FOLFIRINOX In Patients Research Articles

FOLFIRINOX for patients with borderline and never-resectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with the addition of chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable patients: A phase II study.

408 Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is often a mix of borderline and never-resectable tumors. Multimodality treatment might downstage these tumors to allow a potential radical resection, especially the borderline group. In this ongoing phase II study we examined the feasibility of FOLFIRINOX with or without CRT followed by surgery for both borderline and never-resectable tumors (NCT-01397019). Methods: Patients in performance status 0-1, with initially non-resectable stage II/III pancreatic cancer were offered FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2+ 2400 mg/m2) every 14 days. Every 4th series the patients were evaluated and offered CRT (50.4 Gy/27F & capecitabine) if deemed potentially resectable. Resections were performed if deemed possible by the MDT. Results: Between August 2012 and present, 58 patients have been recruited with a median observation time of 14.5 months. Median age was 65(range 38-75) years, with 47%/53% stage II/III distribution. Median CA19-9 was 299(range 2-13,432). Two-hundred-seventy-four courses of FOLFIRINOX have been given, with a median of 6.5 per patient, with a median of 2 without dose modifications. Presently twenty-one patients have been treated with CRT. Twelve patients have been resected, of which 7 received prior CRT. Median survival for all patients was 15.6 months (11-NR) with a 1-year survival of 70% (49-84). For patients not resected the median survival was 12.8 months (9-16) for resected the median survival has not yet been reached. The FOLFIRINOX was associated with adverse events similar to what is expected in metastatic patients. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX with or without CRT in patients with LAPC shows promising efficacy in patients with both borderline and never-resectable tumors. Unmodified FOLFIRINOX had acceptable toxicity, however dose reductions are often needed. CRT following initial FOLFIRINOX was feasible and without unexpected toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT-01397019.

O1-17-3 - Safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

O1-17-3 - Safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer after first-line FOLFIRINOX: single institution retrospective review of efficacy and toxicity

BackgroundWe conducted a retrospective review of the dose, toxicity, and efficacy of second line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (G + Nab-P) after FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we included all patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated at Yale Cancer Center with G + Nab-P between 12/2011 and 12/2013 after receiving first line FOLFIRINOX. For each patient, demographics, prior therapy, doses of G + Nab-P (cumulative doses and dose intensity relative to full dose G + Nab-P), hematologic toxicities, best response by RECIST, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival were compiled. Median TTF and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method.Results28 patients were treated with G + Nab-P after first line FOLFIRINOX. The median TTF was 12.0 weeks (range 2.0–36.0), and the median OS was 23.0 weeks (range 2.1–85.4). Five patients had a partial response (response rate 17.9 %), and 28.6 % of patients had stable disease for ≥7 weeks. A decline in CA 19-9 and CEA by >30 % was observed in 13 (46.4 %) and 11 (39.3 %) patients, respectively. The median relative dose intensities were 62.4 and 57.5 % for G and Nab-P, respectively. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 17.9 %, anemia in 25.0 %, and thrombocytopenia in 25.0 % of patients.ConclusionsSecond line G + Nab-P following FOLFIRINOX is feasible, and demonstrated modest activity and clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer. The optimum sequencing and dosing of these active regimens warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.

P-164 Gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma HENT1 positive: back to the future

P-164 Gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma HENT1 positive: back to the future

Safety and efficacy of modified dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients over 65 years with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

468 Background: There is only limited data regarding efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We aim to evaluate our experience with dose-reduced FOLFIRINOX in patients > 65 years-old. Methods: All patients > 65 years-old with biopsy-proven advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received at least one cycle of modified dose-attenuatedFOLFIRINOX (no bolus FU and reduced dose of oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan) at our institution were identified. Results: Twenty-one consecutive patients (62% males) were reviewed. Median age was 67 (range 65-79). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 7 (33%) patients ; the most common toxicities were anemia (62%), and nausea/vomiting (45%). Elevations in AST and/or ALT above the upper limit of normality were identified in 38%. No deaths due to toxicities were reported. Prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulator factor (G-CSF) was given in 16 (70 %) patients. Dose reductions were substantial with median reductions of 27,8 % (range 15 - 50%) for 5-FU, 27,1% (range 6-50%) for oxaliplatin and 25% (range 12-75%) for irinotecan. Median overall survival (OS) was 11,8 months (95% CI 10,2 - 13,3). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6,9 months (95% CI 5,3 - 8,5). Conclusions: Modified dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX is a reasonable option for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Adverse events were manageable and no deaths due to toxicity were reported. Median OS and PFS were similar to the pivotal phase III trial, demonstrating that dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX may be beneficial to elderly patients.

Investigation of the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer: Single-institution experience in Japan.

487 Background: FOLFIRINOX therapy has contributed to the overall survival extension of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. This regimen is however associated with significant toxicity. And doing the treatment, while careful to toxicity at our institution. We investigated the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX between November 2012 and August 2014. FOLFIRINOX is as follows: irinotecan at 150 mg/m2; oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at 400mg/m2 bolus, 2,400mg/m2 continuous infusion. Patients' characteristics, objective response, survival and toxicities were collected. Response were evaluated with RECIST version 1.1 and toxicities with NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Results: 13 patients were includes (8 males and 5 females). Treatment eligibility criteria in our institution were Performance Status 0 or 1, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms were excluded. Median age was 58.6 years (41-74). Clinical stage IVa/IVb was 3/10. The mean number therapy was 7.7 (3-15) cycles. The toxicity of all grade was 100% and grade 3 was 80%. The non-hematological toxicities included nausea in 8 patients (61.5%) and anorexia in 9 (69.2%). The hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 12 patients (92.3%), of which 11 (84.6%) presented a grade 3/4 neutropenia. In patients who developed grade 3 neutropenia, the treatment of FOLFIRINOX could be continued once every three weeks (triweekly) without reducing the dose. Response rate was 38.5% (CR: 0, PR: 5, SD: 6, PD: 2) and disease control rate was 84.6%. Time to treatment failure was 175 days. Relative dose intensity was 95.0% for oxaliplatin, 88.9% for irinotecan, 81.9% for 5FU (bolus), and 95.6% for 5FU (continuous). Conclusions: In clinical practice, it is expected that FOLFIRINOX is an effective, well-tolerated regimen by reducing the dose or determining the appropriate dosing interval.

707P - Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Folfirinox in Patients (Pts) with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (Lapc)

ABSTRACT Aim: In a retrospective study of 18 pts with unresectable (UR) or borderline resectable (BR) LAPC, neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX with or without subsequent chemoradiation (CCRT) resulted in an R0 resection rate (RR) of 44% (Hosein et al, BMC Cancer 2012). The reported 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 83 % and the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 100 %. Toxicity profile was tolerable. In order to confirm these preliminary results, we analyzed a large cohort of pts treated in a similar fashion with mature follow-up. Methods: Between 2008 and 2013, 51 treatment-naive pts with LAPC were treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX with neoadjuvant intent. Pts were categorized as BR or UR using the NCCN criteria. Pts received FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (at the full dose as described in the ACCORD-11 trial) until maximum response or tolerability, and then underwent surgery if their imaging suggested resectability. Pts then received CCRT if they were still UR or BR after FOLFIRINOX. The end points of this retrospective analysis were OS, PFS, R0 RR and toxicity profile. Results: A total of 429 cycles were given with a median of 8 (range 2-29); 27 (53%) went on to receive CCRT. After a median follow-up of 17 mo (range 2-56), the Kaplan-Meier median OS was 35 mo (95% CI 26-45), the 3-yr OS rate was 42% and the median PFS was 14 mo (95% CI 11 – 16). By imaging criteria, 13 (26%) were converted to resectability and 10 (4 BR and 6 UR) of these had successful R0 resections. Pts who had R0 resections had a significantly longer survival than pts who did not (3-yr OS rate 67% vs 21%, log rank p = 0.042). Grade 1&2/3&4 chemotherapy-related toxicities were neutropenia (39%/20%), neutropenic fever (0%/12%), thrombocytopenia (53%/16%), anemia (63%/10%), fatigue (76%/6%), nausea (57%/4%) vomiting (22%/4%), neuropathy (53%/4%) and diarrhea (37%/10%). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy is feasible as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with unresectable LAPC. Although the resection rate was only 20%, the median OS of almost 3 years is appreciably longer than historical survival rates for this population. Prospective controlled trials testing this algorithm in LAPC are ongoing. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

709P - Single-Agent or Doublets As Second-Line Chemotherapy After Folfirinox in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

ABSTRACT Aim: FOLFIRINOX represents an active regimen in first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients (pts) with good performance status (PS). Currently, there are no accepted standard regimens in second-line therapy for patients with disease progression and data about efficacy of chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX failure are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively investigated clinical and laboratory characteristics (including blood count, LDH, CEA and CA19.9) of PDAC pts treated between June 2011 and April 2014 in four Italian institutions with either doublet or single agent as second-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX failure. Survival estimates were quantified using Kaplan Meier curves, and differences between groups were compared with the log-rank test. Results: Among 96 pts treated with FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy, 50 pts received second-line treatment (52%). Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 36-76); 66 pts were males (72%). PDAC was locally advanced in 15 (30%) and metastatic in 35 pts (70%). Patients who received second line single agent (gemcitabine, docetaxel or nab-paclitaxel) or doublets (gemcitabine with either abraxane, capecitabine, cisplatin or docetaxel) were 24 (48%) and 26 (52%), respectively. According to RECIST criteria, 2 pts achieved PR (4%), 10 (20%) SD for ≥9 wks and 38 (76%) PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months and median overall survival (OS) was 3.4 months. No differences were found in terms of OS (5.0 vs 3.1, p = 0.489) or PFS (4.0 vs 2.7 p = 0.182) between patients treated with single-agent or doublets as second-line. At multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥ 2 was the only independent prognostic factor for worst OS (p = 0.002) and PFS (p = 0.020). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the choice of second line therapy in patients treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX should be carefully evaluated. ECOG ≥ 2 was significantly associated with poor prognosis, while pre-treatment CA 19-9, LDH, Hb, neutrophil and platelet counts were not prognostic factors for OS, although these data should be confirmed in perspective studies. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

305 Background: FOLFIRINOX, one of the gold standard in metastatic pancreatic cancer as first-line therapy for patients under 76 years with PS 0-1, good haematological and renal function and a subnormal bilirubin level (Prodige 4 criteria), was analysed in Brittany (B) and Pays de la Loire (PL) in routine clinical practice. Methods: Our aim is to evaluate the use of Folfirinox between July 2010 and December 2012 in B/PL. Results: Data of 340 patients have been studied (198 men, median age 63 years [29-81]). 208 patients were metastatic at diagnosis (liver 67%). 62 primary tumors were resected and 51 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine, n=48). The median progression free survival PFS and overall survival OS were respectively 6.80 months IC95% [6.18-7.43] and 10.97 months IC 95% [9.56-11.83]. Patients could be divided into 4 groups : Group 1 composed of patients treated according to Prodige 4 trial (n=242), Group 2 1st line metastatic patients with at least one Prodige 4 non-eligibility criterion (n=25), Group 3 locally advanced patients (n=59) and Group 4 by Folfirinox in 2ndline (n=14). The median number of cycles was 9 [1-27] in Group 1 and 6 [1-12] in Group 2. Clinical benefit was 65% (group 1) vs 56% (group 2). During treatment, 81% of patients had a dose adjustment (Group 1) vs 72% (Group 2) and 32% vs 40% presented grade III/IV toxicity (mostly neuro- or haematotoxicity). Median PFS were respectively in Group 1 vs Group 2 : 6.54 months IC95% [5.98-7.29] vs 4.14 [1.68-6.21] (p=0.0107) and median OS :10.91 months IC 95% [8.94-12.02] vs 7.0 IC95% [4.01-11.20] (p=0.0166). For Group 3 and 4, median OS were respectively 11.24 months [10.0-15.01] vs 11.50 [4.83-14.09]. Others results will be shown at the meeting. For Group 1, stopping treatment before progression induced significatively better median PFS and OS than going on treatment until progression : PFS : 8.25 IC95[7.52-8.74] vs 3.48. IC95 [3.09-4.44] (p<0.0001) and OS : 12.78 months IC95 [11.60-15.54] vs 7.62 IC95 [6.44-9.49] (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our results for Group 1 are relatively consistent with those of Prodige 4: objective response rate (39% vs 32%), PFS (6.5 vs 6.4 months) and OS (10.9 vs 11.1 months). Non eligibity for Prodige 4’s criteria decreases PFS and OS significantly.

Female gender may predict response to FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: A single institution retrospective review

FOLFIRINOX is a highly active regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, treatment with FOLFIRINOX is associated with relevant toxicity and predictors for response to therapy are warranted. We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX in order to evaluate a possible predictive role of clinical parameters and tumor characteristics for response to chemotherapy. Tumor samples were characterized histopathologically before treatment and expression of p53 and Ki67 was analyzed using automated immunohistochemistry. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The overall objective response rate was 55.1%, the disease control rate was 70.6%. Female gender was associated with a significantly higher disease control rate of 91.7 compared to 48.0% in male patients (p=0.001) which reached 100% in female patients when primarily treated compared to treatment after surgical resection and relapse (77.8%, p=0.057). For all patients median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.3 months) and median OS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.4-16.6 months). Female patients showed a tendency towards a longer median PFS (5.0 months, 95% CI, 3.6-6.4 months) compared to males (3.0 months, 95% CI, 2.4-3.6 months) (p=0.099). Serum levels of CA19.9 and CEA were significantly higher in female patients compared to male patients (p=0.037, p=0.05). Tumors of patients with response to FOLFIRINOX showed a higher expression level of p53 and Ki67 as well as higher serum levels of CA19.9 compared to non-responders, which was statistically not significant. Our study indicates that female gender is a positive predictor for therapy response to FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Female gender in turn was associated with increased levels of tumor markers CEA and CA19.9 and patients with higher serum levels of CA19.9 were more responsive to FOLFIRINOX.

Updated use of first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine.

6607 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. It is estimated that 45,220 patients will be diagnosed in 2013 and 38,460 will die (Siegel, CA Cancer J Clin 2013). Gemcitabine has long been the standard of care chemotherapy. Recent advances in treatment created a combination regimen (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, fluorouracil [FOLFIRINOX]) for patients with good Karnofsky performance status (PS) (Conroy, NEJM 2011). This retrospective analysis was conducted as an update to results reported at ASCO 2012 (Ginsburg Arlen, JCO 2012) to evaluate characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based treatments in a large outpatient community setting. This is the largest study describing FOLFIRINOX patients to date. Methods: Patients with advanced PC treated within The US Oncology Network entered into the iKnowMed (iKM) database between June 2010 and November 2012 were included. Patterns of treatment were characterized by the median age at diagnosis, sex, PS, and first-line metastatic chemotherapy prescribed. The primary endpoints of the analysis were OS and uptake of FOLFIRINOX within the network. Results: Compared to ASCO 2012 results, 1,000 additional patients were identified in iKM. Of the 1,714 total patients, 24% received FOLFIRINOX (up from 13% in 2012) and 76% gemcitabine-based therapy (87% in 2012). Increased utilization of FOLFIRINOX for patients with good PS began in June 2010. For all patients (55% male), the median age at diagnosis was 67 years and the majority (85%) had a PS of 70% or greater. The OS was significantly longer for FOLFIRINOX (9.6 mos) versus gemcitabine (6.3 mos) (p<0.0001). This held true for PS of 70% or greater patient given FOLFIRINOX (9.6 mos) versus gemcitabine (7 mos) (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Utilization of FOLFIRINOX has continued to expand after the publication of phase III trials. Our data in a community setting supports a survival advantage for FOLFIRINOX. Although the magnitude of benefit may be smaller in the community, we agree that FOLFIRINOX should become a standard of care for good PS patients.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in patients with pancreatic metastatic cancer.

248 Background: Efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) is one of the gold standard in metastatic pancreatic cancer as first-line therapy for patients with PS 0-1, good haematological and renal function and a subnormal bilirubin level. Pending approval, this treatment has been allowed in Brittany (B) and Pays de la Loire (PL) respecting these criteria. Methods: Observatory of Cancer B/PL is a network of 50 private/public cancer centers focused on good practice for cancer drugs use. Our aim is to evaluate the use of FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and June 2013 in B/PL. Sex, age, successive chemotherapeutic regimens, toxicities, response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been studied. Results: Data of 79 patients, treated in 2010 (37%), in 2011 (54%) or early 2012 (9%) have been studied (44 men, median age 62 years [37-74]). 64 patients were metastatic when cancer was diagnosed. Principal site of metastases was liver (73%). 17 primary tumors were resected and 15 patients received an adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine (n=14)).The median number of treatment cycles was 9 [1-24]. Objective response was observed in 29 patients (37%), disease stabilization in 18 patients (23%) and progression in 18 patients (23%). During treatment, 75% of patients had a dose adjustment and 30 % had one or more dose delays. 22 patients presented grade III/IV toxicity (almost neurotoxicity or haematologic). 42 patients had a second line of treatment (mainly gemcitabine) and 7 patients a third line. The median PFS and OS were respectively 174 days IC95% [125-216] and 309 days IC 95% [229-376]. Conclusions: Our preliminary results are relatively convenient with those of Conroy et al in 2011. A higher rate of response (37% vs 32%) has been found. Concerning PFS and OS, our results are clearly worst with 174 vs 195 days and 309 vs 338 days. Our results confirm the aggressiveness of this schedule with 75% of the patients requiring a dose adjustement. Analysis of all pancreatic metastatic patients treated by FOLFIRINOX in B/PL by the Observatory of Cancer allows to assess its good use in the real life.

Use of first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine.

e16536 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. It is estimated that 43,920 patients will be diagnosed in 2012 and 37,390 will die (Siegel, CA Cancer J Clin, 2012). Gemcitabine has long been the standard of care chemotherapy. Recent advances in treatment options have led to the utilization of a combination regimen (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, fluorouracil [FOLFIRINOX]) in patients with good Karnofsky performance status (PS). This regimen was compared to single-agent gemcitabine, presented at ASCO 2010 and recently published (Conroy, NEJM, 2011). This retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based treatments in a large outpatient community setting. Methods: Patients with advanced PC treated within The US Oncology Network and entered into the iKnowMed (iKM) database between June 2010 and November 2011 were included. Patterns of treatment were characterized by the median age at diagnosis, sex, PS, and first-line metastatic chemotherapy prescribed. The primary endpoints of the analysis were OS and uptake of FOLFIRINOX within the network. Results: Of the 717 patients identified within the iKM database, 13% received FOLFIRINOX and 87% gemcitabine-based therapy. Increased utilization of FOLFIRINOX for patients with good PS began in June 2010. For all patients (54% male), the median age at diagnosis was 67 years and the majority of patients (89%) had a PS of 70% or greater. The OS was significantly longer for FOLFIRINOX (8.4 months) versus gemcitabine (6.4 months) (p=0.036). OS was also significantly longer for PS of 70% or greater given FOLFIRINOX (9.0 months) versus gemcitabine (6.7 months) (p=0.022). After controlling for PS, the use of gemcitabine led to a shorter OS (HR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.02-2.01). Conclusions: Utilization of FOLFIRINOX has rapidly been adopted in patients with good PS after the publication of phase III trials. Our data in a community setting supports a survival advantage for FOLFIRINOX. Although the magnitude of benefit may be smaller in the community setting, we agree that should FOLFIRINOX become a standard of care for good PS patients.

Meta-analysis of randomized phase II and phase III trials of gemcitabine with/without S-1 in Asian patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

311 Background: Advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) is a virulent disease, where gemcitabine is considered the standard-of-care. A recent phase III evaluation demonstrated superiority of FOLFIRINOX (bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU), irinotecan, oxaliplatin) in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of ≤1. Recently, three studies were presented in abstract form, comparing gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine. S-1 is a mixture of tegafur (an oral 5-FU prodrug), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor and an agent designed to reduce the gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-FU. All three trials demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) while one study also showed a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS). Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of the three trials. Results: Seven hundred and seventy patients were randomized to receive GS vs. gemcitabine; 75% had metastatic disease and 65% had an ECOG PS of 0. GS was associated with superior RR (hazard ratio (HR) 0.348, p=3.06×10-7), PFS (HR 0.64, p=7.26×10-9) and OS (HR 0.79, p=2.47×10-2) compared to gemcitabine. Patients receiving GS were more likely to experience nausea, diarrhea, rash and stomatitis (mostly grade 1/2); neutropenic fever occurred in <2% of patients. One study demonstrated superior quality-of-life for GS. Conclusions: GS should be considered a first-line option for the treatment of advanced PC in Asian patients. This regimen should serve as the reference for future trials and comparison with FOLFIRINOX in patients with ECOG PS ≤1 is warranted.