(By Tatyana Ivzhenko. Nezavisimaya gazeta, Aug. 30, 2016, p. Complete text:) German and French foreign policy chiefs Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Jean-Marc Ayrault have for the first time discussed Ukraine issue with their Polish counterpart Witold Waszczykowski. The meeting took place on Sunday [Aug. 28] in Ettersberg (near Weimar) on occasion of 25th anniversary of foundation of Weimar Triangle. Poland is not a member of Normandy format [France, Germany, Ukraine, Russia] of negotiations on a [political] settlement in Donetsk Basin, so its inclusion in mediators’ conversation could pave way for a surprise as soon as early September. ... Readers will recall that an informal meeting of foreign ministers from [nations in the] Organization for Security and Cooperation in followed by an informal European Union summit, are due take place. Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin will hold talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande. All of them will discuss prospects for a settlement in Donetsk Basin. ... Vitaly Kulik, director of [Ukrainian] Center for Civil Society Studies, told NG that in this context a meeting of the French, German and Polish foreign ministers is of principal importance Ukraine. On settlement issues, Warsaw supports Kiev’s line. Despite difficulties that have emerged in [Ukrainian-Polish] relations, [Polish President] Andrzej Duda’s arrival in Kiev on [Ukraine’s] Independence Day has demonstrated that Poland remains our reliable partner on strategic matters. At same time, Poland is a leader in Eastern Europe, he said. According expert, Western European leaders have indicated that they intend listen Polish leadership’s position. And this is extremely important in Donetsk Basin settlement process. ... After all, until now situation has remained in a stalemate, since Ukraine on one side and Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics on other have diametrically opposed positions on the purpose and objective of Minsk agreements [for a ceasefire in eastern Ukraine; see Current Digest, Vol. 66, No. 37, pp. 3 - 6 and Vol. 67, No. 7, pp. 3 - 7 - Trans.]. Kiev is convinced that their implementation should result in elimination of DPR/LPR and region’s return Ukrainian control. The republics, on the contrary, are convinced that aim of Minsk agreements is to formalize and recognize [their] special status, independent from Ukraine. ... It is impossible harmonize or coordinate those positions. None of sides is willing make concessions. It is noteworthy that last Sunday (Coalminer’s Day and Donetsk Day), Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko, addressing Donetsk Basin residents, assured them that their region was, is and will remain Ukrainian. Meanwhile, Donetsk people’s republic leader Aleksandr Zakharov talked about cynicism and brutality of Nazi power in Kiev, took pride in fact that the city did not succumb the enemy, and called Donetsk an outpost of Russian world and a symbol of struggle for freedom. ... The intensity of shelling attacks in Donetsk Basin has been increasing throughout summer, and now their number per day is comparable most heated periods of military confrontation. The [Trilateral] Contact Group discussed situation during a meeting last weekend in OSCE special representative Martin Sajdik stated after talks that all parties agreed it is necessary to fully observe ceasefire***in connection with the start of academic year on Sept. 1. But will that actually happen? ... Since June, participants in Minsk negotiations have been trying reach an agreement on sides’ withdrawal from line of contact in at least two or three areas. For starters, towns of Petrovskoye (Donetsk Province) and Zolotoye (Lugansk Province) were chosen. However, at last meeting, parties failed to reach an agreement. The republics suspected Ukrainian side of manipulation. Denis Pushilin, Donetsk people’s republic representative at Minsk talks, told Donetsk News Agency (DAN): At this stage, we also see inexpediency of taking the first steps (in withdrawing troops from line of contact - NG), which were not clearly spelled out, not clearly formalized in documents that were endorsed, initialed and signed at a high level in Minsk. ... The republics are outraged by fact that Ukrainian delegation often cites need approve decisions within the Normandy format. In particular, this concerns issue of amnesty for defenders of DPR/LPR. Commenting on Ukraine’s position, DPR acting foreign minister Natalya Nikonorova told DAN: We have to remind Kiev again that Normandy format will not replace the Minsk format. Our representatives, with whom all modalities and drafts should be agreed on, participate only in Minsk [format].