Four different conductive supports are analysed regarding their suitability forcombined atomic force and scanning electrochemical microscopy (AFM–SECM)on biological membranes. Highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG),MoS2, template stripped gold, and template stripped platinum are compared as supports forhigh resolution imaging of reconstituted membrane proteins or native membranes, and aselectrodes for transferring electrons from or to a redox molecule. We demonstrate that highresolution topographs of the bacterial outer membrane protein F can be recorded by contactmode AFM on all four supports. Electrochemical feedback experiments with conductivecantilevers that feature nanometre-scale electrodes showed fast re-oxidation of the redox coupleRu(NH3)63+/2+ with the two metal supports after prolonged immersion in electrolyte. In contrast,the re-oxidation rates decayed quickly to unpractical levels with HOPG orMoS2 under physiological conditions. On HOPG we observed heterogeneity in the re-oxidationrate of the redox molecules with higher feedback currents at step edges. Thelatter results demonstrate the capability of conductive cantilevers with smallelectrodes to measure minor variations in an SECM signal and to relate themto nanometre-scale features in a simultaneously recorded AFM topography.Rapid decay of re-oxidation rate and surface heterogeneity make HOPG orMoS2 less attractive for combined AFM–SECM experiments on biological membranes thantemplate stripped gold or platinum supports.
Read full abstract