Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Group Research Articles

Myopic Regression after FS-LASIK and SMILE.

To compare the degree of myopic regression after myopia correction with either femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) over 18 months. Patients undergoing FS-LASIK or SMILE surgery for myopia correction were retrospectively recruited. The propensity scores were used to match patients by age and preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (SEQ) from these 2 groups. Myopic regression was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 416 eyes of 416 patients undergoing FS-LASIK and 416 eyes of 416 patients undergoing SMILE were matched. Using 1-month SEQ as baseline, the SEQ regression values after FS-LASIK were 0D, -0.17 ± 0.69D, -0.24 ± 0.65D, -0.31 ± 0.65D, -0.32 ± 0.63D, and -0.33 ± 0.62D and the SEQ regression values after SMILE were 0D, -0.07 ± 0.75D, -0.18 ± 0.77D, -0.23 ± 0.82 D, -0.21 ± 0.77D, and -0.24 ± 0.68D at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that preoperative manifest SEQ (P = 0.021) and designed optical zone (P = 0.048) are significant predictors. The selected surgical procedure had no significant effect on predicting myopic regression (P = 0.470). The cumulative survival rates of myopic regression were 54.74% and 42.10% in the FS-LASIK group and 58.66% and 43.83% in the SMILE group, at 12 and 18 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.11). After matching based on age and preoperative manifest SEQ, we found that higher myopia and a smaller optical zone contribute significantly to the development of myopic regression after undergoing FS-LASIK or SMILE surgery at 18 months. The selected surgical procedure, however, does not affect the likelihood of myopic regression.

Effective optical zone: Differences between small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.

To compare the effective optical zones (EOZs) of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (F-LASIK) by utilizing topographic methods on the tangential curvature difference map at postoperative 1 year and to identify parameters linked to the EOZ alterations following both surgeries. Myopic patients who underwent SMILE or F-LASIK were included in the study. Patients with refractive error greater than -9.0 D sphere or -0.50 D of astigmatism were excluded from the study. EOZs were measured at postoperative 1 year by using the tangential curvature difference map of the Scheimpflug tomography system. Correlations between the EOZ alterations and relevant parameters were assessed. In total, 59 eyes in the SMILE group and 65 eyes in the F-LASIK group were assessed. The decrease in EOZ compared with the programmed optical zone was significantly higher in the F-LASIK group (P < 0.001). The increase in corneal asphericity was significantly relevant to the decrease in EOZin both groups according to the multiple regression analysis (P < 0.001, B/95% CI: 0.62/0.34 and 0.90, standardized-Beta: 0.587 for the SMILE group; P < 0.001, B/95% CI: 0.74/0.41 and 1.07, standardized-Beta: 0.631 for the F-LASIK group). The EOZ decreased 1 year after both SMILE and F-LASIK. The SMILE group showed less EOZ reduction than F-LASIK patients relative to the programmed optical zone. The decrease in EOZ was correlated with the increase in corneal asphericity in both groups.

Moisture chamber goggles for the treatment of postoperative dry eye in patients receiving SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery

BackgroundThe incidence of refractive surgery-related dry eye disease (DED) is rising due to the increasing popularity of corneal refractive surgery. The moisture chamber goggles (MCGs) have been shown to tear evaporation by increasing local humidity and minimizing airflow. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of moisture chamber goggles for refractive surgery-related DED.MethodsIn this nonrandomized open-label controlled study, 78 participants (156 eyes) receiving refractive surgery were enrolled between July 2021 and April 2022, and sequentially allocated to MGC and control groups. 39 participants were allocated to the MGC groups, of which 53.8% received small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and 46.2% received femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and were instructed to wear MCGs for the duration of 1 month postoperatively, in addition to the standard postoperative treatment received by the control groups (56.4% SMILE, 43.6% FS-LASIK). Participants underwent full ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity, manifest refraction, DED evaluations, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), both preoperatively and at routine follow-ups 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery. DED parameters included non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), conjunctival congestion, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaires. Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between control and MCG groups, and between preoperative and postoperative parameters within groups.ResultsPostoperative NIBUT decreased in both SMILE and FS-LASIK control groups 1 day after the surgery (SMILE, P = 0.001; FS-LASIK, P = 0.008), but not in the corresponding MCG groups (SMILE, P = 0.097; FS-LASIK, P = 0.331). TMH in the MCG group was significantly higher at 1 week (P = 0.039) and 1 month (P = 0.015) in SMILE, and 1 day (P = 0.003) in FS-LASIK groups. In FS-LASIK participants, significantly lower HOAs and coma levels in the MCG group were observed 1 day (total HOAs, P = 0.023; coma, P = 0.004) and 1 week (total HOAs, P = 0.010, coma, P = 0.004) after surgery. No consistent statistically significant intergroup difference was observed between MCG and control groups in conjunctival congestion, LLT, and OSDI.ConclusionsMCGs effectively slowed tear evaporation, increased tear film stability, and improved HOAs in patients receiving SMILE and FS-LASIK surgeries. MCG is an effective adjuvant therapy in the comprehensive management of refractive surgery-related DED.

Comparison of myopic astigmatic correction after cross-assisted SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK.

To compare astigmatic correction among cross-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China. Prospective comparison study. 154 right eyes of 154 patients with astigmatism of -1.00 to -2.75 diopters (D) were included in this study. 64 eyes, 42 eyes, and 48 eyes were receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK, respectively. The SMILE group used cross-axial alignment for head positioning for astigmatism correction. In the FS-LASIK and transPRK groups, static and dynamic cyclotorsion control were used. Changes in ocular parameters and vector analysis were assessed at 6 months postoperatively. The safety and efficacy indices were comparable among the 3 groups at 6 months postoperatively. Residual astigmatism was smallest in the SMILE group (-0.23 ± 0.25 D) compared with that in FS-LASIK (-0.40 ± 0.28 D, P = .009) and transPRK groups (-0.42 ± 0.32 D, P = .001). 53 (82.8%), 36 (85.7%), and 37 (77.1%) eyes achieved an angle of error within ±5 degrees, respectively ( P = .55). Notably, vector analysis showed that the difference vector, the magnitude of the error, and its absolute value were significantly smaller in the SMILE group than those in the other groups ( P < .05). In addition, the higher-order aberrations, especially coma, were significantly induced postoperatively in each group ( P < .001). Residual astigmatism magnitude was smallest by cross-assisted SMILE, followed by FS-LASIK and transPRK, and the astigmatism axial correction was comparable among groups.

Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of TransPRK and FS-LASIK refractive procedures on patients with astigmatism and amblyopia.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK) with femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the correction of astigmatism on amblyopic eyes. Methods: The design was a retrospective interventional study on 37 eyes with hyperopic or mixed astigmatism and refractive amblyopia, which underwent transPRK or FS-LASIK. The patients were distributed into 2 groups according to the technique used. Data was collected from patient files and comparison between groups was performed. The main outcomes measured were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent (SEQ), efficiency and safety indexes. Results: In the transPRK group, SEQ improved significantly after 1 month, from 2.08 ± 2.02D (p<0.01) to 0.125 ± 0.86D and at the 12 month visit to -0.04 ± 0.62D (p>0.05), sphere improved from 4.03 ± 1.44D preoperatively to 0.67 ± 0.9D at 1 month (p<0.05) and further to 0.44 ± 0.71 at 12 months (p<0.05). CDVA improved from 0.194 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.115 ± 0.1 logMAR at the 1-year visit. Safety index after 1 month was 1.09 ± 0.2 and 1.12 ± 0.35 at the 1-year visit. Efficiency index was 0.95 ± 0.22 at 1 month and 1.03 ± 0.34 after 1 year. In FS-LASIK group, SEQ improved after 1 month, from 2.28 ± 3.04 to -0.79 ± 0.73D (p<0.01), and further to -0.49 ± 0.79 (p>0.05) at the 12 month visit, sphere improved from 4.11 ± 2.35D preoperatively to -0.42 ± 0.66D at 1 month (p<0.05) and further to -0.08 ± 0.75D at 12 months (p<0.05). CDVA also improved from 0.191 ± 0.1 logMAR to 0.140 ± 0.1 logMAR at 1 year. Safety index after 1 month was 1.1 ± 0.2 and 1.16 ± 0.21 at the 1-year visit. Efficiency index was 0.98 ± 0.27 at 1 month and 1.06 ± 0.23 after 1 year. Conclusion: Both procedures were safe and efficient in improving visual acuity for patients with mixed and hyperopic astigmatism and refractive amblyopia. Abbreviations: transPRK = transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, FS-LASIK = femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis, logMAR = logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, BCVA = best corrected distance visual acuity, CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity.

Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures

BackgroundAs the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE.MethodsA total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients.ResultsThe Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411).ConclusionThe study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes.

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (PGroup = 0.373). At 1year postoperatively, the CCT reduction was overestimated by 17.85 ± 5.36µm in the SMILE group, underestimated by 4.31 ± 7.08µm in the FS-LASIK group, and underestimated by 7.60 ± 8.28µm in the LASEK group (PGroup < 0.001, PTime < 0.001). In the FS-LASIK group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction was not related to the predicted CCT reduction (P = 0.095). The laser platform may overestimate the CCT reduction for SMILE and underestimate it for FS-LASIK and LASEK. FS-LASIK has a much higher level of accuracy in CCT reduction, which is not influenced by refractive correction.

Vector analysis of astigmatism correction after PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE for myopic astigmatism.

To compare astigmatic correction among photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), femtosecond laser-assistedin situkeratomileusis(FS-LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This prospective study enrolled 157 eyes that underwent three procedures (59 PRK, 47 FS-LASIK, and 51 SMILE) for the treatment of myopia with low to high astigmatism (- 0.25 to - 4.50 D). Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was calculated by vector analysis using refractive (RA) and corneal astigmatism. Vector analysis results were compared in different procedures in the two RA groups (low ≤ 1.00 D and high > 1.00 D) at 3 and 12months postoperatively. There were no significant between-group differences in postoperative safety and efficacy outcomes (all P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative cylinders between all surgical groups (all p > 0.05), except for 3months postoperative ORA in FS-LASIK (P = 0.004). At 12months, 77%, 59.2%, and 50% of eyes attainemmetropia in the FS-LASIK, SMILE, and PRK groups, respectively. Vector analysis showed comparable values for surgical induced astigmatism, target induced astigmatism, mean error, and angle of error between groups at 12months. Significant differences were observed only in the correction index and difference vector parameters in the astigmatic > 1.00 D group at 3months (P < 0.001), and FS-LASIK was preferable. One-year outcomes revealed that PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE were all equally effective in correcting myopic astigmatism. However, FS-LASIK demonstrated more favorable astigmatism correction in eyes with astigmatism > 1.00D in early postoperatively.

Comparison of planned versus achieved central corneal stromal thickness reduction in SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a retrospective study

Accuracy of planned corneal stromal thickness (CST) reduction is essential to the safety of laser vision correction. This study was to compare the accuracy of the planned central CST reduction in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). A total of 77 patients (43 for SMILE, 34 for FS-LASIK using Custom-Q algorithm) were included in this retrospective study. At postoperative 6–18 months, the central CST reduction was overestimated by 18.49 ± 6.42 μm in the SMILE group (P < 0.001) and underestimated by 2.56 ± 7.79 μm in the FS-LASIK group (P = 0.064). The planned-achieved difference (PAD) of central CST reduction was positively correlated with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and with planned central CST reduction in both groups. When calculated by manifest refraction (MR) without nomogram adjustment, the central CST reduction was overestimated by 11.14 ± 6.53 μm in the SMILE group and underestimated by 2.83 ± 7.39 μm in the FS-LASIK group. The PAD of central CST reduction without nomogram was significantly narrowed in SMILE and maintained in FS-LASIK, suggesting estimation using MR without nomogram adjustment may be feasible for SMILE and FS-LASIK in clinical practice.

Binocular imbalance in patients after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation or femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia with presbyopia.

To investigate the long-term safety, efficacy, and binocular balance of monovision surgery using Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) V4c implantation and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the treatment of myopic patients with presbyopia. This case series study involved 90 eyes of 45 patients (male/female = 19/26; average age:46.27 ± 5.54 years; average follow-up time:48.73 ± 14.65 months) who underwent the aforementioned surgery to treat myopic presbyopes. Data on manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, dominant eye, presbyopic addition, intraocular pressure, and anterior segment biometric parameters were collected. The visual outcomes and binocular balance at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m were documented. The safety index for the ICL V4c and FS-LASIK groups were 1.24 ± 0.27 and 1.04 ± 0.20 (p = 0.125), respectively. Binocular visual acuity (logmar) for 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m were -0.03 ± 0.05, -0.03 ± 0.02, and 0.10 ± 0.03 for the ICL V4c group, and -0.02 ± 0.09, -0.01 ± 0.02, and 0.06 ± 0.04 for the FS-LASIK group, respectively. The proportions of all patients with imbalanced vision at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m distances were 68.89, 71.11, and 82.22%, respectively (all p > 0.05 between the two groups). There were significant differences in refraction between the balanced and imbalanced vision for patients at 0.4 m distance (for non-dominant eye spherical equivalent [SE]: -1.14 ± 0.17D and -1.47 ± 0.13D, p < 0.001), 0.8 m distance (for preoperative ADD:0.90 ± 0.17D and 1.05 ± 0.11D, p = 0.041), and 5 m distance (for non-dominant SE: -1.13 ± 0.33D and -1.42 ± 0.11D, p < 0.001). ICL V4c implantation and FS-LASIK monovision treatment demonstrated good long-term safety and binocular visual acuity at various distances. After the procedure, the imbalanced patients' vision is primarily related to the age-related presbyopia and anisometropia progression caused by the monovision design.

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-year Result.

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the long-term visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (SMI-LIKE) in the correction of moderate to high hyperopia. In this study, 16 subjects (20 eyes) underwent FS-LASIK and 7 subjects (10 eyes) underwent SMI-LIKE. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, mean keratometry (Km), anterior asphericity (Q), and HOAs preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively were obtained in both procedures. The efficacy indices of the FS-LASIK group and the SMI-LIKE group were 0.85 ± 0.14 and 0.87 ± 0.17, respectively. The safety indices of the FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE groups were 0.99 ± 0.15 and 1.08 ± 0.24, respectively. No significant difference in safety index or efficacy index was found between the FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE groups (all P > 0.05). The correlation coefficient of the attempted versus achieved spherical equivalent postoperatively was 0.69 (P < 0.01) and 0.89 (P < 0.01) in the FS-LASIK group and SMI-LIKE groups, respectively. The front Km, negative Q value, negative spherical aberrations (SAs), coma, and total HOAs significantly increased postoperatively in the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The FS-LASIK group had greater changes in Q value and SA postoperatively than the SMI-LIKE group (P < 0.01). SMI-LIKE had similar safety and efficacy to FS-LASIK in the correction of moderate to high hyperopia. However, SMI-LIKE may equip better visual quality postoperatively for its lower Q value and SA changes than FS-LASIK.

Anterior segment inflammation and its association with dry eye parameters following myopic SMILE and FS-LASIK

Purpose To evaluate dry eye and anterior segment inflammation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and investigate their association. Methods This prospective and observational study included 96 eyes from 48 myopic patients. The evaluation was performed at baseline, postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1 and month 3. Outcome measures included anterior chamber flare, bulbar redness (BR), limbal redness (LR), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear meniscus height (TMH), the first and average noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT-1, NIBUT-a), fluorescein breakup time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and Schirmer I. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were applied to explore the correlation between flare and ocular surface parameters. Results Flare increased significantly in both groups at day 1 and week 1 and then returned to baseline at month 1. In both groups, BR decreased on day 1 and then gradually increased towards the baseline. In FS-LASIK, LR was lower than baseline at day 1 and month 3. An increase in OSDI was found in the SMILE group on day 1, and in the FS-LASIK group at day 1 to month 1. NIBUT-1 and NIBUT-a decreased significantly on day 1 in both groups. At month 3, NIBUT-a did not return to baseline in FS-LASIK. CFS increased significantly at week 1 in both groups. All parameters were comparable between SMILE and FS-LASIK except for OSDI and NIBUT-a. Time and spherical equivalent showed a correlation with flare. Conclusions Both SMILE and FS-LASIK induced elevated anterior chamber flare and dry eye. However, flare might not be considered a factor determining perioperative dry eye. Key Messages Dry eye disease is common after corneal refractive surgery. Signs and symptoms of dry eye disease persist longer after FS-LASIK compared with SMILE. Both FS-LASIK and SMILE transiently disrupted blood-aqueous barrier integrity, leading to anterior segment inflammation. Anterior chamber flare might not be considered a factor explaining perioperative dry eye, other biomarkers remain for future exploration.

Comparison of Changes in Corneal Thickness and Curvature After Myopia Correction Between SMILE and FS-LASIK.

To comparatively investigate the changes in corneal thickness and curvature between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, including central corneal thickness (CCT), midperipheral corneal thickness (MPCT), peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), central keratometry (CK), midperipheral keratometry (MPK), and peripheral keratometry (PK), using a dual rotating Scheimpflug analyzer. At 1 week postoperatively, changes in CCT, MPCT, PCT, and PK were significantly greater in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group (P = .003 for CCT and < .001 for MPCT, PCT, and PK), but no significant inter-group differences were found between changes in CK and MPK (P = .883 and .513, respectively). CCT, MPCT, and PK values showed a similar increase in both groups, but significantly more increase in PCT and significantly less increase in CK and MPK was observed in the SMILE group from 1 week to 3 months after surgery. At 3 months postoperatively, CCT and MPCT were significantly thinner in the SMILE group than in the FSLASIK group (P = .018 and .022, respectively), and there was no significant difference in PCT, CK, MPK, and PK between the two groups. SMILE caused significantly more corneal thinning at the center, midperiphery, and periphery, and more corneal flattening at the periphery, compared to FS-LASIK. A different pattern of corneal remodeling was observed between the two surgeries during the 3-month follow-up period. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):15-22.].

Comparison of Predictability in Central Corneal Thickness Reduction After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Correction.

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) reduction after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in eyes with high myopia. In this prospective, consecutive study, 70 eyes with high myopia undergoing SMILE (n = 35) or FS-LASIK (n = 35) were recruited. Corneal topography images were acquired using the Pentacam HR imaging system preoperatively and at 1day, 1month, and 6months postoperatively. Predicted CCT reduction was extracted directly from the VisuMax femtosecond laser system or MEL80 excimer laser platform. The achieved CCT reduction was determined using corneal thickness difference maps from the Pentacam. Comparative statistics and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictability in stromal thickness reduction. The mean predicted CCT reductions were 152.9 ± 6.7μm and 150.9 ± 7.3μm in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups, respectively, with no statistical difference. For each follow-up time, no significant difference was noted in the two groups in the achieved CCT reduction. At 6-month follow-up, the CCT reductions were overestimated to be 23.06 ± 6.97µm and 28.29 ± 13.92µm in the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively (P = 0.003), showing statistical difference. Regression analysis revealed that the positive correlation between achieved and predicted CCT reductions was stronger in SMILE (R2 = 0.5065, P < 0.001) than in FS-LASIK (R2 = 0.2237, P = 0.004). Overestimated CCT reduction was not correlated with predicted CCT reduction in either group. Systematically overestimated CCT reduction is found after SMILE and FS-LASIK in high myopia correction. Deviations between planned and achieved CCT reductions are more pronounced in FS-LASIK than in SMILE.

Role of corneal epithelial thickness during myopic regression in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in corneal epithelial thickness and the outcome of myopic regression after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK). This study included 45 eyes of 25 patients undergoing FS-LASIK and 44 eyes of 24 patients undergoing TPRK. Myopic regression occurred in these patients postoperatively from 8 to 21 months. The corneal epithelial thickness was measured using a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at the onset of regression, 3 months after treatment, and 3 months after drug withdrawal. Compared with that of preoperation, corneal epithelial thickness increased when regression occurred in both groups (all P < 0.05). The thickness of central corneal epithelium in FS-LASIK and TPRK groups reached 65.02 ± 4.12µm and 61.63 ± 2.91µm, respectively. The corneal epithelial thickness decreased when myopic regression subsided after 3 months of steroid treatment compared to the onset (P < 0.05). With a decrease in corneal epithelial thickness, the curvature of the anterior corneal surface, central corneal thickness, and refractive power all decreased (all P < 0.05). The corneal epithelial thickness and refractive error remained relatively stable after 3 months of treatment withdrawal (P > 0.05). The corneal epithelial thickness determined the outcome of myopic regression similarly in FS-LASIK and TPRK. When the corneal epithelium thickened, regression occurred. After steroid treatment, epithelial thickness decreased whereas regression subsided.

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes With High Myopia With High Astigmatism After SMILE and FS-LASIK.

To compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) in eyes with high myopia with high astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). In total, 45 eyes of 45 patients with high myopia with astigmatism greater than 2.00 diopters (D) who underwent SMILE or FS-LASIK were enrolled. The FOZ, optical zone decentration, and corneal aberrations were analyzed using Scheimpflug imaging. These values were then compared between the two groups 6 months postoperatively. No postoperative complications were observed during follow-up. The mean FOZ diameter was 5.03 ± 0.31 mm for the FS-LASIK group and 5.24 ± 0.27 mm for the SMILE group (P = .007), corresponding to reductions of 1.18 ± 0.23 and 1.01 ± 0.21 mm, respectively, compared with the programmed optical zone (POZ) (P = .013). A significant difference was noted in the FOZ on the short axis between the two groups (P = .002), whereas no significant difference was observed on the long axis (P = .088). The FOZ area in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups was 65.39 ± 6.14% and 70.09 ± 5.46% of the POZ area, respectively (P = .010). There was no significant difference in decentration between the two groups (0.29 ± 0.13 mm for the FS-LASIK group vs 0.30 ± 0.13 mm for the SMILE group, P = .798). A significant increase in spherical aberration was observed in the FS-LASIK group (P < .001). However, the induction of vertical coma was higher in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group (P = .002). Eyes with high myopia with high astigmatism following SMILE achieved a larger FOZ and less spherical aberration but a larger vertical coma introduction than following FS-LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(9):595-601.].

Quantitative changes in iris and retinal blood flow after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.

PurposeTo investigate the quantitative changes in iris and retinal blood flow indices after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).MethodsSeventy-nine patients who underwent FS-LASIK or SMILE were enrolled between July 2020 and September 2020. Participants were followed-up 1 day pre-operatively and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months post-operatively. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was used to acquire and quantify the iris and retinal blood flow indices.ResultsThe iris vessel area density (VAD) and vessel skeleton density (VSD) decreased on post-operative day 1 but recovered on day 7. In both cases, the pupil diameter was positively associated with the post-operative iris blood flow indices (p = 0.0013, p = 0.0002). The retinal VAD and VSD in the superficial and deep capillary plexuses decreased after surgery and failed to recover after 90 days. The SMILE group showed significantly lower iris and retinal blood flow indices than the FS-LASIK group. For both procedures, axial length (p = 0.0345, p = 0.0499), spherical equivalence (p = 0.0063, p = 0.0070), and suction duration (p = 0.0025, p = 0.0130) were negatively correlated with the post-operative VAD and VSD.ConclusionsThe SMILE and FS-LASIK procedures induced a short-term decrease in the iris and retinal blood flow indices, although patients finally showed full visual recovery. This phenomenon should be carefully considered, especially in patients prone to anterior segment lesions.

Comparison of clinical outcome of small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty and FS-LASIK for correction of moderate and high hyperopia.

To compare the clinical outcome of small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (sLIKE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for correction of moderate and high hyperopia. A case-controlled clinical study was performed. Twenty right eyes of 20 moderate and high hyperopia patients underwent sLIKE (sLIKE group) and 22 right eyes of 22 moderate and high hyperopia patients underwent FS-LASIK (FS-LASIK group) were enrolled in this study from October 2015 to October 2017. Visual acuity, refractive error, corneal thickness, and keratometry were compared between the groups before and 1y postoperatively. The postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were improved in the two groups. The UNVA reached J1 in 15 eyes (75.0%) in the sLIKE group and 5 eyes (22.7%) in the FS-LASIK group 1y after surgery (χ 2=11.476, P=0.001). The UDVA was equal or better than the preoperative CDVA in 16 eyes (80.0%) in the sLIKE group and 8 eyes (36.4%) in the FS-LASIK group, respectively (χ 2=8.145, P=0.004). No eyes lost any line of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in either group. The amount of postoperative residual hyperopia in the sLIKE group was significantly less than in the FS-LASIK group (Z=-2.841, P=0.004). The postoperative keratometry and corneal thickness were significantly higher in the sLIKE group than in the FS-LASIK group (t=4.411, 10.279, P<0.001). The SRI and SAI of the sLIKE group were significantly higher than that in the FS-LASIK group. There was no statistically significant difference in mean decentration between the two groups. sLIKE has better visual and refractive outcome than FS-LASIK for correction of moderate and high hyperopia.

Long-Term Observation of Higher-Order Aberrations and Microdistortions in Bowman's Layer After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correcting Myopia With Spherical Equivalent Higher Than -9.0 Diopters.

PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes in corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and microdistortions in the Bowman’s layer after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correcting extremely high myopia.MethodsThis prospective study included patients with myopia with spherical equivalent ≥ -9.0 Diopters (D). SMILE was performed in forty eyes of 40 patients. Pentacam was used to evaluate HOAs before and at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography was used to evaluate microdistortions at 2 years postoperatively. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients receiving femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) were enrolled as the control group. HOAs were measured before, at 1 day and at least 1 year postoperatively.ResultsAfter SMILE, the long-term safety and effectiveness index was 1.25 and 0.85, respectively. Microdistortions were observed in 73.5% of the eyes at 2 years, with an average number of 1.20 ± 1.22 microdistortions and an average width of 287.37 ± 259.00 μm. We detected more microdistortions in the horizontal meridian than in the vertical meridian (p = 0.035). The average number and width of microdistortions were both higher in the central region (≤4 mm) than in the peripheral region (4–8 mm) (both p < 0.001). With the exception of horizontal trefoil in the SMILE group and vertical trefoil in the FS-LASIK group, significant changes over time were observed in all other HOAs (all p < 0.05). Meanwhile, we detected significant increases in the total corneal HOA, spherical aberration (SA), and coma at all time-points after both surgeries (all p < 0.01). Compared with FS-LASIK, SMILE induced less SA (p < 0.001) and more horizontal coma (p = 0.036). In the SMILE group, the HOA, SA, and trefoil were more in the small optical zone (≤6.0 mm) than in the large optical zone (>6.0 mm) (all p < 0.05). The increase in SA and most trefoil correlated with the mean number of central microdistortions number (all p < 0.05).ConclusionFor myopia over −9.0D, the microdistortions in the Bowman’s layer were still detectable in most eyes long-term after SMILE. Both SMILE and FS-LASIK induced more HOAs, mainly HOA, SA, and coma. The small optical zone and microdistortions may affect postoperative aberrations.

Vector analysis of high astigmatism (\u2265\u20092.0 diopters) correction after small-incision lenticule extraction with stringent head positioning and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis with compensation of cyclotorsion

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the astigmatic correction by vector analysis in patients with high myopic astigmatism after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) with cyclotorsion compensation or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with stringent head positioning.SettingBeijing Aier-Intech Eye Hospital, Beijing, China.DesignA retrospective case series.MethodsPatients who had correction of myopic astigmatism of 2 diopters (D) or more treated with either FS-LASIK with cyclotorsion compensation or SMILE with stringent head positioning were included. The results of vision and refraction were analyzed and compared between groups with the right eye.ResultsThe study enrolled 94 patients (41eyes in an FS-LASIK with compensation of cyclotorsion group and 53 eyes in a SMILE with stringent head positioning control group. The mean preoperative manifest cylinder was -2.65 ± 0.77D in the FS-LASIK group and 2.51 ± 0.56D in the SMILE group (P = 0.302). At 12 months, there was no significant between-group difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, P = 0.274) and postoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) (P = 0.107). 46.3% and 24.5% of eyes in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups were within 0.25 D were within 0.25D postoperative cylinder, respectively, and 78% and 66% of eyes in these two groups were within 0.5 D postoperative cylinder (P = 0.027, P = 0.202). The vector analysis showed comparable between-group target-induced astigmatism (TIA) (P = 0.114), surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) (P = 0.057), difference vector (DV, P = 0.069), and the angle of error (AE) (P = 0 .213) values. The index of success (IOS) was 0.18 in the FS-LASIK group and 0.24 in the SMILE group (P = 0.024), with a significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionFS-LASIK with compensation of cyclotorsion showed a favorable correction of high myopic astigmatism (≥ 2.0 D) compared to SMILE with stringent head positioning at 12 months.