On 27 May 2010, with crude oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico after the explosion of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig, the Obama administration announced it would pause offshore drilling plans in the Arctic Ocean, one of the planet’s most pristine ecosystems.1 Hailed by environmental groups, the decision was a major setback to the oil industry, which was gearing up to tap what’s expected to be vast amounts of oil and gas lying under the Arctic’s treacherous waters, wher e sustained winds blow at 30 to 50 miles per hour, and menacing chunks of floating “pack ice,” some hundreds of feet wide and dozens of feet thick, threaten marine traffic. With shallow-water, near-shore reserves increasingly tapped out in the Gulf of Mexico, oil companies are being forced into more challenging terrain to sustain domestic energy production. That means pushing into much deeper geology in the Gulf of Mexico—much of it more than a mile underwater—and also into ecologically fragile locations off the coast of Alaska. In decades past, oil companies didn’t prioritize the offshore Arctic for development because drilling there was too expensive. Oil prices simply weren’t high enough to sustain production windows limited to just a few months in summer, when thawing seas make drilling possible, explains Layla Hughes, an attorney and senior program officer for Arctic oil, gas, and shipping policy at the WWF in Juneau. But as economies in China, India, and Brazil have grown, global fuel demands have risen accordingly,2 driving prices higher and making offshore Arctic development economically viable. “Prices started going up in the late nineties, and they’re projected to stay high,” Hughes says. Oil companies now have to prove they can extract those resources safely, without compromising an ecosystem that might never recover from the effects of a large blowout. Dana Wetzel, an ecotoxicologist at Mote Marine Laboratory with 10 years’ research experience in the Arctic, says oil degradation depends largely on temperature. When exposed to frigid water, oil turns quickly into a thick, tarry substance that microbes can’t easily degrade. The 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, which occurred roughly 400 miles south of the Arctic Circle, likely underestimates the full environmental impact of a blowout even farther to the north. “The Valdez was a horrible spill in a rich marine ecosystem, but you didn’t have the oiling of the sea ice,” Wetzel says. “If you taint sea ice with oil, you’re never going to get rid of it. And those ice floes are home to walruses, seals, and polar bears. Many people survive up there by subsistence hunting, and to contaminate their food is one of the worst moral blows you can deliver to those communities.”3
Read full abstract