Abstract The objective of this survey was to assess how building designs impact management practices and health concerns in confinement-housed beef cow-calf operations. This oral-based, on-farm survey collected responses from 20 cow-calf producers across the state of Illinois who were currently using an alternative housing system. The survey consisted of 94 questions based on 10 categories: demographics, housing, technology use, herd health and nutrition, pasture, manure management, cover crops, feed storage, water, and genetics. There were a variety of question types including multiple choice, select all that apply, open-ended, ranking of importance, and scale from one to ten. Results were analyzed based on respondents building design type (monoslope; n = 6, gable frame; n = 5, and hoop; n = 9). For the producers utilizing a monoslope, 66.7% had cow inventories of 150 or more, whereas 60% of gable frame users had inventories of 150 or more, and 44.4% of hoop building users had inventories of 150 cows or more. For the producers utilizing a monoslope, 16.7% had rubber covered concrete slat flooring, 33.3% had a clay/lime-based flooring, and 50% had concrete flooring. For the producers utilizing a gable frame, 0% had slats, 60% had lime, and 40% had concrete. For the producers utilizing a hoop building, 0% had slats, 88.9% had lime, and 11.1% had concrete. When assessing drylot access, 0% of monoslope users were allowing cows access to a drylot compared with 40% of gable frame users and 66.67% of hoop building users. Most monoslope users (83%) had 6 months or more of under-roof manure storage, whereas 0% of gable frame users did, and only 11.1% of hoops users did. For those utilizing a monoslope, 50% were creep feeding for 4 months or more compared with 80% of gable frame users and 12.5% of hoop building users. For producers utilizing a monoslope, 60% responded cows were over-conditioned, 40% said properly conditioned, and 0% said under-conditioned. For gable frame users, 50% responded cows were over-conditioned, 50% said properly conditioned, and 0% said under-conditioned. For hoop building users, 44.5% responded cows were over-conditioned, 55.5% said properly conditioned, and 0% said cows were under-conditioned. When asked to rank calf issues, 67% of monoslope producers ranked scours first, compared with 40% of gable frame users, and 44% of hoop building users. None of the monoslope users ranked calf respiratory first whereas 40% of those with gable frame did and 22% of hoop building users did. For naval issues, 33.3% of monoslope ranked it first, compared with 20% of gable frame users, and 33% of hoop building users. In conclusion, building design type influenced management practices and health issue concerns.
Read full abstract