Simple SummaryDeutsch Drahthaar (DD) is the most popular hunting dog in Germany, fulfilling all aspects of hunting including searching for trails. This breed was newly created at the beginning of the 20th century from a large number existing versatile hunting dog breeds. The aim of the breed was, and still is, to achieve the best performance in all aspects of hunting. We analyzed pedigrees of DD using demographic measures to quantify genetic diversity such as probabilities of gene origin and degrees of ancestral and individual inbreeding. A large number of genetically diverse founder dogs should open up the opportunity of creating a breed with a high genetic diversity and a low increase of inbreeding per generation. On the other hand, intense use of top sires and dams from a limited number of breeding lines may accelerate breeding progress in hunting abilities but reduce genetic diversity. Monitoring genetic diversity should help to maintain a high diversity of breeding populations. Our analysis of pedigree data from 101,887 DD dogs revealed inbreeding measures (coefficient of inbreeding F = 0.042, individual rate of inbreeding ΔFi = 0.00551) and effective population size (Ne = 92) in the mean range compared to a wide range of other dog breeds. Ancestral inbreeding had a strong increasing trend, whereas trends in individual inbreeding and rate of individual inbreeding were slightly negative.Loss of genetic diversity and high inbreeding rates confer an increased risk of congenital anomalies and diseases and thus impacting dog breeding. In this study, we analyzed recent and ancestral inbreeding as well as other measures of genetic variability in the Deutsch Drahthaar (DD) dog population. Analyses included pedigree data from 101,887 animals and a reference population with 65,927 dogs born between 2000 and 2020. The mean equivalent complete generations was 8.6 with 69% known ancestors in generation 8. The mean realized effective population size was 92 with an increasing trend from 83 to 108 over birth years. The numbers of founders, effective founders and effective ancestors, as well as founder genomes, were 814, 66, 38 and 16.15, respectively. Thirteen ancestors explained 50% of the genetic diversity. The mean coefficient of inbreeding and individual rate of inbreeding (ΔFi) were 0.042 and 0.00551, respectively, with a slightly decreasing trend in ΔFi. Exposure of ancestors to identical-by-descent alleles explored through ancestral coefficients of inbreeding showed a strong increasing trend. Comparisons between new and ancestral inbreeding coefficients according to Kalinowski et al. showed an average relative contribution of 62% of new inbreeding to individual inbreeding. Comparisons among average coancestry within the parental population and average inbreeding in the reference population were not indicative of genetic substructures. In conclusion, the creation of the DD dog breed about 120 years ago resulted in a popular breed with considerable genetic diversity without substructuring into lines or subpopulations. The trend of new inbreeding was declining, while ancestral inbreeding through ancestors who were autozygous at least once in previous generations was increasing.