Fragrance Mix Research Articles

Frequency and clinical relevance of contact allergy in dental patients.

While many studies have reported on occupational allergic contact dermatitis amongst dental personnel, studies on the relevance of patch testing in dental patients are scarce. To determine the frequency and clinical relevance of contact allergy in patients with intra- and perioral complaints. A total of 360 patients with intra- and perioral complaints suspected of having a contact allergy were patch-tested with the dental allergen series, European Baseline Series, and extended Amsterdam Baseline Series at Amsterdam University Medical Centers between January 2015 and November 2021. A total of 285 patients (79.2%) had a positive patch test reaction for either one (18.6%) or multiple allergens (60.6%). Sodium tetrachloropalladate was the most sensitising allergen with 98 patients (27.2%) testing positive, followed by nickel sulphate (23.3%), methylisothiazolinone (15.6%), and fragrance mix I (14.2%). Clinical relevance was found in 68 of 208 patients (32.7%), with patients having one (15.4%) or multiple (17.3%) patch test reactions clinically relevant to their (peri)oral complaints. Clinically relevant patch test reactions were frequently seen in dental patients. Although this study provides us with a better understanding on the frequency and clinical relevance of contact allergy in dental patients, further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Prospective study of consecutive patch testing in patients with contact dermatitis using an adapted Latin American baseline series.

Background. Contact dermatitis is characterized by pruritic skin lesions with high prevalence rates. Our objective is to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of a population with suspected contact dermatitis who underwent to a patch testing using an adapted Latin American baseline series.Methods. Observational, descriptive, analytical clinical study with prospective data collection was performed. 208 participants who underwent patch testing using an adapted Latin American baseline series containing 40 allergens were analyzed. The prevalence of contact allergies was compared with data from the literature. Pearson's chi-square test was used for qualitative variables. Quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance of the regression parameters was tested using the Wald statistical test. Results. A total of 69.7% had one or more positive tests. Among those, 82.8% were women (OR 1.371; p = 0.398). The hands were the most commonly affected site at 43%. An occupational history was detected in 19.2%. The most common allergens were nickel sulfate (32.2%), sodium tetrachloropalladate (19.7%), fragrance mix I (15.4%), and methylisothiazolinone (13.5%). In multivariate logistic regression models, nickel was significantly related to female sex, as well as palladium. Fragrance mix I was related to a family history of allergy (p less than 0.05). Methylisothiazolinone was statistically significantly related to face and hand lesions. Conclusions. This study demonstrated a detailed profile of a population with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Our patch test results, using an adapted Latin American baseline series, represent a significant update of this important diagnostic tool.

Profil des lymphocytes T CD8+ dans l’eczéma allergique de contact sur peaux pigmentées

ObjectiveTo analyze the levels of CD8+ T cells during the effector phase of allergic contact dermatitis. Patients and methodsThis was a cross-sectional, exposed-unexposed study with several passages. The study included 150 exposed patients and 150 matched unexposed subjects representing the control population. Patch tests were performed in exposed subjects. CD8+ T cell counts were performed by flow cytometry. Each patient received 3 samples (Day 0, Day 2 and Day 4). Only one sample was taken from the controls. We considered the average CD8+ T cell rate of the controls as a reference value. Any value below this level was considered low and any value above it was considered high. ResultsThe mean age was 35.77 years. The main allergens were fragrance mix, nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate. The mean CD8+ T cell level in patients at D0 was significantly higher than in the control population. It increased significantly from D0 to D4. There was a significant relationship between mean CD8+ T cells levels and patch test results. There was a twofold increase in the risk of having an elevated CD8+ T cells level when having allergic contact dermatitis. ConclusionOur study showed significant levels of CD8+ T cell in subjects with allergic contact dermatitis. However, it should be supported by work on the exact nature of hapten-specific effector CD8+ T cells, the cytokines involved and the role played by other potential effector cells in allergic contact dermatitis.

Fragrance allergens in cosmetic products marketed for children in Denmark.

Fragrances are among the most common contact allergens in children. Cosmetic products are the most frequent source of skin exposure. To investigate exposure to fragrance allergens among Danish children, based on a sample of 1179 cosmetic products marketed for children. Information regarding cosmetic products marketed to children was obtained using a non-profit smartphone application registry, with data from December 2015 to November 2022. The number of validated products was 26 537, of which 1349 marketed for children. After elimination of duplicates, 1179 (4.4%) individual products remained. The majority 53.8% (634/1179) of the products were fragranced. The highest frequency of declared fragrances was found in 'Facial care'-products: 93.0% (80/86), of which 97.7% were lip balms. The highest number of labelled fragrances in one single product (n = 16) was found in a baby perfume. Fragrance mix I (FMI) or II (FMII) allergens were found in 25.3% (298/1179) of the products. Limonene and linalool were the two most frequently labelled fragrance allergens. Children can be exposed to a vast number of fragrance allergens from scented cosmetic products. Allergens from FM I and FMII are widely used in cosmetic products marketed to children. Patch testing with FMI and FMII remains relevant in children.

Contact hypersensitivity to Indian standard patch test series correlates with disease severity among children with atopic dermatitis.

Background There is emerging evidence of a relationship between atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), though the data available are scarce with conflicting viewpoints. We explored the occurrence of contact hypersensitivity among children with atopic dermatitis by patch testing them with the Indian standard series and tried to correlate the presence of contact hypersensitivity with the clinical severity of AD in these children. Methods In this single-centre, cross-sectional study, children between 6 months and 12 years diagnosed with atopic dermatitis were included and patch tested with the Indian standard series. Outcome parameters were the proportion of patients having positive patch-test reactions, the proportion of positive patch-test reactions for each allergen and factors associated with patch test positivity in atopic dermatitis. Results Of the 136 patients, 80 were boys. The mean age of the study population was 5.6 ± 3.2 years. Twenty-eight (20.6%) patients had patch test positivity at 96 h. Fragrance mix was the commonest allergen, followed by potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride hexahydrate and nickel. SCORing atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) was significantly higher in patients with positive patch tests as compared to patients with negative patch tests (P = 0.009). Conclusion Greater disease severity in atopic dermatitis was found to be associated with patch test positivity. Limitations Inability to establish relevance in about 50% of the patients was a limitation of our study. Follow-up data regarding the impact of allergen avoidance is not available.

P75 Are ‘hypoallergenic’ personal care products truly safe?

Abstract It is estimated that one-fifth of the general population may have allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to common environmental allergens. Skincare companies are increasingly advertising their products as ‘hypoallergenic’, targeting consumers who seek personal care products (PCPs) that are less likely to cause an allergic reaction. However, there are no Food and Drug Administration standards to regulate the use of the term hypoallergenic, allowing manufacturers to use the term freely. We evaluated PCPs marketed as hypoallergenic from two health and beauty retailers in the UK for the presence of allergens in the British Society of Cutaneous Allergy (BSCA) baseline series. Product and ingredient lists were obtained from www.boots.com and www.superdrug.com in November 2022 using the term hypoallergenic in the search box. PCPs without the term hypoallergenic in the product description, unrelated products (plasters, jewellery, sanitary towels, tampons, clothing, facial brushes) and duplicates (same products in different sizes) were excluded. In total, 208 PCPs met the inclusion criteria: 47 (22.6%) were rinse-off and 161 (77.4%) were leave-on products. At least one substance from the BSCA baseline series was an ingredient in 79 (38.0%) PCPs. Of these, 54 (26.0%) had 1 potential allergen, 21 (10.2%) had 2, and 4 (1.9%) had 3 potential allergens from the series. The frequently encountered allergens were cetearyl alcohol and paraben mix, found in 42 (20.4%) and 37 (18.0%) of products, respectively. Other BSCA baseline series allergens identified in PCPs included 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, lanolin, decyl glucoside, diazolidinyl urea, methylisothiazolinone, limonene and linalool. In addition, PCPs had chemicals that were related to and may cross-react with allergens in the BSCA baseline series. Parfum/fragrance, which can cross-react with fragrance mix I and II, was found in 85 (41.3%) PCPs. Sodium benzoate and/or benzoic acid, often used as preservatives in PCPs, were found in 66 (32.0%) products. Forty (19.4%) PCPs had ingredients that belong to the Asteraceae family and therefore may trigger an ACD in those with positive reaction to Compositae and/or sesquiterpene lactone mix. Twenty-three (11.2%) PCPs contained cetyl alcohol and/or stearyl alcohol, the two major components of cetearyl alcohol. Overall, 153 (74.3%) of 206 PCPs marketed as hypoallergenic contained BSCA baseline series allergens or ingredients that may cross-react with them. This highlights the need to increase public awareness and education about the potential dangers of purchasing ‘hypoallergenic’ PCPs.

CD10 (P75) Are ‘hypoallergenic’ personal care products truly safe?

Abstract It is estimated that one-fifth of the general population may have allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to common environmental allergens. Skincare companies are increasingly advertising their products as ‘hypoallergenic’, targeting consumers who seek personal care products (PCPs) that are less likely to cause an allergic reaction. However, there are no Food and Drug Administration standards to regulate the use of the term hypoallergenic, allowing manufacturers to use the term freely. We evaluated PCPs marketed as hypoallergenic from two health and beauty retailers in the UK for the presence of allergens in the British Society of Cutaneous Allergy (BSCA) baseline series. Product and ingredient lists were obtained from www.boots.com and www.superdrug.com in November 2022 using the term hypoallergenic in the search box. PCPs without the term hypoallergenic in the product description, unrelated products (plasters, jewellery, sanitary towels, tampons, clothing and facial brushes) and duplicates (same products in different sizes) were excluded. In total, 208 PCPs met the inclusion criteria: 47 (22.6%) were rinse-off and 161 (77.4%) were leave-on products. At least one substance from the BSCA baseline series was an ingredient in 79 (38.0%) PCPs. Of these, 54 (26.0%) had one potential allergen, 21 (10.2%) had two, and four (1.9%) had three potential allergens from the series. The frequently encountered allergens were cetearyl alcohol and paraben mix, found in 42 (20.4%) and 37 (18.0%) of products, respectively. Other BSCA baseline series allergens identified in PCPs included 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, lanolin, decyl glucoside, diazolidinyl urea, methylisothiazolinone, limonene and linalool. In addition, PCPs had chemicals that were related to and may cross-react with allergens in the BSCA baseline series. Parfum/fragrance, which can crossreact with fragrance mix I and II, was found in 85 (41.3%) PCPs. Sodium benzoate and/or benzoic acid, often used as preservatives in PCPs, were found in 66 (32.0%) products. Forty (19.4%) PCPs had ingredients that belong to the Asteraceae family and therefore may trigger an ACD in those with positive reaction to Compositae and/or sesquiterpene lactone mix. Twenty-three (11.2%) PCPs contained cetyl alcohol and/or stearyl alcohol, the two major components of cetearyl alcohol. Overall, 153 (74.3%) of 206 PCPs marketed as hypoallergenic contained BSCA baseline series allergens or ingredients that may cross-react with them. This highlights the need to increase public awareness and education about the potential dangers of purchasing ‘hypoallergenic’ PCPs.

Allergic reactivity for different dilutions of eugenol in repeated open application test and patch testing.

Eugenol is a known contact sensitiser included in fragrance mix I. To assess the allergic reactivity to eugenol in different concentrations using patch test as well as repeated open application test (ROAT). Overall 67 subjects from 6 European dermatology clinics participated in the study. The ROAT was performed for 21 days twice a day, applying 3 dilutions of eugenol (2.7%-0.5%) and a control. Before and after the ROAT, patch testing with 17 dilutions of eugenol (2.0%-0.00006%) and controls was performed. Out of the 34 subjects with contact allergy to eugenol, 21 (61.8%) showed a positive patch test before ROAT was performed, the lowest positive concentration was 0.031%. The ROAT was positive in 19 (55.9%) of the 34 subjects, the time until a positive reaction occurred was negatively associated with the concentration of the ROAT solution, as well as with the allergic reactivity of the subjects as defined by patch testing. In the patch test after ROAT, 20 of the 34 test subjects (58.8%) showed a positive reaction. In 13 (38.2%) of the 34 test subjects, the patch test result was not reproduceable, still 4 (31.0%) of these 13 subjects developed a positive ROAT. Eugenol can provoke a positive patch test reaction in a very low dose; besides, this hypersensitivity may persist even if a former positive patch test is not reproduceable.

Advancing the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that, especially when the condition becomes chronic, has a high impact on the quality of life and represents a significant disease burden. ACD represents a type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction that is triggered by contact with an allergen in previously sensitized individuals through the activation of allergen-specific T cells. In the acute phase, it is characterized by eczematous dermatitis, which presents with erythema, edema, vesicles, scaling, and intense itch. Non-eczematous clinical forms are also described (lichenoid, bullous, and lymphomatosis). Lichenification is the most common clinical picture in the chronic phase if the culprit allergen is not found or eliminated. ACD can be associated with both occupational and non-occupational exposure to allergens, representing approximately 90% of occupational skin disorders along with irritant contact dermatitis. Patch testing with suspected allergens is required for a diagnosis. Metals, especially nickel, fragrance mix, isothiazolinones, and para-phenylenediamine, are the most commonly positive allergens in patients patch tested for suspected ACD. The treatment goal is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and use topical and/or systemic corticosteroid therapy.

Pediatric Contact Dermatitis: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Background: Although allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is relatively common in the adult and pediatric populations alike, few studies describe the special features of contact sensitization among the Israeli pediatric populations, none of them is multicenter. Our study aims to describe and analyze patch test results and trends in 4 tertiary care centers between 2012 and 2022. Methods: We assessed the results of 357 patch tests performed on children 0-18 years old between 2012 and 2022 in designated clinics in 4 tertiary medical centers. All patients were tested using the European baseline series and additional series as clinically indicated. We assessed the demographic features, atopic features, and influence, as well as the main allergens to cause sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis among the pediatric population. Results: In total 69% of the study population were females, mainly 12-18 years old, 35% of the study population were previously diagnosed with atopic dermatitis, and 57% had an atopic diathesis. Females were more commonly sensitized (P < 0.05). Patients without atopic dermatitis were more commonly diagnosed with ACD and had more reactions on patch test (P < 0.05). The most common allergens to cause ACD are preservatives and metals, as previously described, however, acrylate sensitivity is an emerging group that has not been described among the Israeli pediatric population in previous studies. Fragrance mix 2 and Mroxylon pereirae are relatively rare allergens among the Israeli pediatric population, whereas linalool hyperoxide might be considered an emerging allergen. Methylisothiazolinone causes ACD more frequently among patients without atopic dermatitis (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Among the Israeli pediatric population, ACD is more common in females without atopic dermatitis. Acrylates become a common culprit and should be included in baseline series. Patients with atopic dermatitis are less frequently sensitized by methylisothiazolinone.

Trends in Patch Testing With the Mayo Clinic Standard Series, 2017-2021.

Background: Patch testing to a standard series is used to identify culprit allergens in patients with contact dermatitis. The reaction rates evolve over time based on trends in cutaneous exposures by the general population. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the patch test results of the Mayo Clinic standard series in patients tested from 2017 to 2021. Methods: The patch test reactions of standard series allergens tested from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with the results of our prior report from 2011 to 2015 as well as the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) report from 2017 to 2018. Results: Of 2667 patients tested, 1683 (63.1%) had at least 1 positive reaction. The 15 allergens with the highest reaction rates were hydroperoxides of linalool 1%, nickel (II) sulfate hexahydrate, methylisothiazolinone, Myroxylon pereirae resin, hydroperoxides of linalool 0.5%, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, neomycin sulfate, cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate, fragrance mix I, benzalkonium chloride, bacitracin, hydroperoxides of limonene, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, p-phenylenediamine, and textile dye mix. Twelve (80%) of these allergens were also in the top 15 of the most recent NACDG report. Conclusions: Hydroperoxides of linalool and hydroperoxides of limonene are new allergens that have been added to our standard series. These are associated with high reaction rates.

Analysis of patch testing results in patients with contact dermatitis in Istanbul, Turkey, from 2012 to 2022.

Allergens responsible for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) differ between populations. They can even change over the years with the effect of environmental factors. To evaluate the results of patch testing performed in our center. In this study, the thin-layer rapid-use epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) test results of patients with a diagnosis of ACD between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. In 431 (42.5%) of the total 1012 patients, a positive reaction to at least one allergen was detected in the patch test. Allergen positivity was most detected for nickel sulphate (16.8%), gold sodium thiosulfate (GST) (6.9%), thimerosal (4.2%), fragrance mix (3.4%), carba mix (3.2%), and cobalt dichloride (2.9%). Nickel sulfate and GST sensitivity was found to be significantly higher in women, fragrance mix sensitivity in men, thimerosal sensitivity in individuals aged under 40 years, colophony and balsam of Peru sensitivity in head and neck dermatitis, and carba mix and thiuram mix sensitivity in atopic individuals. This study presents comprehensive data from Turkey concerning the sensitivity frequencies for allergens included in the T.R.U.E. test.

Effects of aluminium chloride added to common patch test substances.

A modulating effect of aluminium regarding type IV reactions might exist but has not been further investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on patch test reactions when adding aluminium chloride hexahydrate (Al-Cl) to common test preparations. Al-Cl in different concentrations was added to nickel sulphate 15.0% aqua (Ni), methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqua (MI) and fragrance mix I 10.0% aqua/ethanol (FM I). The Ni preparations were tested in 120 consecutive patients. MI and FM I were tested in participants known to have contact allergy to the respective allergen. McNemar's test was used to decide which Ni preparation had the highest sensitivity. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate pairwise comparison in summarized test score for the preparations with MI and FM I. Adding Al-Cl 20.0%/30.0% to Ni identified twice as many patients with contact allergy to nickel compared to Ni without Al-Cl. Adding Al-Cl 20.0%/10.0% to MI, decreased the patch test reactivity compared to MI without Al-Cl. No differences in patch reactivity were noticed when adding Al-Cl to FM I. Al-Cl 20.0% or 30.0% seems to enhance the patch test reactivity to Ni 15.0% aqua.

Patch Testing of Thai Children with Eczema

Objective: To detect contact allergy rate and common allergens in Thai children presented with eczema. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 children, aged 1-15 years, were patch tested using a pediatric screening series of 16 allergens and relevant additional allergens. Data on clinical presentation, atopic history and test results were collected. Results: Contact allergy was found in 51 of 124 children (41.1%) presented with all forms of eczema. The common allergens were lanolin alcohol (8.9%), cocamidopropyl betaine (8.1%), nickel sulfate (7.3%), fragrance mix I (5.6%), formaldehyde (5.6%), thimerosal (5.6%), fragrance mix II (4.8%), cobalt chloride (4.0%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (2.4%), methylisothiazolinone (2.4%) and thiuram mix (2.4%). Nineteen of 50 atopic dermatitis patients (38%) showed positive patch test reactions. Conclusion: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in children. Both atopic and non-atopic patients can develop contact dermatitis. Patch testing should be performed in children presented with eczema regardless of contact dermatitis history.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sexual and Gender Minority Patients: Disparities and a Call to Action.

Objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients face health issues relevant to dermatologists, such as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD); however, there is a lack of information surrounding common allergens causing ACD that disproportionally affect SGM patients. Methods: Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles studying ACD in the SGM population. Results: Common allergens associated with ACD in SGM patients include nitrates, fragrance mix, methylisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone-methylchloroisothiazolinone, topical antibiotics, and allergens seen in chest binders. Common anatomic sites included the chest, cheeks, perioral region, nasal orifices, and the anogenital region. Conclusions: Certain allergens and body sites affected by ACD are more common among the SGM community. This can help guide patch testing as a diagnostic tool. Further research must be conducted regarding ACD in SGM patients.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing in Skin of Color Patients.

Objective: Skin of color patients face important health issues relevant to dermatologists, such as allergic contact dermatitis; however, there is a lack of information surrounding common allergens causing contact dermatitis that disproportionately affect skin of color patients, as well as interpreting patch testing in this population. Methods: Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles studying allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in skin of color patients. Results: The most common positive reactions in African American patients included PPD, balsam of Peru, bacitracin, fragrance mix, and nickel. The most common positive reactions in Hispanic patients included Carba mix, nickel sulfate, and thiuram mix. The most common positive reactions in Asian patients included nickel sulfate, fragrance mix, and potassium dichromate. When interpreting patch test results in patients with higher Fitzpatrick skin types, positive patch tests presented with lichenification and hyperpigmentation, rather than erythema and vesicles. Furthermore, characteristic bright red or pink hues for positive results may appear violaceous or faint pink. Conclusions: Awareness of the common allergens associated with allergic contact dermatitis in patients of skin of color can help guide patch testing as an important diagnostic tool. Further research must be conducted regarding contact dermatitis in this patient population, especially given the relative lack of data surrounding Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, and Native American patients.

North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2019-2020.

Background: Patch testing is an important diagnostic tool for assessment of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Objective: This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch testing results from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Methods: At 13 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a screening series of 80 allergens, and, as indicated, supplemental allergens. Results: Overall, 4121 patients were tested; 2871 (69.7%) had at least 1 positive/allergic patch test reaction and 2095 patients (51.2%) had a primary diagnosis of ACD. The most commonly positive allergens were nickel (18.2%), methylisothiazolinone (MI) (13.8%), fragrance mix (FM) I (12.8%), hydroperoxides of linalool (HPL) (11.1%), and benzisothiazolinone (BIT) (10.4%). Compared with that of 2017-2018, prevalence of top 20 allergens statistically increased for FM I, HPL, BIT, propolis, and hydroperoxides of limonene (3.5%). For the first time, MI positivity did not increase between reporting periods. Approximately one-fifth of patients (20.3%) had ≥1 clinically relevant reaction(s) to allergens/substances not on the NACDG series. Conclusions: The epidemic of MI contact allergy in North America may have reached a plateau. Patch testing using a robust screening series, and supplemental allergens as indicated, is necessary for comprehensive evaluation of ACD.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Older Adults: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a significant health problem in older adults. Reports in the literature regarding the prevalence of ACD in older adults are various and inconsistent. In contrast, the data regarding contact irritant dermatitis are more consistent. Objective: To compare ACD characteristics in older adults versus the adult population aged 18-45 years. Methods: We conducted a retrospective controlled study. Data were obtained from the medical records of 4199 patients. We collected information regarding age, gender, atopic diathesis, anatomical distribution of the rash, reactions to patch tests, and final diagnosis. Results: The frequency of positive reactions in patch testing was lower in the older adult group than in the younger population, but the frequency of clinically relevant positive reactions was higher in the older adults. There was no statistically significant difference in the final diagnosis of ACD between the groups. The most common allergens among the older adult population were fragrance mix, preservatives (Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone [MCI/MI]), and nickel sulfate. Conclusion: This study, the first of its kind in Israel to include a large group of older adult patients, contributes to a better understanding of clinical parameters related to ACD among older adults. Consequently, it will hopefully contribute to lowering the disease burden.

Screening for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Based on Pattern of Patch Test Results: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: Contact allergies are associated with morbidity worldwide. Purpose: To investigate the patterns of sensitization to contact allergens in a local population. Methods: A retrospective study investigated patch test reactivity among patients with a clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis referred to the dermatology clinic at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, between January 2021 and January 2023. Pregnant women, immunosuppressed patients, and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Only 92 of 101 referred patients underwent patch testing after fulfilling requirements. The patch test was performed using a Thin-layer Rapid-Use Epicutaneous patch test containing 35 contact allergenic elements and one control (total = 36). Results: Among 92 patients, 35 (38%) were males, and 57 (62%) were females. Of these, 62 (67.4%) patients had a positive patch test and reacted to one or more allergens. The most common sensitizing allergens were p-phenylenediamine (PPD), gold sodium thiosulfate, and disperse blue 106, with equal positive reactions in 16 (25.8%) patients, followed by nickel sulfate in 13 (21%), p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin in eight (13%), fragrance mix in 7 (10.8%), and epoxy resin in six (9.2%) patients. No significant sex differences were found among patients with contact dermatitis where notable patch test allergen reactivity was observed. Conclusion: Patch test reactivity to PPD, gold sodium thiosulfate, and disperse blue 106 was high. The pattern of contact allergy observed here highlights the need for large-scale investigations to identify local allergens for contact allergy and formulate policies for avoiding exposure.

Preliminary Results of the European Standard Battery Epicutaneous Tests at the Dermatology Hospital of Bamako

Contact dermatitis is a frequent reason for consultation in dermatology. In recurrent and erythrodermic forms, patch testing in search of an allergenic substance is necessary. The aim of this study is to describe the preliminary results of patch testing using the standard European battery at the Dermatology Hospital of Bamako. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at the Dermatology Hospital of Bamako over a period of two years. All patients screened for recurrent or extensive eczema were included. The patch tests performed were those of the standard European battery. After application of the allergens, the tests were read at 48 and 72 hours. During the study 5777 cases of eczema were detected , 29 patients presenting a recurrent and/or extensive form were tested, of which 28 patients had a positive test at 72 hours (96%): 17/29 males (56%) and 12/25 females, i.e. a sex ratio of 1.42. The mean age of the patients was 39 years (range 7-72 years). With the exception of 1 patient, all patients were poly-sensitized: 9 patients reacted to 2 allergens, 9 others to three allergens and 6 to at least 5 allergens. Potassium dichromate was found 12 times, paraphenylene diamine 7 times, nickel 5 times and finally epoxy resin and fragrance mix 3 times each. In Africa, in the absence of suitable test batteries, the standard European battery was used. The positivity rates observed in our series are higher than those reported in other African populations. Although the detection of an allergen alone is not sufficient to explain a clinical picture, it is possible that the poly-sensitization observed in our cases could be one of the consequences of exposure to several allergens. In addition, it would have been interesting to explore the role of phytotherapy in the clinical pictures observed in our cases.