There are several dogmatic rules for the prevention of orthodontic failure and to aid in the philosophical approach to orthodontic problems: 1. No occlusion is so stable as a malocclusion once established and in equilibrium. 2. Stability of the anterior teeth can more easily be maintained when upright over basal bone and closest to the position of the original malocclusion. 3. The intercuspal widths and intermolar widths of the mandibular teeth are most stable when contained within the arch form and muscular balance of the original malocclusion. 4. Growth of the jaws is largely a product of genetics, endocrine balance, and nutrition. 5. Proper skeletal relationships may be more important than dental relationships in evaluating the severity of a malocclusion. 6. Relapse is more likely to occur in the mandibular arch first than in the maxillary arch. 7. Most well-treated malocclusions will lose about 10 to 15 per cent of the treatment result after retention. Disregard of the following factors, singly or in combination, probably leads to most failures in orthodontic treatment: 1. Tooth-to-bone discrepancies. 2. Bone-to-bone discrepancies. 3. Tooth-to-tooth discrepancies. 4. Aberrant neuromuscular patterns. 5. Changing growth patterns. 6. The limitations of treatment goals. 7. The limitations of appliance therapy. 8. The effects of orthodontic therapy on the psyche of the patient, his self image, his goals, and his cooperation. Today, it is naive to anticipate that a good dental cusp–fossa relationship, a good centric occlusion and centric relation, proper contact points, and reasonable alignment of the anterior teeth with good cuspid rise, and other mechanistic parameters, will suffice as the sole criteria for tissue health, dental stability, and facial esthetics. Most orthodontic failures cannot be laid to one single factor. Failures usually are the cumulative effect of several factors, one leading to another like a series of fallen dominoes. The important factors in successful treatment can be linked to a chain of events with each link having importance, and the omission of a link causing a break in the successful outcome of treatment. The orthodontist strives, along with his dental colleagues, for perfection in occlusion, stability, function, and dental and facial esthetics, but it is simpler to move a tooth into a given position with known mechanical forces than to maintain the tooth in a new position subject to the unknown forces of occlusal stress and a new muscular environment. Fortunately, the oral mechanism is forgiving of ignorance and abuse, will tolerate many minor errors, and will adjust and compensate to establish harmony and homeostasis within its functional limits.
Read full abstract