This critical review examines four prominent active models of speech perception: quantal theory, motor theory, hyper-hypo-articulation theory, and exemplar theory. Each of these models offers distinctive insights into how listeners perceive, interpret, and categorize speech sounds. Quantal theory explores the non-linear relationship between articulation and acoustic output, emphasizing stable and unstable regions in speech production. Motor theory posits that speech perception is grounded in articulatory gestures, suggesting a direct link between production and perception. The hyper-hypo-articulation theory focuses on the speaker’s adaptive articulation, which ranges from hyper- to hypo-articulation depending on the listener's needs and the communicative context. Exemplar theory, rooted in cognitive psychology, highlights the role of memory and experience, with individual speech sounds compared to stored exemplars in memory to aid perception. Despite their contributions, none of these models offers a comprehensive solution to all speech perception challenges. Each theory is suited to specific contexts, speech features, or tasks, making it crucial for researchers to understand their limitations. Furthermore, the review underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate model for particular research or practical applications, given the variability in their functionality. Finally, it calls for future research to delve deeper into passive models of speech perception and suggests that comparative studies between active and passive models could yield valuable insights.