In tradition of Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary (1857), Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House (1879), and Kate Chopin's Awakening (1899), feminine desire for self-transformation, or becoming, features as recurrent theme across several twenty-first-century novels by Generation X Australian women writers. Joanna Murray-Smith's Sunnyside (2005), Georgia Blain's Too Close to Home (2011), Peggy Frew's House of Sticks (2011), and Anita Heiss's Tiddas (2014) all share character of desperate for some kind of metamorphosis-or, as one of characters in Sunnyside quips, a radical shift in her life map (Murray-Smith 305). Although flight from suburbia dominates as mode of in Australian fiction (McCann 56), these novels explore alternative conduits to feminine reinvention.Among this set, Fiona McGregor's Indelible Ink (2010) offers most complex portrayal of how female protagonist might undergo transformation without recourse to physical relocation away from suburban realm. novel opens about year after King's divorce. We meet lonely fifty-nine-year-old woman, seeking solace in bottle and struggling to maintain an extravagant Mosman lifestyle with no income. After drunken lunch with an old friend, throws up in high-end furniture store, breaking lamp, and she subsequently purchases $10,000 lounge suite on credit to assuage her embarrassment. Humiliated and restless, she stumbles alone into gritty King's Cross hoping for distraction, but she is disappointed: Marie had thought that walk through Cross would testing odyssey, but street was surprisingly bright and short (17). Marie's desire to undertake transformative journey is highlighted by use of word odyssey. But although seeks change, she does not know how to precipitate her becoming-defined by Luce Irigaray as the fullness of all that one could be (Sexes 73). Indeed, as I will argue, Marie's becoming emulates Irigaray's in its evolution from unitary and imposed identity as mother (and former wife) to nonunitary constitution of many others, achieved via an autonomous process of layering and embellishment rather than reductionism or distillation. McGregor's narrative evidences preference for Irigaray's re-essentialism as conduit to feminist becoming via embodiment over Gilles Deleuze's de-essentialism-a theoretical distinction observed by Rosi Braidotti (52). And yet text, relentlessly contradictory in its resistance to simplistic linear trajectories reaching for transformation, accommodates both modes of becoming at different points in narration.While in The Cross, spots tattoo parlor, and in defiant acknowledgment of gulf between her affluent status and this other world, she enters, asking herself, why shouldn't she allowed into places like this? (McGregor, Indelible 19). Emerging with tattoo of cliched red rose on her shoulder, rejoices, interpreting this radical act of border crossing-and for woman from her milieu it is radical-as first step toward becoming after decades of servitude, confinement, and obedience within prescribed roles of mother and wife. Marie's determination to transcend these restrictive labels of femininity, both of which connote self-sacrifice and suppression of desire, echoes Irigaray's call for women to break free from the social roles imposed on [them] as commodities of patriarchal exchange-namely, mother, virgin, prostitute (Irigaray, Women 186)-all of which deny women any right to her own pleasure (187). language that McGregor employs to describe transformative power of Marie's initial tattoo is that of colonization, reclamation, and autonomy: Yet, now, finally, here was mark she had chosen. She had planted her own flag in her own country (McGregor, Indelible 21). Moreover, this catalytic shift toward Marie's metamorphosis from mother (and former wife) to other is enacted on and via body-a narrative choice that iterates McGregor's work as performance artist concerned with body, while invoking materiality of female body as site on and through which feminist might performed. …