Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure Research Articles

The frozen elephant trunk technique: impact of proximalization and the four-sites perfusion technique.

OBJECTIVESTo improve organ protection with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure, a so-called four-sites perfusion in combination with proximalization for the distal aortic anastomosis was performed. The impact of these techniques on patient outcome is reported.METHODSBetween February 2005 and April 2020, a total of 357 patients underwent the FET procedure for acute (54%) or chronic (22%) aortic dissection or aneurysmal disease (24%). The level of the distal FET anastomosis was defined according to aortic arch zones 0–3. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the intraoperative perfusion strategy: (i) selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) alone (N = 96, 2 sites); (ii) SACP plus left subclavian artery or distal aorta (N = 84, 3 sites) and (iii) SACP plus left subclavian artery plus distal aorta (N = 177, 4 sites). Early outcome was addressed by a composite end point: occurrence of either a disabling stroke, a disabling spinal cord injury, extracorporeal circulatory support, kidney dialysis or death within 90 days.RESULTSPreoperative characteristics were similar among the groups. Surgery in group C was characterized by FET proximalization in arch zone ≤2, moderate hypothermia at 28°C and shorter periods of extracorporeal circulation, SACP, hypothermic circulatory arrest and cardioplegic arrest (P < 0.001, respectively). Occurrence of the composite end point was reduced in group C (P = 0.008). The combination of FET proximalization and four-sites perfusion was a protective factor for the composite outcome in multivariable analysis (P = 0.009). The 5-year survival was improved in patients who underwent FET proximalization in zone ≤2 (hazard ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.0; P = 0.036).CONCLUSIONSFET proximalization in combination with four-sites perfusion has the potential to improve patient outcomes in terms of survival and major events.Subject collection120; 161.

Spinal cord injury during selective cerebral perfusion and segmental artery occlusion: an experimental study.

Since selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) has been used in aortic arch surgical procedures, the core temperature during lower body circulatory arrest (LBCA) has been steadily rising. Simultaneously, the use of a frozen elephant trunk (FET) graft has been increasing. The safe period of LBCA in relation to spinal cord ischaemic tolerance in combination with segmental artery occlusion by the FET procedure has not been defined. Sixteen pigs were assigned to undergo 65 (n = 10) or 90 min (n = 6) of SCP at 28°C with LBCA in combination with occlusion of the 8 uppermost segmental arteries in the thoracic (Th) aorta (15-20 cm FET, Th8-level). The follow-up period consisted of a 6-h intensive period and a 5-day observation period. Near-infrared spectroscopy of the collateral network was used to determine spinal cord oxygenation. The neurological status of the patients was evaluated daily, and the brain and the spinal cord were harvested for a histopathological analysis. Five out of 6 pigs after 90 min and 1 out of 10 pigs after 65 min of LBCA died within 48 h of multiorgan failure. Of the survivors in the 65-min group, 6 out of 9 had paraparesis/paraplegia; the remaining 3 reached normal function. The lone survivor after 90 min of LBCA was paraplegic. Nadir near-infrared spectroscopy of the collateral network values at Th8 and Th10 were 34 (±5) and 39 (±4), and they were reached within 35 min of SCP in both groups. An extended FET graft with LBCA and SCP durations >65 min at 28°C results in a poor outcome.

Changes of stent-graft orientation after frozen elephant trunk treatment in aortic dissection.

Our goal was to evaluate the extent of stent-graft (SG) elastic recoil in the descending aorta after the frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute (AAD) and chronic (CAD) aortic dissection as well as the impact of SG movement on distal stent graft-induced new entry (d-SINE). We retrospectively analysed 149 (105 AAD, 44 CAD) of 259 aortic dissection patients after the frozen elephant trunk procedure between January 2005 and April 2019. Inclusion criteria were at least 1-year computed tomography angiography (CTA) aortic examinations during a follow-up time of 3.8 ± 2.7 years and absence of open or endovascular reintervention. Multiplanar reconstruction of CTA scans was used to define the SG vector position and movement in a virtual Cartesian coordinate system. The angle φ of vector movement and changes of aortic areas at the distal landing zone were analysed. The distal SG position changed over time in the cranial (10.06 ± 11.12 mm), dorsal (8.45 ± 11.12 mm) and lateral (4.96 ± 9.89 mm) directions (P < 0.001). The total change of φ (4.08 ± 7.03°) was greater in AAD than in CAD (P = 0.026). d-SINE was more common in CAD (P < 0.001) and was associated with the size of the aortic area, aortic area enlargement and continuous SG unfolding (P < 0.001). With the frozen elephant trunk technique, movement and change of SG orientation in the descending aorta were observed over time. Elastic recoil was greater in AAD than in CAD. The incidence of d-SINE was particularly dependent on the size of the aortic lumen and SG radial expansion and less on elastic recoil.

Aortic Arch Replacement in 2051: Endovascular Skills Would Be Routinely Part of the Procedure

In the last decades we observed an increased use of endovascular techniques to facilitate complex arch reconstruction. The most relevant contribution to open surgery was the deployment of a bare metal stent in the descending thoracic aorta in the frozen elephant trunk procedure.1 The possibility of stenting the distal arch encouraged simplification of the procedure, moving proximally the distal anastomosis and reducing the number of sutures required to replace the arch.2,3 However, that often necessitated endovascular skills to handle catheters and grafts for epiaortic vessels rerouting.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

Post-implantation syndrome after frozen elephant trunk is associated with the volume of new-onset aortic thrombus.

BackgroundPost-implantation syndrome (PIS) is defined as non-infectious continuous fever and a concomitant rise in inflammatory markers shortly after endovascular aortic repair. PIS occurrence after hybrid procedures, such as the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, has not been adequately investigated. The current study aims to define the incidence of PIS after the FET and to identify possible risk factors associated with its occurrence.MethodsThe clinical charts of 59 patients undergoing the FET between February 2015 and April 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The occurrence of PIS was defined as the presence of fever (>38 °C lasting longer than one day during the hospitalisation) and leucocytosis (white blood cell count >12,000/µL). Patients with concomitant conditions possibly leading to fever and/or leucocytosis were excluded. Beside demographic and procedure-related data, serum/plasma inflammatory markers were evaluated before surgery and daily up to seven days postoperatively. Computed tomography scans (CT) were examined to calculate the volume of pre-existent and new-onset mural thrombus after the FET.ResultsThirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the occurrence of PIS (17 cases; 44.7%). Patients with PIS were significantly younger than those without PIS (53.5±8.9 vs. 62.5±9.6 years; P=0.005). Female patients were less likely to develop PIS (5.2% vs. 26.3%, P=0.018). Patients with PIS had a higher volume of new-onset thrombus in the postoperative CT (P<0.001). Patients treated for post-dissection aneurysm had, postoperatively, significantly more thrombus material developed in a false lumen (P=0.02). Among the PIS markers, CRP (C-reactive protein) levels on the third postoperative day were independently associated with the volume of new-onset thrombus (P=0.011). After multivariate analysis, the volume of new-onset thrombus (P=0.028) and age (P=0.036) remained the variable associated with a statistically significant increased incidence of PIS.ConclusionsPIS can occur after the frozen elephant trunk procedure. The volume of new-onset thrombus seems to be associated with an increased incidence of PIS. These findings need to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts.

A novel modification of frozen elephant trunk technique: unique protocol from one institution.

We aim to present a novel surgical technique of Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) to treat complex thoracic aortic diseases in one stage and report its short-term outcomes. Between December 2019 and 30 April 2021, twenty-five patients underwent FET operation at Viet Duc University Hospital. The mean age of the patients was 55.9 (±9.9, range 33-72) years. Eighteen (72%) of the patients were men. Thoracic aortic aneurysm was presented in three (12%) patients. Among seventeen (68%) of the patients undergoing the aortic dissection, eleven (44%) were treated acute type A aortic dissection. Type A intramural hematoma was presented in three (12%) patients. Four (16%) of the patients had undergone previous aortic operations, four (16%) of them had Marphan syndrome and two (11.1%) of them had stage 3 chronic kidney disease. All patients underwent FET procedure by unique protocol. Brain protection was achieved by antegrade bilateral selective cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia (28°C) in all cases; besides cerebral tissue oximetry monitoring was used to control brain oxygenation. There were no perioperative deaths, and all patients are still alive during mild-term follow-up period. Sixteen (88.9%) patients received isolated FET, while a Bentall procedure during FET was performed in two (8%) patients and right coronary artery bypass was in one (4%) case. The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamping, circulatory arrest, and total operation were 176.7 (±48.1, range 102-330), 106 (±39.8, range 63-205), 32.7 (±9.6, range 20-58), and 365.6 (±53.6, range 270-480) min, respectively. There was no bleeding following surgery. Prolonged ventilation required tracheotomy was documented in two (8%) patients, hemodialysis caused acute renal failure was in five (20%) patients, cerebral shock was in one (4%) patient, and type 1A endoleak in 2 (8%) patients. Our modification of FET technique was feasible, effective, and safe, with good postoperative outcomes.

Early-to-midterm outcomes of aortic balloon occlusion technique versus hybrid procedure for aortic arch diseases.

The goal of this study was to compare the early-to-midterm outcomes of patients treated with the frozen elephant trunk procedure with aortic balloon occlusion (FET-ABO) versus hybrid repair for aortic arch diseases. Patients who underwent the FET-ABO (n = 134) and the hybrid procedure (n = 220) from 2017 to 2020 at our institution were analysed retrospectively. Early-to-midterm outcomes were compared using inverse probability weighting. Low-risk and high-risk subgroup analyses were performed according to the cut-off of the additive European System for Cardiac Operative Evaluation value of 6. The present study demonstrated similar 30-day mortality (3.7% vs 8.6%; P = 0.118) and adverse events between the FET-ABO and the hybrid groups. Fewer intraoperative red blood cell transfusions (0.54 ± 1.45 vs 1.26 ± 2.47 U; P = 0.001), decreased total hospital costs (P < 0.001) and considerable early-to-midterm survival [crude: hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.91; P = 0.030; adjusted: HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.91; P = 0.032) were obtained with the FET-ABO compared to the hybrid procedure. The inverse probability weighting method substantiated the foregoing results. Adjusted subgroup analyses suggested that the FET-ABO procedure had a trend towards improved survival in low-risk patients (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.93; P = 0.041) and achieved outcomes comparable to those of the hybrid procedure in high-risk patients (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.15-1.42; P = 0.176). The FET-ABO technique could be better promoted in hospitals lacking experience and equipment and could be more viable and cost-effective for selected patients compared with the hybrid procedure.

Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The treatment of complex thoracic aorta pathologies remains a challenge for cardiovascular surgeons. After introducing Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET), a significant evolution of surgical techniques has been achieved. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of FET in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and the effect of circulatory arrest time on post-operative neurologic outcomes. A standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted for all observational studies of patients diagnosed with ATAAD undergoing total arch replacement with FET reporting in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and neurological outcomes. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (StataCorp, TX, USA). Thirty-five studies were eligible for the present meta-analysis, including 3211 patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement with FET. The pooled estimate for in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and spinal cord injury were 7% (95% CI 5 - 9; I2 = 68.65%), 5% (95% CI 4 - 7; I2 = 63.93%), and 3% (95% CI 2 - 4; I2 = 19.56%), respectively. Univariate meta-regression revealed that with increasing the duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest time, the effect sizes for postoperative stroke and SCI enhances. It seems that employing the FET procedure for acute type A dissection is associated with acceptable neurologic outcomes and a similar mortality rate comparing with other aorta pathologies. Besides, increasing hypothermic circulation arrest time appears to be a significant predictor of adverse neurologic outcomes after FET.

A simplified delivery frozen elephant trunk technique to reduce circulatory arrest time in hybrid aortic arch surgery.

A simplified delivery technique for the frozen elephant trunk procedure allows the distal suture to be performed on a perfused and loaded aorta in moderate hypothermia-or even normothermia-reducing circulatory arrest time to just a few minutes. Two surgical sealing tourniquets are placed around the aortic arch, usually between the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and the left common carotid artery and the aorta is cross-clamped and cardioplegia started. Once in mild hypothermia, the BCT is disconnected and circulatory arrest is initiated while cerebral perfusion is maintained. This modified technique can be used in all pathologies, including dissections.

Examination of Treatment for Complications of the Downstream Aorta after a Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure during the Follow-up Period

Examination of Treatment for Complications of the Downstream Aorta after a Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure during the Follow-up Period

The zone 2 concept and distal stent graft positioning in TH 2-3 are associated with high rates of secondary aortic interventions in frozen elephant trunk surgery.

The goal of this study was to investigate the association between the localization of the distal anastomosis (zone 2/3), the stent graft length (100-160 mm), the position of the distal end of the hybrid prosthesis and the need for secondary aortic intervention (SAI) in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease after the frozen elephant trunk procedure. From 2009 through 2020, a total of 232 patients (137 men; mean age, 61.7 ± 13.8 years) were treated with the frozen elephant trunk procedure. The main indications were acute aortic dissection type A (n = 106, 46%), chronic aortic dissection type A (n = 52, 22%) and degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 74, 32%). The rate of SAI was significantly higher when we performed a distal anastomosis in zone 2 rather than in zone 3, whereas the rate of SAI was less frequent if the distal positioning of the hybrid prosthesis was below TH 4-5. Combining the zone 2 concept and the short stent graft length (100 mm) was associated with a significantly higher rate of SAIs. Patients with a distal anastomosis in zone 2 were significantly less likely to have a recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (P < 0.001). However, no association between a specific arch zone of a distal anastomosis and the occurrence of spinal cord injury was observed. Rates of SAIs are highest in patients who were treated with a distal anastomosis in zone 2 and a short stent graft (100 mm) with the distal end of the hybrid prosthesis at vertebral level TH 2-3.

Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection.

The objective of the study was to evaluate early and midterm outcomes after the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure with different proximal landing zones in patients with aortic dissection. Forty-four patients with type A and type B aortic dissection that extended down to the abdominal aorta were enrolled in the study. All of the patients had the FET procedure. The patients were divided in 2 groups according to the level of the proximal landing zone: the zone 2 (Z2) group and zone 3 (Z3) group. Early and midterm outcomes including the false lumen (FL) thrombosis rate were monitored in both groups. The incidence of stroke, delirium and spinal cord ischaemia was 5.9% vs 3.7% (P = 0.533), 5.9% vs 7.4% (P = 0.903) and 5.9% vs 0 (P = 0.533) in the Z2 and Z3 groups, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 9.1% in both groups. The mean distal landing zone was T7.5 (T7; T9) in the Z2 group vs T9 (T8; T10) in the Z3 group (P = 0.668). The 2-year overall survival was 62.2% with no significant difference in the Z2 and Z3 groups (61.6% vs 64.2%; P = 0.940). There were no aortic-related deaths during the follow-up period. Freedom from reintervention at 24 months was 73% and was comparable between Z2 and Z3 (74.1% vs 91.7%; P = 0.123). The rate of early complete FL thrombosis was comparable in the Z2 and Z3 groups. By 24 months of observation in the Z3 group, the rate of complete FL thrombosis was significantly higher (60% vs 77%; P = 0.046). No statistically significant differences were observed between landing zones 2 and 3 during the FET procedure with regard to early outcomes. Proximalization of the FET was associated with a shorter FL thrombosis in the midterm follow-up period that affected the distal aortic reintervention rate.

Limited vs. extended repair for acute type I aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over a decade in Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

Limited vs. extended repair for acute type I aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over a decade in Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

Sizing of the hybrid stent-graft for the frozen elephant trunk procedure

Objective . The aim of study was to determine the tactics of choosing the optimal diameter of stent-graft in open hybrid repair of thoracic aorta based on the analysis of literature and the experience of Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery. Material and Methods. A hybrid approach using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is currently the safest and most optimal approach for thoracic aorta repair in case of extended pathology of all thoracic aorta segments, including the arch and descending thoracic aorta. Despite this technique has been used for over 15 years, there is no agreement in the current literature regarding the algorithm for choosing the optimal stent-graft diameter. A total of 135 FET procedures were performed at our centre from 2013 to 2020. The average age of patients was 52.8 ± 11.5 years. We analyzed our own experience and current literature to determine the optimal tactics for sizing the hybrid stent-graft for FET procedure. Results. One of the main factors influencing the tactics of selecting the stent-graft diameter is the nature of pathology. The experience of most surgeons suggests that the size of stent-graft should not excessively exceed the diameter of a true canal in chronic dissection and the overall diameter in case of acute aortic dissection. In case of aneurysms, most authors use stent-grafts with the diameters exceeding distal landing zone diameter by 10–20%. Some authors consider it necessary to preoperatively measure the calculated diameter based on multislice computed tomography (CT) data, whereas many other authors prefer intraoperative measurements. Conclusion. The use of a stent-graft, which is too large, can result in a high risk of new fenestration at the distal end level during the postoperative period and follow-up complications, whereas stent-graft, which is too small, would not allow the adequate fit in the distal part. Therefore, the choice of optimal stent-graft size remains one of the key issues in hybrid thoracic aortic surgery.

Comparative study of Japanese frozen elephant trunk device for open aortic arch repairs

ObjectiveWe performed a multicenter prospective comparative study to determine the impact of a Japanese frozen elephant trunk device on total arch replacement compared with conventional repair without it. MethodsBetween 2016 and 2019, a total of 684 patients (frozen elephant trunk procedure; n = 369; conventional repair, n = 315) from 41 institutions were enrolled. The 2 procedures were selected according to each center's strategy. ResultsThe frozen elephant trunk procedure was applied more for aortic dissection, whereas the conventional repairs were predominantly performed for aneurysms. In the former, only hypothermic circulatory arrest time was reduced among the intraoperative parameters. Although there were no differences in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates (0.8% and 1.6%, respectively, for the frozen elephant trunk procedure vs 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, for conventional repair), the neurologic complication rates were significantly higher in stroke (5.7% vs 2.2%; P = .022) and paraplegia (1.6% vs 0%; P = .023). In the propensity score matching analyses using 11 variables, statistical significance disappeared in the differences for mortality and neurologic morbidity (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis) rates of 194 patients of each group, although they were still higher for the frozen elephant trunk procedure. ConclusionsThe early outcomes of total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure were acceptable despite its higher prevalence of emergency or redo surgery, which was comparable to that of the conventional repair. This procedure had higher rates of spinal cord injury than the conventional repair, which is a disadvantage of this approach.

"Proximalization is Advancement"-Zone 3 Frozen Elephant Trunk vs Zone 2 Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Literature Review.

Over the decades, the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) technique has gained immense popularity allowing simplified treatment of complex aortic pathologies. FET is frequently used to treat aortic conditions involving the distal aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta in a single stage. Surgical preference has recently changed from FET procedures being performed at Zone 3 to Zone 2. There are several advantages of Zone 2 FET over Zone 3 FET including reduction in spinal cord injury, visceral ischemia, neurological and cardiovascular sequelae. In addition, Zone 2 FET is a technically less complicated procedure. Literature on the comparison between Zone 3 and Zone 2 FET is scarce and primarily observational and anecdotal. Therefore, further research is warranted in this paradigm to substantiate current surgical treatment options for complex aortic pathologies. In this review, we explore literature surrounding FET and the reasons for the shift in surgical preference from Zone 3 to Zone 2.

Frozen elephant trunk in total arch replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and aortic proximalization.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure became a popular entity for utilization in aortic arch aneurysm disease. However, its proper mortality and morbidities as well as the predictors of outcomes are poorly identified. This systematic review and meta-analysis explore FET outcomes and its predictors with a focus on zone aortic proximalization. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from their beginning to June 2020 to find studies reporting the outcomes of the FET procedure for the total arch replacement (TAR). A total of 64 studies including 7967 patients were evaluated. The pooled estimates of cerebrovascular accidents, paraplegia, renal failure, and in-hospital mortality were 7.104 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.691-8.661; I2 = 78.53%), 3.465 (95% CI, 2.852-4.136; I2 = 15.96), 14.969 (95% CI, 11.361-18.977; I2 = 91.26%), and 8.933 (95% CI, 7.128-10.919; I2 = 78.51%), respectively. Stratification by the geographical locations and by the aortic pathologies led to lower heterogeneity, but not for renal failure. The distal anastomosis in Zone 2 was associated with a lower rate of renal failure compared with Zone 3 (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81; p = .003; I2 = 0%). The FET procedure for TAR can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidities among patients with complex aortic pathologies. Moreover, the distal anastomosis in Zone 2 was associated with lower renal failure compared to Zone 3.

Outcome of the frozen elephant trunk procedure as a redo operation

The goal of this study was to determine the outcome of patients undergoing an elective frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure as a redo operation following previous cardiac surgery. One hundred and eighteen consecutive patients underwent FET procedures between October 2010 and October 2019 at our centre. Patients were registered in a dedicated database and analysed retrospectively. Clinical and follow-up characteristics were compared between patients undergoing a FET operation as a primary (primary group) or a redo procedure (redo group) using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. Emergency procedures (n = 33) were excluded from the analysis. A total of 36.5% (n = 31) of the FET procedures were redo operations (redo group) and 63.5% (n = 54) of the patients underwent primary surgery (primary group). There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality [primary group: 7.4%; redo group: 3.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.19-35.29); P = 0.63] and the 3-year mortality [primary group: 22.2%; redo group: 16.7%; 95% CI (0.23-3.23); P = 0.72] between redo and primary cases. Furthermore, the adjusted statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the groups in the occurrence of transient or permanent neurological deficit, paraplegia, acute renal failure and resternotomy. The redo group showed a higher rate of recurrent nerve palsy, which did not reach statistical significance [primary group: 3.7% (n = 2); redo group: 19.4% (n = 6); P = 0.091]. Elective FET procedures as redo operations performed by a dedicated aortic team following previous cardiac surgery demonstrate an adequate safety profile.

Is total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure reasonable in elderly patients?

Total aortic arch replacement is an invasive procedure with significant risks for complications. These risks are even higher in older, multimorbid patients. The current trends in demographic changes in western countries with an ageing population will aggravate this issue. In this study, we present our experience with total aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique in septuagenarians. We compared the results of septuagenarians with those of younger patients and analysed if there was an improvement in outcome over time. Between August 2001 and March 2020, 225 patients underwent non-urgent FET procedure at our institution. There were 75 patients aged ≥70 years (mean age 74 ± 4) who were assigned to group A, and 150 patients aged <70 years (mean age of 57 ± 11) who were assigned to group B. In groups A and B, the indications for surgery were chronic dissection (21% vs 53%), aortic aneurysm (78% vs 45%) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (1% vs 2%). The rate for temporary dialysis was significantly higher in group A than in group B (29% vs 13%, P = 0.003), although the majority recovered kidney function. Rates for re-exploration for bleeding and stroke were comparable in both groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group A than in group B (24% vs 13%, P = 0.037). Logistic regression analysis showed that age >70 years was an independent statistically significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 2.513, 95% confidence interval = 1.197-5.278, P-value = 0.015). Follow-up was complete for 100% of patients and comprised a total of 1073 patient-years with a mean follow-up time of 4.8 ± 4.5 years. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 68% and 49% in group A, and 85% and 71% in group B, respectively (log rank, P < 0.001). Survival did not significantly improve over time. Total aortic arch replacement using the FET technique has a significantly higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality in septuagenarians than in younger patients. Long-term survival is significantly impaired in older patients. We recommend thorough patient selection of those who require total aortic arch replacement, and optimization of perioperative management to improve outcomes.