580 Reviews Rezensionen wurden seine Visiten- und Eintrittskarten zum gebildeten GrofBbir gertum', P. 43). He sheds light on Hesse's time as"co-editor of the journal Mdrz (I 907-I 7),when he took a decidedly critical view ofWilhelmine society, and focuses on Hesse's most prolific years as a reviewer in the journal Vivos voco from I9I9 till I924, when he not only engaged with thecultural andmoral chaos following theFirst World War but also confronted his own growing doubts about his aesthetic precepts. It is at this time, as Schickling rightlypoints out, thatHesse begins to acknowledge thevalue of 'alternative' literature,be it thenew formof expressionism or, in the case ofKarl May, pure escapism. Schickling devotes considerable space to Hesse's crucial role as 'moralische Instanz' before and during theNational Socialist period, singling out Hesse's early denuncia tionof anti-Semitism in a review in I922 of Wilhelm Michel's Verrat amDeutschtum. In the 1930S Hesse responded to the increasing 'Gleichschaltung' and lack of op portunities for independent expression with amarked increase inhis production, as a means of keeping in touch with the 'geistige Elite'. With the help of staffat the Neue Rundschau, forexample, he circumvented censorship by placing his review of Aldous Huxley's vision of a totalitarian society inBrave New World in an advertising brochure of the S. Fischer Verlag. Schickling reminds us of thecourage Hesse showed in facing down Goebbels's Rottweilers: 'Kein Kritiker vor ihm,und keiner nach ihm hat inderNeuen Rundschau derart deutliche Worte zum Zeitgeschehen gefunden wie Hesse in seinen Sammelrezensionen' (p. I36).When all his usual outlets inGermany dried up,Hesse, now openly critical of theNazis, published his reviews in theSwedish Bonniers Litterdra Magasin. From March I935 to September 1936 he produced six Sammelrezensionen and recommended i96 books, many written by Jews or emigrants. Schickling challenges JosephMileck's view thatHesse used his reviews as an outlet when his own books were not progressing. Instead, he argues, Hesse wrote his reviews out of a strong sense of duty, reacting to an increasing tendency among the 'chattering classes' to view books as a commodity or as something ephemeral. For Hesse, who viewed literature as confession, artwas always theother place: a refuge for the reader. His reviews emerge as thepersonal diary of a voracious reader,written for thebenefit of themany. They served as encouragement tohis fellowwriters, and as justification of his own choice tobecome awriter. This study is a substantial contribution to thehistory ofGerman literarycriticism and certainlywhets the appetite for reading Hesse's reviews afresh. UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS INGOCORNILS Exile and Otherness: New Approaches to theExperience of the Nazi Refugees. Ed. by ALEXANDER STEPHAN. (Exile Studies, iI) Oxford and Bern: Peter Lang. 2005. 3IOPP. ?36; SwF 8o; S55;$6i.95. ISBN 978-3-039IO-56I-8. Earlier volumes in the series 'Exile Studies' focused on standard approaches to ex ile such asMexico in thework of Bodo Uhse; ormore recently, reflecting the exile language-switching problem, English-language fictionbyGerman-speaking exiles in Great Britain, 1933-45 (Nicole Brunnhuber, The Faces of Janus: English-Language Fiction byGerman-Speaking Exiles inGreat Britain, I933-1945 (Oxford and Bern: Peter Lang, 2005), reviewed in MLR, 102 (2007), 283-84). The papers collected in thepresent volume come from theconference held in May 2004 at theOhio State Uni versity.The new approaches are both theoretical and comparative: indeed, the first paper is on comparative literature in exile and isdevoted toEdward Said and Erich Auerbach. There isa great deal ofSaid in thisvolume and therefore much on diaspora, delocalization, hybridity, and marginalization. As far asAuerbach inTurkey is con cerned, thequestion ofwhether his great workMimesis was the result of the absence MLR, 102.2, 2007 58I of library resources orwhether exile inTurkey was an alienating advantage isonly the starting-point for the discussion. Auerbach and Leo Spitzer were not the only Ger mans inTurkish universities at this time. In the next essay Thomas Pekar attempts a comparison of exile works byAnna Seghers and Thomas Mann and early post-war works by Hermann Kasack and Elisabeth Langgasser, focusing on experiences of delocalization and katabasis (the visit to the land of the dead, themost extreme form of delocalization). Susanne Wiedemann's paper is on how German-Jewish...
Read full abstract