Extracorporeal Anastomosis Research Articles

Laparoscopic Assisted Total Gastrectomy (LATG) with Extracorporeal Anastomosis and using Circular Stapler for Middle or Upper Early Gastric Carcinoma: Reviews of Single Surgeon's Experience of 48 Consecutive Patients

Purpose: Many recent studies have reported on the feasibility and usefulness of laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for treating early gastric cancer. On the other hand, there has been few reports about laparoscopy assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) because upper located gastric cancer is relatively rare and the surgical technique is more difficult than that for LADG, We now present our procedure and results of performing LATG for the gastric cancer located in the upper or middle portion of the stomach. Materials and Methods: From Jan 2005 to Sep 2007, 96 patients underwent LATG by four surgeons at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Among them, 48 consecutive patients who were operated on by asingle surgeon were analyzed with respect to the clinicopathological features, the surgical results and the postoperative courses with using the prospectively collected laparoscopy surgery data. Results: There was no conversion to open surgery during LATG. For all the reconstructions, Roux-en Y esophago-jejunostomy and D1+beta lymphadenectomy were the standard procedures. The mean operation time was minutes. The mean total number of retrieved lymph nodes was (range: ) and all the patients had a clear proximal resection margin in their final pathologic reports. The mean time to passing gas, first oral feeding and discharge from the hospital was 2.98, 3.67 and 7.08 days, respectively. There were 5 surgical complications and 2 non-surgical complications for 5 (10.4%) patients, and there was no mortality. None of the patients needed operation because of complications and they recovered with conservative treatments. The mean operation time remained constant after 20 cases and so a learning curve was present. The morbidity rate was not different between the two periods, but the postoperative course was significantly better after the learning curve. Analysis of the factors contributing to the postoperative morbidity, with using logistic regression analysis, showed that the 8MI is the only contributing factor forpostoperative complications (P=0.029, HR=2.513, 95% CI=1.097-5.755). Conclusions: LATG with regional lymph node dissection for upper and middle early gastric cancer is considered to be a safe, feasible method that showed an excellent postoperative course and acceptable morbidity. BMI should be considered in the patient selection at the beginning period because of the impact of the BMI on the postoperative morbidity.

Not Available

A prospective audit of all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with the intention of primary colonic left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomosis to identify the clinical anastomotic leak rate on an intention to treat basis. All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulting in left-sided stapled anastomosis were included. All operations were conducted by the same surgical team with the same pre-operative preparation and surgical technique. The factors analysed for this audit were patient demographics (age and sex), indication for operation, procedure performed, height of anastomosis, leak rate and the outcome, inpatient stay, mortality, rate of defunctioning stomas, and rate of conversion to open procedure. Eighty-four patients (49 females, 35 males; median age 70 years, range 19-89 years) underwent colonic procedures with left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomosis. An intra-operative air leak was evident in one patient, whose anastomosis was oversewn intracorporeally and defunctioned by ileostomy. There were only two clinically evident anastomotic leaks post-operatively (2.9%). One patient died of overwhelming sepsis within 48h of re-operation: Seven patients (8.3%) had a primary defunctioning stoma, with two further stomas formed due to anastomotic leakage. Five cases (6%) were converted to open surgery. The median post-operative stay was six days, range 2-23. Thirty-day mortality was 50% in the leak group and 0% in the non-leak group. We believe that this study demonstrates that the anastomotic leak rate from intra-corporeal laparoscopic anastomosis is no greater than for open surgery or laparoscopic surgery with extra-corporeal anastomosis.

Ipsilateral Placement in Double-Kidney Transplantation

Ipsilateral placement of double kidneys from marginal donors into older recipients may reduce the stress of the operation on the patient and allow for extension of the utility of older donor kidneys. A separate bench preparation of the kidneys is performed to aid in assessing the quality of the kidneys before placement in the recipient. Multiple renal arteries and proximal calcifications may require extracorporeal anastomosis or multiple anastomoses in the recipient depending on length and size of the renal vessels. In the recipient, the incision should allow complete dissection of the common external and internal iliac arteries. This report provides a detail of the technique used for ipsilateral placement of double kidneys.

Low Incidence of Adhesion-Related Bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Postoperative adhesions are a major cause of morbidity, accounting for approximately 5% of the readmissions of surgical patients. Bowel obstruction is attributed to adhesions in more than half of the cases, many of which are following colon and rectal surgery. Laparoscopic surgery has the potential advantage of reduced adhesion formation owing to attenuated surgical trauma, less tissue handling, and smaller scars. However, the translation of these advantages to a reduced rate of bowel obstruction has not been sufficiently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of adhesion-related bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. Data regarding all cases of laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery were prospectively collected. Information relative to demographics, surgical procedures, and follow-up was analyzed, and patients who were readmitted for bowel obstruction were identified. Over a period of 8 years, 306 patients, at a mean age of 63 years, had a laparoscopic colon and rectal operation in our department-122 for benign conditions and 184 for malignant disease. The mean length of follow-up was 38 months. Six cases (2%) of bowel obstruction, which were unrelated to hernia or advanced cancer, were identified. Two patients had a history of open surgery, in addition to the laparoscopic procedure, so adhesions could be attributed solely to the laparoscopic procedure in 4 patients, which consisted of 1.3% of the total study group. Obstruction occurred within 2 weeks of surgery in 2 patients, and one early reoperation was required. The incidence of adhesion ileus after laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery appears to be very low. This long-term benefit of laparoscopic surgery should be considered when comparing this technique to its open counterpart.

Intracorporeal Laparoscopic Cecorectal Anastomosis

We recently described a laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with extracorporeal antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (CRA). We modified this technique by performing an intracorporeal CRA: the anvil head assembly removed from the circular stapler with an ancillary trocar placed into the anvil shaft is pushed through the bottom of the cecum, the cecum with the anvil head assembly is brought into the pelvis, the circular stapler is inserted into the rectum and the cecoproctostomy is performed. Two patients underwent this new laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with CRA. The operating times were 230 and 260 minutes, respectively. There was no postoperative morbidity. Our results allow us to state that intracorporeally performed antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy is feasible.

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy

This study compared the experience and cost of the DaVinci Robotic system and laparoscopy for colon resections. For this study, 30 consecutive robotic and 27 consecutive laparoscopic colectomies were divided into right and sigmoid colectomies for analysis. Comparisons included indications for surgery, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, operating room (OR) cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, OR time cost, and total hospital cost. The comparison groups were similar in indications for surgery, gender, age, BMI, EBL, and LOS. The right colectomies included 17 robotic and 15 laparoscopic procedures. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the robotic cases, and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the laparoscopic cases. The total case time was 218.9 min for the robotic and 169.2 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.002). The total hospital cost was $9,255 for the robotic and $8,073 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.430). The total OR cost was $5,823 for the robotic and $4,339 for the laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.000). The sigmoid colectomies included 13 robotic and 12 laparoscopic procedures. The robotic and laparoscopic cases were managed in similar sequence. The total case time was 225.2 min for the robotic and 199.4 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.128). The total hospital cost was $12,335 for the robotic and $10,697 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.735). The total OR cost was $6,059 for the robotic and $4,974 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.068). The complications in the robotic groups were more numerous, but were not attributable to equipment. The comparison groups were similar. The robotic cases were significantly longer for right colectomies because of the intracorporeal anastomosis instead of the extracorporeal anastomosis performed in the laparoscopy cases. Every cost category was higher for the robotic cases. The right colectomies showed significant increases in total OR cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, and OR time cost. The sigmoid colectomies had significant increases in OR personnel cost and OR supply cost. The total hospital cost was higher for the robotic groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Gastrectomía laparoscópica en el tratamiento del cáncer gástrico

To present our initial results in the laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer. Between March 2002 and June 2005, 12 selected patients with resectable distal gastric cancer and oncological indication for radical treatment underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. There were 9 men and 3 women. The mean age was 62.6 years (range: 45-78). Ten D2 subtotal gastrectomies, with B-II reconstruction in 7 and B-III reconstruction in the remaining 3, were performed. In 6 patients, reconstruction was performed entirely by laparoscopy, while in the remaining 4 patients extracorporeal reconstruction was performed. Two total gastrectomies were performed: one was performed entirely by laparoscopy while in the other, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy with extracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis was carried out. The mean operating time was 197.6 +/- 36.9 (130-260) minutes, although mean operating time was 142.5 minutes in the subgroup that underwent subtotal gastrectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis compared with 190.8 minutes when totally laparoscopic anastomosis was performed (p < 0.002). There were no intraoperative complications or conversions. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients: postoperative ileus for 7 days in 1 patient, intra-abdominal abscess requiring laparotomy in 1 patient and esophagojejunal anastomotic leak that resolved without reintervention in a third patient. Oral intake was reinitiated at 72 hours in 9 patients, while a further 2 required 5 days and the patient with postoperative ileus required 8 days. The mean length of postoperative stay was 10.7 +/- 7.3 (6-28) days. The mean number of resected nodes was 21.3 +/- 5 (16-31). There was 1 locoregional recurrence at 14 months in a patient with stage IIIB tumor after a mean follow-up of 25.8 months (4-73). Laparoscopic gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer is technically feasible and is an alternative to open surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality and oncological effectiveness when performed by teams with experience in laparoscopy and with appropriate patient selection.

Crohn's Disease in Children. Preliminary Experience with a Laparoscopic Approach

Laparoscopic surgery in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) has been demonstrated to have advantages over a conventional approach in children. The aim of this study was to review the children treated for CD with a laparoscopic approach, to report our indications, the surgical procedure, the complications, and to compare the children with pancolitis or ileocaecal (segmental) Crohn's disease. We reviewed the files of 11 children treated for CD in a single institution between 1999 and 2004 for a retrospective study of clinical and surgical data. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical analysis of nonparametric data. Eleven children were operated. The average age when initial clinical symptoms became apparent was 12.1 years (range 6.6 - 15), and surgery was performed after an average of 3.4 years of disease (range 1 - 7.6). The surgical indications were stenosis in 6 cases, failure to thrive in 1 case (segmental CD, SCD group) and pancolitis refractory to medical treatment in 4 cases (pancolitis group, PCD group). Mean operative time was 207 minutes (range 140 - 270) for the SCD group and 285 minutes (range 260 - 300) for the PCD group (p < 0.05). Three cases needed a conversion to open surgery (2 in PCD group, one in SCD group), mainly in relation to anastomosis performed with an EEA stapler. The average length of surgical unit stay was 6.5 days (range 4 - 8) for the PCD group and 6.4 days (range 4 - 8) for the SCD group; average follow-up was 16 months (range 3 - 38). Two patients had a relapse of CD (stenosis of the anastomosis in one, skin fistula in the other). A laparoscopic approach for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease is a feasible procedure, even in cases of pancolitis. We recommend an extra-corporeal anastomosis because, in relation to the inflammatory bowel, the mechanical anastomosis is not a safe procedure in cases of pancolitis.

Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy

The role of laparoscopic colon resection in the management of colon cancer is still controversial. In this article, the surgical strategy and techniques are described, with further consideration of the oncologically relevant aspects. Between March 1993 and July 2003, we performed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in 56 patients with right colon carcinoma. Average age was 74.5 years (range, 17-92). We performed a standardized surgical procedure that included mobilization from the vascularized mesenteric bridges with a window technique, transection of the ileocolic lymphovascular pedicle, and lateral and proximal mobilization of the ileocecum, ascending colon, right flexure, and proximale transversum. After enlargement of one of the trocar incisions the exteriorized colon was resected and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the standard manner. There were no conversions to open. The mean operating time was 119 +/- 38 min, the mean length of resected colon was 27.8 +/- 4.48 cm, and the average width of the clear margins was 6.8 +/- 5.3 cm. One patient died. Lymph nodes were positive in 21 patients. The 5-year survival rate in the 48 patients who were operated on with curative intent was 75%. We have had two local recurrences. The overall 5-year mortality-free fraction was 63%. Cox multivariate analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were tumor stage and length of resected colon, whereas Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were positive lymph nodes and tumor stage. Our results show that laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer can be performed safely. Complications and recurrence rates are comparable to those for left-sided laparoscopic and open procedures. Therefore, we recommend this procedure as the method of choice. Laparoscopically treated patients with stage II and stage III disease have almost the same cumulative rate of survival.

Early outcomes of 100 patients with laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm

Laparoscopic resection has been shown to be a feasible option in patients with colorectal diseases. However, there have been only a few studies on laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm. This report aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of patients treated by laparoscopic rectal resection for neoplasm. From May 2000 to April 2003, 100 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm with mesorectal excision. Data on the patients' demographics, operative details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. In those with successful laparoscopic resection, comparison was made between patients with predominantly intracorporeal surgery (ICS) and those with anterior resection performed with extracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis following intracorporeal bowel mobilization and vessel ligation (IECS). Sixty-six men and 34 women (median age, 69 years; range, 40-85) were included. Operations included 91 anterior resections, eight abdominoperineal resections, and one Hartmann's procedure. Conversion was required in 15 patients and no conversion was needed in patients treated by laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. One patient died 30 days after surgery because of liver failure. Postoperative complications occurred in 31 patients. Among them, three had anastomotic leakage and all of them could be treated conservatively. Reoperation was required in one patient with intestinal obstruction. Patients with conversion were found to have significantly more blood loss, longer time to resume diet, a longer hospital stay, and a higher morbidity rate when compared to those with successful laparoscopic surgery. Among those with successful laparoscopic procedures, no difference was observed between patients with ICS (n = 57) and those with IECS (n = 28), except that a shorter incision and less blood loss were found in patients in the former group. Laparoscopic rectal resection with mesorectal dissection is feasible. The operating mortality and reoperation rates were low. Conversion was associated with an increased morbidity rate, leading to a longer hospital stay. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection with rectal transection by a transverse stapler through the abdominal incision produced similar results when compared to a procedure that was predominantly intracorporeally performed.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy has traversed three phases of distinct development. This review was designed to trace the evolution of hand-assisted colectomy from an infrequently used technique to a clinically useful surgical approach to diseases of the colon and rectum. This review compiles previously reported and published experiences with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy. During the first phase of development of hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy, surgeons explored what could be accomplished by a hand inserted into the abdomen through the specimen extraction site as an adjunct to laparoscopic techniques. Case reports and small trials found that manually assisted laparoscopic techniques permitted more rapid completion of laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. In the second phase, surgeons used early devices that facilitated the insertion of the surgeon's hand into the abdomen and helped to maintain the pneumoperitoneum. Larger series and small, randomized trials indicated a time-saving advantage to hand-assisted techniques and similar short-term outcomes as laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. In the current third phase, surgeons are using a new generation of hand-access devices that extend the options for hand-assisted techniques. These devices, like earlier devices, facilitate hand insertion, protect the wound, act as the retrieval site for the specimen, and serve as the portal for construction of extracorporeal anastomoses. In addition, these new devices can serve as laparoscopic trocar sites. This permits selective use of hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques at various times in the same operation. These new devices have not undergone clinical trials, and therefore, a final appraisal must await future publication of outcomes. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy has evolved into a clinically useful surgical technique. New devices facilitate the performance of these operations and permit the surgeon to switch between hand-assisted and laparoscopic techniques.

Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection in pediatric/adolescent inflammatory bowel disease: laparoscopic bowel resection in children.

The purpose of this study is to discuss indications, technical approach, and morbidity of laparoscopic approaches to major bowel resection in the pediatric/adolescent population with inflammatory bowel disease and familial polyposis. Retrospective review of laparoscopic-assisted bowel procedures between May 1991 and January 2002 was performed. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection is defined as complete intracorporeal mobilization and devascularization of a segment of colon or rectum. The indications for extracorporeal vs. intracorporeal anastomosis will be discussed. Clinically unstable, septic, or massively bleeding patients were not candidates for this technique. The decision to attempt the laparoscopic approach was based on the experience of the consulting surgeon. There were 31 patients, including 14 females. Five patients had undergone prior surgery. Twenty-nine patients had inflammatory bowel disease, one had familial polyposis, and one had a cavernous hemangioma. We included all pediatric/adolescent patients in our practice undergoing laparoscopic resection. Twenty-nine patients had 33 laparoscopic operations, including proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 14), proctocolectomy with ileostomy (n = 3), ileocolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis (n = 13), and small-bowel obstruction (n = 1). Average operating time was 158 (range, 30-400) minutes, with average blood loss of 159 ml. Average wound length was 4.9 cm. The complication rate was 16 percent (n = 5), with one anastomotic leak. The rate of conversion to open operations was 5.8 percent. Liquid diet was begun on Day 3, and the average length of stay was 5.9 days. Major laparoscopic bowel surgery can be performed safely in the pediatric/adolescent population, with reasonable operative times, low conversion to open operations, and low morbidity.

Laparoscopic segmental intestinal resection.

There are numerous disease processes in the pediatric population that require segmental intestinal resection with primary anastomosis. These include intestinal strictures from necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates, resection of congenital lesions such as a Meckel's diverticulum or intestinal webs, and strictures from inflammatory bowel disease. Whereas the treatment of these lesions previously required a major laparotomy, they now can be approached using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. Techniques from laparoscopic intestinal mobilization with extracorporeal resection and anastomosis to complete intracorporeal resection and anastomosis have been successfully developed for pediatric patients. The benefits are similar to those achieved from other laparoscopic procedures and include decreased postoperative pain and morbidity, reduced postoperative hospitalization and faster return to normal activity. Early experience suggests that the minimally invasive approach is acceptable and, perhaps, favorable in the treatment of segmental intestinal disease in infants and children.

Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: reasons for conversion.

To examine factors influencing conversion from a laparoscopic to an open procedure in patients requiring surgery for Crohn's disease. Laparoscopic management of patients with complications of Crohn's produces better outcomes than traditional open approaches, but it is difficult to determine before surgery who will be amenable to laparoscopic management. In this series, a laparoscopic approach was offered to virtually all patients to determine reasons for laparoscopic failure. Data regarding patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic procedures for Crohn's (January 1993 to June 2000) were collected prospectively. The bowel was mobilized laparoscopically and extracorporeal anastomoses were performed. Conversion to open surgery was defined as creation of an incision of more than 5 cm. One hundred ten patients (age 37 +/- 1.1 years, 58% female) underwent 113 attempted laparoscopic interventions. Indications for surgery included obstruction (77%), failure of medical management (35%), fistula (27%), and perineal sepsis (4%). Sixty-eight procedures (60%) were completed laparoscopically. Procedures completed laparoscopically included ileocecectomy (n = 46), small bowel resection (n = 22), fecal diversion (n = 7), intestinal stricturoplasty (n = 7), resection of prior ileocolonic anastomosis (n = 5), segmental colectomy (n = 1), and lysis of adhesions (n = 1). Forty-five procedures (40%) were converted as a result of adhesions (n = 21), extent of inflammation or disease (n = 9), size of the inflammatory mass (n = 7), inability to dissect a fistula (n = 5), or inability to assess anatomy (n = 3). Factors associated with conversion were internal fistula as an indication for surgery, smoking, steroid administration, extracecal colonic disease, and preoperative malnutrition. In laparoscopic patients, mean times to passage of flatus and first bowel movement were 3.6 +/- 0.2 days and 4.4 +/- 0.2 days, respectively. Mean time to discharge was 6 +/- 0.2 days. Attempted laparoscopic management is safe and effective if there is an appropriate threshold for conversion to an open procedure. Conversion factors identified in this study largely reflect technical challenge and severity of disease. Patients taking steroids and those with known fistulas or colonic involvement threaten laparoscopic failure, but many of these patients can be managed laparoscopically and have better outcomes. By understanding the reasons for conversion, it is hoped that the chances of laparoscopic success can be improved by modifying standard preoperative medical management or using additional technological capabilities (e.g., robotics).

Laparoscopically assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn's disease.

Experience with 94 resections in 88 patients with Crohn's disease using advanced laparoscopic techniques is reported. Records of patients who underwent intestinal resection for Crohn's disease between August, 1993 and November, 1998 were reviewed. Indications, operative findings, clinicopathologic, and postoperative data were recorded. In this study, the mean age was 37 years (range, 16-70 years), and 55% of the participants were women. Indications for surgery included obstruction (64 cases), pain (22 cases), peritonitis (1 case) and abscess (1 case). Seventy patients underwent ileocolic resection, 28 of whom had a previous history of one or two ileocolic resections. Eight of these patients had additional procedures including tubal ligation (1), sigmoidectomy (1), cholecystectomy (3 cases), and enterectomy (3 cases). Small bowel resection (13 cases), right hemicolectomy (3 cases), subtotal colectomy (3 cases), anterior rectal resection (2 cases), and sigmoid resection (3 cases) were performed in the remaining patients. All but one procedure were completed laparoscopically with extracorporeal anastomosis. The average length of intestine resected was 33 cm (range, 10-92 cm). Forty-one patients had 58 fistulae between ileum, jejunum, mesentery, colon, abdominal wall, skin, or bladder. Mean blood loss was 168 ml (range, 30-800 ml) and mean operative time was 183 min (range, 96-400 min). More than 85% of the patients were tolerating a liquid diet on the first postoperative day. Average length of hospital stay was 4.2 days (range, 3-11 days). Complications included anastomotic leak necessitating reoperation, stricture requiring endoscopic dilation, hemorrhage treated expectantly, urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolus, line sepsis, and early postoperative intestinal obstruction (7 cases) requiring reoperation in three cases. Experience with both advanced laparoscopic techniques and conventional surgery for inflammatory bowel disease allowed successful laparoscopic management of patients with complicated Crohn's disease.

Laparoscopic-assisted colon surgery by abdominal wall lifting with newly developed lifting bars.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted colon surgery by lifting the abdominal wall with newly developed lifting bars. We have made and used two kinds of lifting bars: type I and type T. Two I-type lifting bars are used in transverse colectomy and right hemicolectomy. One I-type lifting bar and one T-type bar are used in sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection. After the intestine is dissected and the mesenterium is treated under laparoscopy, a small laparotomy wound about 4 to 6 cm long is made, and the intestine is pulled out of the body for extracorporeal anastomosis. The mean operating time was 153.8 +/- 51.9 min, and no particular complications were noted. Since postoperative pain is mild and postoperative recovery is rapid, this method is considered to be an effective surgical procedure.

Is complete laparoscopic colectomy superior to laparoscopic assisted colectomy?: [formula omitted], JW Dawson, P Reissman, EG Weiss, JJ Nogueras, SD Wexner, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Much debate has centered around what constitutes a true laparoscopic colon resection. Purists argue that intracorporeal division of the mesentery and anastomosis confer a benefit over a "laparoscopic assisted" procedure. The aim of this study was to further examine this issue. Data were prospectively collected on 102 consecutive laparoscopic colon resections. Five procedures were converted to open cases and were excluded from analysis. Procedures were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 34) consisted of complete laparoscopic procedures (no abdominal incision was made): abdominoperineal resection (3), Hartmann's reversal (3), end colostomy (7), low anterior resection (5), proctectomy (1), sigmoid colectomy (15). Group 2 (n = 63) consisted of laparoscopic "assisted" procedures (i.e., an incision was made to facilitate anastomosis, division of the mesentery, and/or specimen retrieval): Ileocolic resection (6), restorative proctocolectomy (26), right colectomy (19), subtotal colectomy/end ileostomy (5), subtotal colectomy/ileorectal anastomosis (7). Length of hospitalization and duration of postoperative ileus were compared. A subset analysis of right colectomy (intracorporeal mobilization and extracorporeal division of the mesentery and anastomosis) versus sigmoid colectomy (intracorporeal mobilization, division of the mesentery and anastomosis) was also performed. There were no statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay (Group 1, 7.47 +/- 2.75 days; Group 2, 7.78 +/- 5.55 days) or duration of postoperative ileus (Group 1, 3.24 +/- 1.56 days; Group 2, 3.68 +/- 1.58 days). Similarly, in the sigmoid colectomy versus right colectomy subset analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay (sigmoid colectomy, 7.92 +/- 2.90 days; right colectomy, 6.40 +/- 1.50 days) or duration of postoperative ileus (sigmoid colectomy, 3.36 +/- 1.39 days; right colectomy, 3.18 +/- 1.07 days). Our data demonstrate that intracorporeal division of the mesentery and anastomosis confer no advantage over the laparoscopic assisted procedures. Data were prospectively collected on 102 consecutive laparoscopic colon resections. There were no statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay or duration of postoperative ileus regardless of whether intracorporeal or extracorporeal mesenteric division and anastomosis were undertaken. These data demonstrate that a completely laparoscopic procedure does not appear to offer any advantage as compared to a laparoscopic assisted one.

Laparoscopic Techniques: What is the Role in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has quickly become the preferred technique for removing the gallbladder. Real advantages in the area of laparoscopic gallbladder removal have spurred interest towards other areas of laparoscopic surgery. There has been interest in laparoscopic bowel surgery but this approach has not gained popularity as quickly as gallbladder surgery. Reasons surround the fact that the bowel is a continuous organ (versus an end organ like the gallbladder) laden with bacteria and it has a rich blood supply. These differences make laparoscopic bowel surgery more difficult and challenging. If inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered, the indications to approach surgery laparoscopically fall into two categories: current and future indications. The current indications are diagnostic laparoscopy, fecal diversion, limited bowel resections with extracorporeal anastomosis and stoma closures. Future indications include laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and laparoscopic assisted pelvic pouch procedures. As experience is gained and laparoscopic instruments are modified and refined for bowel surgery, intracorporeal anastomosis and more extensive bowel resections will be feasible. Currently laparoscopic bowel surgery can be done in select circumstances for problems associated with IBD. It has yet to be proven if doing the surgery laparoscopically provides advantages for bowel surgery as has been demonstrated with gallbladder surgery. Prospective studies are underway to answer these questions.

Laparoscopy Assisted Colectomy with Extracorporeal Anastomosis

Abstract: Laparoscopy assisted colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis was carried out in five patients. In three patients, the lesions were carcinoma with submucosal invasion and the histological results of the polypectomy specimen indicated the necessity of the subsequent colectomy. In the other two patients the lesions were either adenoma or carcinoma in adenoma. Under pneumoperitoneum, mobilization of the colon was performed using the laparoscopic technique. In three patients the mesenteric vessels of a segment of the colon were ligated and divided extracorporeally. In two patients the mesenteric vessels were clipped and divided intracorporeally. In all cases, extracorporeal resection of the colon and hand suture anastomosis were performed. Surgery time ranged from 3 hours and 20 minutes to 4 hours and 50 minutes. No postoperative complications were experinced. Four patients began to walk on the first postoperative day. Postoperative administration of analgesics was needed in four patients for two days or less after the operation. In all but one case, bowel sounds were audible from the first post‐operative day onwards. In only one patient was the postoperative recovery delayed. Although sufficient future studies should be accumulated to confirm the advantages of this procedure, we can expect that laparoscopy assisted colectomy will become a useful procedure for benign and early malignant lesions in which colonoscopic removal was not possible or was suspected to be insufficient. (Dig Endosc 1944; 6 : 52–58)

Laparoscopic proctectomy for infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum

Proctectomy for deep endometriosis of the rectal wall was performed without laparotomy. Although laparoscopic pelvic surgery and transperineal proctectomy with primary double-stapled anastomosis are established procedures in gynecological and gastrointestinal surgery, this is the first reported case in which these procedures are combined to mobilize the rectum and perform an extracorporeal transanal rectal resection and anastomosis.