Generative Tasks Research Articles

Generative associative naming in dementia of Alzheimer's type

Forty-eight patients with mild to moderate dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) were tested with a generative associative naming task, a task that combines the aspects of fluency and of word association tests. The variables taken into consideration were the number of adequate and inadequate responses, conventionality, word frequency and lexical-semantic relation to the target. DAT patients' performances were compared to those of a group of control subjects matched for sex, age and educational level. As a group, the patients gave fewer adequate responses, more idiosyncratic responses and perseverations, while there was no difference in the qualitative variables. However, the analyses of the performance profiles suggest that, irrespective of the severity of the disease, two major subgroups of DAT patients may be identified: (1) a first subgroup of subjects produced words with a lower conventionality rate and these were mostly in propositional relationship to the target; they also produced a higher rate of idiosyncratic responses and perseverations. (2) A second subgroup of subjects gave more conventional responses, mostly in the hierarchical-categorical relationship. The disorders of the former subgroup seem to correspond to a disrupted access to some relatively spared semantic abilities, whereas those of the latter to a semantic breakdown.

Semantic and letter category naming in Alzheimer's patients: A predictable difference

Performance on semantic and letter category naming tasks of 32 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Alzheimer's Disease Research Center was analyzed and compared to performance on a variety of other neuropsychological tasks. Although demonstrated to be highly correlated and equally difficult, the two generative naming tasks yielded predictably different performances. The difference score, obtained by subtracting semantic category naming scores from letter category naming scores, was best predicted in stepwise linear multiple regression by Trail Making B and Dictation. We argue that the critical difference between the two tasks is the subsystem of secondary memory on which each relies.

The problem of naming in SDAT: a relative deficit.

Research relating to language disorder in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) has focused primarily on naming impairment, formally termed anomia or nominal aphasia/dysphasia. Data resulting from this research have been insufficiently informed by a comparative linguistic framework in which performance on naming tasks is contrasted with performance on other forms of language tasks. The present study involves the comparison of 21 adults with SDAT and 18 demographically controlled normal elderly adults on the Test for Syntactic Complexity and fifteen subtests of the Western Aphasia Battery. Performance on naming is compared with performance on oral language variables of repetition, yes/no response, auditory word recognition, sequential commands, syntactic processing, as well as with performance on reading tasks and non-verbal tasks. Findings relating to oral language tasks show that structured syntactic processing requiring explicit interpretation and sequential commands are significantly more difficult for the SDAT sample than are three of four naming tasks. Further, significant SDAT performance variability is found across naming tasks. The generative categorical naming task is found to be significantly more difficult for the SDAT patient than are the other three naming tasks. It is concluded that the generative categorical naming task should be regarded as a meta-naming task. In sum, it is found that although language dysfunction in SDAT has anomic components, the essential character of the language disorder is not best conceptualized as a problem of naming.