Using thermal treatment in the waste management process has advantages such as reducing volume and the possibility of energy recovery. There are several incineration technologies with different characteristics and potential. Incineration, however, requires efficient environmental control to reduce associated risks, such as the emission of harmful compounds. The paper aims to compare solid waste treatment processes in grate and fluidized bed incinerators based on technical and environmental characteristics. For this purpose, a bibliometric review was conducted, and consulting works available in the scientific literature describe the waste treatment process with these two technologies. The searches were carried out in the Web of Science and Web of Knowledge databases using the following search engines: “fixed grade incinerator,” “grate incinerator” and “fluidized bed incinerator”. Grate incinerators present a range of elective waste for treatment compared to fluidized bed incinerators, as they do not require homogeneous waste. The study compared solid waste incineration in fixed grate and fluidized bed furnaces. While promising for sludge treatment, the fluidized bed technology may require pre-treatment, increasing costs and limiting its use to larger facilities. Fixed grate furnaces can handle a wider variety of waste without this additional step but generate more halogenated compounds when plastic waste is present. These technologies were primarily studied in Asia and Europe, where landfill space is limited and more significant potential for energy recovery exists. Adopting these technologies in other regions depends on waste characteristics, economic conditions, and environmental impacts.
Read full abstract