large, head-to-head trials are needed to establish whether this GNRFA protocol is superior to those used in previous clinical studies and those currently used more commonly in practice.

A Pilot Study of an Expanded Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Protocol for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain.

A Pilot Study of an Expanded Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Protocol for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain.

Safety and Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Management of Painful Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Painful total knee replacement (TKR) without an obvious underlying identifiable pathology is not uncommon. Dissatisfaction after TKR can be up to 20%. Different treatment modalities, including non-operative and operative procedures, have been described in the literature. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (GNRFA) is emerging as a newer treatment modality for painful TKR without an obvious underlying identifiable pathology. Despite a modest number of publications demonstrating the usefulness of GNRFA in managing pain in knee osteoarthritis, the efficacy of GNRFA has not been completely established in the management of residual pain after TKR. This systematic review aimed to analyze all published studies (nine studies) on GNRFA as an option to manage residual pain after TKR. Based on this current systematic review, we noted that GNRFA is a modality to treat post residual pain and patients can anticipate improvement in pain up to three months with minimal complications. This article provides an overview of the currently available knowledge and techniques employed for this procedure, as well as the expected outcome and safety profile of GNRFA in painful TKR.

Comparison of efficacy of radiofrequency alone or steroid or ozone intra-articular after radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Comparison of efficacy of radiofrequency alone or steroid or ozone intra-articular after radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Functional Outcomes and Physical Performance of Knee Osteoarthritis Patients After Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation.

To elucidate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in alleviating pain as well as its effects on functional outcomes, quality of life and physical performance in knee osteoarthritis patients. Prospective observational study. Patients were recruited within one community hospital. Patients with knee osteoarthritis. The subjects underwent ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves after showing a positive response to a diagnostic block. Outcome assessments were performed at baseline and at 2 and 12 weeks posttreatments using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and a physical performance evaluation including balance tests, quadriceps muscle strength test, two-minute walking test and knee joint proprioception test. Thirteen out of 38 patients were eligible for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation. There were significant improvements from baseline to posttreatment in the numeric rating scale score, physical health domain score of SF-36, and pain and stiffness domain scores of the WOMAC. Regarding physical performance, the step test result significantly improved over the 12 weeks of follow-up. On the other hand, no significant deteriorations in the single leg stance test, isokinetic quadriceps muscle strength test, knee joint proprioception test or two-minute walking test results were observed after radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves may significantly alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis patients. More importantly, static balance control and quadriceps muscle strength were preserved and there was a change of proprioception in the good direction.

Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial

Background and objectiveAlthough total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for severe knee osteoarthritis (OA), a subset of patients experience significant postoperative pain and dissatisfaction. Several clinical trials support...

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being performed to treat chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This narrative review provides a concise summary of the relevant neuroanatomy, randomized controlled trials, appropriate patient selection, and safety relating to genicular RFA. Cadaveric studies demonstrate significant variability in the location of the genicular nerves, which has stimulated debate about the ideal target locations for genicular RFA. Despite this, favorable outcomes have been observed in studies targeting only the superior medial genicular nerve, inferior medial genicular nerve, and superior lateral genicular nerve. Several randomized controlled trials demonstrate superiority of genicular RFA compared with intra-articular steroid, viscosupplementation, and oral analgesics. Genicular RFA of the superior medial genicular nerve, inferior medial genicular nerve, and superior lateral genicular nerve appears to be an effective treatment for painful KOA, but targeting additional sensory nerves may further improve treatment success. Although genicular RFA appears relatively safe on the basis of the available data, additional large-scale studies are needed to provide greater confidence.