Flow Behavior Of Polymer Solutions Research Articles

Extensional flow behavior of polymer solutions and particle suspensions in a spinning motion

Mechanical spinning of fluid filaments was used to generate an extensional flow, in which rheological measurements were obtained for a Newtonian fluid, two aqueous polymer solutions, and two fluid suspensions of rod-shaped particles. The tensile stress was determined by measuring the tensile force of the fluid filament while the kinematics were determined from photographic measurement of the filament profile and the assumption of a flat velocity profile. The measured tensile stresses for the Newtonian fluid matched predicted stresses, thereby confirming the validity of the experimental technique. The spinning behavior of each polymer solution could be correlated as stress versus extension rate. The apparent “spinning viscosity” increased with increasing rate of extension, in contrast to shear-thinning behavior in viscometric flow. For the fluid suspensions, the presence of rod-shaped particles increased the apparent viscosity far more in extensional flow than in shear. Tensile stresses calculated from a theoretical formula for suspensions proposed by Batchelor agreed rather well with experiment. Some general criteria for the interpretation of the spinning experiment are proposed, and some microrheological implications of the present findings are discussed.

Extensional flow behaviour of polymer solutions

Predictions of behaviour of polymer solutions in extensional flow obtained from a variety of available constitutive equations are discussed. An experimental method for measuring stresses in the extensional flow of polymer solutions is presented, and results are discussed. The data obtained are well correlated by a simple integral equation, and the need for more complicated ‘straingth’ theories is not supported.

Rheological Properties of Pseudoplastic Fluids in Porous Media

Abstract With flow of non-Newtonian fluids in porous media, effective viscosities are needed for use in the Darcy equation. These viscosities depend on the rock parameters and flowing conditions. In this investigation, rheological and flow results were correlated to develop an expression for calculating effective viscosities. Surfactant-stabilized dispersions of water in hydrocarbon were used with consolidated sandstone cores of different permeabilities. The average shear rate in a core was related to the permeability and porosity of the core and the frontal velocity through the core. By using the correlation obtained for determining effective viscosity, experimental and theoretical values were compared for each fluid system by determining average and maximum errors. For the fluid system showing the largest average error, the correlation fit 38 experimental points with an average and maximum percentage error of 4.3 and 14.8, respectively. For the fluid system showing the least error, average and maximum percentage errors of 1.8 and 4.3, respectively, were calculated using 29 experimental points. Introduction Use of non-Newtonian fluids in the petroleum industry is not new. Fluids of this type have been used for many years as fracturing agents and drilling muds. Recently, attention has focused on the use of high molecular weight polymer solutions for secondary recovery. Results have been reported on studies relating to the flow behavior of polymer solutions in porous media. Each study gives the viscosity in the Darcy equation as a function of the rheological properties of the fluid, the characteristics of the porous medium and the pressure gradient. The functional forms of the reported expressions differ somewhat in each study.

Some Aspects of Polymer Floods

Abstract Adsorption of polymers and transport, rheology and oil recovery efficiency of their solutions were studied in the laboratory to evaluate the use of polymers in waterflooding. While a tenfold mobility reduction was obtained with polymer concentrations as low as 0.05 per cent by weight, the mobility reduction depended on the type of polymer, molecular weight, salinity and pH of water, crude oil and capillary properties of the porous media. Choice of a suitable polymer and a workable concentration will have to be tailored for each application. Little reduction in the residual oil saturation can be expected from polymer flooding. Improvement in the volumetric sweep efficiency is possible but the extent of the improvement can best be evaluated by properly designed field testing. Some aspects of the field use of polymer floods are discussed. Introduction Waterflooding is a simple, inexpensive secondary recovery method and is being used widely. Innumerable laboratory studies have been made to unravel the fundamentals of the displacement of oil by water and to find the ways of most efficient oil recovery. These studies and a great many field case histories have revealed that the prime cause of poor oil recovery is the inefficient and incomplete sweep of reservoir volume by the injected water. Sweep efficiency is affected by many factors of which the mobility ratio is an important one. Mobility ratio M is defined here as the ratio of water to oil mobilities: .....................(1) In Eq. 1, the permeabilities are the effective permeabilities and depend on fluid saturations and, hence, change during the different depletion stages in a flood. A wide practice is to use the effective water permeability at residual oil saturation and the effective oil permeability at interstitial water saturation in Eq. 1. If the mobility ratio is greater than one, the mobility ratio is unfavorable and water, being more mobile than oil, would finger through the oil zone resulting in poor oil recovery efficiency. If the mobility ratio is favorable (one or less) the displacement of oil by water occurs more or less in a pistonlike fashion, in some waterfloods, the mobility ratio is unfavorable and any additives by which the mobility of water can be decreased would favor more efficient oil recovery. The thing to bear in mind, however, is whether or not the improvement in oil recovery is sufficient to more than pay out the cost of the additives needed. For example, materials like sugars, alcohols and glycerine reduce water mobility by thickening the water, but the cost of material requirement precludes any field application. For an additive to be useful in waterflooding, it must bring about a large reduction in water mobility at low concentrations; it must be adsorbed only negligibly: and it must not completely plug up the formation. Some synthetic organic polymers have shown promise of meeting these requirements and have been used in the field. However, no in-depth studies of the rheological, adsorption and oil displacement characteristics of polymer solutions have been reported. The present work is a study of these properties. EXPERIMENTAL In this work, concentrations are given on a weight per volume basis; 0.5 per cent concentration means 0.5 gm of polymer is dissolved in enough water (or NaCl solution) to make 100 ml. A bactericide, usually 0.1 to 0.2 per cent by volume of 38 per cent formaldehyde solution, was used in the polymer solutions. The NaCl solution was 30,000 ppm. Some properties of the polymers studied are given in Table 1. Physical properties of all cores used are in Table 2. Flow behavior of polymer solutions was studied by three consecutive flow tests in cores. First, water (or brine) was injected at constant rate of about 1 ft/D to obtain the water mobility. Then, filtered polymer solution (prepared in water or brine) was flowed through the core. Since the rate was constant, increase in the pressure drop across the core reflects decrease in the mobility. Finally, the core was flooded with water (or brine) to study recovery of mobility. TABLE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF POLYMERS STUDIED APPROXIMATE TRADE NAME TYPE MOLECULAR WEIGHT Union Carbide"Polyox" WSR 35 Polyethelyene oxide 200,000 Union Carbide"Polyox" WSR-205 Polyethelyene oxide 600,000 Union Carbide "Polyox" WSR-301 Polyethelyene oxide 4,000,000 Union Carbide"Polyox"Coagulant Polyethelyene oxide 6 to 10 million Dow "Separan" NP-10 Polyacrylamide 1,000,000 Dow "Separan" NP-20 Polyacrylamide 2,000,000 Dow "Separan" AP-30 Polyacrylamide 2 to 3 million(approximately 25per cent hydrolyzed) JPT