Mg72Zn27Pt1 and Mg72Zn27Cu1 metallic glasses were produced using a melt-spinner. Their crystallization kinetics were investigated during annealing with five heating rates using DSC. Amorphous Mg72Zn27Pt1 crystallized in the form of one and Mg72Zn27Cu1 crystallized in the form of two exothermic crystallization peaks. It was noticed that the glass transition, the onset crystallization and the crystallization peak temperatures were strongly heating-rate-dependent. The addition of Pt and Cu increased the stability compared to that of binary Mg-Zn glass, and especially so with Pt, due to its higher melting point and different atom size to those of Mg and Zn. The activation energies were calculated using six model-free methods: the Kissinger, Ozawa–Flynn–Wall, Boswell, Tang, Augis–Bennett and Gao–Wang methods. The Augis–Bennett and Gao–Wang methods allow for the calculation of only the activation energy at the crystallization peak but they are the only ones that consider Tx or dx/dT. For Mg72Zn27Pt1, the calculated values fluctuate in the ranges 114.60–117.99 kJ/mol, 102.46–105.98 kJ/mol and 71.16–98.62 kJ/mol for Eg, Ex and Ep, respectively, whereas, for Mg72Zn27Cu1, the calculated values are in the ranges of 98.51–101.77 kJ/mol, 95.15–98.51 kJ/mol and 55.15–93.34 kJ/mol for Eg, Ex and Ep, respectively. Both alloys are meta-stable in the amorphous state and crystallization occurs spontaneously. The Kissinger, Ozawa–Flynn–Wall, Tang and Boswell methods give similar values for the activation energy. The Gao–Wang method significantly underestimates values compared to other methods. The Augis–Bennett method shows much lower values for the local activation energy. Considering the ease of their formulas, best convergence and widespread use in the literature, the Kissinger and Ozawa–Flynn–Wall methods will work very well for any comparison.
Read full abstract