Gemcitabine In Patients Research Articles

DCK expression, a potential predictive biomarker in the adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer after surgical resection: results from a phase II study.

The role of adjuvant therapy following resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of adjuvant gemcitabine in patients with BTC. This clinical phase II trial was an open-label, single center, single-arm study. Within 8 weeks after gross complete resection of BTC, patients were started on intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Intratumoral expression of cytidine deaminase (CDA), human equilibrative transporter-1 (hENT1), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 (RRM1) was measured by immunohistochemistry. This study enrolled 72 patients with BTC (26 with gallbladder cancer, 33 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 13 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 43% (95% CI, 33–57%). Multivariable analysis showed that DCK expression, vascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were significantly associated with RFS. Twenty-one (31.8%) were positive for DCK immunoreactivity. The median RFS was 34.95 months for DCK-positive patients, compared with 11.41 months for DCK-negative patients. Although the primary hypothesis of this study, defined as a 2-year RFS of 60%, was not met, intratumoral DCK expression was significantly associated with RFS in patients with resected BTC treated with postoperative gemcitabine chemotherapy. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Abstract CT066: Global phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PEGPH20) plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated, hyaluronan (HA)-high, stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background: Poor outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is associated partly with stromal hyaluronan (HA) accumulation, which may compromise chemotherapy access to tumors. In animal models, PEGPH20 degrades HA in tumors. Key endpoint data from a phase 2 study showed that PEGPH20 plus chemotherapy improved efficacy over chemotherapy alone in tumors retrospectively identified to accumulate HA (“HA-High”). The objectives of this phase 3 study are to compare efficacy and safety of standard-dose nab-paclitaxel (NAB) and gemcitabine (GEM) combined with either PEGPH20 or placebo in patients with HA-High, previously untreated, Stage IV PDA. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Methods: 420 patients ≥18 years with untreated HA-High metastatic PDA, ECOG PS 0-1 will be randomized (stratified by geographic region: North America/Europe/Other) 2:1 to NAB 125 mg/m2 + GEM 1000 mg/m2 + PEGPH20 3.0 μg/kg or to placebo. Patients with HA-High tumors will be prospectively identified by the co-developed VENTANA HA RxDx Assay, which indicates HA in the extracellular matrix. HA-High status (indicating patients who may achieve clinical benefit) was determined by Halozyme to be ≥50% staining based on clinical outcome data from a phase 2 study. Treatment will be provided in 4 week cycles (Wk 13, Wk 4 rest) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or consent withdrawal. PEGPH20 or placebo will be given twice weekly (Cycle 1) then weekly (Cycles 2+), NAB + GEM once weekly for all cycles. Dexamethasone will be given before and after PEGPH20 administrations to reduce treatment related musculoskeletal symptoms and enoxaparin will be given to minimize thromboembolic events. Tumor response will be assessed by an independent central imaging vendor using RECIST v1.1. Adverse events will be graded per NCI CTCAE v4.03. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will evaluate safety and data for PFS and OS. Trial initiated Q12016 (EudraCT 2015-004068-13; NCT02715804). Citation Format: Lei Zheng, Andrew E. Hendifar, Michele Reni, William P. Harris, Michel Ducreux, Andrea J. Bullock, Pippa G. Corrie, Tara Seery, Dimitrios Chondros, Eric Van Cutsem. Global phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PEGPH20) plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated, hyaluronan (HA)-high, stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT066. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT066

A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus Z-360, a CCK2 receptor-selective antagonist, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer as compared with gemcitabine plus placebo

Background We investigated the efficacy and safety of 60, 120, or 240 mg of Z-360, which is a highly potent cholecystokinin2-receptor-selective antagonist, combined with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.Methods Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of four treatment groups. Patients received 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine for each cycle and Z-360 tablets of 60 mg (GZ 60 mg group), 120, 240 mg or placebo tablets (Gem group) orally twice daily. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsThe median OS was 1.3 months longer in the GZ 60 mg group compared with the Gem group (8.5 vs. 7.2 months) and the risk of death was reduced by 19% compared with the Gem group, although there were no statistically significant differences. The study treatments were well tolerated.ConclusionsIn this Phase II study, no statistically significant differences between the GZ groups and Gem group were detected in any analysis. However, Z-360 in dose of 60 mg tends to improve OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with low toxic effect. Further exploratory trials with other agents such as gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel might be beneficial.

Safety and efficacy of eribulin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer.

e12578 Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) characterized by aggressive tumor behavior with very poor prognosis following progression after standard chemotherapeutic regimens.The combination of Gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue, and eribulin a microtubule-targeting agent exhibited synergistic cytotoxic effects in pre-clinicall and clinical setting . Thus, eribulin combined with gemcitabine may synergistically induce tumor cell death, especially in tumors like TNBC. Based on this rationale, we conducted a phase II study evaluating this combination either in first- or in second-line treatment for advanced TNBC.Methods: Females with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC who had received previous chemotherapy , with an ECOG (PS) ≤ 1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function. Patients received eribulin (1mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on day 1 and 8, q21 until disease progression. CT scans were performed every 12 weeks. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) and secondary were Feasibiliy, safety and clinical benefit rate (CBR ). Results: Thirty –two females (median age: 62 years, median ECOG performance status (PS) 1) were enrolled the study. The majority had visceral disease (78.5%). A median of 9 (range:4–18) treatment cycles was administered (69% of patients received ≥ 6 cycles), .All patients were evaluable for response. We did observe 12 partial responses for an overall response rate of 37.5% (95%CI,26.1-57.0). A stable disease was observed in 15 patients (46.8%). Clinical benefit, was observed in 21 patients (65.6%; 95%CI,48.1-76.6). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were haematologic . The main grade 3 or 4 non-hematolgic toxicities were fatigue, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting. Of the 32 patients in total 7 patients had dose reductions and 14 patients had dose delays. Conclusions: Resistance to current standard therapieslimits the available options for previously treated patients with metastatic TNBC and there is currently no preferred standard chemotherapy. This study demonstrated that the combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was efficacious, feasible and toxicity was generally manageable

Biomarker prediction of efficacy to vandetanib plus gemcitabine in a phase II double blind multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

4104 Background: We investigated the potential of biomarkers to predict efficacy of vandetanib and gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced (N = 41) or metastatic (N = 101) pancreatic cancer in a phase II double-blind multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Methods: All patients were 18y or above, (ECOG = 0-2), with at least 3 mths life expectancy had gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 30min iv wkly for 7 wks, followed by a 1wk break, then cycles of wkly treatment for 3wks with a 1-wk break) and randomly assigned to 300mg/d vandetanib or placebo once daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by intention to treat. A panel of potential biomarkers was tested to predict best survival with vandetanib and gemcitabine. Results: 142 patients were randomised, median FU = 24·9 mths with 131 deaths. The median (95% CI) OS in the 70 gemcitabine-placebo patients was 8·95 (6·55-11·7) mths and 8·83 (7·11-11·6) mths in the 72 gemcitabine-vandetanib patients (HR = 1·21, 95% CI = 0·85, 1·73; log rank X21df = 1·1; P = 0·303). A CTCAE V.4.02 rash grade 2 or above occurred in 4 (6 %) of 70 placebo patients versus 14 (19%) of 72 vandetanib patients. The median OS for the 14 vandetanib patients and with rash was 11·92 (10·89 – NA) mths, 7·76 (4·34 – 11·5) mths for the 58 vandetanib patients and without rash and 8·95 (6·55 – 11·7) mths for the gemcitabine-placebo patients (log rank Χ2 2df = 7·23; P = 0·03). We identified two biomarkers that could select patients for response to vandetanib (JN101, JN102). The biomarker combination was present in 26 patients with median OS of 12.1 (10.9, 16.0) mths versus 8.15 (6.67, 11.7) mths for 23 patients with the same biomarker profile in the placebo group (HR = 0.53 [0.29, 0.97], p = 0.0396). A logistic regression model showed that patients with JN102 were more likely to develop a rash (OR =0.81 [0.713, 0.925] p = 0.002). Conclusions: A two biomarker combination and a rash grade 2 or above may predict response to vandetanib and gemcitabine. This requires prospective evaluation. Clinical trial information: 96397434.

Single Arm Phase I/II Study of Everolimus and Intravesical Gemcitabine in Patients with Primary or Secondary Carcinoma In Situ of the Bladder who failed Bacillus Calmette Guerin (NCT01259063).

Background: Standard treatment for BCG-refractory urothelial cancer is radical cystectomy. Identification of active agents is clearly warranted.Objective: To determine a safe dose of oral everolimus in combination with standard intravesical gemcitabine and to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.Methods: Patients with carcinoma in situ refractory to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin and refusing cystectomy were eligible. Patients in the phase I part of the trial received one of three dose levels of oral everolimus. Patients also received a fixed dose of intravesical gemcitabine. Maintenance everolimus was given for 12 months in patients achieving a complete response confirmed by cystoscopy and cytology. Patients in phase II received continuous everolimus administered at 10 mg daily with intravesical gemcitabine followed by everolimus maintenance for 12 months of total therapy. The enrollment goal for the phase II was 33 patients.Results: 14 patients were enrolled in phase I of the trial. 23 patients were enrolled in phase II of the trial and 19 were evaluable for primary and secondary endpoints. Four patients withdrew consent prior to treatment initiation. Of the 19 patients evaluable for response, 3 (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3% – 40%) were disease free at 1 yr. The probability of RFS was 20% (95% CI 5% – 42%) at 12 months. Ten patients out of 19 had grade 3 or greater toxicity events. Seven withdrew consent or were taken off study.Conclusions: Many patients withdrew, and enrollment was halted. Continuous oral everolimus plus intravesical gemcitabine was not well tolerated in this patient population where the threshold for tolerability is low.

Therapeutic Potential of Curcumin in Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Pancreatic cancer is among the leading cause of deaths due to cancer with extremely poor prognosis. Gemcitabine is being used in the treatment of patient with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), although, the response rate is bellow 12%. A recent phase III trial revealed that FOLFIRINOX could be an option for the treatment of metastatic PDAC patients, although it is associated with increased toxicity. Therefore, identification of novel agents that either improves gemcitabine activity, within novel combinatorial approaches, or with a better efficacy than gemcitabine is warranted. The antitumor activity of curcumin in several tumors, including prostate, breast and colorectal cancers have investigated. A recent phase II trial explored the effects of curcumin in advanced pancreatic cancer patient. They found that oral curcumin was well tolerated. Another trial showed the activity of 8,000 mg of curcumin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This review summarizes the current knowledge about possible molecular mechanisms of curcumin in PDAC with particular emphasis on preclinical/clinical studies in pancreatic cancer treatment. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 1634-1638, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Vandetanib plus gemcitabine versus placebo plus gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma (ViP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 2 trial

Erlotinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown a significant but only marginally improved median overall survival when combined with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Vandetanib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR2, RET, and EGFR, all of which are in involved in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. We investigated the clinical efficacy of vandetanib when used in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The Vandetanib in Pancreatic Cancer (ViP) trial was a phase 2 double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial in previously untreated adult patients (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas confirmed by cytology or histology. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2 and a documented life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive vandetanib plus gemcitabine (vandetanib group) or placebo plus gemcitabine (placebo group) according to pre-generated sequences produced on the principle of randomly permuted blocks with variable block sizes of two and four. Patients were stratified at randomisation by disease stage and ECOG performance status. All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly, for 7 weeks followed by a 1-week break, followed by a cycle of 3 weeks of treatment with a 1-week break, until disease progression, and either oral vandetanib 300 mg per day once daily or matching placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (defined as the difference in time between randomisation and death from any cause or the censor date) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial has been completed and the final results are reported. The study is registered at EudraCT, number 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN, number ISRCTN96397434. Patients were screened and enrolled between Oct 24, 2011, and Oct 7, 2013. Of 381 patients screened, 142 eligible patients were randomly assigned to treatment (72 to the vandetanib group and 70 to the placebo group). At database lock on July 15, 2015, at a median follow-up of 24·9 months (IQR 24·3 to not attainable), 131 patients had died: 70 (97%) of 72 in the vandetanib group and 61 (87%) of 70 in the placebo group. The median overall survival was 8·83 months (95% CI 7·11-11·58) in the vandetanib group and 8·95 months (6·55-11·74) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·21, 80·8% CI 0·95-1·53; log rank χ21df 1·1, p=0·303). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [49%] of 72 patients in the vandetanib group vs 22 [31%] of 70 in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (20 [28%] vs 16 [23%]), hypertension (nine [13%] vs 11 [16%]), leucopenia (12 [17%] vs 13 [19%]), and fatigue (17 [24%] vs 15 [21%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. The addition of vandetanib to gemcitabine monotherapy did not improve overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors might still have potential in the treatment of pancreatic cancer but further development requires the identification of biomarkers to specifically identify responsive cancer subtypes. Cancer Research UK and AstraZeneca.

Abstract OT2-01-17: A Phase II randomized trial of pembrolizumab with carboplatin and gemcitabine for treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Abstract Background: Treatment for mTNBC is limited, and significant challenges persist in treating this disease, as outcomes remain largely dependent on chemotherapy without any effective targeted treatment. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is a highly selective, humanized monoclonal antibody against PD-1, blocking the negative immune regulatory signaling of the PD-1 receptor that is usually expressed by T-cells. Recent data showed that some patients with mTNBC may benefit from immune-based therapies (PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies). Cumulative evidence suggest that stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have a prognostic and predictive role in response to treatment in subsets of TNBC, particularly in response to carboplatin use. Preclinical data revealed that blocking PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in combination with platinum containing cytotoxic therapy improved response rates and survival. High levels of sTILs and an increased PD-L1 expression make mTNBC a candidate for PD-1–targeted therapy. As studies showed that the subset of TNBC with better response rates to carboplatin are heavily infiltrated with sTILs, pembrolizumab, becomes a very attractive drug to be tested in combination with carboplatin, with the goal of improving outcomes in mTNBC. A Phase II multicenter, randomized, trial has been initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining pembrolizumab with carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with mTNBC. Methods: A safety run-in will assess the safety and tolerability of combining pembrolizumab with carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with mTNBC. Following the completion of the safety run-in, patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) on day 1 along with carboplatin (AUC 2, day 1 and day 8, IV) plus gemcitabine (800 mg/m2, day 1 and day 8, IV) of a 21-day cycle, or carboplatin plus gemcitabine (same aforementioned dose) alone. Patients will have histologically documented unresectable mTNBC. Prior systemic therapy for mTNBC, for up to 2 lines is allowed, and patients will have ECOG PS 0–2 and measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Prior carboplatin/gemcitabine or cisplatin therapy is allowed in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, as long as it occurred more than 12 months from the beginning of their enrollment. Subjects whose tumors progressed while on treatment with carboplatin or cisplatin are excluded. Known CNS disease (except asymptomatic treated metastases), autoimmune disease or prior immune checkpoint blockade therapy is an exclusion to enrollment on this trial. Primary endpoint is assessing the objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 . Other endpoints include clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Tumor biopsies will be obtained at baseline and just prior to initiation of cycle 3 to assess biomarkers of response and immune escape. PD-L1 expression will be evaluated in exploratory analysis with a planned assessment of response based on PD-L1 status. This trial will enroll 6-12 patients in the safety run-in portion, and 75 patients in the randomized part, at 7 sites in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT02755272 www.clinicaltrials.gov. Citation Format: Obeid E, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Blackwell K, Goldstein LJ. A Phase II randomized trial of pembrolizumab with carboplatin and gemcitabine for treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-17.

Necuparanib combined with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Phase 2 results.

370 Background: The Phase 1 portion of a Phase 1/2 trial of Necuparanib (“Necu”) combined with nab-paclitaxel (nabP) + gemcitabine (gem) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01621243) showed acceptable safety and tolerability and encouraging signals of activity and established a dose for the randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase 2 portion. Methods: In Phase 2, patients received daily s.c. injections of either 5 mg/kg Necu daily or PBO, combined with i.v. 125 mg/m2 nabP and 1000 mg/m2 gem (Days 1, 8, 15 of each 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, safety, and CA19.9 levels. An interim futility analysis was conducted in July 2016 once 57 deaths (50% of the target number of 114 events required for trial completion) had occurred. Results: The analysis was conducted on data from 120 randomized patients (62 Necu, 58 PBO). The Z-score for futility was -0.42 (prespecified boundary of -0.148 was crossed as actual score was lower). Median OS was Necu = 10.71 and PBO = 9.99 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12 (favoring PBO); OS curves were intertwined. PFS was Necu = 5.52 and PBO = 6.93 months; HR = 0.97. RECIST response rates were comparable between arms: complete response, Necu = 0%, PBO = 3%; partial response, Necu = 26%, PBO = 26%; stable disease, Necu = 31%, PBO = 34%; disease control rate, Necu = 56%, PBO = 64%. The most common Grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (Necu = 33%, PBO = 33%), thrombocytopenia (Necu = 27%, PBO = 5%), and anemia (Necu = 22%, PBO = 11%). There were lower rate of serious AEs with Necu (48%) vs. PBO (60%). Modest increases in APTT, AST, and ALT were noted following Necu relative to PBO. 23% of Necu and 5% of PBO patients were IgG positive with an anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titer of ≥ 0.4 at any time. There were no treatment differences for decreases in CA19.9. Conclusions: No new safety signals were observed and the toxicity profile was considered manageable; however, Necu in combination with nabP and gem did not show a sufficient level of efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer to warrant continued enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT01621243.

A phase II study of gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancer after surgical resection.

330 Background: The role of adjuvant therapy following resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of adjuvant gemcitabine in patients with BTC. Methods: This clinical phase II study was an open-label, single center, single-arm study. Within 8 weeks after gross complete resection of BTC, patents received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2as an intravenous 30-min infusion on day 1, 8, and 15 for every 28 days. Intratumoral expression of cytidine deaminase (CDA), human equilibrative transporter-1 (hENT1), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 (RRM1) was measured by immunohistochemistry and eight SNPs in the CDA, hENT1, dCK, hCNT3 and RRM1 genes were evaluated. The relationship of each with patients’ clinical outcomes was assessed. Results: From January 2010 to July 2014, a total of 72 BTC patients (26 with gallbladder cancer, 33 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 13 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) were enrolled. At a median follow-up was 38.09 months (range: 4.14-68.29), 2-year recur- free survival (RFS) was 43% (95% CI, 33% to 57%). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 8 patients (11%). There was one treatment-related death from pneumonitis. The Cox proportion hazard model was performed with the following nine variables; gross type, degree of tumor differentiation. pathologic T factor, N stage, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymphatic invasion, dosage, and each protein expression. In the multivariable model, DCK expression, vascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis, were significantly associated with RFS. None of the tested SNPs was significantly associated with RFS or with any hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity. Conclusions: Although the primary hypothesis of this study, defined as a 2-year RFS of 60%, was not met, intratumoral DCK expression was significantly associated with RFS in patients with resected BTC treated with postoperative gemcitabine chemotherapy. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01043172.

Phase 2 trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid and/or poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Michaelson MD, McKay RR, Werner L, Atkins MB, Van Allen EM, Olivier KM, Song J, Signoretti S, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK.Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3435-43. [Epub 2015 Jun 8]. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29503.

BackgroundSarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with an aggressive biology and a poor prognosis. Poor-risk RCC is defined by clinical prognostic factors and demonstrates similarly aggressive behavior. No standard treatment exists for patients with sarcomatoid RCC, and treatment options for patients with poor-risk disease are of limited benefit. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in clinically aggressive RCC. MethodsThis was a phase 2, single-arm trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid or poor-risk RCC. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included the time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker correlatives. ResultsOverall, 39 patients had sarcomatoid RCC, and 33 had poor-risk RCC. The ORR was 26% for patients with sarcomatoid RCC and 24% for patients with poor-risk RCC. The median TTP and OS for patients with sarcomatoid RCC were 5 and 10 months, respectively. For patients with poor-risk disease, the median TTP and OS were 5.5 and 15 months, respectively. Patients whose tumors had>10% sarcomatoid histology had a higher clinical benefit rate (ORR plus stable disease) than those with≤10% sarcomatoid histology (P = 0.04). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (n = 20), anemia (n = 10), and fatigue (n = 7). ConclusionsThese results suggest that antiangiogenic therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy are an active and well-tolerated combination for patients with aggressive RCC. The combination may be more efficacious than either therapy alone and is currently under further investigation.

A single arm, prospective multicenter phase II study FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

TPS514 Background: The current standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy. Despite intensive researches, no trials have proved better overall survival (OS) over GC. Recently, FOLFIRINOX provided a remarkable survival benefit over gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Given the promising results of FOLFIRI and FOLFOX in patients with advanced BTC, FOLFIRINOX can be an attractive option in patients with advanced BTC as well. Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced BTC. The major inclusion criteria are as follows; unresectable or recurrent BTC, histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy, age of 20-75 years, an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, at least one measurable lesion, adequate hematological, liver and renal function. The major exclusion criteria are as follows; UGT genetic polymorphisms of homozygous UGT1A1*6 or *28 or heterozygous UGT1A1*6 and *28, massive pleural effusion or ascites. FOLFIRINOX consists of oxaliplatin of 85 mg/m2, irinotecan of 180 mg/m2, leucovorin of 400 mg/m2 administered by intravenous infusion and fluorouracil of 400 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus and of 2,400 mg/m2 by continuous intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. The primary outcome is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes are OS, tumor response and safety. PFS and OS will be calculated from the date of enrollment until the date of documentation of disease progression or death in patients without disease progression and the date of death. Tumor response will be evaluated according to the RECIST version 1.1 every 2 months. Safety will be evaluated with the CTCAE version 4.0. A total of 35 patients will be required to provide 75% power to detect an increase in median PFS from 6 months provided by standard care of GC to 10 months in patients receiving FOLFIRINOX, with a 24 months of recruitment and 18 months of follow-up. A phase III trial will be considered when this study shows the lower limit of the 80% confidence interval for PFS is longer than 6 months. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020801.

Nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a subgroup analysis of the Western European cohort of the MPACT trial.

PurposeThe global Phase III MPACT trial demonstrated superior efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine over gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Region was a randomization stratification factor in the MPACT trial. This subgroup analysis of MPACT examined efficacy and safety of patients treated in Western Europe.Patients and methodsPatients received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer as previously described. A total of 76 patients were included in this analysis (n=38 for each arm).ResultsDifferences between the overall Western European cohort and the intention-to-treat population included lower percentages of male patients (46% and 58%, respectively) and patients with biliary stents (8% and 17%), and higher percentages of patients with Karnofsky performance status of 90–100 (78% and 60%) and primary tumors in the body of the pancreas (48% and 31%). The median overall survival was 10.7 months with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs 6.9 months with gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–1.40]; P=0.471). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 vs 3.7 months, respectively (HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.37–1.33]; P=0.277). The independently assessed overall response rate was 18% vs 5% (response rate ratio, 3.50 [95% CI: 0.78–15.78]; P=0.076). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone were neutropenia (46% vs 33%, respectively), leukopenia (35% vs 19%), anemia (22% vs 0%), asthenia (21% vs 6%), thrombocytopenia (14% vs 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (13% vs 3%).ConclusionAlthough a statistically significant difference between the treatment arms was not reached for efficacy endpoints, this study does report treatment benefit and a manageable safety profile associated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients treated in Western Europe with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results from a Feasibility Study.

Purpose This study assessed the feasibility and compliance of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by simultaneous integrated boost–intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.Materials and Methods In this trial, patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle. Patients were subsequently treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m2/wk) during SIB-IMRT. The patients received total doses of 55 and 44 Gy in 22 fractions to planning target volume 1 and 2, respectively. As an ancillary study, digital polymerase chain reaction was performed to screen for the seven most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA).Results Forty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2015. Of these, 33 (75%) completed the treatment. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (18.2%), grade 3 nausea (6.8%) and vomiting (6.8%). The most common toxicities during SIB-IMRT were grade 3 neutropenia (24.2%) and grade 3 anemia (12.1%). Ten patients (23%) underwent a curative resection after therapy. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative resection (16.8 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.01). The median cfDNA concentration was significantly lower after treatment (108.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001).Conclusion Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent SIB-IMRT was well tolerated and active.

Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase I/II Study of Tocilizumab, an Anti–Interleukin-6 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, Combined with Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background: To assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of tocilizumab + gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with treatment-naive advanced pancreatic cancer and high inflammatory burden (C-reactive protein ≥ 2 mg/dl) without obvious infections received tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) intravenously every 2 weeks with intravenous gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4-week cycle until disease progression or study withdrawal. Interleukin-6 signalling inhibition biomarkers were measured. Efficacy analyses included overall survival, progression-free survival, tumour response and clinical symptoms. Adverse events and laboratory parameters were also assessed. Results: Fifteen patients received tocilizumab+gemcitabine. Tumour response was observed in two patients (13%). Six patients (40%) died within 2 months of treatment start. Median overall survival was 2.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.8); median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.6). Overall and progression-free survival tended to be longer in patients with modest than in patients with higher elevations of baseline C-reactive protein. Changes in C-reactive protein and IL-6 occurred. Although tocilizumab +gemcitabine was tolerable, results were inconclusive because of the brevity of the evaluation period resulting from the death or premature withdrawal of patients. Dose interruption attributed to haematologic toxicity was frequently observed. Conclusions: Tocilizumab+gemcitabine failed to show a clear clinical benefit in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and high inflammatory burden. To evaluate conclusively the benefit of tocilizumab, future study designs should use a comparator treatment that does not interfere with interleukin-6 signalling and that includes better patient selection criteria.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Safety and Exploratory Efficacy Study of Kanglaite Injection (KLTi) plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Background: This study was designed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of KLTi plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.Methods: In a randomized, open-label study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized 2:1 to receive KLTi plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Three sequential cohorts were tested at 30 g/day, 50 g/day, and 30 g/day. Gemcitabine was administered at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. KLTi was administered on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19 of each 28 day cycle. Patients received study treatment until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the ITT population. Safety evaluation was based on patients who received any study treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00733850.Results: Eighty-five patients were randomized including 41 (28:13) in Cohort 1, 18 (12:6) in Cohort 2, and 26 (17:9) in Cohort 3. Due to a different dose and/or shift in patient populations in Cohort 2 and 3, efficacy data for the 30 gm dose are presented in this manuscript for Cohort 1 alone, and for the combination of Cohort 1+3. The 30 gm KLTi + gemcitabine group had a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent radiology review in the ITT population, with a median of 112 days, versus 58 days in the gemcitabine group (HR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.92), p = 0.0240. The incidence rates of TEAEs, CTCAE Grade 3 or higher TEAEs, and SAEs were similar between the two arms. There were no deaths related to KLTi + gemcitabine treatment.Conclusion: Kanglaite Injection (30 g/day) plus a standard regimen of gemcitabine demonstrated encouraging clinical evidence of anti-neoplastic activity and a well-tolerated safety profile.

Safety Study of Targeted and Localized Intra-Arterial Delivery of Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: This is a first-in-man safety study in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using a targeted intra-arterial delivery catheter (RenovoCath™).Methods: Twenty patients were enrolled in a four-stage dose escalation of intra-arterial, locally delivered gemcitabine, at doses up to 1000 mg/m2. Patients' symptoms and laboratory values were monitored for safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included the effect on tumor size, tumor markers, and survival.Results: One hundred one treatments were administered to 20 patients. Five patients dropped out early due to adverse events or withdrawing consent. Serious adverse events and complications were as follows: sepsis (n = 3), grade 3 neutropenia (n = 3), guide-mediated vascular dissection (n = 3), and pulmonary toxicity (n = 1). There were no cases of elevated liver or pancreatic enzymes. All sepsis cases occurred in patients with biliary stent/drains, prompting the addition of periprocedural treatment with antibiotics, which effectively prevented further sepsis in the study. Efficacy analysis was limited to 15 patients who received more than two treatments. Fifty-eight percent of these patients had a reduction in CA 19-9 tumor markers, 3 patients had tumor progression, 1 had partial response, and 11 showed disease stability. The survival rate at 12 months was 60%.Conclusions: The results demonstrate feasibility of localized and selective intra-arterial chemotherapy delivery to the pancreas utilizing the RenovoCath. With gemcitabine, this approach is safe, with the sole prerequisite of perioperative antibiotics for patients with prior biliary drainage/stent. Efficacy results suggest a survival benefit when compared to historical control, especially in patients with prior radiation therapy.

Erratum to: nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Canadian Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 MPACT Trial.

Erratum to: nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Canadian Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 MPACT Trial.

715TiP - Global phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PEGPH20) plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated, hyaluronan (HA)-high, stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

715TiP - Global phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PEGPH20) plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated, hyaluronan (HA)-high, stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma