First-generation Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Research Articles

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mediated by R263K plus E157Q in a patient with HIV infection treated with bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine: case report and review of the literature.

The in vivo selection of E157Q plus R263K has not been reported in patients treated with coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). To the best of our knowledge, we hereby report the first case of high-grade INSTI resistance associated with the presence of these aminoacidic substitutions in a treatment-experienced HIV patient treated with BIC/FTC/TAF. Clinical case report and review of the literature. A heavily treatment-experienced patient was switched to BIC/FTC/TAF due to drug-drug interactions after being diagnosed with disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare disease. He had been treated before with raltegravir with poor adherence. No mutations in the integrase gene were detected 1 year after finishing treatment with raltegravir. Months after being switched to BIC/FTC/TAF, and again with poor adherence documented, virological failure (VF) was detected. The polymorphic substitution E157Q and the resistance mutation R263K in the integrase gene were detected, as well as M184V, among other mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene. The patient is currently being treated with dolutegravir q12h plus boosted darunavir along with directly observed treatment, and for the first time in 20 years, plasmatic viral load values are below 100 copies/mL. This case illustrates that the combination of E157Q and R263K plus M184V can be selected in vivo in a clinical scenario of poor adherence with BIC/FTC/TAF, although it is a very rare phenomenon. Previous VF with first-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) should be kept in mind when switching patients to second-generation INSTIs.

HIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative cohort analysis

The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir in first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) might facilitate emerging resistance. The DTG RESIST study combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for dolutegravir resistance. We included cohorts with INSTI resistance data from two collaborations (ART Cohort Collaboration, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS in Southern Africa), and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort. Eight cohorts from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, and the UK contributed data on individuals who were viraemic on dolutegravir-based ART and underwent genotypic resistance testing. Individuals with unknown dolutegravir initiation date were excluded. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models. We included 599 people with genotypic resistance testing on dolutegravir-based ART between May 22, 2013, and Dec 20, 2021. Most had HIV-1 subtype B (n=351, 59%), a third had been exposed to first-generation INSTIs (n=193, 32%), 70 (12%) were on dolutegravir dual therapy, and 18 (3%) were on dolutegravir monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 86 (14%) individuals; 20 (3%) had more than one mutation. Most (n=563, 94%) were susceptible to dolutegravir, seven (1%) had potential low, six (1%) low, 17 (3%) intermediate, and six (1%) high-level dolutegravir resistance. The risk of dolutegravir resistance was higher on dolutegravir monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 34·1, 95% CI 9·93-117) and dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 9·21, 2·20-38·6) compared with combination ART, and in the presence of potential low or low (aOR 5·23, 1·32-20·7) or intermediate or high-level (aOR 13·4, 4·55-39·7) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. Among people with viraemia on dolutegravir-based ART, INSTI DRMs and dolutegravir resistance were rare. NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk of dolutegravir resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings. Monitoring is important to prevent resistance at the individual and population level and ensure the long-term sustainability of ART. US National Institutes of Health, Swiss National Science Foundation.

Effectiveness and safety of integrase strand transfer inhibitors in Spain: a prospective real-world study.

Second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are preferred treatment options worldwide, and dolutegravir (DTG) is the treatment of choice in resource-limited settings. Nevertheless, in some resource-limited settings, these drugs are not always available. An analysis of the experience with the use of INSTIs in unselected adults living with HIV may be of help to make therapeutic decisions when second-generation INSTIs are not available. This study aimed to evaluate the real-life effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c), and raltegravir (RAL) in a large Spanish cohort of HIV-1-infected patients. Real-world study of adults living with HIV who initiated integrase INSTIs DTG, EVG/c, and RAL-based regimens in three settings (ART-naïve patients, ART-switching, and ART-salvage patients). The primary endpoint was the median time to treatment discontinuation after INSTI-based regimen initiation. Proportion of patients experiencing virological failure (VF) (defined as two consecutive viral loads (VL) ≥200 copies/mL at 24 weeks or as a single determination of VL ≥1,000 copies/mL while receiving DTG, EVG/c or RAL, and at least 3 months after INSTI initiation) and time to VF were also evaluated. Virological effectiveness of EVG/c- and RAL-based regimens was similar to that of DTG when given as first-line and salvage therapy. Treatment switching for reasons other than virological failure was more frequent in subjects receiving EVG/c and, in particular, RAL. Naïve patients with CD4+ nadir <100 cells/μL were more likely to develop VF, particularly if they initiated RAL or EVG/c. In the ART switching population, initiation of RAL and EVG/c was associated with both VF and INSTI discontinuation. There were no differences in the time to VF and INSTI discontinuation between DTG, EVG/c and RAL. Immunological parameters improved in the three groups and for the three drugs assessed. Safety and tolerability were consistent with expected safety profiles. Whereas second-generation INSTIs are preferred treatment options worldwide, and DTG is one of the treatment of choices in resource-limited settings, first-generation INSTIs may still provide high virological and immunological effectiveness when DTG is not available.

Evaluation of integrase resistance in individuals who failed a regimen containing dolutegravir in French and Italian clinical settings.

This work aims to evaluate integrase resistance and its predictors in HIV-1 infected combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) experienced individuals failing a dolutegravir-based regimen. Major resistance mutations (MRM) and genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) of dolutegravir companion drugs were evaluated on plasma genotypic resistance test (GRT) performed at dolutegravir failure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated to the risk of integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-resistance at dolutegravir failure. We retrospectively analysed 467 individuals. At failure GRT, individuals had been under dolutegravir for a median (IQR) time of 11 (5-20) months; around half of them had never been exposed to INSTI (52%) and 10.7% were at first-line regimen. Fifty-eight (12.4%) individuals showed ≥1 INSTI MRM. Among them, people INSTI-exposed showed significantly higher prevalence of INSTI resistance compared to those who were INSTI naïve [46 (21.2%) versus 9 (3.9%), P < 0.001].N155H was the most prevalent MRM (5.4%), followed by G140S (4.5%) and Q148H (4.3%). These MRM were more probably present in INSTI-experienced individuals compared to those INSTI naïve. Despite failure, 89.5% of individuals harboured viral strains fully susceptible to dolutegravir and bictegravir and 85.0% to all INSTI. No INSTI exposure before receiving dolutegravir [OR: 0.35 (0.16-0.78), P < 0.010] and a GSS for companion drugs ≥2 (OR: 0.09 [0.04-0.23], P < 0.001) were negatively associated with INSTI resistance at failure. In a large set of individuals failing dolutegravir in real-life, INSTI resistance was low and mainly related to previous first-generation INSTI exposure. Surveillance of integrase resistance remains crucial to preserve efficacy of INSTI class in the future.

Factors associated with HIV-1 resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors in Spain: Implications for dolutegravir-containing regimens.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens in HIV-1-infected patients have experienced a global increase. Recently, WHO has emphasized the need to fast-track the transition to dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral (ARV) treatments. However, continued surveillance of INSTI resistance is recommended. In this study, clinical, epidemiological, and virological features associated with INSTI resistance diagnosed in Spain were analyzed. Samples collected between 2008 and 2021 from HIV-1-infected patients were analyzed in integrase, protease, and reverse transcriptase using Sanger population sequencing. ARV drug resistance was evaluated with the Stanford University HIVdb program. Among 2,696 patients, 174 (6.5%) had INSTI resistance, all of them to first-generation INSTIs, and 71 (2.6%) had also resistance to second-generation INSTIs. Of these, only 5 individuals were exposed to DTG as the only INSTI, in whom resistance development was associated with poor treatment adherence and/or resistance to other ARV classes. Of newly HIV-1-diagnosed individuals, 0.92% harbored INSTI-resistant viruses, with low prevalences maintained along time, and only one had low-level resistance to DTG. Persons who inject drugs, age over 39 years, resistance to other ARV classes, and longer time from diagnosis were associated with INSTI resistance (p < 0.001). Non-subtype B INSTI-resistant viruses lacked the Q148H + G140S resistance pathway and showed lower INSTI resistance levels than subtype B viruses. In conclusion, INSTI resistance is uncommon and associated with long-term infections, older age and additional resistance to other ARV drug classes, and is rare in newly diagnosed HIV-1 infections. Our results also support the preferential use of DTG-containing regimens in first-line treatments, although surveillance of INSTI resistance is encouraged.

Second-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrase Inhibitors Induce Differentiation Dysregulation and Exert Toxic Effects in Human Embryonic Stem Cell and Mouse Models.

Each year, approximately 1.1 million children are exposed in utero to human immunodeficiency virus antiretrovirals, yet their safety is often not well characterized during pregnancy. The Tsepamo study reported a neural tube defect signal in infants exposed to the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir from conception, suggesting that exposure during early fetal development may be detrimental. The effects of InSTIs on 2 human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines were characterized with respect to markers of pluripotency, early differentiation, and cellular health. In addition, fetal resorptions after exposure to InSTIs from conception were analyzed in pregnant mice. At subtherapeutic concentrations, second-generation InSTIs bictegravir, cabotegravir, and dolutegravir decreased hESC counts and pluripotency and induced dysregulation of genes involved in early differentiation. At therapeutic concentrations, bictegravir induced substantial hESC death and fetal resorptions. It is notable that first-generation InSTI raltegravir did not induce any hESC toxicity or differentiation, at any concentration tested. Exposure to some InSTIs, even at subtherapeutic concentrations, can induce adverse effects in hESCs and pregnant mice. Given the increasingly prevalent use of second-generation InSTIs, including in women of reproductive age, it is imperative to further elucidate the effect of InSTIs on embryonic development, as well as their long-term safety after in utero exposure.

894. Trend of Transmitted Resistance Associated Mutations in People Living with HIV (PLWH) in a Large Southeastern U.S. Ryan White Clinic

BackgroundDepartment of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines recommend integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) as the backbone of preferred initial antiretroviral (ART) regimens (1). Baseline mutation rates for the INSTI class is 0.8% compared with an overall rate of 19% for all ART classes, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. data from 2013-16 (2). First-generation INSTIs (raltegravir and elvitegravir) have a lower genetic barrier to resistance compared with newer, second generation INSTIs (bictegravir and dolutegravir) (3, 4). DHHS guidelines do not currently recommend routine HIV genotypic resistance testing to INSTIs prior to ART initiation (1). Our study seeks to determine the current prevalence of transmitted INSTI and overall resistance in a large southeastern U.S. Ryan White clinic.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective analysis of treatment naïve PLWH presenting for care from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020. Of these, 164 had a baseline genotype performed by one of two commercially available assays – Vela Genomics or ViroSeq. Subsequent interpretations were based on Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Results65 patients (39.6%) had at least one transmitted resistance associated mutation (RAMs). Of these, 24 (36.9%) had an INSTI RAM. Baseline PI, NRTI, and NNRTI RAMs declined during the four-year interval (2017-2020), while the rate of INSTI RAMs increased from 11.1% to 19%; all conferred resistance to the first generation INSTIs with one also conferring resistance to second generation INSTIs.INSTI Resistance Associated Mutation Prevalence 2017-2020 Frequency of Antiretroviral Therapy Class Mutations Per Year Trend of INSTI Mutations and Resistance Associated Mutations 2017-2020 ConclusionUnlike the CDC data which showed the overall prevalence of INSTI RAM transmission rates during 2013-2016 to be 0.8%, our data suggests a higher rate of INSTI RAMs (14.6%) with overall ART RAM transmission of 39.6%. This increase in baseline resistance to the INSTI class, which occurred over time, mimics the historical development of RAMs seen in the earlier ART classes. Though suboptimal adherence in the population promotes development of RAMs, increased frequency of INSTI RAMs may be due to a lower barrier to resistance of first generation INSTIs. Should our observed trend continue, routine baseline INSTI resistance testing may need to be considered prior to ART initiation.Disclosures Cheryl Newman, MD, Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK/ViiV (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

In vitro analysis of the replicative capacity and phenotypic susceptibility to integrase inhibitors of HIV-2 mutants with integrase insertions.

HIV-2 resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) is characterized by two main pathways: (i) mutations at codons 143, 148 and155; and (ii) amino acid insertion after integrase codon 231 (231ins). To complete INSTI resistance data on HIV-2 by determining the viral replicative capacity and INSTI phenotypic susceptibility of integrase mutants obtained through site-directed mutagenesis. Site-directed mutants (SDMs) were constructed and viral stocks produced. Viral replicative capacity was assessed by measuring HIV-2 viral load at days 3, 7 and 14. In vitro phenotypic susceptibility was measured using the ANRS PBMC assay. Viruses bearing 231ins did not present impaired replicative capacity, except the 231ins GIRGK mutant. A 231ins GK SDM was resistant to raltegravir and cabotegravir, but remained susceptible to dolutegravir and bictegravir. SDMs harbouring a 5 amino acid insertion (GYKGK or SREGK) were both resistant to all INSTIs. The SDM with T97A+N155H, with or without E92Q, was resistant to all INSTIs, except bictegravir. These first data on the newly described resistance pathway 231ins, using site-directed mutagenesis, showed no measurable impact on viral fitness and confirmed the decreased susceptibility to a first-generation INSTI (raltegravir) and cabotegravir. Resistance to second-generation INSTIs (dolutegravir and bictegravir) occurred for mutants with a 5 amino acid 231ins.

High-level resistance to bictegravir and cabotegravir in subtype A- and D-infected HIV-1 patients failing raltegravir with multiple resistance mutations.

The second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir is becoming accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and another INSTI, cabotegravir, has recently been approved as a long-acting injectable. Data on bictegravir and cabotegravir susceptibility in raltegravir-experienced HIV-1 subtype A- and D-infected patients carrying drug resistance mutations (DRMs) remain very scarce in LMICs. HIV-1 integrase (IN)-recombinant viruses from eight patients failing raltegravir-based third-line therapy in Uganda were genotypically and phenotypically tested for susceptibility to bictegravir and cabotegravir. Ability of these viruses to integrate into human genomes was assessed in MT-4 cells. HIV-1 IN-recombinant viruses harbouring single primary mutations (N155H or Y143R/S) or in combination with secondary INSTI mutations (T97A, M50I, L74IM, E157Q, G163R or V151I) were susceptible to both bictegravir and cabotegravir. However, combinations of primary INSTI-resistance mutations such as E138A/G140A/G163R/Q148R or E138K/G140A/S147G/Q148K led to decreased susceptibility to both cabotegravir (fold change in EC50 values from 429 to 1000×) and bictegravir (60 to 100×), exhibiting a high degree of cross-resistance. However, these same IN-recombinant viruses showed impaired integration capacity (14% to 48%) relative to the WT HIV-1 NL4-3 strain in the absence of drug. Though not currently widely accessible in most LMICs, bictegravir and cabotegravir offer a valid alternative to HIV-infected individuals harbouring subtype A and D HIV-1 variants with reduced susceptibility to first-generation INSTIs but previous exposure to raltegravir may reduce efficacy, more so with cabotegravir.

Standard versus double dose dolutegravir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis: a phase 2 non-comparative randomised controlled (RADIANT-TB) trial

Dolutegravir, a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI), is replacing efavirenz as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low middle-income countries (LMICs). Tuberculosis remains the leading cause of HIV-related morbidity and mortality in LMICs. Rifampicin is a key agent in the treatment of tuberculosis but induces genes involved in dolutegravir metabolism and efflux. The resulting drug-drug interaction (DDI) reduces the exposure of dolutegravir. However, this can be overcome by supplying a supplemental dose of 50 mg dolutegravir 12 hours after the standard daily dose, which is difficult to implement in LMICs. Four lines of evidence suggest that the supplemental dose may not be necessary: 1) a phase 2 study showed 10 mg of dolutegravir as effective as 50 mg; 2) the prolonged dissociative half-life of dolutegravir after binding to its receptor; 3) a DDI study reported dolutegravir trough concentrations were maintained above its minimum effective concentration when using 50 mg dolutegravir with rifampicin; and 4) virologic outcomes were similar between standard and double dose of raltegravir (a first-generation InSTI) in participants with HIV-associated tuberculosis treated with rifampicin. We hypothesise that virologic outcomes with standard dose dolutegravir-based ART will be acceptable in patients on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. Here we outline the protocol for a phase 2, non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of standard versus double dose dolutegravir among adults living with HIV (ART naïve or first-line interrupted) on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. A total of 108 participants will be enrolled from Khayelitsha in Cape Town, South Africa. Follow up will occur over 48 weeks. The primary objective is to assess proportion virological suppression at 24 weeks between groups analysed by modified intention to treat. Participant safety and the emergence of antiretroviral resistance mutations among those with virologic failure will be assessed throughout. Trial registrations: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03851588 (22/02/2019), SANCTR DOH-27-072020-8159 (03/07/2020).

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Are Effective Anti-HIV Drugs.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently recommended for the first line treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type one (HIV-1) infection. The first-generation INSTIs are effective but can select for resistant viruses. Recent advances have led to several potent second-generation INSTIs that are effective against both wild-type (WT) HIV-1 integrase and many of the first-generation INSTI-resistant mutants. The emergence of resistance to these new second-generation INSTIs has been minimal, which has resulted in alternative treatment strategies for HIV-1 patients. Moreover, because of their high antiviral potencies and, in some cases, their bioavailability profiles, INSTIs will probably have prominent roles in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Herein, we review the current state of the clinically relevant INSTIs and discuss the future outlook for this class of antiretrovirals.

Standard versus double dose dolutegravir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis: a phase 2 non-comparative randomised controlled (RADIANT-TB) trial.

Dolutegravir, a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI), is replacing efavirenz as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low middle-income countries (LMICs). Tuberculosis remains the leading cause of HIV-related morbidity and mortality in LMICs. Rifampicin is a key agent in the treatment of tuberculosis but induces genes involved in dolutegravir metabolism and efflux. The resulting drug-drug interaction (DDI) reduces the exposure of dolutegravir. However, this can be overcome by supplying a supplemental dose of 50 mg dolutegravir 12 hours after the standard daily dose, which is difficult to implement in LMICs. Four lines of evidence suggest that the supplemental dose may not be necessary: 1) a phase 2 study showed 10 mg of dolutegravir as effective as 50 mg; 2) the prolonged dissociative half-life of dolutegravir after binding to its receptor; 3) a DDI study reported dolutegravir trough concentrations were maintained above its minimum effective concentration when using 50 mg dolutegravir with rifampicin; and 4) virologic outcomes were similar between standard and double dose of raltegravir (a first-generation InSTI) in participants with HIV-associated tuberculosis treated with rifampicin. We hypothesise that virologic outcomes with standard dose dolutegravir-based ART will be acceptable in patients on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. Here we outline the protocol for a phase 2, non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of standard versus double dose dolutegravir among adults living with HIV (ART naïve or first-line interrupted) on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. A total of 108 participants will be enrolled from Khayelitsha in Cape Town, South Africa. Follow up will occur over 48 weeks. The primary objective is to assess proportion virological suppression at 24 weeks between groups analysed by modified intention to treat. Participant safety and the emergence of antiretroviral resistance mutations among those with virologic failure will be assessed throughout. Trial registrations: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03851588 (22/02/2019), SANCTR DOH-27-072020-8159 (03/07/2020).

Virological Failure and Acquired Genotypic Resistance Associated With Contemporary Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens.

BackgroundThere are few descriptions of virologic failure (VF) and acquired drug resistance (HIVDR) in large cohorts initiating contemporary antiretroviral therapy (ART).MethodsWe studied all persons with HIV (PWH) in a California clinic population initiating ART between 2010 and 2017. VF was defined as not attaining virologic suppression, discontinuing ART, or virologic rebound prompting change in ART.ResultsDuring the study, 2315 PWH began ART. Six companion drugs were used in 93.3% of regimens: efavirenz, elvitegravir/c, dolutegravir, darunavir/r, rilpivirine, and raltegravir. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 214 (9.2%) PWH experienced VF (2.8 per 100 person-years) and 62 (2.7%) experienced HIVDR (0.8 per 100 person-years). In multivariable analyses, younger age, lower CD4 count, higher virus load, and atazanavir/r were associated with increased VF risk; lower CD4 count, higher virus load, and nevirapine were associated with increased HIVDR risk. Compared with efavirenz, dolutegravir, raltegravir, and darunavir were associated with reduced HIVDR risk. Risks of VF and HIVDR were not significantly associated with ART initiation year. Of the 62 PWH with HIVDR, 42 received an non-nucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI), 15 an integrase-strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and 5 a protease inhibitor (PI). Among those with HIVDR on an NNRTI or first-generation INSTI, 59% acquired dual class resistance and 29% developed tenofovir resistance; those receiving a PI or dolutegravir developed just M184V.ConclusionsDespite the frequent use of contemporary ART regimens, VF and HIVDR continue to occur. Further efforts are required to improve long-term ART virological responses to prevent the consequences of ongoing HIV-1 replication including virus transmission and HIVDR.

Comparable In Vitro Activities of Second-Generation HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) on HIV-1 Clinical Isolates with INSTI Resistance Mutations.

Second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB) showed a high genetic barrier to resistance and limited cross-resistance with first-generation INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). In this study, DTG, BIC, and CAB demonstrated a comparable activity on a panel of INSTI-resistant strains isolated from patients exposed to RAL, EVG, and/or DTG, with a significantly reduced susceptibility only with the pathway Q148H/K/R plus one to two additional INSTI mutations.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-resistance mutations for the surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are expected to be widely adopted globally, requiring surveillance of resistance emergence and transmission. We therefore sought to develop a standardized list of INSTI-resistance mutations suitable for the surveillance of transmitted INSTI resistance. To characterize the suitability of the INSTI-resistance mutations for transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance (TDR) surveillance, we classified them according to their presence on published expert lists, conservation in INSTI-naive persons, frequency in INSTI-treated persons and contribution to reduced in vitro susceptibility. Mutation prevalences were determined using integrase sequences from 17302 INSTI-naive and 2450 INSTI-treated persons; 53.3% of the INSTI-naive sequences and 20.0% of INSTI-treated sequences were from non-B subtypes. Approximately 10% of sequences were from persons who received dolutegravir alone or a first-generation INSTI followed by dolutegravir. Fifty-nine previously recognized (or established) INSTI-resistance mutations were present on one or more of four published expert lists. They were classified into three main non-overlapping groups: 29 relatively common non-polymorphic mutations, occurring in five or more individuals and significantly selected by INSTI treatment; 8 polymorphic mutations; and 22 rare mutations. Among the 29 relatively common INSTI-selected mutations, 24 emerged as candidates for inclusion on a list of INSTI surveillance drug-resistance mutations: T66A/I/K, E92G/Q, G118R, F121Y, E138A/K/T, G140A/C/S, Y143C/H/R/S, S147G, Q148H/R/K, N155H, S230R and R263K. A set of 24 non-polymorphic INSTI-selected mutations is likely to be useful for quantifying INSTI-associated TDR. This list may require updating as more sequences become available from INSTI-experienced persons infected with HIV-1 non-subtype B viruses and/or receiving dolutegravir.

Bictegravir, a novel integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection.

Bictegravir (BIC), a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) approved for HIV treatment in fixed-dose combination with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, has potent antiviral activity in vitro to wild-type virus and strains with resistance to first-generation INSTIs. As part of combination therapy, BIC's virologic suppression rates in clinical trials are comparable to those of first-line combination antiretroviral drug regimens. BIC has demonstrated a high genetic barrier to resistance development in vitro, can be administered with or without food, and has a bioavailability of > 70%. A median plasma half-life of 18 hours allows once-daily dosing. Clearance is primarily hepatic through cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) oxidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) glucuronidation. Thus, potent inducers of UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 (e.g., rifamycins/anticonvulsants) should be avoided due to significantly decreased BIC serum exposure. Chelation with polyvalent cations can decrease absorption; otherwise, drug-drug interactions are few. BIC is well tolerated; diarrhea, nausea and headache are the main adverse effects associated with its use.

Long-term efficacy of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects failing therapy with HIV-1 integrase strand inhibitor-resistant virus.

This study evaluated the virological efficacy of dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily in 190 HIV-1 failing antiretroviral-experienced patients with previous exposure to first-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) over a 5 year follow-up using data from clinical practice. This analysis included HIV-1-infected patients who were ≥18 years of age, treatment experienced, had HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL, with INSTI-resistant virus, who started dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily plus optimized background therapy (OBT), recorded in the national prospective database PRESTIGIO (www.progettoprestigio.it). Follow-up accrued from the start of dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily + OBT until virological failure (VF) or dolutegravir discontinuation for any reason or the last treatment visit on dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily treatment. VF was defined by the lack of achievement of HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by 6 months and thereafter, or the occurrence of two consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL after achievement of undetectable viral load. The estimated VF probabilities were 17% (95% CI = 12%-24%), 28% (95% CI = 21%-37%), 33% (95% CI = 25%-43%), 39% (95% CI = 29%-51%) and 52% (95% CI = 39%-67%) at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months since baseline, respectively. A higher risk of VF was independently associated with baseline viral load >100000 copies/mL (adjusted HR = 4.73, 95% CI = 1.33-16.78, P = 0.016) and with ≥1 INSTI mutations plus Q148H/K/R/N and the G140S/A/C as compared with other subjects (adjusted HR = 4.18, 95% CI = 1.32-13.23, P = 0.015). Our data showed a favourable long-term efficacy of dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily in association with OBT in treatment-experienced failing subjects, with INSTI-resistant virus, in the real world. A close monitoring of adherence is crucial for maintenance of virological response in this fragile subgroup of subjects.

Quantitative evaluation of the antiretroviral efficacy of dolutegravir

The second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) has had a major impact on the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Here we describe important but previously undetermined pharmacodynamic parameters for DTG. We show that the dose-response curve slope, which indicates cooperativity and is a major determinant of antiviral activity, is higher for DTG than for first-generation InSTIs. This steepness does not reflect inhibition of multiple steps in the HIV-1 life cycle, as is the case for allosteric integrase inhibitors and HIV-1 protease inhibitors. We also show that degree of independence, a metric of interaction favorability between antiretroviral drugs, is high for DTG and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Finally, we demonstrate poor selective advantage for HIV-1 bearing InSTI resistance mutations. Selective advantage, which incorporates both the magnitude of resistance conferred by a mutation and its fitness cost, explains the high genetic barrier to DTG resistance. Together, these parameters provide an explanation for the remarkable clinical success of DTG.

The Promise of Dolutegravir: A Novel Second Generation Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor.

Dolutegravir (DTG), a novel integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), is one of the newest addition to the arsenal of anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapeutics. Dolutegravir is the first member of the class of second generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors aimed primarily to address the current unmet need for novel unboosted integrase inhibitors with convenient once-daily dosing and a superior resistance profile. During its clinical development, DTG has demonstrated noninferior or superior efficacy in both treatment-naive as well as treatmentexperienced individuals including those who have previously failed first generation INSTIs. Other potential advantages include a favorable safety profile, low propensity for drug-drug interactions, and prolonged serum half-life permitting once-daily administration in treatment-naive or treatment-experienced INSTI naive HIV patients. Twice-daily administration is recommended in individuals with established or suspected resistance to first-generation INSTIs. This review outlines the need for new HIV therapeutics and summarizes the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of dolutegravir.

Might dolutegravir be part of a functional cure for HIV?

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has greatly decreased HIV-related morbidity and mortality. However, HIV can establish viral reservoirs that evade both the immune system and ART. Dolutegravir (DTG) is a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) related to the first-generation INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). DTG shows a higher genetic barrier to the development of HIV-1 resistance than RAL and EVG. More interestingly, clinical resistance mutations to DTG in treatment-naïve patients have not been observed to date. This review summarizes recent studies on strategies toward a cure for HIV, explores resistance profiles of DTG, and discusses how DTG might help in finding a functional cure for HIV.