Gemcitabine In Patients Research Articles

Phase I, multicenter, open-label study of intravenous VCN-01 oncolytic adenovirus with or without nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

BackgroundVCN-01 is an oncolytic adenovirus (Ad5 based) designed to replicate in cancer cells with dysfunctional RB1 pathway, express hyaluronidase to enhance virus intratumoral spread and facilitate chemotherapy and immune cells...

Baseline Factors Predictive of the Receipt of Second-Line Chemotherapy After Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Second-line (2L) chemotherapy is important for improved survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, approximately half of patients with APC do not receive 2L chemotherapy because of disease progression or adverse events. Baseline factors predictive of the receipt of 2L chemotherapy remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated predictive factors for the receipt of 2L chemotherapy in patients with APC. Between January 2015 and March 2020, 53 patients with APC received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as first-line chemotherapy at our institute. Of these 53 patients, 29 patients received 2L chemotherapy, and 23 patients received best supportive care. Patients' characteristics were compared retrospectively, and predictive factors for the receipt of 2L chemotherapy were evaluated. Sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia at baseline were independent negative predictive factors for the receipt of 2L chemotherapy in multivariate analysis. Although the presence of sarcopenia did not affect the relative dose intensity through 8 weeks of AG therapy, patients with hypoalbuminemia had a significantly lower relative dose intensity. Sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia at baseline might be negative predictive factors for the receipt of 2L chemotherapy after AG treatment in patients with APC.

A phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of GP-2250 in combination with gemcitabine for advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

TPS620 Background: GP-2250 is a metabolic enzyme inhibitor that selectively induces oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis in cancer cells by inhibiting glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and limiting aerobic glycolysis, an essential process for energy production in cancer cells. In vitro, increasing concentrations of GP-2250 induced proportional dose-response effects in 5 different pancreatic cancer cell lines (Buchholtz BMC Cancer 2017). Patient-derived pancreatic xenograft studies in mice demonstrated tumor growth inhibition with GP-2250 monotherapy (Braumann J Clin Oncol 2020). In combination with gemcitabine, a synergistic effect was shown with greater inhibition of pancreatic tumor growth than with either gemcitabine or GP-2250 alone. These findings support the assessment of the therapeutic potential of GP-2250 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: This open-label phase 1/2 trial will evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of GP-2250 and the preliminary efficacy of GP-2250 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have progressed on prior treatment with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. In phase 1, Bayesian Optimal Interval design will be used for GP-2250 dose escalation. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)–assessment period will be 5 weeks at each dose level (starting dose 250 mg once weekly intravenously), consisting of a 1-week run-in period with GP-2250 monotherapy, followed by a full cycle of GP-2250 plus standard dose and schedule of gemcitabine. Single patient cohorts (100% dose escalation between cohorts) will be enrolled until the occurrence of the first DLT (or cohort 4 if no DLTs occur in cohorts 1−3), after which, cohorts will be expanded to 3 patients with 35%−45% dose escalations between cohorts. Patients will receive treatment until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Primary study endpoints include safety and tolerability of GP-2250, tumor response (RECIST 1.1), disease control rate (complete response, partial response, stable disease), and duration of response. Pharmacokinetics, incidence and severity of laboratory abnormalities and treatment-emergent adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival will also be assessed. As of September 2021, 19 patients have been enrolled. Following completion of the phase 1/2 trial, a phase 3 first-line maintenance study will be initiated. This study is funded by Geistlich Pharma AG. Clinical trial information: NCT03854110. Clinical trial information: NCT03854110.

Arterial Administration of DNA Crosslinking Agents with Restraint of Homologous Recombination Repair by Intravenous Low-Dose Gemcitabine Is Effective for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Simple SummaryPancreatic cancer is considered incurable, and most cases are detected in the advanced stages. Establishing a new, effective interventional treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer is a pressing issue. Pretreatment with gemcitabine had a restraining effect on the homologous DNA recombination repair (HRR) of DNA crosslinking, inhibiting the function of Rad51, of which expression is found to be increased in pancreatic cancer. The aim of our prospective study was to assess the potential value of the arterial administration of DNA crosslinking agents after intravenous administration of low-dose gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We confirmed, among forty-five patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer, that a patient subgroup of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC, 10 patients) who underwent these treatment courses successively more than twice in the first 6 months had 33 months of overall survival, 31 months of local progression free survival, and a complete response of 40%. This treatment can be a new treatment option for LAPC.(1) Background: Pretreatment by Rad51-inhibitory substances such as gemcitabine followed by arterial chemotherapy using antineoplastic agents causing DNA crosslink might be more beneficial for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancers than conventional treatments. The efficacy of arterial administration of DNA crosslinking agents with pretreatment of intravenous low-dose gemcitabine for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAPC or MPC) is evaluated. (2) Methods: A single-arm, single-center, institutional review board-approved prospective study was conducted between 2005 and 2015. Forty-five patients (23 LAPC, 22 MPC) were included. Patients received a weekly low dose of gemcitabine intravenously for three weeks followed by arterial administration of mitomycin C and epirubicin hydrochloride at tumor-supplying arteries on the fifth or sixth week. This treatment course was repeated at 1.5-to-2-month intervals. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and therapeutic response were evaluated. LAPC or MPC were divided according to treatment compliance, excellent or poor (1 or 2), to subgroups L1, L2, M1, and M2. (3) Results: OS of LAPC and MPC were 23 months and 13 months, respectively. The OS of LAPC with excellent treatment compliance (subgroup L1, 10 patients) was 33 months with 31 months of LPFS, and four patients (40%) had a complete response (CR). The OS of the L1 subgroup was significantly longer than those of other subgroups L2, M1, and M2, which were 17 months, 17 months, and 8 months, respectively. As Grade 3 adverse effects, severe bone marrow suppression, interstitial pneumonitis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome were observed in six (13.0%), three (6.5%), and three (6.5%) patients, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Arterial DNA crosslinking with the systemic restraint of homologous recombination repair can be a new treatment option for LAPC.

Comparison of two regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: propensity score–matched analysis of real-world data

Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. A total of 140 patients were included. The median PFS and OS was 7.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.0-8.7] months and 22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1) months, respectively. The toxicity of wGT was manageable. Among the patients, 90 (64.3%) received the 21-day regimen and 50 (35.7%) received the 28-day regimen. A higher number of younger patients and patients receiving later-line therapy received the 28-day regimen. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFS after propensity score matching, though subgroup analysis showed that patients with early relapse benefited more from the 28-day regimen. The ORR was numerically higher in 28-day regimen (37.8% versus 28.0%, p = 0.310). However, the 21-day regimen was better tolerated than the 28-day regimen. wGT administration showed efficacy and safety in patients with MBC. The efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated. 21-day regimen of wGT was well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. We found that the efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.

Safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine for the treatment of classic Kaposi's sarcoma without visceral involvement.

Background:Classic Kaposi’s sarcoma (CKS) is a rare, multifocal, endothelial cell neoplasm that typically occurs in elderly people with previous infection by human herpes virus-8. Prospective trials are rare, and the choice of drugs relies on prospective trials performed on HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS). Pegylated liposomal anthracyclines and taxanes are considered the standard first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. Despite the indolent biologic behavior, the natural history is characterized by recurrent disease. This condition of chronic administration of cytotoxic drugs is often associated with immediate/long-term adverse events.Methods:This was an observational, retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine in patients with CKS. From January 2016 to September 2021, the patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, with cycles repeated every 21 days. The treatment was administered as first or second line.Results:Twenty-seven (27) patients were included in the study. Twenty-one (21) out 27 patients (77.8%) achieved a partial response (PR), including 8 patients with major response (MR) (29.6%) and 13 patients with minor response (mR) (48.2%); 2 (7.4%) showed a complete response (CR), 3 (11.1%) a stable disease (SD), and 1 (3.7%) a progressive disease (PD). Tumor responses were generally rapid, with a median time to first response of 4 weeks (range, 3–12 weeks). Patients who responded had disease improvement with flattening of the skin lesions, decrease in the number of lesions, and substantial reduction in tumor-associated complications. Median duration of response was 19.2 months. Common adverse events were grades 1/2 thrombocytopenia, and grade 1 noninfectious fever. No patient discontinued treatment as a result of adverse events.Conclusion:Our study showed that gemcitabine is effective and well tolerated, acts rapidly on cutaneous lesions, and allows substantial symptom palliation, without dose-limiting toxicity. Gemcitabine represents a safe and effective option for the treatment of CKS.

A phase 1b study evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of berzosertib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesBerzosertib (formerly M6620, VX-970) is an intravenous, highly potent and selective, first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase inhibitor. We assessed the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of berzosertib plus gemcitabine in an expansion cohort of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The association of efficacy with TP53 status and other tumor markers was also explored. Materials and methodsAdult patients with advanced histologically confirmed NSCLC received berzosertib 210 mg/m2 (days 2 and 9) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) at the recommended phase 2 dose established in the dose escalation part of the study. ResultsThirty-eight patients received at least one dose of study treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (55.3%), anemia (52.6%), and nausea (39.5%). Gemcitabine had no apparent effect on the PK of berzosertib. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10.5% (4/38, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7–22.5%). In the exploratory analysis, the ORR was 30.0% (3/10, 90% CI: 9.0–61.0%) in patients with high loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and 11.0% (1/9, 90% CI: 1.0–43.0%) in patients with low LOH. The ORR was 33.0% (2/6, 90% CI: 6.0–73.0%) in patients with high tumor mutational burden (TMB), 12.5% (2/16, 90% CI: 2.0–34.0%) in patients with intermediate TMB, and 0% (0/3, 90% CI: 0.0–53.6%) in patients with low TMB. ConclusionsBerzosertib plus gemcitabine was well tolerated in patients with advanced, pre-treated NSCLC. Based on the observed clinical efficacy, future clinical trials should involve genomically selected patients.

Outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant three-week course chemoradiotherapy using capecitabine-based versus gemcitabine-based concurrent chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can provide downstaging and improve margin negativity for borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma [(B)RPC]. Little is known about the relative efficacy of capecitabine (CAPE)-based vs. gemcitabine (GEM)-based 3-week chemoradiation (3WCRT) with 36 Gy in 15 fractions. This study aimed to compare the odds of achieving surgical resection, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 3WCRT with concurrent CAPE versus GEM. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining medical records from a single center for patients with (B)RPC treated with 3WCRT between 1/2009-12/2020. Odd ratios (OR) of achieving surgical resection were estimated using logistic regression for univariable and multivariable analyses. Median TTP (mTTP) and median OS (mOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of progression and survival in univariable and multivariable analyses. Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (71%) patients were treated with CAPE, while 9 (29%) were treated with GEM. All patients in the GEM group were borderline resectable, vs. 18 (82%) patients in the CAPE group, P=0.30. Nineteen (86%) patients in the CAPE group were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, vs. 4 (44%) patients in the GEM group, P=0.03. The CAPE group had higher odds of achieving surgical resection [OR =9.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-58.20]. Adjusting for covariates, the odds of achieving surgical resection were still statistically higher in the CAPE group vs. the GEM group (OR =25.34; 95% CI: 1.14-563.72). The CAPE group had superior mTTP compared to the GEM group (15.4 months, 95% CI: 4.9-71.1 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI: 0.4-14.5; P=0.01), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14-0.81). Adjusting for covariates this effect persisted; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for progression was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08-0.77). Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated that the CAPE group had superior OS compared to the GEM group in unadjusted (HR =0.13; 95% CI: 0.04-0.40) and adjusted models (HR =0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.52). For neoadjuvant 3WCRT, this hypothesis-generating study suggests concurrent CAPE may be a more effective radiosensitizer than GEM for patients with (B)RPC.

Improving Rates of Immediate Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine for Low-Grade Bladder Cancer: An Implementation Analysis.

We sought to demonstrate how an implementation science framework can be used to increase rates of postoperative intravesical chemotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with low-grade, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer, thereby improving the quality of cancer care. An audit performed at 2 University of Rochester Medical Center hospitals involved in the SWOG S0337 trial identified low usage rates of postoperative intravesical chemotherapy once study accrual closed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided an evaluation of barriers to adoption of this evidence-based practice. Methods employed included an online survey of urologists' perceptions of postoperative gemcitabine, face-to-face interviews with key stakeholders and direct observation of utilization processes. Subsequent implementation strategies were mapped to identified barriers; educational training for urologists and support staff and refining workflow processes were critical aspects of the intervention. Repeat usage audits measured practice change at 1 year. The pre-intervention rate of appropriate use of intravesical gemcitabine was 11% at Strong Memorial Hospital and increased to 78% after 4 months and 88% after 12 months. The pre-intervention rate was 37% at Highland Hospital and increased to 82% after 4 months and 94% after 12 months. Over the period audited, 8 patients received gemcitabine who ultimately had nonlow-grade histology. Implementation science can be used to improve the impact of evidence-based findings in urological practice. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research has been used extensively in the literature and was adapted for postoperative intravesical chemotherapy with gemcitabine. This approach is feasible, generalizable, and results in durable practice change.

1466P Napabucasin + nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Results from the phase III CanStem111P study

1466P Napabucasin + nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Results from the phase III CanStem111P study

Clinical prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly malignant tumor type with a high early metastasis rate and no obvious symptoms. Gemcitabine is a first-line chemotherapeutic drug for PC. Since there is no distinct method to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with PC, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether positivity for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with advanced PC is associated with response to gemcitabine chemotherapy and to explore whether CTCs may be used as a predictor of prognosis of patients with advanced PC undergoing chemotherapy. First, immunomagnetic microspheres (magnetic beads; MIL) were prepared to detect CTCs. The patients' clinical characteristics and survival data, as well as efficacy and adverse effects of chemotherapy, were prospectively obtained and their association with CTCs was analyzed. The results indicated that CTC-positive patients with advanced PC had a higher probability of developing resistance to gemcitabine chemotherapy than CTC-negative patients. Survival in the CTC-negative group was significantly higher than in the CTC-positive group (χ2=14.58, P<0.001). CTC-positive patients with advanced PC also had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after chemotherapy with gemcitabine (P=0.01). In conclusion, CTC-positive patients with PC are more likely to develop gemcitabine resistance, have poor PFS and low incidence of thrombocytopenia. CTCs are expected to become a prognostic indicator for chemotherapy response in patients with PC.

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter open-label cohort study (NABGEM cohort study)

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter open-label cohort study (NABGEM cohort study)

MCL1 participates in leptin-promoted mitochondrial fusion and contributes to drug resistance in gallbladder cancer.

Obesity is a risk factor for gallbladder cancer (GBC) development, and it correlates with shorter overall survival. Leptin, derived from adipocytes, has been suggested to contribute to the growth of cancer cells; however, the detailed mechanism of leptin in GBC drug resistance remains uninvestigated. In this study, our finding that patients with GBC with a higher BMI were associated with increased GBC risks, including shortened survival, is clinically relevant. Moreover, obese NOD/SCID mice exhibited a higher circulating concentration of leptin, which is associated with GBC growth and attenuated gemcitabine efficacy. We further revealed that leptin can inhibit gemcitabine-induced GBC cell death through myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) activation. The transcription factor C/EBP δ (CEBPD) is responsive to activated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and contributes to MCL1 transcriptional activation upon leptin treatment. In addition, MCL1 mediates leptin-induced mitochondrial fusion and is associated with GBC cell survival. The findings in this study suggest the involvement of the pSTAT3/CEBPD/MCL1 axis in leptin-induced mitochondrial fusion and survival and provide a potentially new therapeutic target to improve the efficacy of gemcitabine in patients with GBC.

A phase Ⅰ open-label dose-escalation study of AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

e16210 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Overexpression of c-Met is associated with the poor prognosis in patients with PDAC and it was noted that phosphorylation of c-Met is increased in gemcitabine-resistant PDAC. AL2846 is an oral c-Met inhibitor, which targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK’s) primarily including c-Met, VEGFR1, KIT, Axl and RET. The combination of AL2846 with chemotherapy may improve the clinical efficacy of PDAC. Based on these consideration, a phase Ⅰ clinical trial was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced PDAC and to clarify the potential anti-tumor activity. Methods: Patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic PDAC were enrolled to receive oral AL2846 once daily in a fasted state in combination with gemcitabine intravenous infusion over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The starting dose level is AL2846 40 mg and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as the highest dose level at which ≤33 % of patients incurred a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and RP2D. Secondary endpoints included response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: As of January 1, 2021, a total of 15 patients with PDAC were enrolled and received 4 dose-levels of AL2846 (40 mg: n = 1; 60 mg: n = 6; 90 mg: n = 3; 120 mg: n = 5) treatment. DLTs occurred in 1 patient who experienced grade 3 abnormal liver function. The most common grade 3 or above drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (n = 7, 46.7%), thrombocytopenia (n = 5, 33.3%), leukopenia (n = 4, 26.7%), GGT increased (n = 4, 26.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 3, 20.0%) and alkaline phosphatase increased (n = 3, 20.0%). Among the 15 patients available for efficacy evaluation, 1 patient (6.6%) achieved partial response who was at the dose levels of 90mg. There were 4 patients whose PFS was more than 5 months. Although there were no more than 2 DLT events, we chose 90 and 120 mg as the target dose for RP2D according to the dose reduction and proportion of gemcitabine. Conclusions: The RP2D of AL2846 in combination with standard dose of gemcitabine were 90 and 120 mg QD continuously. The results demonstrated that AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine was well tolerated at doses up to 120 mg. Further clinical studies about the efficacy of AL2846 in pancreatic cancer are in progress. Clinical trial information: CTR20201021.

Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407).

4017 Background: FOLFIRINOX, consisting of leucovorin (LV), fluorouracil (FU), irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and GnP, consisting of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nPTX), have shown superior efficacy over GEM in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Although several studies have reported the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX or GnP for pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), no randomized controlled trial to compare the two regimens has been conducted in those pts. To select the most promising chemotherapy for LAPC, a randomized phase II selection design trial (JCOG1407) was conducted to compare between modified FOLFIRINOX (FOLFIRINOX with dose reduction of IRI and without bolus FU; Arm A) and GnP (Arm B) for pts with LAPC. Methods: In Arm A, 85 mg/m2 of L-OHP, 200 mg/m2 of l-LV, 150 mg/m2 of IRI, followed by 2,400 mg/m2 of continuous FU over 46 hours are infused every 2 weeks. In Arm B, 125 mg/m2 of nPTX followed by 1,000 mg/m2 of GEM are infused on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (the proportion of 1-year OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) and response rate in pts with target lesions. The planned sample size was 124 pts to select more effective regimen in 1-year OS with a probability of at least 0.85 and to test the null hypothesis of 53% in 1-year OS with a one-sided alpha of 5% and 80% Results: From 2015 to 2019, a total of 126 pts was enrolled from 29 Japanese institutions, and were allocated to Arm A (n = 62) or Arm B (n = 64). The median (range) age was 66 (44-75) years and 58.7% were male. At the analysis, after a median (range) follow-up of 1.52 (0.55-3.99) years, 75 (59.5%) pts died. The proportion of 1-year OS was better in Arm B, 77.4% [95% CI 64.9–86.0] vs. 82.5% [95% CI 70.7–89.9], but 2-year OS was better in Arm A, 48.2% [95% CI 33.3–61.7] vs. 39.7% [95% CI 28.6–52.5]. Median OS was 2.0 years [95% CI 1.6-2.7] in Arm A and 1.8 years [95% CI 1.5-2.0] in Arm B. 1-year PFS for Arm A/B was 47.5 % [95% CI 34.5-59.4]/40.2% [95% CI 27.8-52.3], and 1-year MFS was 64.2 % [95% CI 50.9-74.8]/57.3% [95% CI 43.9-68.6]. Arm A was better OS in pts with CA19-9 &lt;1000 U/mL and the opposite trend was observed in pts with CA19-9&gt;1000 U/mL. Response rate was 30.9% [95% CI 19.1-44.8] in Arm A, and 41.4% [95% CI 28.6-55.1]) in Arm B. Incidences of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities for Arm A and Arm B were 66.1% and 67.2%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: This study was the first randomized trial comparing the two regimens. The 1-year OS of the primary endpoint in GnP was better than mFOLFIRINOX, but mFOLFIRINOX achieved longer survival in 2-year OS. It is required to confirm longer OS and safety profiles which regimen should be selected as a standard regimen in LAPC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180085.

Activity of single-agent gemcitabine in patients (pts) with advanced angiosarcoma: A retrospective study.

e23547 Background: Gemcitabine has shown clinical activity against angiosarcoma in single cases or small series, as a single agent or in combination with taxanes. We aimed to evaluate its activity in a larger, homogeneous series of pts with advanced angiosarcoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of consecutive adult pts with advanced angiosarcoma treated with gemcitabine(1000 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-days cycle) at our institutions from January 2010 to January 2021. All cases were confirmed by an expert pathologist from the French network of Sarcoma pathologists (RRePS). Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fourty-two pts [median age : 52 years (range : 25-90), median PS : 1 (range : 0-2), 36 women)] were identified. Ten (24%) had locally advanced disease; the median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range : 1-4) in the remaining 32 pts. Primary tumor site was breast/chest wall (12), face/scalp (9), heart (8), other viscera (7) or limbs (7). Eleven (26%) occurred in previously irradiated field. All pts but 4 had received prior anthracyclines (peri-operatively or in the metastatic setting) and weekly paclitaxel, and 9 (21%) had received pazopanib. Gemcitabine was given as second, third and fourth line in 7 (17%), 20 (47%) and 15 (36%) pts, respectively. Best tumor response by RECIST 1.1 was PR (16 pts, 38%), SD (10 pts, 24%) or PD (16 pts, 38%). All pts with cardiac angiosarcoma experienced a PR, as well as 4 of 10 pts with angiosarcoma arising in irradiated field and 3 of the 4 pts with CNS metastases. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI : 3.1-6.5), and median OS was 9.9 months (95%CI : 6.6-13.4). Two febrile neutropenia occurred. No new safety signal was observed. Ongoing studies are exploring whether candidate biomarkers such as hENT1 expression could help predicting the benefit of gemcitabine in pts with angiosarcoma of the heart and large vessels. Conclusions: Single agent gemcitabine has clinically meaningful activity in advanced, heavily pre-treated angiosarcoma (including cardiac angiosarcoma). This series may serve as a benchmark for future clinical trials in angiosarcoma.

Fever after Gemcitabine Administration is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma : Multicenter Retrospective Study

Gemcitabine (GEM) is currently a standard chemotherapeutic agent for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Fever isknown to be an adverse effect of GEM ; however, itsincidence, etiology and clinical significance have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to elucidate the characteristics and clinical significance of fever associated with GEM in patients with mUC receiving GEM plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Between 2005 and 2014, 184 patientswith mUC who received first-line GC therapy at 10 institutions were enrolled. GEM-associated fever (GEMAF) was defined as a body temperature ≥37.5ºC within 96 hours after administration of GEM with no evidence of specific conditions causing fever including infection. Clinical parametersbefore GC therapy were evaluated to determine predictorsof GEMAF. Furthermore, the impact of GEMAF on clinical outcomeswasals o evaluated. The median age was70 years and median follow-up was14.2 months. GEMAF wasobs erved in 44 patients (23.9%). In multivariate analysis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) before chemotherapy was an independent predictive factor for GEMAF (oddsratio 2.450, p＝0.041). There was a significant difference in progression-free survival (median 6.7 vs 8.0 months, p＝0.031) and cancer-specific survival (median 12.0 vs 15.8 months, p＝0.045) between patients with and without GEMAF. Results of this study suggest that GEMAF is a common adverse event of GC therapy for mUC and can be a poor prognostic factor. GEMAF may be associated with systemic inflammatory response induced by the tumor in patients with mUC.

Safety of perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pilot study of the clinical trial EudraCT 2016-004298-41.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with gemcitabine, after cytoreductive surgery, may reduce the tumor progression of pancreatic cancer through the reduction of the neoplastic volume and the subpopulation of residual pancreatic cancer stem cells, improving the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and decreasing the recurrence of the disease. A pilot study is performed with the first ten patients in the experimental group. A randomized study (phase II-III clinical trial) that requires a population of 42 patients, with 21 patients in each group. All patients have a diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, which will be surgically resected with curative intention. (I) Group I: after an R0 resection, patients receive individualized adjuvant treatments. (II) Group II: after an R0 resection, HIPEC is performed with gemcitabine (120 mg/m2 for 30 min), and they also receive individualized adjuvant treatments. To analyze the safety of the procedure, the main variables measured were as follows: grades of complications by means of the Clavien-Dindo system: pancreas surgery complications (e.g., pancreatic fistula, perioperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula), operative mortality, and laboratory parameters to control system functions. Values were measured three times: preoperatively, twenty-four hours after surgery, and on the 7th postoperative day. From 2018 to 2019, 31 patients were recruited for our clinical trial. Fifteen patients were excluded because of intraoperative unresectability or a different intraoperative histologic diagnosis. Ten patients were included in the experimental group (resection plus HIPEC gemcitabine). The mean age was 65±7 years, and six patients were female (60%). We confirmed the histologic diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma in all patients prior to HIPEC. Total pancreatectomy was performed in five patients. The surgical median time was 360 min, and the hospital stay was 11 days. Four patients showed complications classified as Clavien-Dindo type II and one showing type I. Six patients were classified as having stage III tumors. To date, no hospital mortality, locoregional recurrence, or differences between the two groups in terms of perioperative complications, biochemical and gasometric values, or Clavien-Dindo complication grades were observed. Our clinical pilot study demonstrated a similar perioperative outcome that allows the trial until main objectives are achieved.

A phase I trial of chemoimmunotherapy combining bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and intravesical gemcitabine for patients with BCG-relapsing high-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

TPS509 Background: Intravesical BCG is the most effective treatment for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), yet recurrences are common. Patients with BCG-relapsing NMIBC are often re-treated with BCG or BCG with interferon (IFN) with an expected response rate of only 40–60%. Several studies show that a major mechanism of resistance to BCG is high levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the pretreatment tumor microenvironment. Gemcitabine is a commonly used intravesical treatment for NMIBC that, in addition to direct anti-tumor cytotoxic effects, may also reduce MDSCs and Tregs. Prior trials combining BCG with intravesical mitomycin C have shown improved efficacy over BCG alone but with higher toxicity. While gemcitabine has been shown to be better tolerated than mitomycin as an intravesical treatment, no study has looked at combined BCG and intravesical gemcitabine. We hypothesize that combining BCG and intravesical gemcitabine will be well tolerated and result in higher response rates by reducing levels of MDSCs and Tregs. A novel aspect of our trial design is the use of a modified continual reassessment method to more accurately identify the maximum tolerated dose instead of the traditional 3 + 3 design used in most NMIBC phase I trials. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase I trial (NCT04179162) that will study the safety of alternating intravesical gemcitabine and BCG. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are designed so most patients who would ordinarily be re-treated with BCG or BCG/IFN would be eligible. Patients must have recurrent high-grade NMIBC within 24 months of their last BCG treatment without meeting the criteria for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Intravesical gemcitabine is given twice a week on weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10, for a total of 8 doses. BCG (50 mg) is given once a week on weeks 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9, for a total of 6 doses. The trial is monitored using a modified continual reassessment method with increasing dose levels of gemcitabine (500 mg, 1,000 mg, 1,500 mg, and 2,000 mg) being evaluated. Adverse events are assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this combination to inform our planned phase II trial. Correlative studies will look at the immunomodulating effects of gemcitabine by evaluating changes in immune cell populations in serial blood and urine specimens. Tissue and urine will also be evaluated for molecular determinants of response and resistance to the combination. The trial is open to enrollment with 10 of 25 planned patients accrued to date. Clinical trial information: NCT04179162.

Identification of laminin γ2 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for determining response to gemcitabine-based therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. While the extracellular matrix component plays an integral role in PDAC pathogenesis and mediating chemoresistance, its role in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with PDAC remains unclear. MethodsWe performed a systematic biomarker discovery by analysing genome-wide transcriptomic profiling data from 423 patients (GSE71729, GSE21501 and The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA]) for predicting overall survival (OS). This was subsequently validated in two independent clinical cohorts of 270 patients with PDAC (training cohort, n = 121, and validation cohort, n = 149). In addition, we investigated endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens from 51 patients with PDAC with an unresectable cancer for predicting therapeutic response to gemcitabine-based therapy. ResultsAfter rigorous bioinformatic analysis, we identified laminin γ2 (LAMC2) to be a significant prognostic factor in all three PDAC data sets (GSE71729: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, P = 0.002; GSE21501: HR = 2.17, P = 0.031; TCGA: HR = 2.57, P < 0.001). High LAMC2 expression in patients with PDAC was associated with a significantly poor OS and relapse-free survival in both the training (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and validation cohorts (P = 0.001, P = 0.026). More importantly, LAMC2 expression robustly identified patients with PDAC and unresectable disease and those who responded to gemcitabine-based therapy (area under the curve = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.89). The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high LAMC2 expression was the only factor that predicted poor response to gemcitabine in patients with PDAC (odds ratio = 4.90; 95% CI, 1.45–16.6; P = 0.011). ConclusionWe conclude that LAMC2 is a novel prognostic and predictive biomarker for gemcitabine-based therapy in both the adjuvant and palliative setting; which could have significant impact on precision and individualised treatment of patients with PDAC.