Using case studies (with names redacted for confidentiality of victims), based on relief workers’ experience in Taiwan and Cambodia as “importing countries” (the “Southeast Asian Story”), the Article analogizes the victims of human trafficking to a group of forgotten “prisoners of conscience” found at the heart of modern society’s human rights dilemma. Yet, as the Article points out, there is no Amnesty International to advocate and apply pressure upon governments for the “rescue” of these victims. There are a good number of volunteers, activists, church organizations, and NGO/INGOs (many of which receive U.S. Department of State’s funding), which specialize in providing relief to victims and in pursuing advocacy on their behalf. However, their efforts are not well coordinated.This Article examines the doctrine of state responsibility in international law and the resulting role of governments, and proposes a concrete agenda for the anti-human trafficking NGO/INGOs, including lobbying domestic and international lawmakers. The Article argues that human trafficking should considered a crime against humanity, and that an effective enforcement mechanism for the state responsibility doctrine can serve as an effective means to combat human trafficking. The Article also argues that by aiding and abetting traffickers, or failing to act or coming to the rescue of victims, governments step into the shoes of traffickers and indirectly commit the crime against their own citizens, aliens found in their territories, or simply citizens of the world. Since the crime is a human rights violation, governments have violated international law, which can form the basis for private causes of action for the victims, under certain systems of domestic law such as the United States’ Alien Tort Claims Act. Such an enforcement mechanism must combine (i) a regional or international convention system, with (ii) strong national law systems in which a combination of both consumption and trafficking of child prostitution, for example, should be made a first or second degree felony. In “superpower” countries, such a strong national law system must be made to have extraterritorial effect, establishing jurisdiction over actions beyond the countries’ borders.In conclusion, the Article suggests that the anti-human trafficking NGO/INGOs join forces and share expertise in preparation for an integrated, collective “Amnesty International” model – one that combines and strengthens the voices of NGO/INGOs in the eradication and deterrence of global human trafficking. This collective “Amnesty model” acts as the non-governmental “voice of conscience” that can become the “public opinion” monitor over the conduct and policies of governments. The Article urges this future “Amnesty model” to focus on collective lobbying toward the formation of a workable legal enforcement mechanism for the doctrine of state responsibility. The doctrine, when put to work in a well designed global enforcement regime, will provide the watchdog for the conduct of the “importing, exporting, and consuming countries” in the human trafficking scenario.