FDG Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Research Articles

Antitumor and Antivascular Effects of AVE8062 in Ovarian Carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to examine the therapeutic efficacy and underlying mechanisms of action of a vascular-disrupting agent, AVE8062, and to determine its effects on tumor metabolic activity. The in vitro and in vivo effects of AVE8062 alone and in combination with docetaxel were tested in chemotherapy-sensitive and chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer models. Tumors were analyzed for necrosis, microvessel density, endothelial cell apoptosis, and proliferation following treatment. The effect of AVE8062 on tumor regression and metabolic activity was examined by magnetic resonance (MR) or by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) uptake by positron emission tomography (PET) with MR imaging, respectively. AVE8062 monotherapy was effective in inhibiting tumor growth in all models (range 43-51% versus control; P < 0.05). Combination therapy was even more effective in inhibiting tumor growth (range 76-90% compared with controls, P < 0.01). AVE8062 in combination with chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival in HeyA8-injected mice (P < 0.001) compared with other groups. AVE8062-based therapy resulted in rapid development of central tumor necrosis, decreased microvessel density, decreased proliferation, and induction of apoptosis of tumor-associated endothelial cells. MR imaging showed regression of established HeyA8 ovarian tumors and [18F]FDG PET with MR showed rapid decrease in metabolic activity after AVE8062 therapy. Combination of AVE8062 plus docetaxel results in potent inhibition of ovarian cancer growth. These results suggest that AVE8062 may be useful as a clinical therapeutic approach for ovarian cancer patients and that functional [18F]FDG PET imaging may predict clinical response before an anatomic reduction in tumor size.

Positron emission tomography (PET) in endocrine tumours

Positron emission tomography (PET) has many clinical applications in oncology, neurology and cardiology. PET is widely available in developed countries, and has also become available in a number of middle-income countries, including South Africa. Commonly used PET radionuclides include fluorine-18, carbon-11, nitrogen-13 and oxygen-15, which are commonly found in organic chemistry and biochemistry. Undoubtedly the most important radiopharmaceutical used in PET scanning at present is [F-18]-FDG, which accumulates in many tumour cells. FDG PET imaging has some specific uses in the evaluation of patients with endocrine tumours. These include the detection of recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients with a rising thyroglobulin level and negative iodine scan, and cases of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma with rising calcitonin levels. In parathyroid adenoma, FDG PET appears useful in cases where conventional nuclear medicine imaging is negative. For adrenal masses, FDG PET appears to be a hi...

TU‐B‐BRA‐01: CE: Functional/Molecular Imaging: PET for Planning/assessment

Purpose: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images show physiological and biological information through the in vivo distribution of radioactive, positron‐emitting agents. PET imaging shows focal and distributed regions of cancer and its metastases. Initial PET uses in oncology include diagnosis and staging, which are important for determining treatment decisions. Current PET uses now include target definition for radiation planning followed by PET‐based assessment of treatment. Hybrid PET‐CT devices are beginning to be used as radiation treatment simulators. Method and Materials: F‐18‐labled Fluoro‐deoxyglucose (F‐18 FDG) is the most commonly used PET imaging agent. FDG shows regions of active glucose metabolism, such as local cancer, metastases, non‐cancer inflammation, and normal glucose use. Non‐FDG PET agents can be more specific in cell targeting (binding), and can image different aspects of tumor biology, like hypoxia (FMISO, CuATSM) and cell proliferation (FLT) Results: PET imaging has coarse spatial resolution compared to CT and MR. PET's clinical use is valued because of its great sensitivity for cancer detection. Voxel intensity and image fidelity depend on equipment design, patient size, anatomic site, and imaging study parameters. PET‐CT units enable CT‐based attenuation corrections and inclusion of CT information in a registered PET‐CT dataset. The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) is a normalized intensity measure for quantitative indication of disease, and can be used to identify disease or possibly for target delineation, with certain limitations. While FDG remains the most promising agent for tumor detection, other, biologically more specific agents (e.g., FMISO, CuATSM for hypoxia imaging or FLT for cell proliferation imaging) might be more appropriate for target delineation and treatment assessment. Conclusion: This course reviews PET‐CT hybrid scanning devices, uses of FDG and non‐FDG PET for oncology imaging, and quantitative aspects for PET‐based radiation target definition and treatment assessment. Example images demonstrate the potential contributions and limitations of FDG and non‐ FDG PET oncology imaging. This review course is intended for both imaging and radiation oncology physicists.Educational Objectives1. Describe FDG PET imaging and oncologic indications.2. Review the uses and limitations of PET images in radiation treatment.3. Describe the SUV and other threshold parameters for target delineation.4. Review non‐FDG PET imaging of tumor biology.5. Discuss quantitative aspects of PET imaging for treatment assessment.Conflict of Interest: (JDB) Research sponsored in part by Varian Medical Systems.

TU‐A‐224A‐01: Positron Emission Tomography for Oncologic Imaging and Treatment

Purpose: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images show physiological and biological information through the in‐vivo distribution of radioactive, short‐lived, positron‐emitting species. PET imaging shows focal and distributed regions of cancer and its metastases. PET uses in oncology include diagnosis, staging, and disease monitoring, important for prognosis and treatment decisions. Quantitative uses of PET include assessment of the degree of malignancy and target definition for radiation treatment. Hybrid PET‐CT devices are being used as radiation treatment simulators. Method and Materials: F‐18‐labled Fluoro‐deoxyglucose (F‐18 FDG) is the most commonly used PET imaging agent. FDG shows regions of active glucose metabolism, such as local cancer, metastases, non‐cancer inflammation, and normal glucose use in brain. Non‐FDG PET agents can be highly specific in tissue targeting (binding), such as F‐18 Misonidazole and C‐11‐labeled amino acids, to image tumor biology like hypoxia and cell proliferation, respectively. Results: PET imaging has coarse spatial resolution compared to CT and MR. PET's clinical use is valued because of its great sensitivity for cancer detection. Voxel intensity and image fidelity depend on equipment design, patient size, anatomic site, and imaging study parameters. PET‐CT units enable CT‐based attenuation corrections and inclusion of CT information in a registered PET‐CT dataset. Interest is high for PET‐CT simulators. The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) is a normalized intensity measure for quantitative indication of disease, and can be used for target delineation, with certain constraints. Conclusion: This course reviews the basic physics of PET, uses of FDG and non‐FDG PET for oncology imaging, and quantitative aspects for PET‐based radiation target definition. Example images demonstrate the potential contributions and limitations of FDG and non‐FDG PET oncology imaging. This review course is intended for both imaging and radiation oncology physicists.Educational Objectives:1. Review the basics physics of PET imaging.2. Describe FDG PET imaging and oncologic indications.3. Review the uses and limitations of PET images in radiation treatment.4. Describe the SUV and other threshold parameters for target delineation.5. Review non‐FDG PET imaging of tumor biology.Conflict of Interest: Research sponsored in part by Varian Medical Systems and GE Healthcare.

Intense Esophageal FDG Activity Caused by Candida Infection Obscured the Concurrent Primary Esophageal Cancer on PET Imaging

Esophageal cancer frequently causes a focal intense FDG uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging while esophagitis often results in a mild to moderate degree of FDG activity in a diffuse pattern. However, detection of an esophageal cancer can become difficult in the presence of a diffuse esophageal activity because of esophagitis. We present such case in which esophageal cancer superimposed by Candidal esophagitis is difficult to recognize on FDG PET images.

Myelofibrosis on F-18 FDG PET Imaging

A 60-year-old male was referred for a positron emission tomography (PET) scan using F-18 fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) for evaluation of a right lung opacity identified on a computed tomography (CT) scan. The patient also had a history of idiopathic myelofibrosis. The PET scan revealed markedly increased uptake throughout the spleen and liver, which were massively enlarged. There was also significantly increased uptake diffusely throughout the bone marrow. These findings are a reflection of the patient's myelofibrosis.

Use of a decision analysis model to assess the medicoeconomic implications of FDG PET imaging in diagnosing a solitary pulmonary nodule

This study assessed the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in identifying and diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). For this a decision analysis model was constructed, and three alternatives were compared: wait and watch (WW), PET and anatomical computed tomography (PET), and CT plus PET (CT+PET). Transition probabilities were estimated from published data and consultations with experts. Costs of diagnosis were derived from the French reimbursement scale, and treatment costs from a national hospital database of diagnosis-related groups. The base case was defined as a 65-year-old male smoker with a 2-cm SPN and an associated high risk of malignancy of 43%. Evaluation criteria included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and the proportion of unnecessary operations avoided in patients without malignant SPN. For the base case WW was the least effective and cheapest strategy. CT+PET was more effective and presented lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (<euro>3,022 per life-year gained). It also was superior to PET in cost-effectiveness terms and resulted in 4.3% fewer unnecessary resections of benign SPN than did PET. Risk profile analyses performed on SPN malignancy risk showed that CT + PET remains the most cost-effective strategy in the range of 5.7-87%, and that WW is more cost-effective in the range of 0.3-5.0%. CT+PET is thus cost-effective in detecting malignant SPN in patients with a risk of malignity of at least 5.7% and may avoid inappropriate resections of benign SPN. These findings support the attempts to introduce a larger number of PETs in France for SPN diagnosis.

Hexokinase-II expression in untreated oral squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison with FDG PET imaging

Hexokinase is thought to be one of the key factors of glucose catabolism in the cell. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between HK-II expression and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in human untreated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Pre-operatively FDG positron emission tomography (PET) was performed 60 min after FDG injection in all the patients. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was used for evaluation of tumor FDG uptake. Tumor sections were stained immunohistochemically for HK-II. All the tumor sections stained positive for HK-II. Eighteen (95%) tumors in HK-II showed immunostained positive area >50%. HK-II findings revealed eleven (58%) tumors with strong intensity, six (32%) with moderate intensity and two with weak intensity (10%). There was no statistically significant correlation between SUV and the expression of HK-II (p = 0.46). In conclusion, OSCC showed increased FDG accumulation and overexpression of HK-II. However, we did not find any significant relationship between high FDG uptake and overexpression of HK-II in this patient population, and thus other properties need to be evaluated in order to elucidate key factors responsible for FDG activity in OSCC.

Coincidence Planar Imaging for Dynamic [ 18F]FDG Uptake in Nude Mice with Tumors and Inflammation: Correlated With Histopathology and Micro-autoradiography

The Institute of Nuclear Energy Research of Taiwan has developed a dynamic coincidence detection device for positron emitted radiotracer pharmacodynamic study in small mice models. In this study, we set up an experimental paradigm by determining [fluorine-18]-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) dynamic uptake in tumors and inflammations in nude mice as the foundation for future applications in therapy development. Histopathology and micro-autoradiography of these tumors and inflammations were obtained for confirmation. Dynamic coincidence planar images of six tumors and two inflammations in nude mice were acquired over 4 hours immediately after injection of 25.9 MBq of [18F]FDG into the right thigh of each animal. After image reconstruction, the lesion-to-background ratios were calculated in regions of interest over the lesion and contralateral thigh to determine the equilibrium status of the radiotracer. All mice were sacrificed for histopathologic examination and six of the mice were examined with micro-autoradiography. [18F]FDG uptake in tumors and inflammations both reached equilibrium about 3 hours after injection. At equilibrium, [18F]FDG uptake into tumors was two to four times higher than the background. Uptake into the 4-day and 8-day inflammations was 2.3 and 5.5 times higher than the background, respectively. Histopathology showed macrophage and neutrophil infiltration around the tumors and in the inflammations. Micro-autoradiography showed dense silver grains in the granulation tissue surrounding the tumors and inflammations. The preliminary results suggested that dynamic [18F]FDG coincidence planar imaging can help in determining the suitable time for static [18F]FDG imaging in nude mice models. The optimal time for static [18F]FDG positron emission tomography imaging was around 3 hours after injection. The paradigm for determining a dynamic [18F]FDG uptake pattern was demonstrated for future new therapeutic drug experimental use.

Multimodality Imaging

Noninvasive “multimodal” in vivo imaging is not just becoming standard practice in the clinic, but is rapidly changing the evolving field of experimental imaging of genetic expression (“molecular imaging”). The development of multimodality methodology based on nuclear medicine (NM), positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and optical imaging is the single biggest focus in many imaging and cancer centers worldwide and is bringing together researchers and engineers from the far-ranging fields of molecular pharmacology to nanotechnology engineering. The rapid growth of in vivo multimodality imaging arises from the convergence of established fields of in vivo imaging technologies with molecular and cell biology. The cross-pollination of these disciplines has been accelerated in part by the establishment of the National Institutes of Health NCI P20 and P50 awards, for example, and by the sheer potential of the technology. Multimodality imaging is widely considered to involve the incorporation of two or more imaging modalities, usually within the setting of a single examination using, for example, dual- or triple-labeled optical or nuclear medicine “reporter” agents or by performing ultrasound or optical studies within the MR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or x-ray computed tomography (CT) environment. Clinically, the best example of multimodality imaging is seen in the rapid evolution of PET-SPECT and PET-CT scanner hybrids. The PET modality has developed into perhaps the most used “multimodal” imaging method. The incorporation of PET into single, hybrid, and multimodality units to provide functional (typically from injected F-18DG studies) and anatomic information is becoming extremely popular,1–2 so much so that, for example, PET/CT hybrids can be found in outpatient screening centers located in shopping malls. The role of any multimodal imaging …

PET studies in dementia.

Measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolism (lCMRGlc) by positron emission tomography (PET) and 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has become a standard technique during the past 20 years and is now available at many university hospitals in all highly developed countries. Many studies have documented a close relation between lCMRGlc and localized cognitive functions, such as language and visuoconstructive abilities. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by regional impairment of cerebral glucose metabolism in neocortical association areas (posterior cingulate, temporoparietal and frontal multimodal association cortex), whereas primary visual and sensorimotor cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum are relatively well preserved. In a multicenter study comprising 10 PET centers (Network for Efficiency and Standardisation of Dementia Diagnosis, NEST-DD) that employed an automated voxel-based analysis of FDG PET images, the distinction between controls and AD patients was 93% sensitive and 93% specific, and even in very mild dementia (at MMSE 24 or higher) sensitivity was still 84% at 93% specificity. Significantly abnormal metabolism in mild cognitive deficit (MCI) indicates a high risk to develop dementia within the next two years. Reduced neocortical glucose metabolism can probably be detected with FDG PET in AD on average one year before onset of subjective cognitive impairment. In addition to glucose metabolism, specific tracers for dopamine synthesis (18F-F-DOPA) and for (11C-MP4A) are of interest for differentiation among dementia subtypes. Cortical acetylcholine esterase activity (AChE) activity is significantly lower in patients with AD or with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) than in age-matched normal controls. In LBD there is also impairment of dopamine synthesis, similar to Parkinson disease.

Interaction of Colony-Stimulating Factors and Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Positron Emission Tomography

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate reports of altered diagnostic images with fluorodeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) after treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs).DATA SOURCES:Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search (1966–December 2001). Key search terms included granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte—macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, fluorodeoxyglucose, and emission-computed tomography. English language literature was reviewed.DATA SYNTHESIS:Reports have suggested altered FDG PET images following CSF treatment. Studies that assessed the effect of CSF administration on FDG PET imaging of the bone and bone marrow were reviewed.CONCLUSIONS:Administration of CSFs may interfere with accurate FDG PET imaging. Separating FDG PET imaging from CSF therapy by ≥5 days may diminish this interference.

Interaction of colony-stimulating factors and fluorodeoxyglucose f(18) positron emission tomography.

To evaluate reports of altered diagnostic images with fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) after treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-December 2001). Key search terms included granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, fluorodeoxyglucose, and emission-computed tomography. English language literature was reviewed. Reports have suggested altered FDG PET images following CSF treatment. Studies that assessed the effect of CSF administration on FDG PET imaging of the bone and bone marrow were reviewed. Administration of CSFs may interfere with accurate FDG PET imaging. Separating FDG PET imaging from CSF therapy by >/=5 days may diminish this interference.

Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas.

The purpose of our study was to investigate the potential of FDG positron emission tomography (PET) to distinguish viable tumor from changes caused by therapy in areas with equivocal MR imaging findings in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas. We evaluated 12 patients (nine males, three females; age range, 9-56 years; mean age, 25 years) with a history of bone or soft-tissue sarcoma who had undergone various treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of treatments) and who presented with clinically suspected recurrent or residual tumor. All patients underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and whole-body FDG PET. Imaging results were correlated with histologic findings or with clinical findings from long-term follow-up. In nine patients, MR imaging findings were equivocal in differentiating between posttherapeutic changes and tumor recurrence. FDG PET images showed increased uptake, suggestive of recurrent tumor, in five patients. These findings were confirmed by biopsy. Four patients showed no increased uptake on FDG PET and were closely monitored clinically. No tumor recurrence was found in these patients. One patient showed MR imaging findings suggestive of recurrent tumor that was confirmed on FDG PET and at histology. Two patients underwent a limb salvage procedure before MR imaging, but MR images were deemed inadequate for interpretation because of extensive metallic artifacts. FDG PET was helpful in evaluating these patients for tumor recurrence. FDG PET is a useful adjunct to MR imaging in distinguishing viable tumor from posttherapeutic changes in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.

The impact of FDG positron emission tomography imaging on the management of lymphomas.

The role of 2-(F-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in the management of patients with lymphoma has been evaluated. 29 patients (12 Hodgkin's disease, 17 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)) who underwent FDG-PET imaging during their lymphoma treatment programme were reviewed retrospectively. Correlation between FDG-PET and CT was evaluated, together with the impact upon clinical management of the findings on FDG-PET imaging. FDG-PET added extra information to the findings on clinical examination and CT in 12 patients (41%). This was seen both in patients with negative and positive CT scan. Two false positive FDG-PET scans were seen, reflecting FDG uptake in extranodal sites. Information from FDG-PET imaging resulted in a change in clinical management in 10 patients (34%); in two, initial management was altered, and in eight consolidation therapy after completion of initial chemotherapy was influenced. These changes in clinical management occurred in six patients with high grade NHL, two with low grade NHL and two with Hodgkin's disease. No specific subgroup was identified in whom FDG-PET was particularly discriminant.

Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

To determine whether [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ([(18)F]-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) can predict the pathologic response of primary and metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Thirty patients with noninflammatory, large (> 3 cm), or locally advanced breast cancers received eight doses of primary chemotherapy. Dynamic PET imaging was performed immediately before the first, second, and fifth doses and after the last dose of treatment. Primary tumors and involved axillary lymph nodes were identified, and the [(18)F]-FDG uptake values were calculated (expressed as semiquantitative dose uptake ratio [DUR] and influx constant [K]). Pathologic response was determined after chemotherapy by evaluation of surgical resection specimens. Thirty-one primary breast lesions were identified. The mean pretreatment DUR values of the eight lesions that achieved a complete microscopic pathologic response were significantly (P =.037) higher than those from less responsive lesions. The mean reduction in DUR after the first pulse of chemotherapy was significantly greater in lesions that achieved a partial (P =.013), complete macroscopic (P =.003), or complete microscopic (P =.001) pathologic response. PET after a single pulse of chemotherapy was able to predict complete pathologic response with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 74%. Eleven patients had pathologic evidence of lymph node metastases. Mean pretreatment DUR values in the metastatic lesions that responded did not differ significantly from those that failed to respond (P =.076). However, mean pretreatment K values were significantly higher in ultimately responsive cancers (P =.037). The mean change in DUR and K after the first pulse of chemotherapy was significantly greater in responding lesions (DUR, P =.038; K, P =.012). [(18)F]-FDG PET imaging of primary and metastatic breast cancer after a single pulse of chemotherapy may be of value in the prediction of pathologic treatment response.

Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

We determined the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for patients with treated lung cancer. We examined patients who underwent FDG PET after first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. FDG PET results were correlated with survival rates to determine whether FDG PET findings were predictive of outcomes. After initial therapy, 113 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent FDG PET. One hundred patients had positive FDG PET results and a median survival of 12 months (95% confidence interval, 9.2-15.4). Thirteen patients had negative FDG PET results, and 11 (85%) of these patients are still living at a median follow-up of 34 months. The difference in survival for patients with positive and negative FDG PET results was statistically significant (p = 0.002). FDG PET has prognostic value and strongly correlates with survival rates of patients with treated lung cancer. Patients with positive FDG PET results have a significantly worse prognosis than patients with negative results. Additionally, FDG PET may be helpful in guiding therapeutic treatments.

Attenuation-corrected 99mTc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography in the detection of viable myocardium: comparison with positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of attenuation-corrected (AC) technetium-99m (99mTc)-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in detecting viable myocardium compared to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET).Background. The role of 99mTc-labeled perfusion tracers in the assessment of myocardial viability remains controversial. Attenuation artifacts affect the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT images.Methods. Twenty-four patients with coronary artery disease (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30%) underwent resting 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT and FDG PET imaging. Both AC and non–attenuation-corrected (NC) SPECT images were generated.Results. Using a 50% threshold for viability by FDG PET, the percentage of concordant segments of viability between 99mTc-tetrofosmin and FDG on the patient basis increased from 79.8% ± 14.0% (mean ± SD) on the NC images to 90.8% ± 10.6% on the AC images (p = 0.002). The percentage of 99mTc-tetrofosmin defect segments within PET-viable segments, an estimate for the degree of underestimation of viability, decreased from 19.8% ± 15.2% on the NC images to 9.7% ± 12.6% on the AC images (p = 0.01). Similar results were obtained when a 60% threshold was used to define viability by FDG PET. When the anterior-lateral and inferior-septal regions were separately analyzed, the effect of attenuation correction was significant only in the inferior-septal region.Conclusions. The results indicate that AC 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT improves the detection of viable myocardium mainly by decreasing the underestimation of viability particularly in the inferior-septal region, although some underestimation/overestimation of viability may still occur even with attenuation correction.

Imaging of oncologic patients: benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy.

The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of combined CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in diagnosing malignancy. The records of 26 patients with intraabdominal and intrathoracic neoplasms who underwent CT and FDG PET between January 1995 and September 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Most of these patients had inconclusive findings on prior CT for the diagnosis of malignancy. Only sites of potential malignant disease were included in the data analysis. Presence or absence of malignancy was confirmed by histopathology or follow-up CT. Three observers experienced in abdominal imaging used CT findings alone to estimate level of suspicion (1 = definitely not malignant to 5 = definitely malignant) for primary or recurrent neoplasms (n = 21), distant metastases (n = 25), and neoplastic nodal involvement (n = 18). Six weeks later the three observers reviewed the same CT examinations supplemented with FDG PET and reestimated suspicion of malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic methodology was used to analyze the results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in diagnosis of malignant disease were calculated using level 4 (probable malignancy) as the cutoff for the presence of disease. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, indicating successful diagnosis of malignancy, was .82 for CT alone and .92 for CT with FDG PET (p < .05). The accuracies for diagnosis of primary or recurrent neoplasms, distant metastases, and neoplastic nodal involvement were 62%, 68%, and 83%, respectively, for CT alone and 81% (p = .06), 88% (p = .03), and 89% (p > .25), respectively, for CT with FDG PET. Also, supplemental FDG PET imaging improved observer confidence and accuracy in diagnosing recurrent neoplasm in four (36%) of 11 patients who had undergone surgery or chemoradiation and in diagnosing four (29%) of 14 extrahepatic sites that had potential metastases. Diagnosis of malignancy in oncologic patients is significantly improved when CT is supplemented with FDG PET. Combined imaging is particularly helpful in the evaluation of potential recurrence in previously treated patients and for diagnosing extrahepatic lesions that may be distant metastases.

Positron emission tomography to stage suspected metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver

Accurate detection of recurrent colorectal carcinoma remains a clinical challenge. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) is an imaging technique that allows direct evaluation of cellular metabolism. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET was compared to computed tomography (CT) and CT portography for staging metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Twenty-four patients previously treated for colorectal carcinoma who had suspected recurrence to the liver underwent an 18FDG PET scan of the entire body. All patients had either a CT scan of the abdomen (n = 17), a CT portogram (n = 18), or both (n = 11). The final diagnosis was obtained by tissue pathology in 19 patients and clinical follow-up in 5 patients. A total of 60 suspicious lesions were identified. Of the 55 intrahepatic lesions, 39 were malignant and 16 were benign. Of the 5 extra-hepatic lesions, 4 were malignant. The 18FDG PET imaging had a higher accuracy (93%) than CT and CT portography (both 76%) in detecting metastatic disease to the liver, and detected unsuspected extrahepatic recurrence in 4 patients. Although the sensitivity of 18FDG PET (90%) was slightly lower than that of CT portography (97%), the specificity was much higher (100% versus 9%), including postsurgical sites. 18FDG PET altered surgical plans in 6 (25%) of 24 patients. 18FDG PET is extremely useful in staging patients with suspected metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver.