European LeukemiaNet Risk Research Articles

Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source Data.

In 2022, the revised WHO classification and International Consensus Classification (ICC) for myeloid neoplasms were published. We examined the impact of these guidelines on AML diagnoses alongside the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations on risk stratification. We included 450 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML (non-acute promyelocytic leukemia) from the cBioPortal open-source dataset. Diagnoses and risk stratifications were revised based on the new guidelines and compared with the 2017 WHO classification. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression. Among the patients included, 190 (42.2%) had consistent diagnoses across the three classifications, whereas 225 (50.0%) had inconsistent diagnoses. The two major WHO 2017 subtypes, AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), were further subdivided according to the WHO 2022 and ICC. The ICC had the highest prognostication power among the three classifications. Subgroup analysis according to the different definitions of myelodysplasia-related AML and the introduction of AML with mutatedTP53 (AML-TP53) showed that the differentiation of AML-TP53 was beneficial. The update from ELN 2017 to ELN 2022 resulted in significant transitions in a subset of patients. The updated diagnostic classification and ELN risk stratification (i.e., the ICC and ELN 2022) showed a straightforward relationship. This study presents an integrative comparative analysis of past and current guidelines for AML diagnosis and risk classification based on open-source data. The ICC diagnostic criteria are clinically significant for determining AML prognosis. In line with the changing treatment paradigm for AML, future research is needed to continuously validate diagnostic and risk stratification systems.

High iASPP (PPP1R13L) expression is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Apoptosis-stimulating proteins of p53 (ASPPs) are a family of proteins that modulate key tumor suppressor pathways via direct interaction with p53. Deregulation of these proteins promotes cancer development and impairs sensitivity to systemic (chemo)therapy and radiation. In this study, we describe that the inhibitor of ASPP (iASPP) is frequently highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and that overexpression correlates with a poor clinical outcome. Four independent patient cohorts comprising about 1500 patient samples were analysed and consistently confirm an association of high iASPP expression with unfavourable clinical characteristics and shorter survival. Notably, the predictive role of iASPP is independent of, and adds information to, the European LeukemiaNET (ELN) risk classification. iASPP-interference cell models were developed to investigate the underlying functional aspects of iASPP in AML biology. Attenuation of iASPP expression resulted in reduced proliferation rates of leukemic blasts and rendered cells more susceptible towards induction of apoptosis in response to cytotoxic therapy. In line, independent NSG xenograft mouse experiments demonstrate that attenuation of iASPP results in a significant delay of disease onset and tumor burden and this translates to longer overall survival of mice. In conclusion, deregulation of iASPP has direct functional consequences in AML. Determination of iASPP expression levels provides valuable additional information as a predictive marker in AML and may guide treatment decisions.

Validation of the revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia

AbstractIn 2022, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been updated. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the 2022 ELN classification (ELN22) by evaluating 1570 newly diagnosed patients with AML (median age, 56 years) treated with cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy regimens. Compared with ELN17, which allocated 595 (38%), 413 (26%), and 562 patients (36%) to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk categories, ELN22 classified 575 (37%), 410 (26%), and 585 patients (37%) as favorable, intermediate, and adverse risks, respectively. Risk group allocation was revised in 340 patients (22%). Most patients were reclassified into the ELN22 intermediate- or ELN22 adverse-risk group. The allocation of patients according to the ELN22 risk categories resulted in a significantly distinct event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Compared with ELN17, reallocation according to the ELN22 recommendations resulted in a significantly improved prognostic discrimination for OS (3-year area under the curve, 0.71 vs 0.67). In patients with ELN22 favorable-risk AML, co-occurring myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations did not significantly affect outcomes. Within the ELN22 adverse-risk group, we observed marked survival differences across mutational groups (5-year OS rate of 21% and 3% in patients with MR gene mutations and TP53 mutations, respectively). In patients harboring MR gene mutations, EZH2-, STAG2-, and ZRSR2-mutated patients showed an intermediate-like OS. In patients with secondary AML and those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, EFS and OS significantly differed between ELN22 risk groups, whereas the prognostic abilities of ELN17 and ELN22 classifications were similar. In conclusion, ELN22 improves prognostic discrimination in a large cohort of intensively treated patients with AML. Given the heterogeneous outcome in patients with MR gene alterations, ranging from those with intermediate to adverse risk, we suggest reevaluation of risk allocation in these patients.

Prognostic Impact of PTPN11 mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background: The classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is being refined as knowledge of associated genetic alterations increases. The role of the protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11) oncogene is well-established in Noonan syndrome and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, although less is known about its implications in adult AML. PTPN11 is involved in RAS/MAPK signaling pathway regulation. In this study, we sought to characterize the co-mutational landscape and outcomes of PTPN11 mutations in patients with AML. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a database of 645 patients aged > 18 years with AML treated at our institution from 2014 to 2024. The PTPN11wild-type cohort was selected to match age, ECOG score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score median and range of the PTPN11mut cohort. Data was collected on molecular and cytogenetic profiles, European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk, response after induction therapy, and survival. Composite complete response (CCR) was defined as complete response, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, or CR with partial hematologic recovery. Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (mOS) were compared using the Kaplan Meier method. RFS included patients who had primary refractory disease. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t test. Results: PTPN11 mutations were detected in 35 patients with newly diagnosed AML. Those who received intensive induction had a median age of 62 (range, 24-74), median ECOG score of 1 (range, 0-2), and median CCI score of 4 (range, 2-11). The PTPN11mut non-intensive cohort had a median age of 78 (range, 70-85), ECOG of 2 (range, 1-3), and CCI of 7 (range, 5-12). Within a matched cohort of 216 patients with PTPN11wild-type, both the intensive and non-intensive groups had similar characteristics to their PTPN11mut counterpart . Co-occurring mutations in NPM1 were significantly enriched in the PTPN11mut cohort compared to PTPN11wild-type (46% v. 25%, p=0.015). There were no significant differences in cytogenetic profiles. The frequency of patients in each ELN genetic risk category was similar between the two cohorts. The mOS was 11.2 months in the PTPN11mut cohort and 15.3 months in the PTPN11wild-type cohort (HR=1.31, p=0.236). There were no significant survival differences between PTPN11mut and PTPN11wild-type when stratified by induction treatment intensity. The mOS of the PTPN11mut cohort was significantly shorter than that of the PTPN11wild-type favorable risk group (mOS=not reached [NR], HR=2.42, p=0.006) and PTPN11wild-type intermediate risk group (mOS=23.8 months, HR=1.90, p=0.033) but similar to mOS of the PTPN11wild-type adverse risk group (mOS=12.7 months, HR 0.94, p=0.80). Patients with PTPN11mut favorable risk AML had significantly worse mRFS (6.5 v. 22.8 months, HR 2.24, p=0.041) and shorter mOS than those with PTPN11wild-type favorable risk disease (21 months v. NR, HR 2.11, p=0.166), although the latter did not reach significance. Of note, all patients in the PTPN11mut favorable risk group had NPM1 co-mutations. PTPN11mut intermediate risk patients also had shorter mOS than PTPN11wild-type intermediate risk patients (12.3 v. 23.8 months, HR 2.35, p=0.065), trending toward significance. There was no difference in mOS between PTPN11mut adverse risk and PTPN11wild-type adverse risk (9.5 v. 10.5 months, HR 1.17, p=0.594). PTPN11mut with NPM1wild-type (not stratified by ELN risk) had a mOS of 11.1 months, similar to that of PTPN11mut with NPM1mut (12.3 months, HR 0.64, p=0.336). Conclusions: While PTPN11 mutations frequently co-occur with NPM1 mutations, they are also associated with higher risk mutations. PTPN11mut is associated with shorter OS and earlier relapse in ELN favorable risk AML compared to favorable risk with PTPN11wild-type, despite co-occurring NPM1 mutations. These patients should be considered for stem cell transplant in first remission. Co-occurring NPM1mut alone does not improve the OS of PTPN11mut. The OS of PTPN11mut AML more closely resembles that of ELN adverse risk AML. Overall, PTPN11 mutations are associated with poor prognosis. Larger studies are warranted to support the incorporation of PTPN11 into the ELN criteria for higher risk AML.

Validation of the 2022 European Leukemianet Risk Stratification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Validation of the 2022 European Leukemianet Risk Stratification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Clinical relevance of NFYA splice variants in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing intensive chemotherapy.

Aberrant alternative splicing (AS) contributes to leukemogenesis, but reports on the clinical and biological implications of aberrant AS in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) remain limited. Here, we used RNA-seq to analyse AS in AML cells from 341 patients, comparing them to healthy CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Our findings highlight distinct AS patterns in the nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha (NFYA) gene, with two main isoforms: NFYA-L (Long) and NFYA-S (Short), differing in exon 3 inclusion. Patients with lower NFYA-L but higher NFYA-S expression, termed NFYA-S predominance, displayed more favourable characteristics and better outcomes following intensive chemotherapy, regardless of age and European LeukemiaNet risk classification, compared to those with higher NFYA-L but lower NFYA-S expression, termed NFYA-L predominance. The prognostic effects were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Transcriptome analysis revealed upregulated cell cycle genes in NFYA-S predominant cases, resembling those of active HSCs, demonstrating relative chemosensitivity. Conversely, NFYA-L predominant cases, as observed in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia, were associated with relative chemoresistance. NFYA-S overexpression in OCI-AML3 cells promoted cell proliferation, S-phase entry and increased cytarabine sensitivity, suggesting its clinical and therapeutic relevance in AML. Our study underscores NFYA AS as a potential prognostic biomarker in AML.

Genetic risk stratification and outcomes among treatment-naive patients with AML treated with venetoclax and azacitidine

AbstractThe European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) genetic risk classification systems are based on response to intensive chemotherapy; their ability to discriminate outcomes in older patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine may be suboptimal. This pooled analysis of the phase 3 VIALE-A trial (NCT02993523) and phase 1b study (NCT02203773) examined prognostic stratification according to the 2017 and 2022 ELN risk classifications and derived new molecular signatures differentiating venetoclax-azacitidine–treated patients based on overall survival (OS). Overall, 279 patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine and 113 patients treated with placebo-azacitidine were analyzed. The ELN 2017 or 2022 prognostic criteria classified most patients as adverse-risk AML (60.2% and 72.8% for venetoclax-azacitidine and 65.5% and 75.2% for placebo-azacitidine, respectively). Although outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine improved across all ELN risk groups compared with placebo-azacitidine, ELN classification systems poorly discriminated venetoclax-azacitidine outcomes. By applying a bioinformatic algorithm, new molecular signatures were derived differentiating OS outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine. The mutational status of TP53, FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD), NRAS, and KRAS categorized patients into higher-, intermediate-, and lower-benefit groups (52%, 25%, and 23% of patients, respectively), each associated with a distinct median OS (26.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.2-32.7]; 12.1 months [95% CI, 7.3-15.2]; and 5.5 months [95% CI, 2.8-7.6], respectively). ELN prognostic classifiers did not provide clinically meaningful risk stratification of OS outcomes in patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine. TP53, FLT3-ITD, NRAS, and KRAS mutation status allows the classification of these patients into 3 risk groups with distinct differences in median OS. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02993523 and #NCT02203773.

Beat-AML 2024 ELN–refined risk stratification for older adults with newly diagnosed AML given lower-intensity therapy

AbstractAlthough the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk classification reliably predicts outcomes in younger patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, it is unclear whether it applies to adults ≥60 years treated with lower-intensity treatment (LIT). We aimed to test the prognostic impact of ELN risk in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML aged ≥60 years given LIT and to further refine risk stratification for these patients. A total of 595 patients were included: 11% had favorable-, 11% intermediate-, and 78% had adverse-risk AML. ELN risk was prognostic for overall survival (OS) (P < .001) but did not stratify favorable- from intermediate-risk (P = .71). Within adverse-risk AML, the impact of additional molecular abnormalities was further evaluated. Multivariable analysis was performed on a training set (n = 316) and identified IDH2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor, and KRAS, MLL2, and TP53 mutations as unfavorable (P < .05). A “mutation score” was calculated for each combination of these mutations, assigning adverse-risk patients to 2 risk groups: −1 to 0 points (“Beat-AML intermediate”) vs 1+ points (“Beat-AML adverse”). In the final refined risk classification, ELN favorable- and intermediate-risk were combined into a newly defined “Beat-AML favorable-risk” group, in addition to mutation scoring within the ELN adverse-risk group. This approach redefines risk for older patients with ND AML and proposes refined Beat-AML risk groups with improved discrimination for OS (2-year OS, 48% vs 33% vs 11%, respectively; P < .001), providing patients and providers additional information for treatment decision-making.

A propensity score–matched comparison of cytoreductive strategies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis.

e18509 Background: Hyperleukocytosis (white blood cell (WBC) count greater than 100x109), which may lead to the clinical entity of leukostasis, is a hematologic emergency present at diagnosis in 18% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is controversy regarding the appropriate cytoreductive strategy, which may include cytoreductive chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, and/or leukapheresis. The American society for apheresis (ASFA) released guidelines in 2023 making leukapheresis a Category III recommendation, however significant heterogeneity and methodologic flaws exist in the evidence used to make these recommendations. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 58 patients at Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2017 and 2023 who received either hydroxyurea alone (n=35) or both hydroxyurea and leukapheresis (n=23) for hyperleukocytosis at time of presentation for AML diagnosis was performed. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification, and WBC count prior to cytoreduction were collected. Comparisons of complete remission rates (CR/CRi), 30- and 60-day mortality, median overall survival (OS), and rates of therapy-induced tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier, Fisher’s exact, Mann-Whitney tests, respectively on a propensity score matched cohort to account for differing initial WBC counts between the treatment groups. Results: PSM was used to match presenting WBC counts between the two cohorts. Other baseline characteristics including median age (65y v. 60y), median CCI (5 v. 4), ELN adverse risk rate (31.53% v. 26.1%) did not differ after PSM. No significant difference was found between the hydroxyurea group compared to the hydroxyurea and leukapheresis group, respectively, when analyzing for rate of CR/CRi (36.5% v. 43.5%), 30-day mortality (10.5% v. 17.3%), 60-day mortality (10.5% v. 34.8%), median OS (7.77 mo. v. 8.07 mo.), or rates of DIC (10.5% vs. 8.7%) and therapy induced TLS (0% v. 0%). Conclusions: Patients who received hydroxyurea alone had similar outcomes when compared to the combined treatment group with respect to median OS, CR/CRi, and mortality rates. These results are notable given that leukapheresis is not available at many medical centers and is a resource-heavy procedure, and especially so in light of new ASFA guideline changes. However, these results reflect the laboratory entity of hyperleukocytosis rather than the clinical entity of leukostasis. Further work is ongoing to assess impact of cytoreductive strategies in leukostasis in AML, and among different cytogenetic and molecular subtypes. Decisions for leukapheresis or other cytoreductive strategies should be made on a case-by-case decision at an experienced center when possible.

RNA expression-based risk stratification of de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

e18503 Background: Prognostication of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at initial diagnosis relies on the identification of certain underlying genetic abnormalities as proposed by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification. However, AML is highly heterogenous at the molecular level and standard guidelines are often not straightforwardly applicable. In this study, we explored gene expression-based risk stratification strategies and found that FLT3 and NPM1 transcript level profiles can predict overall survival in de novo AML. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas AML (TCGA-LAML) project’s normalized RNA-Seq transcriptome profile (n=158) published in 2013 was analyzed with MATLAB software. "High” or “low” level of each gene was determined by the median RPKM of the cohort used as cutoff. P-values were obtained from Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The low-FLT3 level group was associated with superior median OS (mOS) compared to high-FLT3 group (24 vs. 16 months; p = 0.02), whereas high-NPM1 level group was associated with superior mOS compared to low-NPM1 group (26 vs. 12 months; p = 0.03). The mOS for high-FLT3/low-NPM1 and low-FLT3/high-NPM1 groups were 9 months and 27 months, respectively (p = 0.001). In high-FLT3/low-NPM1 and low-FLT3/high-NPM1 groups, composition of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cytogenetic risk category [favorable, intermediate, adverse] was [9%, 73%, 18%] and [32%, 49%, 19%], respectively; composition of French-American-British (FAB) classification [M0, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7] was [15%, 27%, 3%, 6%, 24%, 24%, 0%, 0%] and [3%, 14%, 41%, 19%, 22%, 0%, 0%, 3%], respectively; composition of FLT3/NPM1c mutations [ wt/wt, mut/wt, wt/mut, mut/mut, NOS] was [45%, 18%, 18%, 18%, 0%] and [61%, 14%, 7%, 14%, 2%], respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrate a de novo AML risk categorization method solely based on FLT3 and NPM1 RNA-Seq transcript levels. The mOS of high-FLT3/low-NPM1 group resembled that of ELN "adverse" risk group, whereas the mOS of low-FLT3/high-NPM1 group resembled that of ELN "favorable" risk group. High-FLT3/low-NPM1 group was composed of fewer "favorable” but more “intermediate” CALGB risk categories compared to low-FLT3/high-NPM1 group. Notably, considerably more FAB M0, M1 and M5 but fewer M2 and M3 classes were enriched in high-FLT3/low-NPM1 group compared to low-FLT3/high-NPM1 group. We also note approximately half of the cases analyzed were FLT3 and NPM1 wild-types and speculate FLT3 and NPM1 transcript profiles may represent a global oncogenic state regardless of the underlying FLT3 or NPM1 mutations. This is also supported by the previously reported FLT3 mutation-like transcriptomic profiles observed in FLT3 wild-type AML cases1). Reference: 1) Mosquera Orgueira A, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies FLT3 mutation-like cases in wild-type FLT3 acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0247093

Health disparities in acute myeloid leukemia: A decade-long analysis of Afro-Caribbean patients in a safety net New York City hospital.

e18515 Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in the Afro-Caribbean population is associated with poor outcomes due to disparities in health insurance and access to healthcare resources, among other factors, when compared to survival data in the national SEER database. This study reviews clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of a cohort of 51 Afro-Caribbean patients who were diagnosed with AML and treated in the past 10 years in a urban safety net hospital in Brooklyn, New York. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed and treated for AML at New York City Health and Hospitals/Kings County from 2012 to 2022. Electronic Health Data was reviewed for clinicopathologic data and treatment outcomes. Analysis was performed through descriptive statistics with specific focus on insurance status and survival outcomes. Results: Our AML patient cohort had a mean age of 66, with 84% of patients identifying as Afro-Caribbean, and 51% being female. In this cohort, the AML risk stratification distribution based on 2022 European LeukemiaNet Risk classification includes 21 (41%) patients in the adverse-risk group, 23 (45%) patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 7 (14%) patients in the favorable-risk group. Of the 36 patients with molecular analysis data, 9 (25%) harbored a mutation in FLT3-ITD. Healthcare disparities are evident in insurance coverage, as 58% of patients lacked medical insurance, 19% had Medicare/Medicaid, and 23% had private insurance. At the time of this retrospective chart review, 35% of patients lacked any follow-up information, including appointments or status updates regarding their condition, vital status, or engagement with healthcare, possibly due to missed appointments, transfers, mortality, or other reasons. Of the 27 patients who were deemed transplant eligible, three (11%) successfully completed allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Reasons for non-transplantation include lack of a compatible donor, inadequate social support, insurance-related challenges, or patient refusal. Patients who completed induction and consolidation treatment with documented follow-up had a 23% survival rate at the five-year mark, compared to 31.7% overall survival rate reported in SEER data from 2013 to 2019. Conclusions: Our study highlights persistent healthcare disparities in Afro-Caribbean AML patients leading to poor survival outcomes. Despite treatment advancements, challenges related to insurance coverage, social support, follow-up care, and access to restricted, advanced care remain. Addressing these disparities calls for targeted interventions to enhance access and support systems for this vulnerable population.

Medium-cumulative dose of cytarabine in consolidation therapy shows the greatest benefit in AML patients

BackgroundHigh-dose cytarabine (HDAC) is commonly used for consolidation therapy in young acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, but the dosage of cytarabine is still controversial in the clinic due to its obvious post-chemotherapy adverse effects. The aim of this study was to contrast the efficacy in different dose groups of cytarabine after consolidation therapy in Chinese AML patients.MethodsAML patients treated with cytarabine consolidation at Qilu Hospital, Shandong University from January 2010 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, from which 346 AML patients with relatively complete follow-up data were selected for this study. We compared the patients’ overall survival (OS) rate, relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, and hematologic adverse events in terms of their general characteristics, cytarabine consolidation therapy dose, consolidation course, 2022 European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification, and transplantation.ResultsIn AML patients under 60 years of age, the 5-year RFS rate with high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy was superior to that of small-dose cytarabine (P = 0.024), while the 5-year RFS rate was comparable in the high-dose and intermediate-dose groups, and there was no obvious difference among the three groups in the 5-year OS rate (P > 0.05). OS and RFS of those given more than 3 courses of cytarabine consolidation therapy were better than those in the 1–2 courses group (P = 0.060, P = 0.040). OS and RFS were better in patients with cumulative dose of cytarabine ≥ 36g than in patients with cumulative dose < 36g (P < 0.05), but cumulative dose ≥ 54g was comparable in OS and RFS with ≥ 36–< 54g group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in hematologic adverse effects among the three treatment groups.In the latest ELN risk stratification favorable-risk group, the cumulative dose of cytarabine ≥ 36g had a better 5-year RFS rate than the < 36g group (P = 0.038), and in the intermediate-risk group the 5-year OS rate and RFS rate were better in the ≥ 36g group than the < 36g group (P = 0.012, 0.025). In addition, the prognosis of transplanted patients was better than that of non-transplanted patients, whereas in non-transplanted patients, consolidation therapy with ≥ 36g cytarabine can effectively improve outcomes. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, fibrinogen (FIB) and the cumulative dose of cytarabine of ≥ 36–< 54g were predictors of OS, while age, white blood cell (WBC) and HDAC were predictors of RFS.ConclusionThe results of the study showed that consolidation therapy with cytarabine up to a cumulative dose of ≥ 36–< 54g in AML patients who did not undergo transplantation significantly improved patient prognosis. In the latest ELN risk stratification, cumulative doses of cytarabine ≥ 36g had a better prognosis in favorable and intermediate-risk patients.

Serum albumin is associated with the inherent property of acute myeloid leukemia and correlates with patient outcomes.

An accurate prognostic model for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can guide personalized treatment. In our prospective cohort of 591 patients newly diagnosed with AML, we evaluated the prognostic significance of serum albumin levels. We recognized baseline serum albumin as a prognostic factor by univariate Cox regression analysis (albumin-high vs albumin-low: overall survival [OS]: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.679, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.529-0.870, P = .002; cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR]: HR: 0.705, 95% CI: 0.530-0.938, P = .017) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (OS: HR per g/L: 0.966, 95% CI: 0.940-0.993, P = .014; CIR: HR per g/L: 0.959, 95% CI: 0.927-0.993, P = .017). In the subgroup analysis, serum albumin was prognostic significant in patients who received intermediate-dose cytarabine combined with daunorubicin and omacetaxine mepesuccinate induction (albumin-high vs albumin-low: OS: HR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.397-0.863, P = .007; CIR: HR: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.353-0.861, P = .009) rather than those receiving conventional-dose induction regimens. In addition, the impact of baseline serum albumin level was evident in patients with intermediate European LeukemiaNet risk (albumin-high vs albumin-low: OS: HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.424-0.896, P = .011; CIR: HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.388-0.979, P = .040). Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that leukemia stem cell signatures were enriched in patients with low serum albumin levels. Our study suggested that baseline serum albumin level was associated with the inherent properties of AML and correlated with patient outcomes.

Validation of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia

This study aimed to validate the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 624 newly diagnosed AML patients from 1998 to 2014 were included in the analysis. Genetic profiling was conducted using targeted deep sequencing of 45 genes based on recurrent driver mutations. In total, 134 (21.5%) patients had their risk classification reassessed according to the 2022 ELN risk stratification. Among those initially classified as having a favorable risk in 2017 (n = 218), 31 and 3 patients were reclassified as having intermediate risk or adverse risk, respectively. Among the three subgroups, the 2022 ELN favorable-risk group showed significantly longer survival outcomes than the other groups. Within the 2017 ELN intermediate-risk group (n = 298), 21 and 46 patients were reclassified as having favorable risk or adverse risk, respectively, and each group showed significant stratifications in survival outcomes. Some patients initially classified as having adverse risk in 2017 were reclassified into the intermediate-risk group (33 of 108 patients), but no prognostic improvements were observed in this group. A multivariable analysis identified the 2022 ELN risk stratification, age, and receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation as significant prognostic factors for survival. The 2022 ELN risk stratification enables more precise decisions for proceeding with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML patients.

Increased co-expression of ICOS and PD-1 predicts poor overall survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BackgroundInducible co-stimulatory factor (ICOS) has a dual role: activating cytotoxic T cells against tumors or exacerbating immunosuppression of regulatory T cells (Tregs) to participate in immune evasion. However, the correlation between ICOS and its co-expression with inhibitory immune checkpoints (IICs) and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is little known. MethodsThe prognostic importance of ICOS and IICs in 62 bone marrow (BM) samples of de novo AML patients from our clinical center (GZFPH) was explored and then the RNA sequencing data of 155 AML patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used for validation. ResultsIn both GZFPH and TCGA cohorts, high expression of ICOS was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) in patients with AML (P < 0.05). Importantly, co-expression of ICOS and PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, and LAG-3 predicted poor OS in AML; among them, ICOS/PD-1 was the optimal combination of immune checkpoints (ICs). The co-expression of ICOS and PD-1 was correlated with poor OS in non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (non-APL) patients following chemotherapy. Additionally, ICOS/PD-1 was an independent OS-predicting factor (P < 0.05). Notably, a nomogram model was constructed by combining ICOS/PD-1, age, European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification, and therapy to visually and personalized predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of patients with non-APL. ConclusionIncreased expression of ICOS predicted poor outcomes, and ICOS/PD-1 was the optimal combination of ICs to predict outcomes in patients with AML, which might be a potential immune biomarker for designing novel AML therapy.

CD7-positive leukemic blasts with DNMT3A mutations predict poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

DNMT3A mutations can be detected in premalignant hematopoietic stem cells and are primarily associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; however, current evidence does not support assigning them to a distinct European Leukemia Net (ELN) prognostic risk stratification. CD7 is a lymphoid antigen expressed on blasts in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and its role in AML remains unclear and depends on subgroup evaluation. This study investigated the prognostic value of DNMT3A mutation combined with CD7 expression in AML. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 297 newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients. According to the DNMT3A mutation and CD7 expression in AML cells, patients were divided into the DNMT3A-mutated/CD7-positive (CD7+), DNMT3A-mutated/CD7-negative (CD7-), DNMT3A-wild-type/CD7+, and DNMT3A-wild-type/CD7- groups. The DNMT3A-mutated/CD7+ group had lower complete remission rates and higher relapse rates. Importantly, these patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that CD7+ with DNMT3A mutation was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. CD7+ with DNMT3A mutation predicts a poor prognosis in AML patients, and the immunophenotype combined with molecular genetic markers can help to further refine the current risk stratification of AML.

Evaluation of apoptosis stimulating protein of TP53-1 (ASPP1/PPP1R13B) to predict therapy resistance and overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

ASPP1 (PPP1R13B) belongs to a family of p53-binding proteins and enhances apoptosis by stimulation of p53-transactivation of selected proapoptotic target genes. It is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and together with p53 preserves the genomic integrity of the HSC pool. Consequently, dysfunction of ASPP1 has been associated with malignant transformation and development of acute lymphoblastic leukemias and lymphomas - whereas methylation of the promoter region is linked to reduced transcription and ultimately attenuated expression of ASPP1. The role of ASPP1 in AML is not known. We now show that impaired regulation of PPP1R13B contributes to the biology of leukemogenesis and primary therapy resistance in AML. PPP1R13B mRNA expression patterns thereby define a distinct prognostic profile - which is not reflected by the European leukemia net (ELN) risk score. These findings have direct therapeutic implications and we provide a strategy to restore ASPP1 protein levels using hypomethylating agents to sensitize cells towards proapoptotic drugs. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to investigate the role of ASPP1 (PPP1R13B) as a biomarker for risk stratification and as a potential therapeutic target to restore susceptibility to chemotherapy.

Prognostic significance of multiparametric flow cytometry minimal residual disease at two time points after induction in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

BackgroundPrompt response to induction chemotherapy is a prognostic factor in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of multiparametric flow cytometry-minimal residual disease (MFC-MRD), assessed at the end of the first and second induction courses.MethodsMFC-MRD was performed at the end of the first induction (TP1) in 524 patients and second induction (TP2) in 467 patients who were treated according to the modified Medical Research Council (UK) acute myeloid leukemia 15 protocol.ResultsUsing a 0.1% cutoff level, patients with MFC-MRD at the two time points had lower event-free survival and overall survival. Only the TP2 MFC-MRD level could predict the outcome in a separate analysis of high and intermediate risks based on European LeukemiaNet risk stratification and KMT2A rearrangement. The TP2 MFC-MRD level could further differentiate the prognosis of patients into complete remission or non-complete remission based on morphological evaluation. Multivariate analysis indicated the TP2 MFC-MRD level as an independent adverse prognostic factor for event-free survival and overall survival. When comparing patients with MFC-MRD ≥ 0.1%, those who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant during the first complete remission had significantly higher 5-year event-free survival and overall survival and lower cumulative incidence of relapse than those who only received consolidation chemotherapy.ConclusionsThe TP2 MFC-MRD level can predict the outcomes in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia and help stratify post-remission treatment.

Development and validation of a promising 5-gene prognostic model for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

Risk classification in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (P-AML) is crucial for personalizing treatments. Thus, we aimed to establish a risk-stratification tool for P-AML patients and eventually guide individual treatment. A total of 256 P-AML patients with accredited mRNA-seq data from the TARGET database were divided into training and internal validation datasets. A gene-expression-based prognostic score was constructed for overall survival (OS), by using univariate Cox analysis, LASSO regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier (K-M) survival, and multivariate Cox analysis. A P-AML-5G prognostic score bioinformatically derived from expression levels of 5 genes (ZNF775, RNFT1, CRNDE, COL23A1, and TTC38), clustered P-AML patients in training dataset into high-risk group (above optimal cut-off) with shorter OS, and low-risk group (below optimal cut-off) with longer OS (p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, similar results were obtained in internal validation dataset (p = 0.005), combination dataset (p < 0.001), two treatment sub-groups (p < 0.05), intermediate-risk group defined with the Children's Oncology Group (COG) (p < 0.05) and an external Japanese P-AML dataset (p = 0.005). The model was further validated in the COG study AAML1031(p = 0.001), and based on transcriptomic analysis of 943 pediatric patients and 70 normal bone marrow samples from this dataset, two genes in the model demonstrated significant differential expression between the groups [all log2(foldchange) > 3, p < 0.001]. Independent of other prognostic factors, the P-AML-5G groups presented the highest concordance-index values in training dataset, chemo-therapy only treatment subgroups of the training and internal validation datasets, and whole genome-sequencing subgroup of the combined dataset, outperforming two Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk stratification systems, 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification tool and two leukemic stem cell expression-based models. The 5-gene prognostic model generated by a single assay can further refine the current COG risk stratification system that relies on numerous tests and may have the potential for the risk judgment and identification of the high-risk pediatric AML patients receiving chemo-therapy only treatment.

Prognostic risk signature in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax

AbstractHypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax (Ven) represent the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classifications have been validated for patients treated with intensive therapy. In this study, we validate a recently proposed new molecular prognostic risk signature (mPRS) for patients with AML treated with HMAs and Ven. This classification allocated patients to favorable, intermediate (N/KRAS or FLT3–internal tandem duplication mutations), and lower (TP53 mutations) benefit groups. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients treated with HMA and Ven. The mPRS classification allocated 74 (47%), 31 (19%), and 54 (34%) patients to the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively. The overall response rate was 71% (86%, 54%, and 59% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) times were 30 and 19 months, respectively, in the higher-benefit group; 12 and 8 months in the intermediate-benefit group; and 5 and 4 months in the lower-benefit group (P < .001). The C-index for OS and EFS was higher when stratifying patients according to mPRS classification than with the ELN 2022 classification. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 35%, 70%, and 60% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively (P = .005). The mPRS classification accurately segregated groups of patients with AML treated with HMA plus Ven. In these patients, N/KRAS and TP53 mutations appear to negatively affect outcomes; therefore, new treatment approaches are warranted.