Abstract

Performance on semantic and letter category naming tasks of 32 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Alzheimer's Disease Research Center was analyzed and compared to performance on a variety of other neuropsychological tasks. Although demonstrated to be highly correlated and equally difficult, the two generative naming tasks yielded predictably different performances. The difference score, obtained by subtracting semantic category naming scores from letter category naming scores, was best predicted in stepwise linear multiple regression by Trail Making B and Dictation. We argue that the critical difference between the two tasks is the subsystem of secondary memory on which each relies.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.