Generalized Pivotal Quantities Research Articles

Prediction intervals for general balanced linear random models

The main interest of prediction intervals lies in the results of a future sample from a previously sampled population. In this article, we develop procedures for the prediction intervals which contain all of a fixed number of future observations for general balanced linear random models. Two methods based on the concept of a generalized pivotal quantity (GPQ) and one based on ANOVA estimators are presented. A simulation study using the balanced one-way random model is conducted to evaluate the proposed methods. It is shown that one of the two GPQ-based and the ANOVA-based methods are computationally more efficient and they also successfully maintain the simulated coverage probabilities close to the nominal confidence level. Hence, they are recommended for practical use. In addition, one example is given to illustrate the applicability of the recommended methods.

Generalized confidence intervals for the process capability index C pm

Process capability indices have been proposed to the manufacturing industry for measuring process reproduction capability. The Cpm index takes into account the degree of process targeting (centering), which essentially measures process performance based on average process loss. To properly and accurately estimate the capability index, numerous conventional approaches have been proposed to obtain lower limits of the classical confidence intervals (CLCLs) for providing process capability information. In particular, lower confidence limits (LCLs) not only provide critical information regarding process performance but are used to determine if an improvement was made in reducing the nonconforming percent and the process expected loss. However, the conventional approach lacks for exact confidence intervals for Cpm involving unknown parameters which is a notable shortcoming. To remedy this, the method of generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) is proposed as an extension of classical confidence intervals (CCIs). For evaluating practical applications, two lower limits of generalized confidence intervals (GLCLs) for Cpm using generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) are considered, (i) to assess the minimum performance of one manufacturing process/one supplier, and (ii) to assess the smallest performance of several manufacturing processes/several suppliers for equal as well as unequal process variances.

On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves

An important measure for comparison of accuracy between two diagnostic procedures is the difference in paired areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Non-parametric and maximum likelihood methods have been proposed for interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. However, these two methods are asymptotic procedures and their performance in finite sample sizes has not been thoroughly investigated. We propose to use the concept of generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) to construct an exact confidence interval for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. A simulation study is conducted to empirically investigate the probability coverage and expected length of the three methods for various combinations of sample sizes, values of the area under the ROC curve and correlations. Simulation results demonstrate that the exact confidence interval based on the concept of GPQs provides not only sufficient probability coverage but also reasonable expected length. Numerical examples using published data sets illustrate the proposed method.

Generalized confidence intervals for proportions of total variance in mixed linear models

Exact confidence intervals for a proportion of total variance, based on pivotal quantities, only exist for mixed linear models having two variance components. Generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) introduced by Weerahandi [1993. Generalized confidence intervals (Corr: 94V89 p726). J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88, 899–905] are based on generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) and can be constructed for a much wider range of models. In this paper, the author investigates the coverage probabilities, as well as the utility of GCIs, for a proportion of total variance in mixed linear models having more than two variance components. Particular attention is given to the formation of GPQs and GCIs in mixed linear models having three variance components in situations where the data exhibit complete balance, partial balance, and partial imbalance. The GCI procedure is quite general and provides a useful method to construct confidence intervals in a variety of applications.

Fiducial Generalized Confidence Intervals

Generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) and generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) have proven to be useful tools for making inferences in many practical problems. Although GCIs are not guaranteed to have exact frequentist coverage, a number of published and unpublished simulation studies suggest that the coverage probabilities of such intervals are sufficiently close to their nominal value so as to be useful in practice. In this article we single out a subclass of generalized pivotal quantities, which we call fiducial generalized pivotal quantities (FGPQs), and show that under some mild conditions, GCIs constructed using FGPQs have correct frequentist coverage, at least asymptotically. We describe three general approaches for constructing FGPQs—a recipe based on invertible pivotal relationships, and two extensions of it—and demonstrate their usefulness by deriving some previously unknown GPQs and GCIs. It is fair to say that nearly every published GCI can be obtained using one of these recipes. As an interesting byproduct of our investigations, we note that the subfamily of fiducial generalized pivots has a close connection with fiducial inference proposed by R. A. Fisher. This is why we refer to the proposed generalized pivots as fiducial generalized pivotal quantities. We demonstrate these concepts using several examples.