School children 6–8 years of age were allocated to “conservation” and “nonconservation” groups using the usual Piagetian test for conservation of quantity. They were then tested for ability to predict whether the contents of each of a series of comparison containers was equal or unequal to that of an original container. The comparison containers differed from the original in both height and breadth. For experimental Ss, a standard container, equal to the comparisons in height or breadth, but different from the original in both, was filled from the original in S's view. Conservation and nonconservation Ss were compared for their ability to utilize the knowledge that the quantity in the standard was equal to that in the original, in spite of the change in height and breadth. The results showed that conservation Ss were superior to nonconservation Ss in their ability to recognize equality and inequality, even without the use of the standard. However, the results give grounds for not abandoning the hypothesis that conservation Ss made superior use of the knowledge that the standard and the original, though of different heights and breadths, contained the same quantity. The results are interpreted as showing that both logical reasoning and other processes are important in the understanding of constancy of quantity.
Read full abstract