The Gaussian process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic chronometer data, type Ia supernovae data, and gamma-ray burst data, using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC rejection, the Matérn kernel with ν = 5/2 (M52 kernel) outperformes the commonly used radial basis function (RBF) kernel in approximating all three data sets. Bayes factors indicate that the M52 kernel typically supports the observed data better than the RBF kernel but with no clear advantage over other alternatives. However, nested sampling gives different results, with the M52 kernel losing its advantage. Nevertheless, Bayes factors indicate no significant dependence of the data on each kernel.
Read full abstract