T HE sterling area crisis threatens the existence of the institution of the sterling area. But the crisis is not the same for all members of the area. In fact this is a very particular crisis-a sterling crisis-it is not a crisis of Australian pounds or South African pounds, or rupees, or any of the other sterling area currencies. There have from time to time been crises in those currencies, but this is a strictly sterling crisis and it is therefore something with which the United Kingdom is even more directly concerned than the other members of the sterling area. An economic crisis, in modern jargon, has come to have a particular technical meaning. It does not mean a shortage. A shortage can mean poverty, and it can mean hardship, but not a crisis. By an economic crisis we have come to mean a condition of affairs in which the supply of something is out of balance with the means of payment for it, where the means of payment are in excess of the supply at the price, and where, therefore, the stocks run down, shelves go bare, the resources disappear, and there comes a stage where even if you are prepared to pay any price you cannot get it. We have had meat crises of that kind, we have had coal crises, we have had housing crises-one crisis after another. But it does not mean merely that the commodity is short. We have always had shortages; every commodity is always short unless everybody has all they want of it. It means that the supply of the means of payment for that commodity is in excess of the supply of the commodity at that price. That is what is true of the sterling crisis, or sterling's foreign exchange crisis. From one point of view it means that there are not enough dollars, and by dollars nowadays we mean all currencies in general-the time when we could separate other currencies into hard and soft has very largely gone, particularly now when any further deficit with the European Payments Union would mean payment almost pound for pound in gold. But if we say that there are not enough dollars, it is exactly the same as saying that there is too much sterling. There is too much sterling, to use the old catch phrase, pursuing too few dollars. That enables us to see how the two halves of the crisis fall into relation with each other. There are two sorts of owners of sterlingthere are the inhabitants of the United Kingdom and there are the overseas owners of the sterling balances, about three quarters of the total of which is now held by other members of the sterling area; therefore the crisis falls into two parts according to whether the excess demand comes from those people in the United Kingdom who hold too much sterling or from those people outside the United Kingdom who hold too much sterling.