Abstract Functional responses in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) to risk- and reward-related cues can predict real-life risk-taking behavior. Since NAcc activity depends on neurotransmission from connected brain regions, projections to the NAcc may also predict risk preference. To quantify risk preference, we employed latent variables previously derived in a comprehensive, independent study examining the psychometric structure of risk preference, which yielded a general risk preference factor as well as several specific factors, including a factor capturing impulsivity. Informed by previous work, we preregistered a set of hypotheses concerning the association between different risk preference factors and fractional anisotropy (or FA, which is sensitive to fiber coherence) for projections to the NAcc from Medial PreFrontal Cortex (MPFC), Anterior Insula, Amygdala, and an inferior tract from the Ventral Tegmental Area (iVTA). We tested our hypotheses in a community sample of 125 healthy human adults. As predicted, bilateral iVTA-NAcc tract FA showed a negative correlation with a psychometric factor that captured impulsivity, generalizing findings from prior research. Also as predicted, FA of the bilateral Amygdala-NAcc tract was positively associated with the impulsivity factor. Contrary to predictions, however, we observed no robust associations between the general risk preference factor and FA for projections from bilateral MPFC, right Anterior Insula, or bilateral Amygdala to the NAcc. Notably, exploratory unilateral analyses revealed an association between the general risk preference factor and left MPFC-NAcc tract FA. Taken together, these findings suggest that impulse control as a facet of risk preference maps onto specific neurobiological targets, while more general facets of risk preference may be supported by structural properties of lateral fronto-striatal projections. Although the exact associated functional mechanisms remain to be fully clarified, conNAcctomic approaches like the one presented here could pave the way for further research into the physiological foundations of risk preference and related constructs.