383 Background: The global incidence of Young Onset ( YO) cancers diagnosed in adults under 50 years, is increasing for unknown reasons. YO Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, which account for approximately 27% of newly diagnosed cancer cases and 37% of cancer deaths present distinct challenges in areas including sexual health, finance, career and family. We assessed the holistic needs of these patients through a mixed methods approach. Methods: A single institution needs analysis study was undertaken in YO GI patients diagnosed 2014-2024 through an anonymous survey and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). The surveys asked about their experiences of sexual health and function, psychosocial concerns, financial concerns, career developments and when in their cancer journey would they prefer to speak to a health care professional about these. FGD's used nominal group technique to deepen the analysis. Results: 88 participants responded via survey and 10 participated in a FGD. The average age at diagnosis was 43 years. 80% of participants reported they would have benefitted from a conversation about fertility, sexual health/function (82%) and financial supports (98%) at diagnosis. 93% of patients were out of work during cancer treatment with average length of time > 1 year. Conclusions: This needs analysis highlights the importance of specialised clinical pathways for young onset GI cancer patients focusing on these unique and complex needs. Financial supports, conversations regarding sexual health/function, fertility preservation and psychosocial support are critical areas requiring structured intervention. 2014-2024 young onset SJH. UGI ( N=233) Colorectal (N=275) Clinical Stage at diagnosis Oeso Stage 4 = 39% Gastric stage 4 = 26% Stage 3= 46% Stage 4 = 20% Treatment intent % Radical =54% Palliative =38% Radical/Palliative = 8% Radical =75% Palliative 25% Mortality rate 66% 25% GI Survey results ( N=236) Support offered Y/N Preferred timing of support Sexual health/ function No=85% Yes =15% 82% At diagnosis Financial support No=95%Yes= 5% 98% At diagnosis Fertility preservation No = 65% Yes=35% 80% At diagnosis
Read full abstract