Abstract Background Nutrition plays a crucial role in the development and course of disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, standardized nutritional assessments are often lengthy and require the expertise of professional nutritionists, leading to a significant gap in the ability to screen for important dietary factors. As a result, these aspects are frequently overlooked in both clinical practice and scientific research. To address this issue, we aim to develop a short screening instrument that can effectively assess dietary and nutritional aspects in patients with IBD. This tool is not intended to replace, but complement standardized assessments, and to enable clinicians and researchers to address dietary and nutritional aspects in situations where these are otherwise disregarded. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify nutritional factors with regard to their pro- and antiinflammatory characteristics in the context of IBD. Based on this research, a prototype screening tool was developed in collaboration with nutritional experts from 3 German University Hospitals (Mannheim, Munich, and Hannover). The first phase of validation involved an evaluation of the prototype screener by consecutive outpatients at the University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM) to assess its feasibility and acceptance. Results Our screening tool contains 28 questions and asks about the frequency of consumption of certain food groups as well as the type of preparation and eating habits with regard to vegetarian or vegan diet, the frequency of meals and the balance and variety of the diet. In the patient evaluation phase, we received feedback from 52 patients (n=37 female, n=36 with Crohn’s Disease, n=51 with remitted or mild disease (1 moderate, none severe). Mean time to complete the screening tool was 9.3 min (SD 7.8). The vast majority of patients stated that they found the screener somewhat or very important (n=47) and somewhat or very easy to understand (n=48), see fig. 1. Seven patients reported that they found at least one question difficult to understand. Ten patients stated that the screener was missing at least one aspect of their dietary habits. No patients reported any unpleasant questions. A global evaluation of the screener according to the German school grading system (from 1 = very good, 6 = very bad) was rated with a mean grade of 1.6. Conclusion This newly developed screening tool to semi-quantitatively assess dietary habits and relevant nutritional aspects in IBD was well-accepted and positively evaluated by patients. In the next step, we will adapt the questionnaire according to patient feedback and then initiate the next phase of the validation process in a multicentric setting.
Read full abstract