In this work, using the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral and Berry formula, a topological charge (TC) of a Gaussian optical vortex with an initial fractional TC in the far field was calculated. It was found that, for diverse fractional parts of the TC, the beam contained different numbers of screw dislocations, which determined the TC of the entire beam. If a fractional part of the TC was small, the beam consisted of the main optical vortex centered on the optical axis, with the TC equal to the nearest integer (say n>0) and two edge dislocations located on the vertical axis (one above and the other below the center). When the fractional part of the initial TC increased, a "dipole" was formed from the upper edge dislocation, consisting of two vortices with TCs equal to +1 and -1. With a further increase in the fractional part, the additional vortex with TC=+1 moved to the center of the beam, and the vortex with TC=-1 moved to the periphery. When the fractional part of the TC increased further, another "dipole" was formed from the lower edge dislocation, in which, on the contrary, the vortex with TC=-1 was displaced to the optical axis (to the center of the beam) and the vortex with TC=+1 moved to the beam periphery. When the fractional part of the TC became equal to 1/2, the lower vortex with a TC=-1, which was earlier displaced to the center of the beam, began to shift to the periphery, and the upper vortex with a TC=+1 moved closer and closer to the center of the beam, eventually merging with the main vortex when the fractional part approached 1. Such dynamics of additional vortices with TCs above +1 and below -1 determined which whole TC the beam would have (n or n+1) for different values of the fractional part from the segment [n,n+1]. Our analysis has shown that, for any value of the fractional part of the initial topological charge, the TC of the beam in the far field will not be determined. Since, with an increase in the radius of the circle in the beam section on which the TC is calculated, more optical "dipoles" will appear, and the TC will be either n or n+1.
Read full abstract