Extended Dose Range Film Research Articles

On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT

Specialized techniques that make use of small field dosimetry are common practice in today's clinics. These new techniques represent a big challenge to the treatment planning systems due to the lack of lateral electronic equilibrium. Because of this, the necessity of planning systems to overcome such difficulties and provide an accurate representation of the true value is of significant importance. Pinnacle3 is one such planning system. During the IMRT optimization process, Pinnacle3 treatment planning system allows the user to specify a minimum segment size which results in multiple beams composed of several subsets of different widths. In this study, the accuracy of the engine dose calculation, collapsed cone convolution superposition algorithm (CCCS) used by Pinnacle3, was quantified by Monte Carlo simulations, ionization chamber, and Kodak extended dose range film (EDR2) measurements for 11 SBRT lung patients. Lesions were < 3.0 cm in maximal diameter and <27.0 cm3 in volume. The Monte Carlo EGSnrc\\BEAMnrc and EGS4\\MCSIM were used in the comparison. The minimum segment size allowable during optimization had a direct impact on the number of monitor units calculated for each beam. Plans with the smallest minimum segment size (0.1 cm2 to 2.0 cm2) had the largest number of MUs. Although PTV coverage remained unaffected, the segment size did have an effect on the dose to the organs at risk. Pinnacle3‐calculated PTV mean doses were in agreement with Monte Carlo‐calculated mean doses to within 5.6% for all plans. On average, the mean dose difference between Monte Carlo and Pinnacle3 for all 88 plans was 1.38%. The largest discrepancy in maximum dose was 5.8%, and was noted for one of the plans using a minimum segment size of 0.1 cm2. For minimum dose to the PTV, a maximum discrepancy between Monte Carlo and Pinnacle3 was noted of 12.5% for a plan using a 6.0 cm2 minimum segment size. Agreement between point dose measurements and Pinnacle3‐calculated doses were on average within 0.7% in both phantoms. The profiles show a good agreement between Pinnacle3, Monte Carlo, and EDR2 film. The gamma index and the isodose lines support the result.PACS number: 87.56.bd

Effect of processor temperature on film dosimetry

Optical density (OD) of a radiographic film plays an important role in radiation dosimetry, which depends on various parameters, including beam energy, depth, field size, film batch, dose, dose rate, air film interface, postexposure processing time, and temperature of the processor. Most of these parameters have been studied for Kodak XV and extended dose range (EDR) films used in radiation oncology. There is very limited information on processor temperature, which is investigated in this study. Multiple XV and EDR films were exposed in the reference condition (dmax., 10 × 10 cm2, 100 cm) to a given dose. An automatic film processor (X-Omat 5000) was used for processing films. The temperature of the processor was adjusted manually with increasing temperature. At each temperature, a set of films was processed to evaluate OD at a given dose. For both films, OD is a linear function of processor temperature in the range of 29.4–40.6°C (85–105°F) for various dose ranges. The changes in processor temperature are directly related to the dose by a quadratic function. A simple linear equation is provided for the changes in OD vs. processor temperature, which could be used for correcting dose in radiation dosimetry when film is used.

Patient-Specific 3D Pretreatment and Potential 3D Online Dose Verification of Monte Carlo–Calculated IMRT Prostate Treatment Plans

Fast and reliable comprehensive quality assurance tools are required to validate the safety and accuracy of complex intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for prostate treatment. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the COMPASS system for both off-line and potential online procedures for the verification of IMRT treatment plans. COMPASS has a dedicated beam model and dose engine, it can reconstruct three-dimensional dose distributions on the patient anatomy based on measured fluences using either the MatriXX two-dimensional (2D) array (offline) or a 2D transmission detector (T2D) (online). For benchmarking the COMPASS dose calculation, various dose-volume indices were compared against Monte Carlo-calculated dose distributions for five prostate patient treatment plans. Gamma index evaluation and absolute point dose measurements were also performed in an inhomogeneous pelvis phantom using extended dose range films and ion chamber for five additional treatment plans. MatriXX-based dose reconstruction showed excellent agreement with the ion chamber (<0.5%, except for one treatment plan, which showed 1.5%), film (∼100% pixels passing gamma criteria 3%/3 mm) and mean dose-volume indices (<2%). The T2D based dose reconstruction showed good agreement as well with ion chamber (<2%), film (∼99% pixels passing gamma criteria 3%/3 mm), and mean dose-volume indices (<5.5%). The COMPASS system qualifies for routine prostate IMRT pretreatment verification with the MatriXX detector and has the potential for on-line verification of treatment delivery using T2D.

Dosimetric investigation of high dose rate, gated IMRT

Increasing the dose rate offers time saving for IMRT delivery but the dosimetric accuracy is a concern, especially in the case of treating a moving target. The objective of this work is to determine the effect of dose rate associated with organ motion and gated treatment using step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. Both measurements and analytical simulation on clinical plans are performed to study the dosimetric differences between high dose rate and low dose rate gated IMRT step-and-shoot delivery. Various sites of IMRT plans for liver, lung, pancreas, and breast cancers were delivered to a custom-made motorized phantom, which simulated sinusoidal movement. Repeated measurements were taken for gated and nongated delivery with different gating settings and three dose rates, 100, 500, and 1000 MU/min using ion chambers and extended dose range films. For the study of the residual motion effect for individual segment dose and composite dose of IMRT plans, our measurements with 30%-60% phase gating and without gating for various dose rates were compared. A small but clinically acceptable difference in delivered dose was observed between 1000, 500, and 100 MU/min at 30%-60% phase gating. A simulation is presented, which can be used for predicting dose profiles for patient cases in the presence of motion and gating to confirm that IMRT step-and-shoot delivery with gating for 1000 MU/min are not much different from 500 MU/min. Based on the authors sample plan analyses, our preliminary results suggest that using 1000 MU/Min dose rate is dosimetrically accurate and efficient for IMRT treatment delivery with gating. Nonetheless, for the concern of patient care and safety, a patient specific QA should be performed as usual for IMRT plans for high dose rate deliveries.

Dosimetric characteristics of dual‐layer multileaf collimation for small‐field and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy applications

The purpose of the present work was to measure the performance characteristics in the penumbra region and on the leaf‐end of an innovative dual‐layer micro multileaf collimator (DmMLC). The DmMLC consists of two orthogonal (upper and lower) layers of leaves; a standard MLC consists of one layer. The DmMLC provides unique performance characteristics in smoothing dose undulation, reducing leaf‐end transmission, and reducing MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle. Two standard MLCs (80‐leaf and 120‐leaf versions: Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a DmMLC (AccuKnife: Initia Medical Technology, Canton, MA), and a Cerrobend (Cerro Metal Products, Bellefonte, PA) block were used in performance studies involving a triangular field, a cross leaf‐end field, and a circular field. Measurements were made with 6‐MV X‐rays and extended dose range film at a depth of 5 cm in Solid Water (Gammex rmi, Middleton, WI) at a source–axis distance of 100 cm. The field penumbra width measured between the 20% and 80% isodose lines through the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, DmMLC, and Cerrobend block were 9.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 2.0 mm respectively. The dose undulation amplitude of the 50% isodose line was measured as 5.5, 2.0, and 0.5 mm for the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC respectively. The planar dose difference between the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC against Cerrobend block was measured as ranging at ±52.5%,±35.0%, and ±20.0% respectively. The leaf‐end transmission was measured at 22.4% in maximum and 15.4% in average when closing a single layer of the DmMLC, and at 2.4% in maximum and 2.1% in average when closing both layers. The MLC dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC ranged from 45 degrees to 90 degrees. The standard MLC leaf stepping angle ranged from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. In conclusion, the dose undulation, leaf‐end transmission, and MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC were remarkably reduced as compared with those of the standard MLCs. And as compared with Cerrobend block, the DmMLC provided very comparable performance in field‐edge smoothing and in the shaping of complex fields.PACS numbers: 87.56.Jk, 87.56.Nk, 87.56.Nj, 87.57.Nt

The use of extended dose range film for dosimetric calibration of a scanning liquid‐filled ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device

A scanning liquid‐filled ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device (SLIC‐EPID) and extended dose range (EDR2) films were used to evaluate transmitted dose profiles for homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms. Calibrated ionization chamber measurements were used to convert the pixel values acquired from the electronic portal images to dose. Because SLIC‐EPID was developed to have a uniform response for all liquid ionization chambers, the off‐axis dose values were reconstructed using a correction factor matrix, defined as the ratio of the relative EDR2 film and the corresponding EPID dose values measured in air. The transmitted dose distributions in the EPID detector layer were also modeled using a Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (TPS: Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA). The gamma function algorithm was then used to assess agreement between transmitted dose distributions measured using a SLIC‐EPID and EDR2 film, and those calculated using the TPS. For homogenous and inhomogeneous phantoms, more than 90% agreement was achieved using gamma criteria of 2% and 3 mm and 3% and 2.5 mm respectively. Our results indicate that the calibration procedure proposed in the present study should be performed if SLIC‐EPID is to be used as a reliable two‐dimensional transmitted dosimeter for clinical purposes.PACS numbers: 87.53.Tf, 87.53.Oq

TU‐E‐ValB‐01: Helical Tomotherapy Targeting Total Bone Marrow ‐ Initial Clinical Experience at the University of Minnesota

Purpose: We report here the successful use of Tomotherapy at delivering intensity modulated radiotherapy to the bone and bone marrow spaces along the entire axis of a patient and describe a dosimetric analysis of the total marrow irradiation (TMI) treatment. This is part of a dose escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TMI when given prior to an alkylator‐intensive conditioning regimen for the treatment of high risk or relapsed solid tumors. Method and Materials: A patient enrolled in a dose escalation study trial received 600 cGy in 3 fractions. Two independent CT image sets (upper and lower part of the body) were obtained. A helical tomotherapy treatment plan was created from this CT image sets. The quality assurance was evaluated with the use of (a) ion chamber and (b) extended dose range film. The isorad‐p cylindrical diodes were used for in‐vivo dosimetry. Results: The patient showed neutrophil engraftment on day 11 and platelet engraftment by day 58. He is currently well at 120 days post transplant with no evidence of disease. The patient developed nausea and vomiting after the first fraction of Tomotherapy TMI. Other than above there were no adverse effects of TMI. The planned radiation conformed to all bone marrow sites. Average doses to lungs, kidneys, heart, and eyes were 50–70% of the prescribed dose for TMI treatments. The dose delivery verifications (pretreatment and in vivo dose measurement) were within ±3–5% of the expected dose calculated from the treatment planning station. Conclusions: We show that helical tomotherapy targeting the bone marrow of the whole body is clinically feasible. The clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiation to conform the radiation dose to all active bone marrow of the whole body opened up the possibility of a dose escalation study for high risk patients.

Theoretical and experimental validation of treatment planning for narrow MLC defined photon fields

In intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the use of small fields where electronic equilibrium does not exist is becoming more common and presents difficulties for both the measurement and calculation of dose to such fields. Pinnacle3 (Version 6.2b) allows the user to specify a total minimum open area for each IMRT segment, which can result in sub-segments with widths of only a few millimetres. The dose for 6 MV narrow MLC defined fields between 0.1 and 3 cm in width was investigated using Kodak extended dose range film (EDR2), ionization chamber and MOSFET dosimeters and BEAMnrc Monte Carlo calculations, and these results were used to determine the accuracy of Pinnacle3 dose calculation for narrow MLC segments. The incident fluences calculated by Pinnacle3 and BEAMnrc were also compared. Results show that if a fluence and dose grid resolution of 0.1 cm is used, Pinnacle3 dose agrees with the EDR2 and BEAMnrc to within 5% for field widths between 0.5 and 3.0 cm. However, Pinnacle3 will underestimate the dose by up to 45% for the 0.1 and 0.3 cm wide fields. It is shown that the source size in the Pinnacle3 beam model and both the fluence and dose grid resolutions have a significant effect on the accuracy of dose calculation for field widths of 1.0 cm and less. For single segment fields, Pinnacle3 agrees with EDR2 and BEAMnrc to within 0.1 cm at the field edges and underestimates the penumbra width by up to 0.08 cm. Results for multiple segment fields showed that an MLC transmission of 1.7% and a 0.06 cm inward shift of MLCs prior to beam delivery gave the closest agreement between Pinnacle3 and measurement. The multiple segment fields also revealed a pattern of low dose troughs of up to 7% in the Pinnacle3 dose profiles.

Characteristics of sensitometric curves of radiographic films.

A new type of radiographic film, EDR (extended dose range) film, has been recently become available for film dosimetry. It is particularly attractive for composite isodose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy because of its low sensitivity relative to the more common Kodak XV film. For XV film, the relationship between optical density and dose, commonly known as the sensitometric curve, depends linearly on the dose at low densities. Unlike XV film, the sensitometric curve of EDR film irradiated by megavoltage x rays is not linearly dependent on the dose at low densities. In this work, to understand the mechanisms governing the shape of the sensitometric curves, EDR film was studied with kilovoltage x rays, 60Co gamma rays, megavoltage x rays, and electron beams. As a comparison, XV film was also studied with the same beams mentioned above. The model originally developed by Silberstein [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 35, 93-107, 1945)] is used to fit experimental data. It is found that the single hit model can be used to predict the sensitometric curve for XV films irradiated by all beams used in this work and for EDR films exposed to kilovoltage x rays. For EDR film irradiated by 60Co gamma rays, megavoltage x rays, and electron beams, the double hit model is used to fit the sensitometric curves. For doses less than 100 cGy, a systematic difference between measured densities and that predicted by the double hit model is observed. Possible causes of the observed differences are discussed. The results of this work provide a theoretical explanation of the sensitometric behavior of EDR film.

Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons

Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons

Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry

We have investigated the dependence of the measured optical density on the incident beam energy, field size and depth for a new type of film, Kodak extended dose range (Kodak EDR). Film measurements have been conducted over a range of field sizes (3 × 3 cm2 to 25 × 25 cm2) and depths (dmax to 15 cm), for 6 MV and 15 MV photons within a solid water phantom, and the variation in sensitometric response (net optical density versus dose) has been reported. Kodak EDR film is found to have a linear response with dose, from 0 to 350 cGy, which is much higher than that typically seen for Kodak XV film (0–50 cGy). The variation in sensitometric response for Kodak EDR film as a function of field size and depth is observed to be similar to that of Kodak XV film; the optical density varied in the order of 2–3% for field sizes of 3 × 3 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2 at depths of dmax, 5 cm and 15 cm in the phantom. Measurements for a 25 × 25 cm2 field size showed consistently higher optical densities at depths of dmax, 5 cm and 15 cm, relative to a 10 × 10 cm2 field size at 5 cm depth, with 4–5% differences noted at a depth of 15 cm. Fractional depth dose and profiles conducted with Kodak EDR film showed good agreement (2%/2 mm) with ion chamber measurements for all field sizes except for the 25 × 25 cm2 at depths greater than 15 cm, where differences in the order of 3–5% were observed. In addition, Kodak EDR film measurements were found to be consistent with those of Kodak XV film for all fractional depth doses and profiles. The results of this study indicate that Kodak EDR film may be a useful tool for relative dosimetry at higher dose ranges.