Experienced Shoulder Surgeons Research Articles

TikTok and frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of the material provided on TikTok regarding frozen shoulders. The hypothesis was that the video content on this platform would not provide adequate and valid information.MethodsThe current study focused on frozen shoulder videos on the TikTok social media platform. The terms “frozen shoulder” and/or “adhesive capsulitis” were used as keywords for an extensive online search of video content on TikTok, and the first 100 videos were included. Out-of-topic, non-English, and duplicated videos were excluded from the analysis. The duration and numbers of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Further, videos were categorized based on the source (physiotherapist/osteopath, medical doctor, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, etiopathogenesis, anatomy, clinical examination, patient experience, or symptoms), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or a voice. The assessment of the video content’s quality and reliability was performed by two experienced shoulder surgeons using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS).ResultsA total of 100 videos were included in the analysis, of which 86 (86.0%) were published by physiotherapists/osteopaths. Most of the information and video content focused on physical therapy and rehabilitation (83.0% and 84.0%, respectively). Eighty-four (84.0%) videos included voice comments, while the remaining featured music. The mean number of views was 2,142,215.32 ± 6,148,794.63, while the mean numbers of likes, comments, and shares were 58,438.67 ± 201,863.54, 550.81 ± 1712.22, and 3327.43 ± 7320.81, respectively. The mean video duration was 110.20 ± 116.43 s. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 16.17 ± 2.36, 0.61 ± 0.51, and 1.18 ± 0.41, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors or private users received higher scores than those posted by physiotherapists/osteopaths (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe educational value of videos published on TikTok was poor; videos posted by medical doctors exhibited better quality and educational value than those of physiotherapists or osteopaths. It is the responsibility of orthopedic surgeons to investigate the potential benefits, consequences, and implications of TikTok video content for the health of frozen shoulder patients and to propose necessary adjustments. Given the rapid growth of TikTok, further research is needed.Level of evidenceLevel IV—cross-sectional study.

Navigation increases the accuracy of glenoid component implantation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in shoulders with severe glenoid wear: a comparative cohort study

BackgroundIndications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) have increased over the years and seem to yield satisfactory functional results even in patients with severe glenoid wear. New technologies such as navigation have gained in popularity intending to increase implantation precision, which is a crucial factor for long-term implant survivorship. However, these technologies remain costly and their widespread use for everyday cases has yet to be determined. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the accuracy of glenoid component implantation in consecutive series of patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation, according to the wear patterns of the glenoid. Study Design & MethodsTwo consecutive series of patients operated on by the same shoulder surgeon for rTSA, with and without navigation using the NextAR system (Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland), were prospectively included in the study. Revision procedures or rTSA requiring glenoid bone graft were not included. Patients' demographics (age, sex, side, BMI), preoperative diagnosis and glenoid wear patterns in both the coronal and axial planes were analyzed and defined as mild and severe. Postoperative implantation accuracy measurements were carried out on postoperative CT scans and consisted of rTSA angle, version, maximal bone purchase of peripheral screws and central peg, and glenosphere eccentricity from the inferior glenoid neck. Results56 shoulders were included, 28 in each group. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and wear pattern severity between both groups. In the navigated group, patients with severe bone wear presented a significantly higher accuracy in all analyzed parameters, whereas patients with mild glenoid defects did not show significant differences in the glenoid implantation version and glenosphere position from the inferior glenoid neck. ConclusionNavigation significantly improves glenoid implantation accuracy, particularly in patients with severe glenoid wear patterns. While its applicability in standard cases is debatable for experienced shoulder surgeons, it could prove valuable for patients with severe bone defects. Further studies are needed to assess if this will impact clinical and long-term implant survival outcomes.

Revising Failed Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comprehensive Techniques for Precise Explantation of Well-Fixed Implants.

With the increased utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), there has been a corresponding increase in the incidence of and demand for revision RTSA3. In cases in which the patient has undergone multiple previous surgeries and presents with well-fixed shoulder implants, even the most experienced shoulder surgeon can be overwhelmed and frustrated. Having a simple and reproducible treatment algorithm to plan and execute a successful revision surgery will ease the anxiety of a revision operation and avoid future additional revisions. The extraction techniques described here strive to preserve the humeral and glenoid anatomy, hopefully facilitating the reimplantation steps to follow. The main principles of implant removal include several consistent, simple steps. In order to revise a well-fixed humeral implant, (1) identify the old implants; (2) create a preoperative plan that systematically evaluates the glenoid and humeral deficiencies; (3) prepare consistent surgical tools, such as an oscillating saw, osteotomes, and/or a tamp; (4) follow the deltoid; (5) dissect the soft tissue with a sponge; (6) dissect the bone with use of an osteotome; and (7) remove the humeral stem in rotation. In cases in which there is also a well-fixed glenoid implant, the surgical procedure will require additional steps, including (8) exposure of the anteroinferior glenoid, (9) disengagement of the glenosphere, and (10) removal of the glenoid baseplate in rotation. Alternatives to revision RTSA include nonoperative treatment, implant retention with conversion of modular components, extensile revision surgical techniques, and/or mechanical implant removal. With the advent of modular humeral and glenoid components, surgeons may choose to change the implant components instead of removing the entire humeral and glenoid implants; however, repeat complications may occur if the previous implant or implant position was not completely revised. When confronted with a tough humeral explantation, an extensile surgical approach involves creating a cortical window or humeral osteotomy to expose the humeral implant. This approach can compromise the humeral shaft integrity, leading to alternative and less ideal reconstruction implant choices, the use of cerclage wires, and/or the use of a strut graft, all of which may complicate postoperative mobilization. If glenoid implant removal is necessary, the glenosphere is removed first, followed by the underlying baseplate component(s). If the glenosphere is stuck or if screws are cold-welded, the use of a conventional mechanical extraction technique with a burr or diamond saw may be required; however, this may lead to additional metal debris and intraoperative sparks. Revision RTSA can lead to high complication rates, ranging from 12% to 70%2, which will often require additional revision surgeries4. The first steps to all revision RTSA procedures include careful surgical exposure and component explantation. A simplified approach to expose the humerus and glenoid, coupled with a systematic and atraumatic approach to remove the implants without inadvertent injuries, will prevent surgical complications and the need for re-revision. The proposed comprehensive technique hopefully will allow precise removal of the humeral and glenoid implants while also preserving the remnant humerus or glenoid for future reconstruction. Few studies have evaluated postoperative patient outcomes in revision RTSA. Chalmers et al. performed a meta-analysis and found that patients were able to achieve a mean elevation of 106°, a mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 63, and a mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score of 522. Boileau showed very similar outcomes, with a mean elevation of 107° and a mean adjusted Constant score of 621. These outcomes are slightly inferior to those of primary RTSA, but patients remain satisfied with their improvement from their preoperative function. Preoperative preparation will reduce intraoperative reparation. Know the existing implant and the unique features of its design, understand the patient anatomy including bone defects, and anticipate all of the potential tools that may be needed.Know your anatomy. The anteromedial deltoid edge will help you identify the scarred-in humeral shaft.Da Vinci said that simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. Some of the most common surgical tools and instruments can be more effective than custom-designed ones.The implant should be removed in rotation.There are some company-specific explantation instruments that can be very helpful. Give the appropriate ones a try, but be prepared to consider alternative solutions. RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyCT = computed tomographyFE = forward elevation.

Experimental guide wire placement for total shoulder arthroplasty in glenoid models: higher precision for patient-specific aiming guides compared to standard technique without learning curve

BackgroundPatient-specific aiming devices (PSAD) may improve precision and accuracy of glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty, especially in degenerative glenoids. The aim of this study was to compare precision and accuracy of guide wire positioning into different glenoid models using a PSAD versus a standard guide.MethodsThree experienced shoulder surgeons inserted 2.5 mm K-wires into polyurethane cast glenoid models of type Walch A, B and C (in total 180 models). Every surgeon placed guide wires into 10 glenoids of each type with a standard guide by DePuy Synthes in group (I) and with a PSAD in group (II). Deviation from planned version, inclination and entry point was measured, as well as investigation of a possible learning curve.ResultsMaximal deviation in version in B- and C-glenoids in (I) was 20.3° versus 4.8° in (II) (p < 0.001) and in inclination was 20.0° in (I) versus 3.7° in (II) (p < 0.001). For B-glenoid, more than 50% of the guide wires in (I) had a version deviation between 11.9° and 20.3° compared to ≤ 2.2° in (II) (p < 0.001). 50% of B- and C-glenoids in (I) showed a median inclination deviation of 4.6° (0.0°-20.0°; p < 0.001) versus 1.8° (0.0°-4.0°; p < 0.001) in (II). Deviation from the entry point was always less than 5.0 mm when using PSAD compared to a maximum of 7.7 mm with the standard guide and was most pronounced in type C (p < 0.001).ConclusionPSAD enhance precision and accuracy of guide wire placement particularly for deformed B and C type glenoids compared to a standard guide in vitro. There was no learning curve for PSAD. However, findings of this study cannot be directly translated to the clinical reality and require further corroboration.

The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning.

Background: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established surgery for many pathologies of the shoulder and the demand continues to rise with an aging population. Preoperative planning is mandatory to support the surgeon's understanding of the patient's individual anatomy and, therefore, is crucial for the patient's outcome. Methods: In this observational study, we identified 30 patients who underwent RTSA with two- and three-dimensional preoperative planning. Each patient underwent new two-dimensional planning from a medical student and an orthopedic resident as well as through a mid-volume and high-volume shoulder surgeon, which was repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was then analyzed and compared to the 3D planning and the implanted prosthesis. The evaluated parameters were the size of the pegged glenoid baseplate, glenosphere, and humeral short stem. Results: The inter-rater reliability showed higher deviations in all four raters compared to the 3D planning of the base plate, glenosphere, and shaft. The intra-rater reliability showed a better correlation in more experienced raters, especially in the planning of the shaft. Conclusions: Our study shows that 3D planning is more accurate than traditional planning on plain X-rays, despite experienced shoulder surgeons showing better results in 2D planning than inexperienced ones.

Responses From ChatGPT-4 Show Limited Correlation With Expert Consensus Statement on Anterior Shoulder Instability

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the similarity of answers provided by GPT-4 to those of a consensus statement on diagnosis, nonoperative management, and Bankart repair in anterior shoulder instability (ASI). MethodsAn expert consensus statement on ASI published by Hurley et al. in 2022 was reviewed and questions laid out to the expert panel were extracted. GPT-4, the subscription version of ChatGPT, was queried using the same set of questions. Answers provided by GPT-4 were compared to those of the expert panel and subjectively rated for similarity by two experienced shoulder surgeons. GPT-4 was then used to rate the similarity of its own responses to the consensus statement, classifying them as low, medium, or high. Rates of similarity as classified by the shoulder surgeons and GPT-4 were then compared and interobserver reliability calculated using weighted κ scores. ResultsThe degree of similarity between responses of GPT-4 and the ASI consensus statement, as defined by shoulder surgeons, was high in 25.8%, medium in 45.2%, and low 29% of questions.GPT-4, assessed similarity as high in 48.3%, medium in 41.9%, and low 9.7% of questions.Surgeons and GPT-4 reached consensus on the classification of 18 questions (58.1%) and disagreement on 13 questions (41.9%). ConclusionThe responses generated by artificial intelligence exhibit limited correlation with an expert statement on the diagnosis and treatment of ASI.

SECEC Didier Patte Prize 2023: the ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability

BackgroundThe ABC classification has recently been proposed as a comprehensive classification system for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter- and intra-rater reliability of the ABC classification. MethodsIn a prospective study all consecutive patients presenting with unidirectional PSI from June 2019 to June 2021 were included. No patients were excluded, leaving a consecutive series of 100 cases in 91 patients. All recorded clinical and imaging data was used to create anonymized clinical case vignettes, which were evaluated twice according to the ABC classification at the end of the recruitment period in random sequential order by four independent raters, two experienced shoulder surgeons and two orthopedic residents in order to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter- and intra-rater reliability of the ABC classification for posterior shoulder instability and to describe differences in characteristics among subtypes. Group A was defined as first-time singular posterior shoulder instability event less than 3 months in the past regardless of etiology and is further subdivided in Type 1 and Type 2 depending on the occurrence of a subluxation (A1) or dislocation (A2). Group B comprises recurrent dynamic PSI regardless of time since onset and is further subdivided by the cause of instability in functional (B1) and structural (B2) dynamic PSI. Group C includes chronic static PSI with posterior humeral decentering that can either be constitutional (C1) or acquired (C2). ResultsNone of the cases was deemed unsuitable to be classified based on the proposed system by the observers. After consensus agreement between the two experts 16 cases were attributed to group A (A1: 8, A2: 8), 64 to group B (B1: 33, B2: 31), and 20 to group C (C1: 11, C2: 9). The expert raters agreed in 99% and 96% of the cases on the classification subtypes during the first and second rating (ICC: 0.998 and ICC: 0.99). The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both raters. The beginners reached the same conclusion as the consensus agreement in 94% (ICC: 0.99) and 89% of the cases (ICC: 0.97) during the first round and 94% each (ICC: 0.97) during the second round. The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both beginners. Overall, discrepancies between raters were found between groups B1 and B2 (n=14), B2 and C2 (n=4), B1 and C1 (n=1), as well as A1 and B2 (n=1). In general, each subtype shows distinctive clinical and imaging characteristics that facilitate the diagnosis. ConclusionThe presented ABC classification for PSI is a comprehensive classification with a high reliability and reproducibility. However, a gradual transition and potential progression between the subtypes of PSI must be considered. The reliable distinction between different subtypes of PSI based on etiology and pathomechanism provides a standardized basis for future investigations on treatment recommendation.

Consensus on the preoperative management of patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain to improve postoperative outcomes: Delphi results

BackgroundAn appropriate preoperative management of patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain who are candidates for surgery due to rotator cuff disease or glenohumeral osteoarthritis may improve surgery and patient outcomes, but published evidence in this regard is scarce. Therefore, the availability of recommendations on preoperative interventions based on expert consensus may serve as guidance. MethodsA Delphi study was conducted to develop a preoperative management algorithm based on a national expert consensus. A Delphi questionnaire was developed by a Scientific Committee following a systematic review using PRISMA criteria of the relevant literature published during the last 10 years. It consisted of 48 statements divided into five blocks (I. Assessment/diagnosis of preoperative pain; II. Preoperative function/psychosocial aspects; III. Therapeutic objectives; IV. Treatment; V. Follow-up/referral), and 28 experienced shoulder surgeons from across the country were invited to answer. ResultsAll participants responded to the Delphi questionnaire in the first round and 25 in the second round (89.3% of those invited). Overall, 46/49 final statements reached a consensus, based on which a final preoperative management algorithm was defined by the Scientific Committee. First, surgeons should assess shoulder pain intensity and characteristics, shoulder functionality and psychosocial aspects using specific validated questionnaires. Preoperative therapeutic objectives should include shoulder pain control, depression/nocturnal sleep improvement, opioid consumption adjustment and substance abuse cessation. Postoperative objectives regarding the degree of shoulder pain reduction or improvement in functionality/quality of life should be established in agreement with the patient. Treatment of preoperative chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain should comprise non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological interventions. Follow-up of shoulder pain levels, treatment adherence and mental health status of these patients may be carried out by the surgical team (surgeon and anesthesiologist) together with the Primary Care team. Patients with very intense shoulder pain levels may be referred to the Pain Unit, following specific protocols. ConclusionA preoperative management algorithm for patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain who are candidates for surgery due to rotator cuff disease or glenohumeral osteoarthritis was defined based on a national expert consensus. Main points include a comprehensive patient management starting with an objective assessment of shoulder pain and function, quality of life, establishment of preoperative and postoperative therapeutic targets, prescription of individualized therapeutic interventions and multidisciplinary patient follow-up. Implementation of these recommendations to clinical practice may result in better preoperative shoulder pain management and more successful surgery outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Validation of mixed-reality surgical navigation for glenoid axis pin placement in shoulder arthroplasty using a cadaveric model

Mixed reality may offer an alternative for computer-assisted navigation in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and precision of mixed-reality guidance for the placement of the glenoid axis pin in cadaver specimens. This step is essential for accurate glenoid placement in total shoulder arthroplasty. Fourteen cadaveric shoulders underwent simulated shoulder replacement surgery by 7 experienced shoulder surgeons. The surgeons exposed the cadavers through a deltopectoral approach and then used mixed-reality surgical navigation to insert a guide pin in a preplanned position and trajectory in the glenoid. The mixed-reality system used the Microsoft Hololens 2 headset, navigation software, dedicated instruments with fiducial marker cubes, and a securing pin. Computed tomography scans obtained before and after the procedure were used to plan the surgeries and determine the difference between the planned and executed values for the entry point, version, and inclination. One specimen had to be discarded from the analysis because the guide pin was removed accidentally before obtaining the postprocedure computed tomography scan. Regarding the navigated entry point on the glenoid, the mean difference between planned and executed values was 1.7 ± 0.8 mm; this difference was 1.2 ± 0.6 mm in the superior-inferior direction and 0.9 ± 0.8 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. The maximum deviation from the entry point for all 13 specimens analyzed was 3.1 mm. Regarding version, the mean difference between planned and executed version values was 1.6° ± 1.2°, with a maximum deviation in version for all 13 specimens of 4.1°. Regarding inclination, the mean angular difference was 1.7° ± 1.5°, with a maximum deviation in inclination of 5°. The mixed-reality navigation system used in this study allowed surgeons to insert the glenoid guide pin on average within 2 mm from the planned entry point and within 2° of version and inclination. The navigated values did not exceed 3 mm or 5°, respectively, for any of the specimens analyzed. This approach may help surgeons more accurately place the definitive glenoid component.

LONG-STEMMED HEMIARTHROPLASTY WITH CERCLAGE WIRING FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURE: A CASE REPORT OF THE MULTIMORBID PATIENT

Introduction: Complex multi-fragmentary fractures of the proximal humerus are a rare type of injury, which represent a major challenge, even to the most experienced shoulder surgeons. Hemiarthroplasty is commonly accepted as the first surgical choice of treatment for three or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Case Report: A 62-year-old female who has sustained complex multi-fragmentary trauma of the proximal humerus presented to the clinic after a low-energy trauma. The patient was managed with a long-stemmed shoulder hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wiring of the fracture area. A good clinical and radiological outcome was observed 5 months post-operatively. Conclusion: We report the functional, anatomical and radiological outcome of a case of a rare type of proximal humeral fracture that was managed with a long-stemmed hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wire and has shown a good early clinical outcome.

Factors influencing choice of treatment for proximal humeral fractures elaborated in a Delphi consensus process

IntroductionHitherto, the decision-making process for treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) remains controversial, with no established or commonly used treatment regimens. Identifying fracture- and patient-related factors that influence treatment decisions is crucial for the development of such treatment algorithms. The objective of this study was to define a Delphi consensus of clinically relevant fracture- and patient-related factors of PHF for clinical application and scientific research.MethodsAn online survey was conducted among an international panel of preselected experienced shoulder surgeons. An evidence-based list of fracture-related and patient-related factors affecting treatment outcome after PHF was generated and reviewed by the members of the committee through online surveys. The proposed factors were revised for definitions, and suggestions from the first round mentioned in the free text were included as possible factors in the second round of surveys. Consensus was defined as having at least a two-thirds majority agreement.ResultsThe Delphi consensus panel consisted of 18 shoulder surgeons who completed 2 rounds of online surveys. There was an agreement of more than two-thirds of the panel for three fracture-related factors affecting treatment decision in the case of PHF: head-split fracture, dislocated tuberosities, and fracture dislocation. Of all patient-related factors, a two-thirds consensus was reached for two factors: age and rotator cuff tear arthropathy.ConclusionThis study successfully conducted a Delphi consensus on factors influencing decision-making in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The documented factors will be useful for clinical evaluation and scientific validation in future studies.

Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Treated Using the Arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet Technique: Experience of a Peripheral Hospital.

The arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet procedure is used in the surgical management of anterior shoulder instability. This technique is mainly performed in referral centers due to its high technicity. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes in a peripheral hospital center. This is a retrospective study of patients treated for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The clinical scores (Walch-Duplay, Rowe, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)) were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. The consolidation and the position of the bone block were evaluated at 6 months using a CT scan. Between 2016 and 2020, 40 patients had been operated on (mean age: 28.5 ± 7.9 years). During a mean follow-up of 29.5 ± 11.6 months, we noted only one complication, a case of fracture of the callus of a consolidated bone block. No recurrence of instability was recorded. The Walch-Duplay score increased from 17.8 to 94.6, the Rowe score from 24.9 to 96.8, and the WOSI score decreased from 52.1% to 6.9%. The bone block was consolidated in 35 patients (87.5%), and a flush position with the anterior edge of the glenoid was noted for all patients. At one year, 67.0% of the patients practicing sport had returned to sports. The arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet technique was a reliable procedure in the hands of an experienced shoulder surgeon, even in a peripheral hospital center.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Olympic Volleyball Players: Return to Sports and Return to Performance.

The decision-making process and predicting the time to return to sport (RTS) and return to performance (RTP) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in elite volleyball players are difficult issues to address, even among experienced shoulder surgeons. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results in Olympic-level volleyball players treated with arthroscopic supraspinatus repair and to report the RTS and the RTP. It was hypothesized that these athletes had higher RTS and faster RTP. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. This study included 17 elite volleyball athletes (11 male, 6 female; mean age, 26.2 years) who underwent ARCR for partial- and full-thickness supraspinatus tears that did not improve despite nonoperative treatment. The clinical results were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. The authors compared the athletes' preoperative, 6-month, and 12-month Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) scores and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain after competition and conducted 6- and 12-month isometric strength analyses. The athletes' RTS and RTP times were recorded. All tears were on the dominant side (15 right, 2 left), and 82% were partial tears (14 partial thickness, 3 full thickness). The mean time from the onset of symptoms to surgery was 11.3 ± 6.7 months. While the mean Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score was 31 preoperatively, it was 89 after 6 months (P < .001 vs preoperative) and 96 after 12 months (P = .003 vs 6 months). The mean VAS for pain was 7.9 preoperatively, 0.4 at 6 months (P < .001 vs preoperative), and 0.1 at 12 months (P = .02 vs 6 months). All athletes were able to reach their preinjury level, with RTS at a mean of 6.9 months and RTP at a mean of 12.4 months. ARCR appears to be an effective option for Olympic-level volleyball players who do not benefit from nonoperative treatment. All athletes returned to their preinjury level of sports. The surgeon and athlete can plan surgical decision-making and timing based on the mean RTS time of 6.9 months and mean RTP time of 12.4 months.

Arthroscopic revision cuff repair: do tendons have a second chance to heal?

Few studies have investigated postoperative tendon integrity after reoperation for failed rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomic and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (AR-RCR) and identify the risk factors related to re-retear. Sixty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 55 years) with primary failed open (38%) or arthroscopic (62%) cuff repairs underwent AR-RCR and were reviewed regarding clinical examination findings and imaging studies. Patients with massive cuff tears and upward humeral migration (acromiohumeral distance < 6 mm) or glenohumeral osteoarthritis were excluded. Revision repair was performed by a single, experienced shoulder surgeon. Complete footprint coverage was achieved in all cases using a single-row (70%), double-row (19%), or side-to-side (11%) technique. The primary outcome measure was tendon healing assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (57 cases) or computed tomography arthrogram (12 cases) performed at minimum 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included functional outcome scores, subjective results, and complications. The mean follow-up period was 43 months (range, 12-136 months). The cuff tendons did not heal to the tuberosity in 36% of the shoulders (25 of 69) following revision cuff surgery. Absence of tendon healing was associated with poorer shoulder function (average Constant score, 69±20 vs. 54±18; P=.003) and a decreased Subjective Shoulder Value (72% vs. 54%, P=.002). Factors that were negatively associated with tendon healing were age ≥ 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.6-12.5]; P=.02), tendon retractionof stage 2 or higher (OR, 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-14.3]; P=.01), and fatty infiltration index > 2 (OR, 10.2; P<.0001). No differences in retear rates were found between single-row and double-row cases. In 36 shoulders, tissue samples were harvested and submitted for bacteriologic culture analysis; 13 (36%) showed positive findings for infection (Cutibacterium acnesin 12 of 13) and associated antibiotic treatment was given. Overall, 25% of patients had unsatisfactory clinical results and 22% were disappointed or dissatisfied. At last follow-up, 4 patients (5.7%) underwent reoperations, with a second AR-RCR in 1 and conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 3. Despite careful patient selection and intraoperative complete footprint coverage, in this study the tendons did not heal to bone in 36% of cases after revision cuff surgery. The absence of tendon healing is associated with poorer clinical and subjective results. Patients aged ≥ 55 years and patients with larger tears (stage 2 or higher) and/or muscle fatty infiltration (fatty infiltration index > 2) have significantly lower rates of healing. Surgeons should be aware that structurally failed cuff repair may also be associated with low-grade infection.

Incidence of teres minor muscle atrophy in young and middle-aged populations.

BackgroundTeres minor atrophy can be seen in shoulders both with and without a rotator cuff tear, even among the young population. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the incidence of teres minor atrophy in young and middle-aged patients with or without a rotator cuff tear.MethodsPatient records were reviewed to identify 10-39-year-old patients (Group Y) and 60-69-year-old patients (Group O) who underwent MRI because of shoulder disorders. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) prior surgeries, (2) neurological disorders in the cervical spines or shoulder girdle, (3) global atrophy of all four cuff muscles without a rotator cuff tear, (4) acute trauma, and (5) poor image quality due to artifacts. An experienced shoulder surgeon evaluated teres minor atrophy on T1-weighted oblique sagittal images. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test for comparison of Groups Y and O.ResultsGroup Y consisted of 528 shoulders in 520 patients, including 406 males and 114 females with a mean age of 26 years. Group O consisted of 884 shoulders in 837 patients, including 394 males and 443 females with a mean age of 65 years. Rotator cuff tears were seen in 33 shoulders (6.3 %) in Group Y, and 411 shoulders (46.5%) in Group O. Teres minor atrophy was more present in Group O (59 shoulders [6.7%]) than Group Y (11 shoulders [2.1%], P < .001). Among shoulders with teres minor atrophy, the incidence of intact cuff tended to be higher in Group Y than O (7 shoulders [64%] and 21 shoulders [36%], P = .08). However, the ratio of the intact cuff to the number of patients in each group was not significantly different (Group Y, 7 of 528 [1.3%]; Group O, 21 of 884 [2.3%]). Teres minor muscle atrophy tended to be more common in athletes than nonathletes in Group Y, although the difference was not significant (P = .057).ConclusionThe incidence of teres minor atrophy was significantly higher in middle-aged patients than young patients. Middle-aged patients with teres minor atrophy were more associated with rotator cuff tears. The common cause of teres minor atrophy may be rotator cuff tears. Teres minor atrophy in young patients might be associated with sports-related factors such as infraspinatus hypertrophy or axillary nerve injury.

Three-dimensional muscle loss assessment: a novel computed tomography–based quantitative method to evaluate rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration

Rotator cuff fatty infiltration (FI) is one of the most important parameters to predict the outcome of certain shoulder conditions. The primary objective of this study was to define a new computed tomography (CT)-based quantitative 3-dimensional (3D) measure of muscle loss (3DML) based on the rationale of the 2-dimensional (2D) qualitative Goutallier score. The secondary objective of this study was to compare this new measurement method to traditional 2D qualitative assessment of FI according to Goutallier etal and to a 3D quantitative measurement of fatty infiltration (3DFI). 102 CT scans from healthy shoulders (46) and shoulders with cuff tear arthropathy (21), irreparable rotator cuff tears (18), and primary osteoarthritis (17) were analyzed by 3 experienced shoulder surgeons for subjective grading of fatty infiltration according to Goutallier, and their rotator cuff muscles were manually segmented. Quantitative 3D measurements of fatty infiltration (3DFI) were completed. The volume of muscle fibers without intramuscular fat was then calculated for each rotator cuff muscle and normalized to the patient's scapular volume to account for the effect of body size (NVfibers). 3D muscle mass (3DMM) was calculated by dividing the NVfibers value of a given muscle by the mean expected volume in healthy shoulders. 3D muscle loss (3DML) was defined as 1 - (3DMM). The correlation between Goutallier grading, 3DFI, and 3DML was compared using a Spearman rank correlation. Interobserver reliability for the traditional 2D Goutallier grading was moderate for the infraspinatus (ISP, 0.42) and fair for the supraspinatus (SSP, 0.38), subscapularis (SSC, 0.27) and teres minor (TM, 0.27). 2D Goutallier grading was found to be significantly and highly correlated with 3DFI (SSP, 0.79; ISP, 0.83; SSC, 0.69; TM, 0.45) and 3DML (SSP, 0.87; ISP, 0.85; SSC, 0.69; TM, 0.46) for all 4 rotator cuff muscles (P < .0001). This correlation was significantly higher for 3DML than for the 3DFI for SSP only (P = .01). The mean values of 3DFI and 3DML were 0.9% and 5.3% for Goutallier 0, 2.9% and 25.6% for Goutallier 1, 11.4% and 49.5% for Goutallier 2, 20.7% and 59.7% for Goutallier 3, and 29.3% and 70.2% for Goutallier 4, respectively. The Goutallier score has been helping surgeons by using 2D CT scan slices. However, this grading is associated with suboptimal interobserver agreement. The new measures we propose provide a more consistent assessment that correlates well with Goutallier's principles. As 3DML measurements incorporate atrophy and fatty infiltration, they could become a very reliable index for assessing shoulder muscle function. Future algorithms capable of automatically calculating the 3DML of the cuff could help in the decision process for cuff repair and the choice of anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

The Injured Shoulder in High-Level Male Gymnasts, Part 2: Can Athletes Return to Competition After Surgery?

Background:The results of surgical treatment of shoulder injuries in high-level male gymnasts have not yet been documented.Purpose:To evaluate the functional and subjective results after surgical treatment of shoulder injuries in high-level gymnasts and the possibilities to return to sport at the same level.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Over a 20-year period (1994-2014), 23 high-level male gymnasts (26 shoulders) underwent surgery by a single experienced shoulder surgeon. At the time of surgery, 7 gymnasts competed at the international level, 12 at the national elite level, and 4 at the regional level. According to symptoms and anatomic lesions, the shoulders were classified into 2 groups: painful shoulders (n = 11) and unstable shoulders (n = 15). Fifteen capsulolabral repairs, 10 cuff debridements, 1 cuff repair, 4 SLAP (superior labral anterior and posterior) repairs, and 8 suprapectoral biceps tenodesis were performed. Twelve shoulders (46%) had >1 procedure performed. Outcomes assessment was performed by an independent observer at a mean of 5 years (range, 2-15 years) postoperatively. In addition, patients completed the Subjective Shoulder Value (range, 0%-100%).Results:After shoulder surgery, 21 (91%) of the 23 gymnasts returned to competitive gymnastics, and 20 gymnasts (87%) regained their preinjury level of sport. All international-level gymnasts returned to their preinjury level of sport. Three athletes (13%) underwent revision surgery, and 1 athlete (4%) ended his career without returning to competition. The postoperative period before resumption of competitive gymnastics was 9 ± 3.5 months (mean ± SD). Of the 15 gymnasts treated for shoulder instability with arthroscopic stabilization, 12 were able to return to their previous level of sport. All 8 gymnasts who had arthroscopic biceps tenodesis were able to return to their previous level of sport, as opposed to only 2 of 4 gymnasts treated with SLAP repair. The gymnastics-specific Subjective Shoulder Value score was 80% ± 11%.Conclusion:Most gymnasts who required surgical treatment for a shoulder injury were able to return to competition at their previous level, although there was a considerable postoperative recovery period. Current arthroscopic reconstruction techniques were effective for treating structural lesions and allowing return to high-level gymnastics.

Posterior Open-wedge Osteotomy and Glenoid Concavity Reconstruction Using an Implant-free, J-shaped Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Atraumatic Posterior Instability with Pathologic Glenoid Retroversion and Dysplasia: A Preliminary Report.

Atraumatic posterior shoulder instability in patients with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia is an unsolved problem in shoulder surgery. In a preliminary study of a small group of patients with atraumatic posterior shoulder instability associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and glenoid dysplasia who underwent posterior open-wedge osteotomy and glenoid concavity reconstruction using an implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone graft, we asked: (1) What proportion of the patients had persistent apprehension? (2) What were the improvements in patient-reported shoulder scores? (3) What were the radiographic findings at short-term follow-up? Between 2016 and 2018, we treated seven patients for atraumatic posterior shoulder instability. We performed this intervention when posterior shoulder instability symptoms were unresponsive to physiotherapy for at least 6 months and when it was associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and dysplasia of the posteroinferior glenoid. All seven patients had a follow-up examination at a minimum of 2 years. The median (range) age at surgery was 27 years (16 to 45) and the median follow-up was 2.3 years (2 to 3). Apprehension was assessed by a positive posterior apprehension and/or posterior jerk test. Patient-reported shoulder scores were obtained and included the subjective shoulder value, obtained by chart review (and scored with 100% representing a normal shoulder; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 12%), and the Constant pain scale score (with 15 points representing no pain; MCID 1.5 points). Radiographic measurements included glenohumeral arthropathy and posterior humeral head subluxation, bone graft union, correction of glenoid retroversion and glenoid concavity depth, as well as augmentation of glenoid surface area. All endpoints were assessed by individuals not involved in patient care. In four of seven patients, posterior apprehension was positive, but none reported resubluxation. The preoperative subjective shoulder value (median [range] 40% [30% to 80%]) and Constant pain scale score (median 7 points [3 to 13]) were improved at latest follow-up (median subjective shoulder value 90% [70% to 100%]; p = 0.02; median Constant pain scale score 15 points [10 to 15]; p = 0.03). Posterior glenoid cartilage erosion was present in four patients (all four had Walch Type B1 glenoids) preoperatively and showed no progression until the final follow-up examination. The median (range) humeral head subluxation index decreased from 69% (54% to 85%) preoperatively to 55% (46% to 67%) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and in two of four patients with preoperative humeral head subluxation (> 65% subluxation), it was reversed to a centered humeral head. CT images showed union in all implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone grafts. The median preoperative retroversion was corrected from 16° (15° to 25°) to 0° postoperatively (-5° to 6°; p = 0.02), the median glenoid concavity depth was reconstructed from 0.3 mm (-0.7 to 1.6) preoperatively to 1.2 mm (1.1 to 3.1) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and the median preoperative glenoid surface area was increased by 20% (p = 0.02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded, and no reoperation was performed or is planned. In this small, retrospective series of patients treated by experienced shoulder surgeons, a posterior J-bone graft procedure was able to reconstruct posterior glenoid morphology, correct glenoid retroversion, and improve posterior shoulder instability associated with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia, although four of seven patients had persistent posterior apprehension. Although no patients in this small series experienced complications, the size and complexity of this procedure make it likely that as more patients have it, some will develop complications; future studies will need to characterize the frequency and severity of those complications, and we recommend that this procedure be done only by experienced shoulder surgeons. The early results in these seven patients justify further study of this procedure for the proposed indication, but longer term follow-up is necessary to continue to assess whether it is advantageous to combine the reconstruction of posterior glenoid concavity with correction of pathological glenoid retroversion and increasing glenoid surface compared with traditional surgical techniques such as the posterior opening wedge osteotomy or simple posterior bone block procedures. Level IV, therapeutic study.

Subscapularis Tendon Tears - Usefulness of Written MRI Reports forGuiding Patient Referral to Shoulder Specialists.

Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common reasons for shoulder pain, and patients often present initially to general practitioners. However, subscapularis tears are especially difficult to diagnose and hence adequate therapy is often delayed. General practitioners or non-specialist orthopedic surgeons need reliable MRI findings to allow timely referral of patients to shoulder specialists. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the written MRI report of patients with arthroscopically proven subscapularis tendon tears. In this retrospective study, 97 patients (mean age 62.4 ± 10 years, 63 men) who underwent arthroscopic subscapularis repair between April 2013 and January 2015 by two experienced shoulder surgeons and who underwent a preoperative 1.5 T MRI study were included. All of these patients had high-field strength (i. e., ≥ 1.5 T) standard MRI scans performed within 4-164 (mean 57.4 ± 38.4) days before their arthroscopic procedures. Subscapularis tendon tears, verified by arthroscopy, were correctly identified in only 37 of 97 cases in the written report of the preoperative MRI. This resulted in an overall low sensitivity of 38.1 %. Correctly predicted lesions were as follows: Fox and Romeo I 29.4 % (5/17 patients), Fox and Romeo II 20 % (7/35 patients), Fox and Romeo III 46.7 % (14/30 patients) and Fox and Romeo IV 73.3 % (11/15 patients). In contrast, concurrent supraspinatus tendon tears were identified correctly in 88.2 % of patients (60/68 cases, sensitivity 88.2 %, specificity 96.5 %). Preoperative written radiology reports provided by a heterogeneous group of 39presumably non-MSK-specialized radiologic centers do not reliably detect subscapularis tendon tears and are not sufficient for guiding patients to specialist centers. Compared to other rotator cuff injuries, this study shows difficulties in the correct diagnosis of subscapular tendon injuries. However, this is necessary to provide patients with timely therapy. It can be assumed that MRI review by musculoskeletal-specialized radiologists would more often than not lead to the correct diagnosis. · Subscapularis tendon ruptures are difficult to diagnose on standard shoulder MRI.. · Written MRI reports from non-musculoskeletal-specialized radiologists are not reliable, especially for smaller lesions.. · Reliable findings are required for referral allocation to shoulder specialists (specialized musculoskeletal radiologists).. · Lenz R, Kircher J, Schwalba K et al. Subscapularis Tendon Tears - Usefulness of Written MRI Reports for Guiding Patient Referral to Shoulder Specialists. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 797 - 803.

A new radiographic classification of greater tuberosity irregularities in the detection of rotator cuff tears

INTRODUCTION: We propose a new radiographic classification of greater tuberosity changes seen in patients with atraumatic rotator cuff dysfunction. The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values and accuracy of this classification for the detection of rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic findings as the gold standard. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 91 consecutive patients (47 male, 44 female; mean age 57 year old) who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for a clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff dysfunction. The presence and size of a rotator cuff tear for each patient had been documented at the time of surgery. The radiographs were anonymised and randomised for interpretation by 2 experienced shoulder surgeons and of 2 orthopaedic residents newly-educated on the use of the classification. The predicative values of the new classification for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear were calculated. Inter-rater agreement values were obtained using the Fliess’ kappa method. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Comparative statistics showed that Stage 0 or 1 were associated with the absence of a cuff tear. Stage 2 and 3 were strongly predictive of a rotator cuff tear. The mean predicative values of the new classification stage 2 and 3 for the detection of a rotator cuff tear were: sensitivity 93%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 87%, and negative predictive value 92%. The accuracy of the experienced observer group was significantly higher than the inexperienced group (97% v 83%, p-value <0.01) and therefore the overall group accuracy was 89%. Inter-rater agreement for stages 1, 2 and 3 changes was substantial overall (Kappa value of 0.63) and almost perfect between the experienced assessors (Kappa=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The new classification is a useful adjunct for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears where adequate radiographs are available. It may be used as a screening test in a large number of patients with shoulder pain and select stage 2 and 3 patients for further rotator cuff imaging to assist preoperative planning.