Abstract The evaluation of turbulence closure models for large-eddy simulation (LES) has primarily been performed over flat terrain, where comparisons with theory and observations are simplified. The authors have previously developed improved closure models using explicit filtering and reconstruction, together with a dynamic eddy-viscosity model and a near-wall stress term. This dynamic reconstruction model (DRM) is a mixed model, combining scale-similarity and eddy-viscosity components. The DRM gave improved results over standard eddy-viscosity models for neutral boundary layer flow over flat but rough terrain, yielding the expected logarithmic velocity profiles near the wall. The results from the studies over flat terrain are now extended to flow over full-scale topography. The test case is flow over Askervein Hill, an isolated hill in western Scotland, where a field campaign was conducted in 1983 with the purpose of capturing wind data representing atmospheric episodes under near-neutral stratification and steady wind conditions. This widely studied flow provides a more challenging test case for the new turbulence models because of the sloping terrain and separation in the lee of the hill. Since an LES formulation is used, a number of simulation features are different than those typically used in the Askervein literature. The simulations are inherently unsteady, the inflow conditions are provided by a separate turbulent flow database, and (uniquely herein) ensemble averages of the turbulent flow results are used in comparisons with field data. Results indicate that the DRM can improve the predictions of flow speedup and especially turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) over the hill when compared with the standard TKE-1.5 model. This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, in which explicit filtering and reconstruction (scale similarity) and dynamic turbulence models have been applied to full-scale simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer over terrain. Simulations with the lowest level of reconstruction are straightforward. Increased levels of reconstruction, however, present difficulties when used with a dynamic eddy-viscosity model. An alternative mixed model is proposed to avoid the complexities associated with the dynamic procedure and to allow higher levels of reconstruction; this mixed model combines a standard TKE-1.5 eddy-viscosity closure with velocity reconstruction to form a simple and efficient turbulence model that gives good results for both mean flow and turbulence over Askervein Hill. The results indicate that significant improvements in LES over complex terrain can be obtained by the use of mixed models that combine scale-similarity and eddy-viscosity components.
Read full abstract