Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole and itopride in patients with overlap of gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia: A prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study.

Combining proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with prokinetics can provide synergistic action in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and overlapping dyspepsia, but data regarding this is lacking. This single-center, prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-week treatment with fixed-drug combination (FDC) of pantoprazole (PPI) and itopride (prokinetic) in 50 patients with ≥3 month history of GERD and overlapping dyspepsia refractory to pantoprazole. Efficacy was assessed as reduction in GERD symptom assessment scale (GSAS) distress score for 15 symptoms from baseline to week 6. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored up to week 6. Although heartburn was the most common symptom at week 6 (26.8%), its frequency significantly decreased from baseline (84.0%; P <0.01). A similar trend was observed for other symptoms: pressure/discomfort inside chest (19.5%), belching (14.6%), regurgitation (12.2%), bloating (9.8%), flatulence (9.8%), early satiety (7.3%), acidic/sour taste in mouth (7.3%), nausea (7.3%), frequent gurgling in stomach/belly (4.9%), and pressure/lump in throat (2.4%). Mean distress scores of all symptoms markedly decreased at week 6. Three AEs (n = 2) of moderate intensity were reported. The FDC of pantoprazole and itopride showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with GERD and overlapping dyspepsia refractory to pantoprazole monotherapy. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted.

Modification of the Paediatric Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire (PGSQ) for children with cerebral palsy: a preliminary study

ObjectiveGastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition affecting children, characterised by the passage of gastric contents into the oesophagus causing pain, vomiting and regurgitation. Children with neurodisability (such as...

Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, with increasing worldwide disease prevalence and high economic burden. A significant number of patients will remain symptomatic following an empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Persistent symptoms despite PPI therapy are often mislabeled as refractory GERD. For patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD), testing is performed off antisecretory therapy to identify objective evidence of pathologic reflux using criteria outlined by the Lyon consensus. In proven GERD, differentiation between refractory symptoms (persisting symptoms despite optimized antisecretory therapy) and refractory GERD (abnormal reflux metrics on ambulatory pH impedance monitoring and/or persistent erosive esophagitis on endoscopy while on optimized PPI therapy) can direct subsequent management. While refractory symptoms may arise from esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn, proven refractory GERD requires personalization of the management approach, tapping from an array of non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Proper diagnosis and management of refractory GERD is critical to mitigate undesirable long-term complications such as strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review outlines the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with refractory GERD symptoms, describes the distinction between unproven and proven GERD, and provides a comprehensive review of the current treatment strategies available for the management of refractory GERD.

A Comparison between Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0 and Their Impact on Manometric Diagnoses in Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Cases

High-resolution manometry (HRM) facilitates the detailed evaluation of esophageal motility. In December 2020, Chicago classification (CC) version 4.0 introduced modifications to improve consistency and accuracy. We conducted this study to compare the differences in the interpretations of HRM examinations between CC 3.0 and 4.0. Consecutive HRM records at a Taiwan tertiary medical center, including wet swallows and MRS performed in both supine and sitting positions from October 2019 to May 2021, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using both CC versions 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 105 patients were enrolled, and 102 patients completed the exam, while three could not tolerate HRM sitting up. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (n = 65, 63.7%) and dysphagia (n = 37, 36.3%) were the main indications. A total of 18 patients (17.6%) were reclassified to new diagnoses using CC 4.0. Of the 11 patients initially diagnosed with absent contractility, 3 (27.3%) were reclassified as having Type 1 achalasia. Of the 18 patients initially diagnosed with IEM, 6 (33.3%) were reclassified as normal. The incidence of diagnosis changes was similar in both the dysphagia and refractory GERD symptoms groups (21.6% versus 15.3%, p = 0.43). The use of CC 4.0 led to changes in the diagnoses of esophageal motility disease, irrespective of examination indications. Early adoption improves the accuracy of diagnoses and affects patient management.

High Diagnostic Yield of Abnormal Endoscopic Findings in the Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended in patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain) in the setting of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) nonresponse. EGD evaluates for erosive disease, assesses antireflux barrier integrity, excludes non-GERD conditions, and, in the absence of erosive findings, is followed by reflux testing.1,2 The diagnostic utility of EGD is less clear in the evaluation for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and the current reference standard is ambulatory reflux monitoring.1,3,4 This study of patients referred for evaluation of chronic laryngeal symptoms had the following aims: (1) to characterize endoscopic findings, (2) to discern whether findings differed between patients with or without concomitant esophageal reflux symptoms, and (3) to measure the association between endoscopic findings and objective GERD on ambulatory reflux monitoring.

Long-Term Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors: Unravelling the Safety Puzzle.

Globally, over 25% of the population suffers from acid-related disorders such as dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and around 7.6% of Indians report having GERD symptoms on a frequent enough basis to warrant a diagnosis. Over the past three decades, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay of medical therapy for acid-peptic diseases like GERD, etc. Additionally, they are frequently prescribed for prophylactic purposes and in conjunction with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. PPIs are generally prescribed for four to eight weeks. However, it may be prescribed for patients with comorbidities and multiple medications for a longer period of time. While this remains true in terms of effectiveness, concerns have been raised about the safety of long-term PPI use and the serious adverse effects that may result. Some of the observational and population-based cohort studies have shown an association between long-term use of PPIs and an increased risk of pneumonia, major cardiovascular events, dementia, vitamin B12 deficiency, bone fractures, gastric cancer, and kidney injury, among others. This review analyzes the clinical data supporting the long-term use of PPIs and takes a deep dive into whether these several emerging long-term concerns apply to the currently available PPIs in India. We have summarized a vast array of studies, including randomized trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses, that report low or high incidences of major health risks linked with PPIs and have assessed their appropriateness over a given period.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of vonoprazan for proton pump inhibitor-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Up to 40% of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients experience inadequate symptom relief with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), termed PPI-resistant or refractory GERD. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, has better efficacy than PPI in suppressing gastric acid secretion. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan for treating PPI-resistant GERD (both erosive esophagitis [EE] and non-erosive reflux disease [NERD]). Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL) were searched for studies indexed until August 1, 2023. Both observational studies and clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in PPI-resistant GERD were included. Efficacy outcomes included healing and maintenance rates of EE and improvement of the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) scores. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were considered a safety outcome. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality. Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Healing rates of PPI-resistant EE with vonoprazan 20mg were 91.7% (95% CI 86.8-94.8%) and 88.5% (95% CI 69.7-96.2%) at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. For healed PPI-resistant EE, the overall maintenance rates with vonoprazan 10mg were 82.6% (95% 61.2-95.0%) at week 8, 86.0% (95% CI 72.1-94.7%) at week 24, and 93.8% (95% CI 69.8-99.8%) at week 48. FSSG scores were improved in 74.6% (95% CI 65.8-81.7%) and 51.9% (95% CI 37.8-65.7%) of patients at weeks 4 and 8. Overall, no SAE was reported. Vonoprazan demonstrated high efficacy in the healing and maintenance of PPI-resistant EE and moderate efficacy for the improvement of FSSG score. Vonoprazan was well tolerated in PPI-resistant GERD patients.

The Effect of Dexlansoprazole on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of dexlansoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor-PPI) in resolving heartburn, reflux, and other symptoms and complications resulting from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020206513). The search strategy used MeSH and free terms appropriately adapted for each database. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. Ten RCTs were included. Dexlansoprazole outperformed the placebo and other PPIs in the resolution of heartburn and reflux symptoms in patients with GERD, with benefits during and after treatment, especially in those with moderate and severe symptoms. The meta-analyses indicated that dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg had more 24 h heartburn-free days and nights compared to the placebo medications; no difference was reported between dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg in heartburn-free nights. A low bias risk and a moderate certainty of evidence were observed. This review confirms the therapeutic effect of dexlansoprazole (placebo-controlled) and its improvements in GERD symptoms compared to another PPI. However, the interpretation of the results should be carried out cautiously due to the small number of included studies and other reported limitations.

De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Are Infrequent after Sleeve Gastrectomy at 2-Year Follow-Up Using a Comprehensive Preoperative Esophageal Assessment.

Pathological obesity is a growing public health concern, and its association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) poses challenges in selecting the appropriate bariatric procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a popular choice due to its simplicity and effectiveness in weight loss. However, concerns regarding postoperative GERD have been raised. This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative assessment of esophageal function and the risk of developing postoperative GERD in patients undergoing SG. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted, including symptom assessment, upper endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), and 24 h esophageal pH impedance monitoring (MII-pH). A total of 500 obese patients were included, and their data were compared with 25 healthy volunteers. This study revealed that patients without GERD symptoms, normal endoscopy, HRM, and MII-pH were suitable candidates for SG, with low risk of developing postoperative GERD. The addition of fundoplication techniques to SG may be considered in patients with mild reflux or those at risk of developing it. This study emphasizes the importance of preoperative evaluation in selecting the appropriate bariatric procedure to minimize the risk of postoperative GERD and expand the indications for SG in obese patients.

The Dental Implications of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease in Children

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common in children and has numerous extra-oesophageal manifestations which dental practitioners should be aware of. This article illustrates the role of the dentist in recognizing the signs and symptoms of GORD in children. A risk-based management system is illustrated to guide clinicians in managing children exhibiting erosive tooth wear. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Dental implications of GORD in children and its management provide useful clinical information for dental practitioners.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and risk of atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort study (the HUNT study).

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may influence the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the association between symptoms of GERD and AF in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT). The study cohort comprised 34,120 adult men and women initially free of AF with information on GERD symptoms. Participants were followed from the baseline clinical examination (1 October 2006 to 30 June 2008) to March 31, 2018. During a median follow-up of 8.9 years, 1,221 cases of AF were diagnosed. When looking at the whole population, participants with much GERD symptoms did not have an increased risk of AF (HR: 1.01; CI: 95%, 0.82 to 1.24) while participants with little GERD symptoms had a 14% lower risk of AF compared those with no GERD symptoms (HR: 0.86; CI: 95%, 0.76 to 0.97). Among younger participants (<40 years of age), the risk of AF had a trend towards increased risk with increasing symptom load of GERD (little GERD symptoms, HR: 3.09; CI: 95%, 0.74 to 12.94 and much GERD symptoms, HR: 5.40; 95% CI: 0.82 to 35.58). Among older participants (≥65 years of age), we saw a slightly reduced risk of AF in participants with little symptoms (HR: 0.84; CI: 0.72 to 0.97) and no association among those with much GERD symptoms (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.36). We did not find support for a clinically important association between symptoms of GERD and AF across all age groups but for some younger people, GERD might play a role in the development of AF. However, our estimates for this age group were very imprecise and larger studies including younger individuals are warranted.

Does weather and time have any effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in a sample of the Saudi community?

Objective: This study aimed to determine if there was any correlation between weather and time and their effects on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. Methods: The analytical cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to gather information from the population of Saudi Arabia aged above 16 years. The questionnaire included questions regarding the demographic factors of the patients, the severity of GERD in patients, and whether the symptoms change depending on the weather and time of day. Results: In this study, the data were collected from 400 participants. Among the sample, 31% were aged between 16 and 25 years old and 57% were females. Furthermore, 40.0% of the patients described the severity of pain associated with GERD as moderate, while 6.7% reported having very severe pain. Considering the relation between symptoms of GERD and climate differences, it was found that morning was the last time that was reported by patients to have severe and painful reflux (15%). Moreover, almost three quarters of the participants reported having severe and painful reflux in both the summer and winter seasons (35.5% and 39.3%). Furthermore, most of the participants reported that symptoms become worse at high temperatures (36.5%) and low temperatures (36.8%). Conclusion: There was a significant relation between the symptoms of GERD and weather and time of the day. Severe symptoms of GERD were found to be reported significantly at bedtime and in extreme weather conditions (high and low temperatures). The results were not affected by the demographic factors of the patients.

Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in Mazandaran, North of Iran: A Tabari cohort study.

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common complaint. It is a major health concern and there is paucity of information about the epidemiology of the disease and its risk factors in Iran, especially Mazandaran province (North of Iran). This study aimed at investigating the prevalence of regurgitation and the factors associated with this condition in Tabari cohort study. This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed data from Tabari cohort study. Information including the presence and frequency of heartburn and regurgitation, demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, occupational history, history of chronic illnesses, history of alcohol and cigarette consumption were recorded. The prevalence of GERD symptoms were 27.6% (20.4% in men, and 32.4% in women, p=0.0001). The frequency of typical symptoms was significantly higher in women than that in men. The risk of developing GERD symptoms were 1.7 times higher in women (p=0.0001). The highest prevalence of GERD symptoms was found in urban areas (41.8%, p=0.0001), in people with low educational levels (48%, p=0.0001), and in participants with history of depression symptoms (36.2%, p=0.0001). The prevalence of GERD symptoms was significantly high in individuals with higher BMI (29.5%, p=0.006), greater waist to hip ratio (29.1%, p=0.0001, p=0.0001), and high waist circumference (31.7%, p=0.0001). This study showed gender, region of residence, educational level, and depression symptoms as the main risk factors for developing GERD symptoms.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Sri Lanka: An island-wide epidemiological survey assessing the prevalence and associated factors.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly encountered in clinical practice in Sri Lanka. However, its prevalence in Sri Lanka is unknown. Our objective was to study the island-wide prevalence of GERD symptoms in Sri Lanka and its associated factors. A total of 1200 individuals aged 18-70 years (male: female 1: 1.16, mean age 42.7 years [SD 14.4 years]). were recruited from all 25 districts of the country, using stratified random sampling. An interviewer-administered, country-validated questionnaire was used to assess the GERD symptom prevalence and associated factors. Weight, height, waist, and hip circumference were measured. Heartburn and/or regurgitation at least once a week, an internationally used criterion for probable GERD was used to diagnose GERD. In this study, GERD symptom prevalence was 25.3% (male 42.1% and female 57.9%). Factors independently associated with GERD were inadequate sleep, snacking at midnight, sleeping within two hours of consuming a meal, skipping breakfast, increased mental stress, and certain medications used such as statins, and antihypertensive medications (p<0.001, univariate and logistic regression analysis). 38.4% of the study population have been using medication for heartburn and regurgitation in the past 3 months and 19.8% were on proton pump inhibitors. To conclude, the prevalence of GERD symptoms in Sri Lanka (25.3%) is higher than its estimated global prevalence of 13.8%. Several meal-related lifestyle habits, mental stress, and the use of some medications are significantly associated with GERD, indicating the importance of lifestyle modification and stress reduction in its management.

The real occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy - a prospective pH-monitoring study.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is currently the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in the world. However, the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SG remains controversial and questionable. To determine the occurrence of GERD after SG using a pH-monitoring study. This is a prospective study involving patients undergoing SG in one surgical centre. Inclusion criteria were eligibility for bariatric surgery, no symptoms of GERD, normal gastroscopy, and pH-monitoring before the surgery. Postoperative examinations were performed 6 months after surgery. A total of 38 patients were analysed in the study. The mean age was 44.9 years, and the mean preoperative BMI was 42.6 kg/m2. Before surgery, all patients had normal pH values. After surgery, mean acid exposure time (AET), number of refluxes, and DeMeester score increased statistically significantly (p < 0.001). 27 (71.1%) patients each had AET > 6%, but only 9 (23.7%) reported GERD symptoms and the need for PPIs. The correlation between AET and %TWL was moderate positive, and the correlation between DeMeester score and %TWL was low positive (p = 0.011, p = 0.014, respectively). GERD after SG seems to be a significant problem. More than two-thirds of patients had de novo GERD after SG in pH-monitoring, but only one-quarter of them required PPIs.

Protocolo diagnóstico de la pirosis retroesternal

Pyrosis is one of the typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is one of the most common causes for consultation in primary care and gastrointestinal department clinical practice. In Spain, it has been reported that approximately one out of every three people has pyrosis on a regular basis. Therefore, its diagnosis is of utmost importance. Pyrosis’ favorable response to empirical treatment with proton pump inhibitors allows for diagnosing it in the absence of alarm symptoms. If alarm signs are present, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) should be performed as soon as possible. Patients who do not respond to medical treatment and whose UGIE does not show abnormalities compatible with gastroesophageal reflux disease should undergo a pH meter test±esophageal impedance testing without treatment.

Efficacy of abdominal breathing on sleep and quality of life among patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux.

Abdominal breathing recently has demonstrated an important role in managing symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), improving quality of life, medication adherence, and sleep quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of abdominal breathing on sleep and quality of life in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux. A Quasi-experimental design was used. A purposive sample of 100 patients was selected from the medical outpatient clinics of Menoufia University Hospital and the outpatient clinics of the National Liver Institute in Menoufia Governorate, Egypt. A Structured interview questionnaire was used to collect data on patients' sociodemographic characteristics, belly breathing exercise performance and self-reported compliance, GERD symptoms severity and frequency, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and GERD Health-Related Quality of Life. The frequency of GERD symptoms decreased from 26.64 pre-intervention to 17.61 and 9.58, respectively, at two- and four-months post-intervention. Antacid consumption among patients taking it 7 days/week was reduced from 34% pre-intervention to 2% and 0% post-intervention by two and four months, respectively. Good sleepers were 24% pre-intervention then increased to 62% and 90% post-intervention by 2 and 4 months, respectively. Regarding GERD related quality of life, only 1% was satisfied pre-intervention, which increased to 32% and 72% post-intervention by 2 and 4 months, respectively. Abdominal breathing offers better therapeutic improvements in all patients' outcomes such as reduced severity and frequency of GERD symptoms, reduced antacid consumption, increased sleep quality, and increased satisfaction with life quality. Healthcare professionals are encouraged to incorporate abdominal breathing into treatment protocols for patients with non-erosive GERD.

Patient journey in gastroesophageal reflux disease: real-world perspectives from Italian gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, and ENT specialists.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a challenging condition that involves different physicians, such as general practitioners (GPs), gastroenterologists, and ears, nose and throat (ENT) specialists. A common approach consists of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) administration. Adjunctive pharmacological treatment may have a role in the management of non-responders to PPIs. We aimed to survey GPs and different medical specialists to investigate the medical approaches to patients reporting GERD symptoms. In addition, we examined the use of adjunctive pharmacological treatments in patients with GERD symptoms who do not respond to PPIs. Retrospective observational study. A survey was conducted among a large sample of gastroenterologists, GPs, and ENT specialists. Symptoms were divided into typical and extraesophageal, and their severity and impact on quality of life were explored with the GERD Impact Scale and with Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). All therapies administered usually for GERD were investigated. A total of 6211 patients were analyzed in this survey. Patients with typical symptoms were 53.5%, while those with extraesophageal symptoms were 46.5%. The latter were more frequently reported by ENT patients (53.6%, p < 0.0001). The GSI was higher in patients followed by gastroenterologists (9 points) and GPs (9 points) than ENT specialists (8 points), but the RSI was higher in the ENT group (14.3 ± 6.93) than in GPs and gastroenterologist groups (10.36 ± 6.36 and 10.81 ± 7.30, p < 0.0001). Chest pain had the highest negative impact on quality of life (p < 0.0001). Of the 3025 patients who used PPIs, non-responders showed a lower GSI when treated with a combination of adjunctive pharmacological treatments and bioadhesive compounds, than with single-component drugs. Patients with GERD referred to a gastroenterologist had more severe disease and poorer quality of life. The combination of adjunctive pharmacological treatments and bioadhesive compounds seems to be effective in the management of PPI refractory patients.

Narrative review of relationship between chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a possible cause of chronic cough is known for decades. However, more than 75% of patients with extraoesophageal symptoms do not suffer from typical symptoms of GERD like pyrosis and regurgitations and have negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For such a condition term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was introduced and is used for more than two decades. Since the comprehensive information on relationship between chronic cough and LPR is missing the aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge based on review of published information during last 13 years. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is found in 20% of patients with chronic cough. The main and recognized diagnostic method for LPR is 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, revealing reflux episodes irritating the upper and lower respiratory tract mucosa. The treatment of LPR should be initiated with dietary and lifestyle measures, followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and other measures. Despite progress, more research is needed for accurate diagnosis and targeted therapies. Key areas for exploration include biomarkers for diagnosis, the impact of non-acid reflux on symptom development, and the efficacy of new drugs. Further studies with a focused population, excluding other causes like asthma, and using new diagnostic criteria for LPR are essential. It's crucial to consider LPR as a potential cause of unexplained chronic cough and to approach diagnosis and treatment with a multidisciplinary perspective.

Association of body mass index and blood pressure with GERD severity

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the chronic reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus, leading to various symptoms and complications. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, and GERD severity. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 50 participants diagnosed with GERD, recruited from the Department of Medical Gastroenterology at King George’s Medical University in Lucknow, India. Data on BMI, blood pressure, and GERD severity were collected through standardized assessments. Results: It was observed that patients in the first tertile (T1) of the GERD score, as compared to their counterparts in the second and third tertiles (T2 and T3), were lower in age, smaller in height, and had lower body weight, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure levels, but none of the associations were found to be significant statistically. Conclusion: There are significant clinical implications for knowing how blood pressure, GERD severity, and BMI relate to one another. To maximize treatment success and lower the risk of complications, health-care practitioners should think about evaluating and treating modifiable risk factors, such as obesity and hypertension, in patients with GERD. Pharmacological therapies may be used in conjunction with lifestyle adjustments such as blood pressure control, diet adjustments, and weight loss to help treat GERD symptoms and enhance overall patient health.